European Political Science

, Volume 15, Issue 3, pp 303–313 | Cite as

lost in the mainstream? gender in dutch political science education

  • saskia bonjour
  • liza mügge
  • conny roggeband


What have been the losses and the gains of the shift from women’s studies to gender studies for political science in The Netherlands? What are present-day opportunities and how should we move forward? Our systematic analysis of the Bachelor programmes offered by four Dutch political science departments shows that gender is not a central feature in the current curricula. Gender in political science has become dependent on personal interests and engagements at the individual level rather than being sustained by structural commitments at the departmental level. This article argues that a gender perspective should be part of the analytical toolkit of anyone trained as a political scientist. Students should be made aware that gender is a fundamental aspect of the organisation of power and therefore unambiguously political. Gender awareness impacts upon both students’ academic development and Dutch politics given that many graduates take up jobs in or close to the political environment. With this in mind, being equipped with a ‘gender lens’ will enable students to identify and explain gender inequalities and more importantly stimulate them to develop innovative strategies to close the gaps.


political science teaching and learning gender feminism women’s studies The Netherlands 


  1. Abels, G. (2016) ‘The gender gap in political science education in Germany’, European Political Science. doi:10.1057/eps.2015.80.Google Scholar
  2. Akkerman, T., Bervoets, L., Campagne, T., Grotenhuis, S., Lammers, S., Paasman, R., Poelstra, J., Sommer, A. and Vos, A. (1986) ‘Redaktioneel’, Tijdschrift voor Vrouwen Studies 7(1): 1–3.Google Scholar
  3. Beckwith, K. (2005) ‘A common language of gender?’ Politics & Gender 1(1): 128–137.Google Scholar
  4. ECPG-convenors. (2014) ‘Trends in gender/sexuality and politics research’, ECPR News 4(1): 12–14.Google Scholar
  5. Evans, E. and Amery, F. (2016) ‘Gender and politics in the UK: banished to the sidelines’, European Political Science. doi:10.1057/eps.2015.79.Google Scholar
  6. Gerritsen, M., Verdonk, T. and Visser, A. (2012) Monitor Vrouwelijke Hoogleraren 2012, Utrecht: Landelijk Netwerk Vrouwelijke Hoogleraren.Google Scholar
  7. Goertz, G. and Mazur, A.G. (2008) Politics, Gender and Concepts: Theory and Methodology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Matthes, M. (2013) ‘Conclusion and rejoinders’, Politics & Gender 9(2): 207–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Mazur, A.G. and Appleton, A.M. (1997) ‘Mainstreaming gender into the classroom: cases from contemporary Europe’, PS: Political Science and Politics 30(2): 194–195.Google Scholar
  10. M’charek, A., Andeweg, A. and van Balen, B. (eds.) (2005) Sporen & Resonanties. De klassieken van de Nederlandstalige Genderstudies, Amsterdam: Uitgeverij SWP Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  11. Messer-Davidow, E.E. (2002) Disciplining Feminism. From Social Activism to Academic Discourse, Durhan: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Meulenbelt, A. (1979) Feminisme en socialisme. Een inleiding, Amsterdam: Kritiese Bibliotheek van Gennep.Google Scholar
  13. Mügge, L.M. (2013) ‘Pregnant politicians and sexy fathers. The politics of gender equality representations in Europe’, Women’s Studies International Forum 41(3): 165–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mügge, L.M., Evans, E. and Engeli, I. (2016) ‘Gender in European political science education: taking stock and future directions’, European Political Science doi:10.1057/eps.2015.72.Google Scholar
  15. Mügge, L.M. and De Jong, S. (2013) ‘Intersectionalizing European politics: bridging gender & ethnicity’, Politics, Groups & Identities 1(3): 380–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Outshoorn, J. (1998) ‘Gender: revolutie en risico’, Tijdschrift voor Genderstudies 1(1): 5–6.Google Scholar
  17. Outshoorn, J. and Van Soest, M. (1977) Lijfsbehoud. Tien jaar Abortusstrijd in Nederland (1967–1977), The Hague: Stichting Uitgeverij Dolle Mina.Google Scholar
  18. Pande, R. (ed.) (2014) A Journey into Women’s Studies: Crossing Interdisciplinary Boundaries, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Richardson, D. and Robinson, V. (1994) ‘Theorizing women’s studies gender studies and masculinity: the politics of naming’, European Journal of Women’s Studies 1(1): 11–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sauer, B. (2016) ‘Austrian exceptionalism? Insights from a huge department in a small country’, European Political Science doi:10.1057/eps.2015.81.Google Scholar
  21. Schenkeveld-van der Dussen, R., van Haegendoren, M., Jansen, W. and van Balen, B.M. (2005) De kwaliteit van onderwijs, onderzoek en maatschappelijke dienstverlening van het Centrum voor Gender en Diversiteit 1998–2004, Maastricht: Centrum voor Gender en Diversiteit.Google Scholar
  22. Van Soest, M. (1975) Meid, wat ben ik bewust geworden. Vijf jaar Dolle mina, The Hague: Stichting Uitgeverij Dolle Mina.Google Scholar
  23. VBEO. (1981) Werkboek emancipatie onderzoek: eerste fase van een inventarisatie van onderzoeksbehoeften: problemen, ontbrekende kennis en onderzoeksvragen rond [vrouwen] emancipatie, Rijswijk: Voorlopige Begeleidingsgroep Emancipatie-Onderzoek VBEO.Google Scholar
  24. VSNU. (2015) ‘Onze leden’ available at:, accessed 15 December 2014.

Copyright information

© European Consortium for Political Research 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • saskia bonjour
    • 1
  • liza mügge
    • 1
  • conny roggeband
    • 1
  1. 1.University of AmsterdamNB AmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations