Feminist Review

, Volume 112, Issue 1, pp 95–112 | Cite as

sexual assault as trauma: a Foucauldian examination of knowledge practices in the field of sexual assault service provision

  • Suzanne Egan
Article

Abstract

This paper examines the deployment of the concept of psychological trauma in the field of sexual assault service provision, a field in which a feminist understanding of sexual violence has achieved a position of ‘truth’. Using a Foucauldian methodological approach, the investigation centred on service provision in New South Wales, Australia, and analysis focused on the everyday practices of workers illuminated through documents collected from the field, in particular the interview texts produced from interviews with thirty sexual assault practitioners. The paper focuses on the adult survivor of child sexual assault who emerged in the study as the most traumatised category of victim. I lay out how ‘trauma’, specifically the concept of ‘complex trauma’, operates as the conceptual (emotional, relational, neurobiological) link between past abuse and current problems, redefining them not as ‘problems’ but as the symptoms or effects of untreated childhood trauma. I argue that in the local field this deployment is simultaneously enabling and problematic. The production of a subject position of ongoing ontological vulnerability has the effect of repositioning the ‘adult survivor’ outside the socio-political context of their current lives and as such appears misaligned with a feminist ‘regime’ centred on enabling practices and structural gender inequality. However, I demonstrate how this same knowledge of the neurobiological, relational and emotional effects of trauma on the survivor self is used by practitioners as part of their established feminist practices of enabling victims to regain a sense of power and control, of interrupting blame and working for victims at a broader systemic level. The research adds to feminist research and commentary that has drawn critical attention to uptake of trauma in sexual assault work by showing the specificity of how trauma operates in a specific location, and illustrating both the potential and the problematic aspects of trauma as a feminist knowledge practice.

Keywords

Australian sexual assault service provision trauma sexual assault ‘adult survivor’ feminist knowledge practices Foucauldian methodology 

References

  1. Atmore, C., 1999a. Sexual abuse and troubled feminism. A reply to Camille Guy. Feminist Review, 61, pp. 83–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atmore, C., 1999b. Victims, backlash, and radical feminist theory (or, the morning after they stole feminism’s fire). In S. Lamb, ed. New Versions of Victims: Feminists Struggle with the Concept. New York and London: New York University Press, pp. 183–211.Google Scholar
  3. Atmore, C., 2003. Feminism’s restless undead: the radical/lesbian/feminist/vicitims theorist and conflicts over sexual violence against children and women. In P. Reavey and S. Warner, eds. New Feminist Stories of Child Sexual Abuse: Sexual Scripts and Dangerous Dialogues. London: Routledge, pp. 15–33.Google Scholar
  4. Bay-Cheng, L.Y., 2012. Recovering empowerment: de-personalizing and re-politicizing adolescent female sexuality. Sex Roles, 66(11–12), pp. 713–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bay-Cheng, L.Y., 2015. The agency line: a neoliberal metric for appraising young women’s sexuality. Sex Roles, 73(7–8), pp. 279–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bay-Cheng, L.Y., Livingston, J.A. and Fava1, N.M., 2011. Adolescent girls’ assessment and management of sexual risks: insights from focus group research. Youth & Society, 43(3), pp. 1167–1193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bell, V., 1993. Interrogating Incest: Feminism, Foucault and the Law. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bolen, R., 2000. Validity of attachment theory. Trauma, Violence, Abuse, 1(2), pp. 128–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Briere, J., 2002. Treating adult survivors of severe childhood abuse and neglect: further development of an integrative model. In J.E.B. Myers, L. Berliner, J. Briere, C.T. Hendrix, T. Reid and C. Jenny, eds. The APSAC Handbook on Child Maltreatment, 2nd Edition. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 1–26.Google Scholar
  10. Briere, J., Hodges, M. and Godbout, N., 2010. Traumatic stress, affect dysregulation, and dysfunctional avoidance: a structural equation model. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 23(6), pp. 767–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Briere, J. and Jordan, C.E., 2009. Childhood maltreatment, intervening variables, and adult psychological difficulties in women: an overview. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 10(4), pp. 375–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Briere, J., Kaltman, S. and Green, B.L., 2008. Accumulated childhood trauma and symptom complexity. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 21(2), pp. 223–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Briere, J. and Scott, C., 2006. Principles of Trauma Therapy. A Guide to Symptoms, Evaluations, and Treatment. Thousand Oaks, London and New Delhi: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  14. Briere, J. and Spinazzola, J., 2005. Phenomenology and psychological assessment of complex posttraumatic states. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 18(5), pp. 401–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brownmiller, S., 1975. Against Our Will: Men, Women and Rape. London: Secker, Warburgsimon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  16. Burman, E., 2003. Childhood sexual abuse and contemporary political subjectivities. In P. Reavey, and S. Warner, eds. New Feminist Stories of Child Sexual Abuse: Sexual Scripts and Dangerous Dialogues. London: Routledge, pp. 34–51.Google Scholar
  17. Butler, J., 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Carmody, M., 2000. Ethical erotics. Reconceptualsing anti-rape education. Sexualities, 8(4), pp. 465–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Carmody, M., 2003. Sexual ethics and violence prevention. Social & Legal Studies, 12(2), pp. 199–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Carmody, M., 2004. Sexual ethics and the erotics of consent. In P. Cowling, and P. Reynolds, eds. Making Sense of Sexual Consent. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 45–56.Google Scholar
  21. Carmody, M., 2008. Preventing adult sexual violence through education? Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 18(2), pp. 342–356.Google Scholar
  22. Carmody, M., 2009. Conceptualising the prevention of sexual assault and the role of education. ACSSA Issues, No. 10. Melbourne: Australian Centre for the Study of Sexual Assault. Australian Institute of Family Studies, pp. 1–19.Google Scholar
  23. Davidson, J., 2007. Looking to a future: a research report on the Jacaranda Project. Sydney: Northern Sydney Sexual Assault Service.Google Scholar
  24. Dean, M., 1994. Critical and Effective Histories: Foucault’s Methods and Historical Sociology. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Deveaux, M., 1994. Feminism and empowerment: a critical reading of Foucault. Feminist Studies, 20(2), pp. 223–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dombrowski, J. and Burke, J., 2009. A Best Practice Manual for Specialised Sexual Assault Crisis Telephone and Online Counselling, 2nd Edition. Drummoyne, NSW: NSW Rape Crisis Centre.Google Scholar
  27. Dworkin, A., 1982. Our Blood: Prophecies and Discourses on Sexual Politics. London: The Women’s Press.Google Scholar
  28. Edwards, A., 1987. Feminist Theory: An Analysis of the Changing Perceptions of Sex/Gender, Violence and Male Dominance. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  29. Fine, M. and McClelland, S., 2006. Sexuality education and desire: still missing after all these years. Harvard Educational Review, 76(3), pp. 297–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Firestone, S., 1970. The Dialectic of Sex: The Case for Feminist Revolution. New York: Morrow.Google Scholar
  31. Foucault, M., 1972. The Archaeology of Knowledge and The Discourse on Langauge. Tr. A.M Sheridan Smith. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  32. Foucault, M., 1980a. Truth and power. Tr. C. Gordon. In C. Gordon, ed. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977. New York: Pantheon, pp. 109–133.Google Scholar
  33. Foucault, M., 1980b. Two lectures. Tr. K. Sopher. In C. Gordon, ed. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977. New York: Pantheon, pp. 78–108.Google Scholar
  34. Foucault, M., 1982. Madness and Civilization. A History of Insanity in The Age of Reason. Tr. R. Howard. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  35. Foucault, M., 1998. The Will To Knowledge. The History of Sexuality:1. Tr. R. Hurley. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  36. Foucault, M., 2001. Fearless Speech. Ed. J. Pearson Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).Google Scholar
  37. Gavey, N., 2003. Writing the effects of sexual abuse: interogatting the possibilities and pitfalls of using clinical psychology expertise for a critical justice agenda. In P. Reavey, and S. Warner, eds. New Feminist Stories of Child Sexual Abuse: Sexual Scripts and Dangerous Dialogues. London: Routledge, pp. 187–209.Google Scholar
  38. Gavey, N., 2005. Just Sex? The Cultural Scaffolding of Rape. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Gavey, N., 2012. Beyond ‘empowerment’? Sexuality in a sexist world. Sex Roles, 66(11–12), pp. 718–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Gill, R., 2012. Media, empowerment and the ‘sexualization of culture’ debates. Sex Roles, 66(11–12), pp. 736–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Gordon, C., 1980. Afterword. In C. Gordon, ed. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977. New York: Pantheon Books, pp. 229–258.Google Scholar
  42. Graham, R., 2001. Deconstructing reform: exploring oppositional approaches to research in sexual assault. Social & Legal Studies, 10(2), pp. 257–271.Google Scholar
  43. Griffin, S., 1977. Rape: the all American crime. In D. Chappell, R. Geis, and G. Geis, eds. Forcible Rape: The Crime, The Victim, and the Offender. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 47–66.Google Scholar
  44. Gutting, G., 2005. Foucault. A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Healy, K., 2000. Social Work Practises: Contemporary Perspectives on Change. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  46. Herman, J.L., 1992. Trauma and Recovery: From Domestic Abuse to Political Terror. London: Pandora.Google Scholar
  47. Herman, J.L., 2001. Trauma and Recovery: The Aftermath of Violence—From Domestic Abuse to Political Terror. London: Pandora.Google Scholar
  48. Holloway, W. and Jefferson, T., 1998. ‘A kiss is just a kiss’: date rape, gender and subjectivity. Sexualities, 1(4), pp. 405–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hunter, S., 2010. Evolving narratives about childhood sexual abuse. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 31(2), pp. 176–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Irwin, J., 2004. Discounted Stories: Lesbians and Domestic Violence. Unpublished doctoral thesis. Sydney, Australia: University of Sydney.Google Scholar
  51. Jackson, S., 1996. Heterosexuality and feminist theory. In D. Richardson, ed. Theorising Heterosexuality. Telling it Straight. Buckingham: Open University Press, pp. 21–38.Google Scholar
  52. Lamb, S., 1999. Constructing the victim. Popular images and lasting labels. In S. Lamb, ed. New Versions of Victims: Feminists Struggle with the Concept. New York and London: New York University Press, pp. 108–138.Google Scholar
  53. Lamb, S., 2010. Feminist ideals for a healthy female adolescent sexuality: a critique. Sex Roles, 62(5–6), pp. 294–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Levett, A., 2003. Problems of cultural imperialism in the study of child sexual abuse. In P. Leavey, and S. Warner, eds. New Feminist Stories of Child Sexual Abuse: Sexual Scripts and Dangerous Dialogues. London: Routledge, pp. 52–76.Google Scholar
  55. Marcus, S., 1992. Fighting bodies, fighting words: a theory and politics of rape prevention. In J. Butler, and J. Scott, eds. Feminists Theorize the Political. London; New York: Routledge, pp. 385–403.Google Scholar
  56. Mardorossian, C.M., 2002. Towards a new feminist theory of rape. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 27(3), pp. 743–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Marecek, J., 1999. Trauma talk in feminist clinical practice. In S. Lamb, ed. New Versions of Victims: Feminists Struggle with the Concept. New York and London: New York University Press, pp. 158–182.Google Scholar
  58. Mason, G., 2002. The Spectacle of Violence: Homophobia, Gender and Knowledge. London; New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. MacKinnon, C., 1982. Feminism, Marxism, method and the state: an agenda for theory. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 7(3), pp. 515–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. MacKinnon, C., 1983. Feminism, Marxism, method and the state: towards feminist jurisprudence. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 8(4), pp. 635–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Millett, K., 1970. Sexual Politics. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  62. O’Dell, G.L., 2003. The ‘harm’ story in childhood sexual abuse: contested understandings, disputed knowledges. In P. Reavey, and S. Warner, eds. New Feminist Stories of Child Sexual Abuse: Sexual Scripts and Dangerous Dialogues. London: Routledge, pp. 131–147.Google Scholar
  63. Peterson, Z.D., 2010. What is sexual empowerment? A multidimensional and process-oriented approach to adolescent girls’ sexual empowerment. Sex Roles, 62(5), pp. 307–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Peterson, Z.D. and Lamb, S., 2012. The political context for personal empowerment: continuing the conversation. Sex Roles, 66(11–12), pp. 758–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Reavey, P., 2003. When past meets present to produce a sexual ‘other’: examining professional and everyday narratives of child sexual abuse and sexuality. In P. Reavey and S. Warner, eds. New Feminist Stories of Child Sexual Abuse: Sexual Scripts and Dangerous Dialogues. London: Routledge, pp. 148–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Reavey, P., 2010. Rethinking agency through materiality. In J. Haaken and P. Reavey, eds. Memory Matters: Contexts for Understanding Sexual Abuse Recollections. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 131–141.Google Scholar
  67. Reavey, P. and Brown, S.D., 2007. Rethinking agency in memory: space and embodiment in memories of child sexual abuse. Journal of Social Work Practice, 21(1), pp. 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Rich, A., 1980. Compulsory heterosexuality and lesbian existence. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 5(4), pp. 631–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Sawicki, J., 2005. Queering Foucault and the subject of feminism. In G. Gutting, ed. The Cambridge Companion to Foucault. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 379–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Smart, C., 1995. Law, Crime and Sexuality: Essays in Feminism. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  71. Tolman, D.L., 2012. Female adolescents, sexual empowerment and desire: a missing discourse of gender inequity. Sex Roles, 66(11–12), pp. 746–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. van der Kolk, B., 1997. The psychobiology of posttraumatic stress disorder. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 58(9), pp. 16–24.Google Scholar
  73. van der Kolk, B., 1998. The psychology and psychobiology of developmental trauma. In A. Stoudemire, ed. Human Behavior. An Introduction for Medical Students, Vol. 918. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, pp. 383–402.Google Scholar
  74. van der Kolk, B., Roth, S., Pelcovitz, D., Sunday, S. and Spinazzola, J., 2005. Disorders of extreme stress: the empirical foundation of a complex adaptation to trauma. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 18(55), pp. 389–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Whittier, N., 2009. The Politics of Child Sexual Abuse: Emotions, Social Movements and the State. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Yeatman, A., 1994. Postmodern Revisionings of the Political. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  77. Young, A., 1996. Imagining Crime: Textual Outlaws and Criminal Conversations. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Feminist Review 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Suzanne Egan

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations