Advertisement

Feminist Review

, Volume 101, Issue 1, pp 5–23 | Cite as

trans- bodies in/of war(s): cisprivilege and contemporary security strategy

  • Laura J Shepherd
  • Laura Sjoberg
Article

Abstract

This article explores a gendered dimension of war and conflict analysis that has up until now received little attention at the intersection of gender studies and studies of global politics: queer bodies in, and genderqueer significations of, war and conflict. In doing so, the article introduces the concept of cisprivilege to International Relations as a discipline and security studies as a core sub-field. Cisprivilege is an important, but under-explored, element of the constitution of gender and conflict. Whether it be in controversial reactions to the suggestion of United Nations Special Rapporteur Martin Scheinin that airport screenings for terrorists not discriminate against transgendered people, or in structural violence that is ever-present in the daily lives of many individuals seeking to navigate the heterosexist and cissexist power structures of social and political life, war and conflict is embodied and reifies cissexism. This article makes two inter-related arguments: first, that both the invisibility of genderqueer bodies in historical accounts of warfare and the visibility of genderqueer bodies in contemporary security strategy are forms of discursive violence; and second, that these violences have specific performative functions that can and should be interrogated. After constructing these core arguments, the article explores some of the potential benefits of an interdisciplinary research agenda that moves towards the theorisation of cisprivilege in security theory and practice.

Keywords

gender queer war cisprivilege violence security 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Both authors are grateful to the anonymous reviewers and to the Feminist Review Collective for their thoughtful engagement with this article. Laura Sjoberg would like to thank her mother, Marie Sjoberg, for inspiring her to work in this area. Laura Shepherd thanks Laura Sjoberg for inviting her to participate in this endeavour and Cai Wilkinson at the University of Birmingham for the opportunity to discuss the ideas and the ethico-political issues raised in this article at some length.

References

  1. Alison, M. (2007) ‘Wartime sexual violence: women's human rights and questions of masculinity’ Review of International Studies, Vol. 33, No. 1: 75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beauchamp, T. (2009) ‘Artful concealment and strategic visibility: transgender bodies and U.S. state surveillance after 9/11’ Surveillance and Society, Vol. 6, No. 4: 356–366.Google Scholar
  3. Bettcher, T.M. (2007) ‘Evil deceivers and make-believers: on transphobic violence and the politics of illusion’ Hypatia, Vol. 22, No. 3: 43–65.Google Scholar
  4. Blanchard, E. (2003) ‘Gender, international relations and the development of feminist security theory’ Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, Vol. 28, No. 4: 1289–1312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bracewell, W. (2000) ‘Rape in Kosovo: masculinity and Serbian nationalism’ Nations and Nationalism, Vol. 6, No. 4: 563–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Browne, K. (2004) ‘Genderism and the bathroom problem: (re)materialising sexed sites, (re)creating sexed bodies’ Gender, Place & Culture, Vol. 11, No. 3: 331–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Budgeon, S. (2003) ‘Identity as an embodied event’ Body & Society, Vol. 9, No. 1: 35–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Butler, J. (1993) Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of Sex, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Butler, J. (1999) Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Butler, J. (2004) Undoing Gender, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Dillon, M. (1999) ‘The scandal of the refugee: some reflections on the “inter” of international relations and continental thought’ in Campbell, D. and Shapiro, M. (1999) editors, Moral Spaces: Rethinking Ethics and World Politics, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  12. Enloe, C. (1990) Bananas, Beaches, and Bases, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  13. Feinburg, L. (1993) Stone Butch Blues, Ithaca, NY: Firebrand Books.Google Scholar
  14. Feinburg, L. (1996) Transgender Warriors: Making History from Joan of Arc to Dennis Rodman, Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  15. Foucault, M. (1983) ‘The subject and power’ in Faubion, J. (2001) editor, Michel Foucault: Power, London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  16. Grosz, E. (1994) Volatile Bodies: Toward a Corporeal Feminism, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Hall, S. (1996) ‘The west and the rest: discourse and power’ in Hall, S., Held, D., Hubert, D. and Thompson, K. (1996) editors, Modernity: An Introduction to Modern Societies, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  18. Hansen, L. (2001) ‘Gender, nation, rape: Bosnia and the construction of security’ International Feminist Journal of Politics, Vol. 3, No. 1: 55–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hanssen, B. (2000) Critique of Violence: Between Poststructuralism and Critical Theory, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Heyes, C.J. (2003) ‘Feminist solidarity after queer theory: the case of transgender’ Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, Vol. 28, No. 4: 1093–1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hudson, H. (2005) ‘“Doing” security as though humans matter’ Security Dialogue, Vol. 36, No. 2: 155–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jones, A. (1996) ‘Does “gender” make the world go round? Feminist critiques of international relations’ Review of International Studies, Vol. 22, No. 4: 405–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lamble, S. (2009) ‘Unknowable bodies, unthinkable sexualities: lesbian and transgender legal invisibility in the Toronto women's bathhouse raid’ Social Legal Studies, Vol. 18, No. 1: 111–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lev, A.I. (2004) Transgender Emergence, New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  25. MacKenzie, G.O. (1994) Transgender Nation, New York: Popular Press.Google Scholar
  26. MacKenzie, M. (2010) ‘Securitizing sex?’ International Feminist Journal of Politics, Vol. 12, No. 2: 202–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McCloskey, D.N. (2000) Crossing: A Memoir, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  28. McDonald, M. (2002) ‘Human security and the construction of security’ Global Society, Vol. 16, No. 3: 277–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mohanty, C.T. (1988) ‘Under Western eyes: feminist scholarship and colonial discourses’ Feminist Review, Issue 30: 61–88.Google Scholar
  30. Munoz, J.E. (1999) Disidentifications: Queers of Color and the Performance of Politics, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  31. Peterson, V.S. (1992a) editor, ‘Security and Sovereign states: what is at stake in taking feminism seriously?’ in Gendered States: Feminist (Re)Visions of International Relations Theory, London and Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  32. Peterson, V.S. (1992b) editor, Gendered States: Feminist (Re)Visions of International Relations Theory, London and Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  33. Peterson, V.S. and Runyan, A.S. (1999) Global Gender Issues, 2nd edition, Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
  34. Roen, K. (2002) ‘“Either/or” and “both/neither”: discursive tensions in transgender politics’ Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, Vol. 27, No. 2: 501–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Serano, J. (2007) Whipping Girl, Emeryville, CA: Seal Press.Google Scholar
  36. Shepherd, L.J. (2008) Gender, Violence, and Security: Discourse as Practice, London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  37. Shepherd, L.J. (2010a) ‘Sex or gender? Bodies in world politics and why gender matters’ in Shepherd, L.J. (2010d) editor, Gender Matters in Global Politics: A Feminist Introduction to International Relations, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Shepherd, L.J. (2010b) Feminist Security Studies; International Studies Encyclopedia Online. Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  39. Shepherd, L.J. (2010c) ‘Gendering security’ in Burgess, J.P. (2010) editor, The Routledge Handbook of New Security Studies, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. Shepherd, L.J. (2010d) editor, Gender Matters in Global Politics: A Feminist Introduction to International Relations, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Shotwell, A. and Sangray, T. (2009) ‘Resisting definition: gendering through interaction and relational selfhood’ Hypatia, Vol. 24, No. 3: 56–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sjoberg, L. (2009) ‘Introduction to security studies: feminist contributions’ Security Studies, Vol. 18, No. 2: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sjoberg, L. and Gentry, C.E. (2007) Mothers, Monsters, Whores: Women's Violence in Global Politics, London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  44. Sjoberg, L. and Martin, J. (2010) ‘Feminist security theorizing’, in Denmark R. (2010) editor International Studies Encyclopedia, London: Wiley-Blackwell, 2207–2226.Google Scholar
  45. Stryker, S., Currah, P. and Moore, L.J. (2008) ‘Introduction: trans-, trans, or transgender?’ Women's Studies Quarterly, Vol. 36, Nos. 3&4: 11–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Taylor, E. (2010) ‘Cisgender privilege: on the privileges of performing normative gender’ in Bornstein, K. and Bergman, S.B. (2010) editors, Gender Outlaws: The Next Generation, Berkeley, CA: Seal Press.Google Scholar
  47. Thomas, C. (2000) Global Governance, Development and Human Security, London: Pluto.Google Scholar
  48. Tickner, J.A. (1992) Gender in International Relations, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Wilton, T. (2000) ‘Out/performing our selves: sex, gender and Cartesian dualism’ Sexualities, Vol. 3, No. 2: 237–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zalewski, M. (1995) ‘Well, what is the feminist perspective on Bosnia?’ International Affairs, Vol. 71, No. 2: 339–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Feminist Review 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laura J Shepherd
  • Laura Sjoberg

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations