French Politics

, Volume 8, Issue 4, pp 377–401 | Cite as

The French two-round system and party format: From extreme pluralism to concentration?

  • Adriano Pappalardo
Original Article
First Online:
  • 29 Downloads

Abstract

The article deals with the debate about French parties and the party system. Through a large-n controlled comparison, a number of persistent ambiguities, conceptual fallacies and received ideas are criticized and disproved. The most tenacious and popular fallacy is that parliamentary two-round system (2RS) works in the same way and generates the same effects as the plurality system. Instead, the French 2RS operates more like a system of proportional representation (PR); indeed, it operates like a permissive or weakly restraining variety of PR, given France has one of the most fragmented party systems of any democracy. Fragmentation, in turn, goes along with the limited control of the electoral market by poorly structured French parties, as indicated by total net electoral volatility. Finally, a recent counter-tendency towards the concentration of the party system is put in the context of a turn to re-presidentialization and the personalization of politics. Whether such processes will feed a sustainable change of party format, or even a peculiar sort of French twopartism, is discussed in the concluding section.

Keywords

electoral system two-round system multipartism electoral volatility presidentialism 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Amorim Neto, O. and Cox, G.W. (1997) Electoral institutions, cleavage structures, and the number of parties. American Journal of Political Science 41 (1): 149–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baldini, G. and Pappalardo, A. (2009) Elections, Electoral Systems and Volatile Voters. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bartolini, S. and Mair, P. (1990) Identity, Competition and Electoral Availability: The Stabilization of European Electorates 1885–1985. Cambridge, MS: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Blais, A. (2004) Modes de Scrutin et Systèmes de partis: Les Scrutins à Deux tours dans une perspective comparative. In: A. Laurent, P. Delfosse and A.-P. Frognier (eds.) Les systèmes Électoraux: Permanences et Innovations. Paris: L’Harmattan, pp. 47–70.Google Scholar
  5. Blais, A. and Loewen, P.J. (2009) The French electoral system and its effects. West European Politics 32 (1): 345–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blais, A. and Massicotte, L. (2002) Electoral systems. In: L. LeDuc, R.G. Niemi and P. Norris (eds.) Comparing Democracies 2 New Challenges in the Study of Elections and Voting, 2nd edn. London: Sage, pp. 40–69.Google Scholar
  7. Bon, F. (1978) Les Élections en France. Histoire et Sociologie. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
  8. Bornschier, S. and Lachat, R. (2009) The evolution of the French political space and party system. West European Politics 32 (1): 360–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Braud, Ph. (1993) La Réactivation du Mythe Présidentiel. Effets de langage et manipulation symbolique. In: B. Lacroix and J. Lagroye (eds.) Le Président de la République. Usages et Genèse d’une Institution. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po, pp. 377–397.Google Scholar
  10. Chiche, J., Haegel, F. and Tiberj, V. (2004) Érosion et Mobilités partisanes. In: B. Cautrès and N. Mayer (eds.) Le Nouveau Désordre Électoral. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po, pp. 255–278.Google Scholar
  11. Cox, G.W. (1997) Making Votes Count. Strategic Coordination in the World's Electoral Systems. Cambridge, MS: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Duhamel, O. (2008) Vers une Présidentialisation des institutions? In: P. Perrineau (ed.) Le Vote de Rupture. Les Élections Présidentielles et Législatives d’Avril-Juin 2007. Paris: SciencesPo. Les Presses, pp. 271–282.Google Scholar
  13. Dupoirier, E. (2008) Le Parti Socialiste et la Gauche. L’Implacable Spiral de l’Échec. In: P. Perrineau (ed.) Le Vote de Rupture. Les Élections Présidentielles et Législatives d’Avril-Juin 2007. Paris: SciencesPo. Les Presses, pp. 145–174.Google Scholar
  14. Duverger, M. (1987) Les Partis Politiques, X edn. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
  15. EJPR. (various years) Political Data Yearbook. London: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  16. Elgie, R. (2005) France: Stacking the deck. In: M. Gallagher and P. Mitchell (eds.) The Politics of Electoral Systems. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp. 119–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Elgie, R. (2009) Duverger, semi-presidentialism and the supposed French archetype. West European Politics 32 (2): 248–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fisichella, D. (2003) Elezioni e Democrazia. Un’ Analisi Comparata, 4th edn., Bologna, Italy: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
  19. Grossman, E. (2009) The President's choice? Government and cabinet turnover under the fifth Republic. West European Politics 32 (2): 268–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Grossman, E. and Sauger, N. (2009) The end of ambiguity? Presidents versus parties or the four phases of the fifth Republic. West European Politics 32 (2): 423–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Grunberg, G. (2008a) Vers un Espace Politique Bipartisan? In: P. Perrineau (ed.) Le Vote de Rupture. Les Élections Présidentielles et Législatives d’Avril-Juin 2007. Paris: SciencesPo. Les Presses, pp. 253–270.Google Scholar
  22. Grunberg, G. (2008b) La Volatilité Électorale. In: P. Perrineau (ed.) Atlas Électorale 2007. Paris: Presses de Sciences-Po.Google Scholar
  23. Grunberg, G. and Haegel, F. (2007) La France Vers le Bipartisme? La Présidentialisation du Ps et de l’Ump. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.Google Scholar
  24. Habert, P., Perrineau, P. and Ysmal, C. eds. (1993) Le Vote Sanction. Les Élections Législatives des 21 et 28 Mars 1993. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.Google Scholar
  25. Haegel, F. ed. (2007) Partis Politiques et Systèmes Partisanes en France. Paris: Presses de Sciences-Po.Google Scholar
  26. Laakso, M. and Taagepera, R. (1979) Effective number of parties: A measure with application to Western Europe. Comparative Political Studies 12 (1): 3–27.Google Scholar
  27. Lawson, K.E and Ysmal, C. (2000) Do the parties matter? In: M.S. Lewis-Beck (ed.) How France Votes. London: Chatham House Publishers, pp. 225–243.Google Scholar
  28. Lewis-Beck, M.S. (2000) The enduring French voter. In M.S. Lewis- Beck (ed.) How France Votes. London: Chatham House Publishers, pp. 1–13.Google Scholar
  29. Lijphart, A. (1994) Electoral Systems and Party Systems. A Study of Twenty-Seven Democracies, 1945–1990. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lijphart, A. (1999) Patterns of Democracy. Government, Forms, and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven, CT:Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Mackie, T.T. and Rose, R. (1991) The International Almanac of Electoral History, 3rd edn. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mackie, T.T. and Rose, R. (1997) A Decade of Elections Results: Updating the International Almanac. Glasgow, UK: Center for the Study of Public Policy, University of Strathclyde.Google Scholar
  33. Mair, P. and van Biezen, I. (2001) Party membership in twenty European democracies, 1980–000. Party Politics 7 (1): 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Parodi, J.-L. (1978) Les Règles du Scrutin majoritaire. Projet n 122, pp. 191–200.Google Scholar
  35. Perrineau, P. (2008a) La Construction Électorale de la Victoire de Nicolas Sarkozy. In: P. Perrineau (ed.) Le Vote de Rupture. Les Élections Présidentielles et Législatives d’Avril-Juin 2007. Paris: SciencesPo. Les Presses, pp. 119–144.Google Scholar
  36. Perrineau, P. ed. (2008b) Le Vote de Rupture. Les Élections Présidentielles et Législatives d’Avril-Juin 2007. Paris: SciencesPo. Les Presses.Google Scholar
  37. Perrineau, P. and Ysmal, C. eds. (1998) Le Vote Surprise. Les Élections Législatives des 25 May et 1er Juin 1997. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.Google Scholar
  38. Perrineau, P. and Ysmal, C. eds. (2003) Le Vote de Tout les Refus. Les Élections Présidentielles et Législatives de 2002. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.Google Scholar
  39. Pütz, Ch. (2007) La Présidentialisation des partis Français. In: F. Haegel (ed.) Partis Politiques et Systèmes Partisanes en France. Paris: Presses de Sciences-Po, pp. 321–357.Google Scholar
  40. Sauger, N. (2007) Un système électorale Vecteur d’instabilité? In: F. Haegel (ed.) Partis Politiques et Systèmes Partisanes en France. Paris: Presses de Sciences-Po, pp. 359–390.Google Scholar
  41. Sartori, G. (1994) Comparative Constitutional Engineering. An Inquiry into Structures, Incentives and Outcomes. Houndsmills and London, UK: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  42. Schlesinger, J.A. and Schlesinger, M. (2000) The stability of the French party system: The enduring impact of the two-ballot electoral rules. In: M.S. Lewis-Beck (ed.) How France Votes. London: Chatham House Publishers, pp. 130–152.Google Scholar
  43. Wilson, F.L. (1988) When parties refuse to fail: The case of France. In: K. Lawson and P. H. Merkl (eds.) When Parties Fail. Emerging Alternative Organizations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 500–530.Google Scholar
  44. Ysmal, C. (1998) The evolution of the French party system. In P. Ignazi and C. Ysmal (eds.) The Organization of Political Parties in Southern Europe. Westport, CT: Praeger, pp. 9–25.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adriano Pappalardo
    • 1
  1. 1.University of SalernoFisciano

Personalised recommendations