European Political Science

, Volume 15, Issue 3, pp 281–291 | Cite as

introduction: gender in european political science education – taking stock and future directions

Symposium

Abstract

Major changes have occurred in the teaching of gender since the shift from women’s studies to gender studies. In some institutions gender studies became a separate and interdisciplinary track within social sciences and humanities, while in others it either lacked integration or disappeared altogether. What do these developments mean for gender in political science curricula? In this symposium scholars from different European countries, including Austria, Germany, the Netherlands, Spain and the United Kingdom reflect on the state of gender within political science education. This introductory essay places national experiences within a broader European perspective; highlighting that gender is virtually absent from much of the political science curriculum. Gender and political science courses suffer from issues of supply (rather than demand), such as the persistent under-representation of women academics within political science as well as tight budget constraints. We argue that this is problematic and that gender should be a core part of the political science curricula for three key reasons: (i) politics is about power and power is always gendered; (ii) embedding gender in the core of political science education may positively affect gender equality in the profession and politics; and (iii) it reflects the contemporary resurgence of feminist activism across Europe. We conclude with concrete recommendations about how institutions and individuals can help address the virtual absence of gender, including: the integration of gender-related courses in politics programs; Gender & Politics related awards; big data collection projects regarding women in the profession and gender and politics teaching; and the development of leadership courses for women in politics.

Keywords

political science teaching and learning gender feminism political science associations 

References

  1. Abels, G. (2016) ‘The gender gap in political science education in Germany’, European Political Science doi:10.1057/eps.2015.80.Google Scholar
  2. Abels, G. and Woods, D.R. (2015) ‘The status of women in German political science’, European Political Science 14(2): 87–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ackerly, B.A., Stern, M. and True, J. (eds.) (2006) Feminist Methodologies for International Relations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ackerly, B. and True, J. (2010) Doing Feminist Research in Political and Social Science, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  5. Ali, S., Benjamin, S. and Mauther, M. (eds.) (2004) The Politics of Gender and Education, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Alonso, A. and Lombardo, E. (2016) ‘Ending ghettoization? Mainstreaming gender in Spanish political science education’, European Political Science doi:10.1057/eps.2015.77.Google Scholar
  7. Altinay, A.G. (2004) The Myth of the Military-nation: Militarism, Gender, and Education in Turkey, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Atchison, A.L. (2013a) ‘Introduction: Teaching gender and politics: Views from the field’, Politics & Gender 9(2): 207–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Atchison, A.L. (2013b) ‘The practical process of gender mainstreaming in the political science curriculum’, Politics & Gender 9(2): 228–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bates, S. and Savigny, H. (2015a) ‘Introduction: Women in European political science’, European Political Science 14(2): 75–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bates, S. and Savigny, H. (2015b) ‘Conclusion: The future status of women in European political science’, European Political Science 14(2): 131–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bayes, J.H. (ed.) (2012) Gender and Politics. The State of the Discipline, Opladen: Barbara Budrich Publishers.Google Scholar
  13. Bonjour, S., Mügge, L. and Roggeband, C. (2016) ‘Lost in the mainstream? Gender in Dutch political science education’, European Political Science doi:10.1057/eps.2015.78.Google Scholar
  14. Briggs, J. and Harrison, L. (2015) ‘The status of women in UK political science’, European Political Science 14(2): 105–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cassese, E.C. and Bos, A.L. (2012) ‘A hidden curriculum? Examining the gender content in introductory-level political science textbooks’, Politics & Gender 9(2): 214–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cassese, E.C., Holman, M.R., Schneider, M.C. and Bos, A.L. (2015) ‘Building a gender and methodology curriculum: Integrated skills, exercises, and practices’, Journal of Political Science Education 11(1): 61–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Childs, S. and Krook, M.L. (2006) ‘Gender and politics: The state of the art’, Politics 26(1): 18–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dahlerup, D. (2010) ‘The development of gender and politics as a new research field within the framework of the ECPR’, European Political Science 9: 85–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Davis, A. (1982) Women, Race and Class, London: The Women’s Press.Google Scholar
  20. Dean, R.D. (1998) ‘Masculinity as ideology: John F. Kennedy and the domestic politics of foreign policy’, Diplomatic History 22(1): 29–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Doherty, L. (2011) ‘Filling the female political pipeline: Assessing a mentor-based internship program’, Journal of Political Science Education 7(1): 34–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Elizondo, A. (2015) ‘The status of women in Spanish political science’, European Political Science 14(2): 96–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Evans, E. (2015) The Politics of Third Wave Feminism: Neoliberalism, Intersectionality and the State in Britain and the US, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Evans, E. and Amery, F. (2016) ‘Gender and politics in the UK: Banished to the Sidelines’, European Political Science doi:10.1057/eps.2015.79.Google Scholar
  25. Faludi, S. (1991) Backlash. The Undeclared War Against American Women, New York: Three Rivers Press.Google Scholar
  26. Foster, E., Kerr, P., Hopkins, A., Byrne, C. and Ahall, L. (2013) ‘The personal is not political: At least in the UK’s top politics and IR departments’, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 15(4): 566–585.Google Scholar
  27. Goertz, G. and Mazur, A.G. (eds.) (2008) Politics, Gender, and Concepts. Theory and Methodology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hearn, J. (2004) ‘From hegemonic masculinity to the hegemony of men’, Feminist Theory 5(1): 49–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hemmings, C. (2011) Why Stories Matter: The Political Grammar of Feminist Theory, Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Kantola, J. (2015) ‘Political science as a gendered discipline in Finland’, European Political Science 14(2): 79–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Krook, M.L. and Norris, P. (2014) ‘Beyond quotas: Strategies to promote gender equality in elected office’, Political Studies 62(1): 2–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Krook, M.L. and Childs, S. (2010) Women, Gender and Politics. A Reader, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Lindroos, K., Cardinal, L., Sawer, M. and St-Lauran, M. (2014) IPSA Gender Monitoring Report 2013, Quebec: International Political Science Association.Google Scholar
  34. Lukes, S. (1974) Power: A Radical View, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Maliniak, D., Powers, R. and Walter, B.F. (2013) ‘The gender citation gap in international relations’, International Organizations 67(4): 889–922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Matthes, M. (2013) ‘Conclusion and rejoinders’, Politics & Gender 9(2): 207–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mazur, A.G. and Appleton, A.M. (1997) ‘Mainstreaming gender into the classroom: Cases from contemporary Europe’, PS: Political Science and Politics 30(2): 194–195.Google Scholar
  38. Murray, R. (2014) ‘Quotas for men: Reframing gender quotas as a means of improving representation for all’, American Political Science Review 108(3): 520–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rowley, C. and Shepherd, L.J. (2012) ‘Contemporary Politics: Using the ‘F’ Word and Teaching Gender in International Relations’, in C. Gormley-Heenan and S. Lightfoot (eds.) Teaching Politics and International Relations, New York: Palgrave MacMillan, pp. 146–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sauer, B. (2016) ‘Austrian exceptionalism? Insights from a huge department in a small country’, European Political Science doi:10.1057/eps.2015.81.Google Scholar
  41. Scharff, C. (2012) Repudiating Feminism: Young Women in a Neoliberal World, Surrey: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  42. Scott, J. (ed.) (1994) Power: Critical Concepts, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. Shepherd, L. (2010) Gender Matters in Global Politics: A Feminist Introduction to International Relations, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. Smith, N. and Lee, D. (2015) ‘What’s queer about political science?’ The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 17(1): 49–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Squires, J. (2000) Gender in Political Theory, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  46. Tickner, A.J. (1997) ‘You just don’t understand: Troubled engagements between feminists and IR theorists’, International Studies Quarterly 41(4): 611–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Walby, S. (2011) The Future of Feminism, London: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  48. Waylen, G., Celis, K., Kantola, J. and Weldon, S.L. (eds.) (2013) The Oxford Handbook of Gender and Politics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Williams, H., Bates, S., Jenkins, L., Luke, D. and Rogers, K. (2015) ‘Gender and journal authorship: An assessment of articles published by women in three top British political science and international relations journals’, European Political Science 14(1): 116–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Youngs, G. (2004) ‘Feminist international relations: A contradiction in terms? Or: Why women and gender are essential to understand the world ‘we’ live’, International Affairs 13(3): 193–209.Google Scholar
  51. Zalewski, M. (2007) ‘Do we understand each other yet? Troubling feminist encounters with(in) international relations’, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 9(2): 302–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Consortium for Political Research 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.University of BristolBristol BS8 1TUUK
  3. 3.University of BathBath BA1 2ANUK

Personalised recommendations