Feminist Review

, Volume 111, Issue 1, pp 59–74 | Cite as

transness as debility: rethinking intersections between trans and disabled embodiments

  • Alexandre Baril


Some authors in disability studies have identified limits of both the medical and social models of disability. They have developed an alternative model, which I call the ‘composite model of disability’, to theorise societies’ ableist norms and structures along with the subjective/phenomenological experience of disability. This model maintains that ableist oppression is not the only source of suffering for disabled people: impairment can be as well. From a feminist, queer, trans activist, anti-ableist perspective and using an intersectional, autoethnographic methodology, I apply this composite model of disability to trans identities to consider the potentially ‘debilitating’ aspects of transness. I argue that transness, like disability, has too often been perceived from two perspectives, medical or social, without the benefit of a third option. From a medical perspective, transness is reduced to an individual pathology curable with hormonal/surgical treatments, a conceptualisation that erases structural oppression. From a social point of view, transness is conceptualised as a neutral condition and variation in sex/gender identity. In this model, structural oppression (transphobia/cisgenderism) is seen as the only cause of ‘trans suffering’. I argue that, just as the medical and social models of disability provide limited opportunities for reflection on the complex experience of disability, medical and social understandings of transness, respectively, are insufficient to describe the complexity of trans experience. I explore the possibilities presented by the application of a composite model of disability in trans studies. By both problematising cisgenderist oppression and acknowledging trans people’s subjective experiences of suffering through some of the debilitating aspects of transness, this composite model avoids the pitfalls of the medical and social models. The application of tools from disability studies to trans issues uncovers cisnormativity in disability movements and denounces ableism in trans movements. This will, I hope, solidify alliances between these communities and fields of study.


debility transness trans studies and movements disability studies and movements intersectionality autoethnographic methodology 


  1. American Psychiatric Association (APA)., 2013. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-V). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  2. Baril, A., 2013. La normativité corporelle sous le bistouri: (re)penser l’intersectionnalité et les solidarités entre les études féministes, trans et sur le handicap à travers la transsexualité et la transcapacité. [Bodily Normativity Under the Knife: (Re)thinking Intersectionality and Solidarities between Feminist, Trans, and Disability Studies through Transsexuality and Transability] PhD. Ottawa: University of Ottawa [in French]. Available at: [last accessed 10 September 2014].
  3. Baril, A., 2015. Needing to acquire a physical impairment/disability: (re)thinking the connections between trans and disability studies through transability. Hypatia, 30(1), pp. 30–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baril, A. and Trevenen, K., 2014. Exploring ableism and cisnormativity in the conceptualization of identity and sexuality ‘disorders’. Annual Review of Critical Psychology, 11(1), pp. 389–416.Google Scholar
  5. Bauer, G.R., Hammond, R., Travers, R., Kaay, M., Hohenadel, K.M. and Boyce, M., 2009. ‘I don't think this is theoretical; this is our lives’: how erasure impacts health care for transgender people. The Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care, 20(5), pp. 348–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bettcher, T.M., 2014. Trapped in the wrong theory: rethinking trans oppression and resistance. Signs, 39(2), pp. 383–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clare, E., 2009[1999]. Exile and Pride: Disability, Queerness and Liberation, 2nd Edition. Cambridge, MA: South End Press.Google Scholar
  8. Clare, E., 2013. Body shame, body pride. Lessons from the disability rights movement. In S. Stryker and A.Z. Aizura, eds. The Transgender Studies Reader 2. New York: Routledge, pp. 261–265.Google Scholar
  9. Cotten, T.T. ed., 2012. Hung Jury: Testimonies of Genital Surgery by Transsexual Men. Oakland: Transgress Press.Google Scholar
  10. Crow, L., 1996. Including all of our lives: renewing the social model of disability. In C. Barnes and G. Mercer, eds. Exploring the Divide: Illness and Disability. Leeds: The Disability Press, pp. 55–72.Google Scholar
  11. Davy, Z., 2011. Recognizing Transsexuals: Personal, Political and Medicolegal Embodiment. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  12. Drescher, J., 2010. Queer diagnoses: parallels and contrasts in the history of homosexuality, gender variance, and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39(2), pp. 427–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Foucault, M., 2001. Dits et écrits II. 1976–1988. [Sayings and Writings II]. Paris: Gallimard [in French].Google Scholar
  14. Garland-Thomson, R., 2011. Misfits: a feminist materialist disability concept. Hypatia, 26(3), pp. 591–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gorton, R.N., 2013. Transgender as mental illness: nosology, social justice, and the tarnished golden mean. In S. Stryker and A.Z. Aizura, eds. The Transgender Studies Reader 2. New York: Routledge, pp. 644–652.Google Scholar
  16. Hall, K.Q., 2009. Queer breasted experience. In L.J. Shrage, ed. ‘You've Changed’: Sex Reassignment and Personal Identity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 121–134.Google Scholar
  17. Halley, J.E., 1994. Sexual orientation and the politics of biology: a critique of the argument from immutability. Stanford Law Review, 46(3), pp. 503–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jung, K.E., 2011. Chronic illness and educational equity: the politics of visibility. In K.Q. Hall, ed. Feminist Disability Studies. Bloomington and Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press, pp. 263–286.Google Scholar
  19. Kafer, A., 2013. Feminist, Queer, Crip. Bloomington and Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Lane, R., 2009. Trans as bodily becoming: rethinking the biological as diversity, not dichotomy. Hypatia, 24(3), pp. 136–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lev, A.I., 2005. Disordering gender identity: gender identity in the DSM-IV-TR. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 17(3/4), pp. 35–69.Google Scholar
  22. Levi, J.L. and Klein, B.H., 2006. Pursuing protection for transgender people through disability laws. In P. Currah, R.M. Juang and S. Minter, eds. Transgender Rights. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 74–92.Google Scholar
  23. Lewis, B., 2010 [1997]. A mad fight: psychiatry and disability activism. In L.J. Davis, ed. The Disability Studies Reader, 3rd Edition. New York: Routledge, pp. 160–176.Google Scholar
  24. Livingston, J., 2005. Debility and the Moral Imagination in Botswana. Bloomington and Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  25. McRuer, R., 2006. Crip Theory: Cultural Signs of Queerness and Disability. New York and London: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  26. McRuer, R. and Mollow, A. eds., 2012. Sex and Disability. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Meyerowitz, J., 2002. How Sex Changed: A History of Transsexuality in the United States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Mog, A. and Swarr, A.L., 2008. Threads of commonality in transgender and disability studies. Disability Studies Quarterly, 28(4), pp. 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mollow, A., 2006. ‘When black women start going on Prozac …’: the politics of race, gender, and emotional distress in Meri Nana-Ama Danquah's Willow Weep for Me. MELUS, 31(3), pp. 67–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nicki, A., 2001. The abused mind: feminist theory, psychiatric disability, and trauma. Hypatia, 16(4), pp. 80–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Price, M., 2011. Mad at School: Rhetorics of Mental Disability and Academic Life. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Prosser, J., 1998. Second Skins: The Body Narratives of Transsexuality. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Puar, J.K., 2009. Prognosis time: towards a geopolitics of affect, debility and capacity. Women & Performance: a journal of feminist theory, 19(2), pp. 161–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Puar, J.K., 2014. Disability. TSQ: Transgender Studies Quarterly, 1(1/2), pp. 77–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rubin, H.S., 1998. Phenomenology as method in trans studies. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 4(2), pp. 263–281.Google Scholar
  36. Rubin, H.S., 1999. Trans studies: between a metaphysics of presence and absence. In K. More and S. Whittle, eds. Reclaiming Genders: Transsexual Grammars at the Fin de Siècle. New York and London: Cassell, pp. 173–192.Google Scholar
  37. Rubin, H.S., 2003. Self-Made Men: Identity and Embodiment among Transsexual Men. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Salamon, G., 2010. Assuming a Body: Transgender and Rhetorics of Materiality. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Serano, J., 2007. Whipping Girl. A Transsexual Woman on Sexism and the Scapegoating of Femininity. Berkeley, CA: Seal Press.Google Scholar
  40. Shakespeare, T., 2010 [1997]. The social model of disability. In L.J. Davis, ed. The Disability Studies Reader, 3rd Edition. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Shelley, C.A., 2008. Transpeople: Repudiation, Trauma, Healing. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  42. Sherry, M., 2004. Overlaps and contradictions between queer theory and disability studies. Disability & Society, 19(7), pp. 769–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Spade, D., 2003. Resisting medicine, re/modeling gender. Berkeley Women's Law Journal, 18(1), pp. 15–37.Google Scholar
  44. Sullivan, N., 2008. The role of medicine in the (trans)formation of ‘wrong’ bodies. Body & Society, 14(1), pp. 105–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wendell, S., 1996. The Rejected Body: Feminist Philosophical Reflections on Disability. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. Wendell, S., 2001. Unhealthy disabled: treating chronic illnesses as disabilities. Hypatia, 16(4), pp. 17–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wilkerson, A.L., 2012. Normate sex and its discontents. In R. McRuer and A. Mollow, eds. Sex and Disability. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press, 183–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Feminist Review 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexandre Baril

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations