European Political Science

, Volume 16, Issue 3, pp 415–429 | Cite as

re-visualising international relations: audio-visual projects and direct encounters with the political in security studies

Teaching and Training

Abstract

In this paper we discuss how an innovative audio-visual project was adopted to foster active, rather than declarative learning, in critical International Relations (IR). First, we explore the aesthetic turn in IR, to contrast this with forms of representation that have dominated IR scholarship. Second, we describe how students were asked to record short audio or video projects to explore their own insights through aesthetic and non-written formats. Third, we explain how these projects are understood to be deeply embedded in social science methodologies. We cite our inspiration from applying a personal sociological imagination, as a way to counterbalance a ‘marketised’ slant in higher education, in a global economy where students are often encouraged to consume, rather than produce knowledge. Finally, we draw conclusions in terms of deeper forms of student engagement leading to new ways of thinking and presenting new skills and new connections between theory and practice.

Keywords

teaching critical security studies audio-visual assessments sociological imagination 

References

  1. Aradau, C. and Hill, A. (2013) ‘The politics of drawing: Children, evidence and the darfur conflict’, International Political Sociology 7(4): 368–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barron, L. (2013) Social Theory in Popular Culture, London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Biggs, J. (2003) ‘Aligning teaching for constructing learning’, Higher Education Academy. available at: https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/aligning-teaching-constructing-learning, accessed 18 August 2015.
  4. Biggs, J. and Tang, C. (2007) Teaching for Quality Learning at University: What the Student Does, Maidenhead: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bilgin, P. (2010) ‘The ‘western-centrism’ of security studies: ‘Blind spot or constitutive practice?’ Security Dialogue 41(6): 615–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. BIS. (2011) Higher Education: Students at the Heart of The System, London: The Stationary Office.Google Scholar
  7. Black, C. (2002) ‘Amending assessment for a dyslexic student’, available at : http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/pesl/resources/assessment/amending100/, accessed 10 January 2015.
  8. Bleiker, R. (2001) ‘The aesthetic turn in international political theory’, Millennium 30(2): 509–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bonwell, C.C. and Eison, J.A. (1991) ‘Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom’, ERIC digest Washington DC: George Washington university, available at: http://www.oid.ucla.edu/about/units/tatp/old/lounge/pedagogy/downloads/active-learning-eric.pdf, accessed 12 July 2012.
  10. Brotzen, F. (2010) ‘Rice students include audio-visual element in classroom assignments’, Rice University News, available at: http://news.rice.edu/2010/05/07/rice-students-include-audio-visual-element-in-classroom-assignments/, accessed 10 December 2014.
  11. Buddle, C. (2013) ‘Hear this! podcasts as an assessment tool in higher education’, The Teaching Blog, available at: http://teachingblog.mcgill.ca/2013/06/19/hear-this-podcasts-as-an-assessment-tool-in-higher-education/, accessed 10 January 2015.
  12. Collins, A. (ed.) (2013) Contemporary Security Studies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Dall’Alba, G. (2009) ‘Learning professional ways of being: Ambiguities of becoming’, Educational Philosophy and Theory 41(1): 34–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dauphinee, E. (2013) Politics of Exile, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Der Derian, J. (2001) Virtuous War: Mapping the Military-Industrial-Media-Entertainment-Network, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Fierke, K. (2007) Critical Approaches to International Security, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  17. Hansen, L. (2015) ‘How icons make world politics: International icons and the case of Abu Ghraib’, Review of International Studies 41(2): 263–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hansen, L. (2011) ‘Theorizing the image for security studies: Visual securitization and the Muhammad cartoon crisis’, European Journal of International Relations 17(1): 51–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hansen, L. (2000) ‘The little mermaid’s silent security dilemma and the absence of gender in the Copenhagen school’, Millennium – Journal of International Studies 29(2): 285–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hayes, S. (2015) ‘Encouraging the Intellectual Craft of Living Research: Tattoos, Theory and Time’, in P. Bartholomew, C. Guerin and C. Nygaard (eds.) Learning to Research – Researching to Learn, London: Libri Publishing.Google Scholar
  21. Jackson, R. (2014) Confessions of a Terrorist: A Novel, London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  22. Levidow, L. (2002) ‘Marketizing Higher Education: Neoliberal Strategies and Counter-Strategies’, in K. Robins and F. Webster (eds.) The Virtual University? Knowledge, Markets and Management, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 227–248.Google Scholar
  23. Merizow, J. (2000) Learning as Transformation: Critical Perspectives on a Theory in Progress. The Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  24. Mills, C.W. (1959) The Sociological Imagination, London, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Molesworth, M., Nixon, E. and Scullion, R. (2009) ‘Having, being and higher education: The marketisation of the university and the transformation of the student into consumer’, Teaching in Higher Education 14(3): 277–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Molesworth, M., Scullion, R. and Nixon, E. (eds.) (2010) The Marketisation of Higher Education, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Race, P. (2006) The Lecturer’s Toolkit, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Ralph, J., Head, N. and Lightfoot, S. (2010) ‘Pol-casting: The use of podcasting in the teaching and learning of politics and international relations’, European Political Science 9(1): 13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Särmä, S. (2012) ‘Feminist Interdisciplinarity and Gendered Parodies of Nuclear Iran’, in P. Aalto, V. Harle and S. Moisio (eds.) Global and Regional Problems: Towards and Interdiscplinary Study, Farnham: Ashgage, pp. 151–170.Google Scholar
  30. Särmä, S. (2014) Junk Feminism and Nuclear Wannabes: Collaging Parodies of Iran and North Korea. PhD Dissertation, University of Tampere, Finland, available at: https://uta32-kk.lib.helsinki.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/95961/978-951-44-9535-9.pdf?sequence=1, accessed 20 July 2015.
  31. Savin-Baden, M. (2010) ‘The sound of feedback in higher education’, Learning, Media and Technology 35(1): 53–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Williams, M.C. (2003) ‘Words, images, enemies: Securitization and international politics’, International Studies Quarterly 47(4): 511–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Consortium for Political Research 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Politics and International Relations, School of Languages and Social Sciences, Aston UniversityBirminghamUK
  2. 2.Centre for Learning, Innovation and Professional Practice, School of Languages and Social Sciences, Aston UniversityBirminghamUK

Personalised recommendations