Feminist Review

, Volume 99, Issue 1, pp 79–97 | Cite as

blogging solo: new media, ‘old’ politics

  • Anthea Taylor
Article

Abstract

This article focuses on the blogosphere as an oppositional field where the meanings around contemporary Western women's singlehood are contested, negotiated and rewritten. In contrast to dominant narratives in which single women are pathologised, in the blogs by, for, and about single women analysed here, writers aim to refigure women's singleness as well as providing resources, support and a textual community where others can intervene and contribute to the re-valuation of single women. These blogs also function as alternative forms of knowledge, seeking to (re)legitimise women's singleness and to trouble their aberrance and social liminality. Rather than only considering the form in isolation from its content, this article analyses the discourses deployed by bloggers and within blogs and how women bloggers publicly perform their very singleness as part of a personal and political strategy of re-signification. In this way, while cautious not to overestimate the democratic potentialities of the so-called blogosphere, it underscores the important cultural – and indeed political – work being undertaken by single women therein. Moreover, by demonstrating how these blogs use discursive tactics commonly associated with feminism's second-wave – women's consciousness-raising; identity politics; deploying and reiterating the famous feminist dictum: ‘the personal is political’; naming discrimination; and empathy and community-building – it argues that they are using so-called ‘new’ media for what is now problematically believed to be ‘old’ (feminist) politics.

Keywords

blogging single women new media blogosphere popular feminism 

References

  1. Budgeon, S. (2006) ‘Friendship and formations of sociality in late modernity: the challenge of “post traditional intimacy”’ Sociological Research Online, Vol. 11, No. 3.Google Scholar
  2. Budgeon, S. (2008) ‘Couple culture and the production of singleness’ Sexualities, Vol. 11, No. 3: 301–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bruns, A. (2006) ‘Introduction’ in Bruns, A. and Jacobs, J. (2006) editors, The Uses of Blogs, New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  4. Cohen, K. (2006) ‘A welcome for blogs’ Continuum, Vol. 20, No. 2: 161–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Coleman, S. (2005) ‘Blogs and the politics of listening’ Political Quarterly, Vol. 76, No. 2: 273–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cullen, R. (2001) ‘Addressing the digital divide’ Online Information Review, Vol. 25, No. 5: 311–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. De Paulo, B. (2006) Singled Out: How Singles are Stereotyped, Stigmatised, and Ignored, and Still Live Happily Ever After, New York: St Martin's Griffin.Google Scholar
  8. Douglas, S. (2010) Enlightened Sexism: The Seductive Message that Feminism's Work is Done, New York: Times Books.Google Scholar
  9. Fitzpatrick, K. (2007) ‘The pleasure of the blog: the early novel, the serial and the narrative archive’ in Burg, T. and Smidt, J. (2007) editors, Blog Talks Reloaded, Norderstedt: Books on Demand: http://www.plannedobsolescence.net/wp-content/files/fitzpatrickblogtalk.pdf, last accessed 15 July 2011.Google Scholar
  10. Giddens, A. (1991) Modernity and Self Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  11. Gokulsing, K.M. and Dissanayake, W. (2009) Popular Culture in a Globalised India, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Grant, L. (1993) Fundamental Feminism, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Gurak, L.J. and Antonijevic, S. (2008) ‘The psychology of blogging: you, me, and everyone in between’ American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 52, No. 1: 60–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Henry, A. (2004) Not My Mother's Sister: Generational Conflict and Third Wave Feminism, Boston: University of Indiana Press.Google Scholar
  15. Hermes, J. (1995) Reading Women's Magazines, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  16. Herring, S.C., Kouper, I., Scheidt, L.A. and Wright, E.L. (2004) ‘Women and children last: the discursive construction of weblogs’ in Gurak, L.J., Antonijevic, S., Johnson, L., Ratliff, C. and Reyman, J. (2004) editors, Into the Blogosphere: Rhetoric, Community, and Culture of Weblogs. http://blog.lib.umn.edu/blogosphere/women_and_children.html.
  17. Hindman, M. (2009) The Myth of Digital Democracy, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Hodkinson, P. (2007) ‘Interactive online journals and individualization’ New Media and Society, Vol. 9, No. 4: 625–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hogeland, L. (1998) Feminism and Its Fiction: The Consciousness Raising Novel and the Women's Liberation Movement, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Karlsson, L. (2006) ‘Acts of reading diary weblogs’ HUMAN IT, Vol. 8, No. 2: 1–59.Google Scholar
  21. Karlsson, L. (2007) ‘Desperately seeking sameness’ Feminist Media Studies, Vol. 7, No. 2: 137–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lopez, L.K. (2009) ‘The radical act of “mommy blogging”: redefining motherhood through the blogosphere’ New Media and Society, Vol. 11: 729–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Loewenstein, A. (2008) The Blogging Revolution, Carlton: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Marshall, P.D. (1997) Celebrity and Power, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  25. McNeil, L. (2003) ‘Teaching an old genre new tricks: the diary on the internet’ Biography, Vol. 26, No. 1: 24–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McRobbie, A. (2009) The Aftermath of Feminism, London: Sage.Google Scholar
  27. Meehan, J. editor (1995) Feminists Read Habermas: Gendering the Subject of Discourse, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Pearce, L. (2003) The Rhetorics of Feminism, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Plummer, K. (1995) Telling Sexual Stories, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Perlmutter, D. (2008) Blogwars: The New Political Battleground, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Reynolds, J. (2008) The Single Woman: A Discursive Analysis, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Reynolds, J. and Wetherell, M. (2003) ‘The discursive climate of singleness: the consequences for women's negotiation of a single identity’ Feminism and Psychology, Vol. 13, No. 4: 498–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ringrose, J. and Walkerdine, V. (2008) ‘Regulating the abject: The TV Make-Over as Site of Neoliberal Reinvention Towards Bourgeois Femininity’ Feminist Media Studies, Vol. 8, No. 3: 227–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Serfaty, V. (2004a) ‘From self-explanation to self-justification: online diaries and blogs in America’ Recherches Anglaises et Nord-Américaines (RANAM), Université Marc Bloch, Vol. 37, No. Octobre: 247–256.Google Scholar
  35. Serfaty, V. (2004b) ‘Online diaries: towards a structural approach’ Journal of American Studies, Vol. 38: 457–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Serfaty, V. (2004c) The Mirror and the Veil: An Overview of Online Diaries and Blogs, Amsterdam: Rodophi.Google Scholar
  37. Smith, S. and Watson, J. (1996) Getting a Life: Everyday Uses of Autobiography, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  38. Sorapure, M. (2003) ‘Screening moments, scrolling lives: diary writing on the web’ Biography, Vol. 26, No. 1: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Taylor, A. (2011, forthcoming) Single Women in Popular Culture: The Limits of Postfeminism, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  40. Travers, A. (2003) ‘Parallel subaltern counterpublics in cyberspace’ Sociological Perspectives, Vol. 46, No. 2: 223–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tremayne, M. editor (2007) Blogging, Citizenship, and the Future of Media, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  42. Turner, G. (2006) ‘The mass production of celebrity: “celetoids”, reality TV and the “demotic turn”’ International Journal of Cultural Studies, Vol. 9, No. 2: 153–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Turner, G. (2010) Ordinary People and the Media: The Demotic Turn, London: Sage.Google Scholar
  44. van Dijck, J. (2004) ‘Composing the self: of diaries and lifeblogs’, The Fibreculture Journal, Issue 3.Google Scholar
  45. Wei, L. (2009) ‘Filter blogs vs. personal journals: understanding the knowledge production gap on the internet’ Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, Vol. 14: 532–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Willis, S. and Tranter, B. (2006) ‘Beyond the “digital divide”: internet diffusion and inequality in Australia’ Journal of Sociology, Vol. 42, No. 1: 43–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wood, E.A. (2008) ‘Consciousness-raising 2.0: sex blogging and the creation of a feminist sex commons’ Feminism and Psychology, Vol. 18, No. 4: 480–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Young, S. (1997) Changing the Wor(l)d: Discourse, Politics and the Feminist Movement, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  49. Youngs, G. (2009) ‘Blogging and globalization: the blurring of the public/private spheres’ Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives, Vol. 61, No. 2: 127–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

blog addresses

  1. Living Single, http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/living-single, last accessed 28 March 2011.
  2. Onely: Single and Happy, http://onely.org/, last accessed 28 March 2011.
  3. Quirkyalone, http://www.quirkyalone.net/, last accessed 29 March 2011.
  4. Rachel's Musings, http://www.rabe.org/about/, last accessed 30 March 2011.
  5. Single and Thirty Something, http://singlethirtysomethingwordpress.com/, last accessed 28 March 2011.
  6. Single Women Rule, http://singlewomenrule.com/, last accessed 28 March 2011.Google Scholar
  7. Singletude, http://singletude.blogspot.com/, last accessed 31 March 2011.
  8. Singlutionary, http://singlutionary.blogspot.com/, last accessed 28 March 2011.
  9. Sixty and Single in Seattle, http://marysreallife.blogspot.com/, last accessed 28 March 2011.
  10. Solo Lady, http://www.sololady.com/, last accessed 29 March 2011.
  11. The Spinster Chronicles, http://spinningleese.blogspot.com/, last accessed 31 March 2011.

Copyright information

© Feminist Review 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anthea Taylor

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations