European Political Science

, Volume 16, Issue 1, pp 14–33 | Cite as

what’s new? a first appraisal of the juncker commission

  • hussein kassim


Although still in its early phases, the Juncker Commission has already broken new ground. Not only is Jean-Claude Juncker the first Commission President to be selected by the Spitzenkandidaten process, an extra-constitutional system that has reconfigured the European Union’s institutional balance, but he has transformed the structure and operation of the College with the aim of creating a more political, and therefore more effective, Commission, and made good – so far – on his promise ‘to do better on the bigger things and be small on the small things’. This article examines this three-fold transformation. It looks at the innovations and change associated with the Juncker Commission. It considers what motivated them and how they were achieved, sets them in historical perspective, and discusses their implications for the institutions and for the European Union more broadly.


Juncker commission European commission European commission presidency spitzenkanditaten 



The author would like to thank the officeholders in the European Commission who kindly agreed to answer his questions on a strictly non-attributable basis about the operation of the new Commission in interviews in Brussels between March and July 2015 as part of the research for this article. He is also grateful to Sara Connolly, and to two anonymous referees, who offered comments on an earlier version, to two members of Commission staff who read the original draft, and to Martin Westlake for several very helpful suggestions. The usual disclaimer applies.


  1. Barber, T. (2014) ‘Juncker’s Triumph would be Revolutionary for the EU’. Financial Times 22 June, available at:
  2. Barroso (2012) ‘State of the Union 2010’ SPEECH/10/411, 7 September,, accessed 5 January 2016.
  3. Bertonchini, Y. (2014) ‘The Juncker commission: What party balances?’ Euractiv, available at:, accessed 22 October 2014.
  4. Campbell, J. (1983) Roy Jenkins: A Biography, London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
  5. Christiansen, T. (2015) ‘European integration after the “Spitzenkandidaten”: The new dynamics of EU leadership change’, Integration 38(1): 26–43.Google Scholar
  6. Commission. (2013) ‘Commission Recommendation of 12 March 2013 on enhancing the democratic and efficient conduct of the elections to the European Parliament Support for a candidate for President of the European Commission’, C(2013) 1303 final, available at:, accessed 5 January 2016.
  7. Commission. (2014a) ‘The Juncker Commission: A Strong and Experienced Team Standing for Change’, Brussels, IP/14/984, available at:, accessed 5 January 2016.
  8. Commission. (2014b) ‘Questions and Answers: The Juncker Commission’, MEMO Brussels, available at:, accessed 10 September 2014.
  9. Commission. (2014c) ‘An Investment Plan for Europe’, COM(2014) 903 final, 26 November 2014.Google Scholar
  10. Commission. (2015a) ‘A Digital Single Market Strategy for Europe’, COM(2015) 192 final, 6 May 2015.Google Scholar
  11. Commission. (2015b) ‘Commission Work Programme 2015 A New Start’ COM/2014/0910 final, 16.12.2014 COM(2014) 910 final, available at:
  12. Connolly, S. and Kassim, H. (2015) ‘European Commission: Facing the Future’, report available at:, accessed 4 December 2015.
  13. Cramme, O. (2011) ‘In Search of Leadership’, in L. Tsoukalis and J.A. Emmanouilidis (eds.) The Delphic Oracle on Europe: Is There a Future for the European Union?, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 30–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. EuroParl TV. (2015) ‘ “Spitzenkandidaten”: The Underlying Story’, available at:
  15. European Council. (2014) ‘European Council Decision of 23 October 2014 appointing the European Commission’ (2014/749/EU), available at:
  16. European Parliament. (2012) ‘Resolution of 22 November 2012 on Elections to the European Parliament in 2014’, 2012/2829(RSP).Google Scholar
  17. European Parliamentary Research Service. (2014) ‘What an Extraordinary Year for the EU: EPRS-EUI Conference On 2014’, available at:, accessed 5 January 2016.
  18. European People’s Party. (2014) ‘Factsheet: The Story of the “Spitzenkandidaten” ’, available at:, accessed 5 January 2016.
  19. Gotev, G. (2014) ‘Juncker: I will Always Respond to Unfair Criticism from National EU Leaders’, EurActiv, 5 November 2014 – 16:47 updated: 8 January 2015 – 15:45,
  20. Grant, C. (2014) ‘The new European commission: Which president, and what priorities? – see more at:’, Centre for European Reform,, accessed 30 May 2014.
  21. Hayward, J. (2008) Leaderless Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Helms, L. (2016, this issue of European Political Science) ‘Introduction: Leadership Questions in Transnational European Governance’, European Political Science. doi: 10.1057/eps.2015.113.Google Scholar
  23. Hix, S. (2002) ‘Constitutional agenda-setting through discretion in rule interpretation: Why the European parliament won at Amsterdam’, British Journal of Political Science 32(2): 259–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Juncker, J.-C. (2014a) ‘A New Start for Europe: My Agenda for Jobs, Growth, Fairness and Democratic Change. Political Guidelines for the next European Commission’, available at:
  25. Juncker, J.-C. (2014b) ‘The Juncker Commission: The Right Team to Deliver Change’, Press Conference, Brussels, 10 September, SPEECH/14/585, available at:
  26. Juncker, J.-C. (2014c) ‘Time for Action – Statement in the European Parliament Plenary Session Ahead of the Vote on the College’, 22 October, SPEECH/14/1525, available at:
  27. Juncker, J.-C., Tusk, D., Dijsselbloem, J., Draghi, M. and Schulz, M. (2015) ‘Completing Europe’s Economic and Monetary Union’, available at:, accessed 5 January 2016.
  28. Kassim, H. (2012) ‘The Presidents and Presidency of the European Commission’, in E. Jones, A. Menon and S. Weatherill (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of the EU, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 219–232.Google Scholar
  29. Kassim, H., Peterson, J., Bauer, M.W., Connolly, S., Dehousse, R., Hooghe, L. and Thompson, A. (2013) The European Commission of the Twenty-First Century, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kassim, H., Connolly, S., Dehousse, R. and Rozenberg, O. (2015) ‘Managing the House: The Presidency, Agenda Control and Policy Activism in the European Commission’, unpublished mimeo.Google Scholar
  31. Keating, D. (2014) ‘Commission Unveils 2015 Work Programme’, European Voice, available at:, accessed 16 December 2014.
  32. Keating, D. (2015) ‘Energy Union: Who’s the boss?’, European Voice, available at:, accessed 19 May 2015.
  33. Kocharov, A. (2014) ‘This Time It’s Different? Constitutional Complexities of the Spitzenkandidaten Arrangement’, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin e-Working Papers on European Law, 2014/95.Google Scholar
  34. Majone, G. (1996) ‘Regulatory Legitimacy’, in G. Majone (ed.) Regulating Europe, London: Routledge, pp. 284–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Majone, G. (1998) ‘Europe’s democratic deficit. The question of standards’, European Law Journal 4(1): 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Majone, G. (2002) ‘The European commission: The limits of centralization and the perils of parliamentarization’, Governance 15(3): 375–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Majone, G. (2014) Rethinking the Union of Europe Post-Crisis: Has Integration Gone Too Far?, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Palmeri, T. (2015) ‘The Most Exclusive Dining Club in Brussels. Inside the G5 where “the Best Jokes are Told” and Major EU Policies are Pre-cooked’, Politico, available at:, accessed 18 June 2015.
  39. Pop, V. (2015) ‘Let’s get Political. Juncker-style’, Wall Street Journal, available at:, accessed 7 May 2015.
  40. Reinalda, B. and Verbeek, B. (2014) ‘Leadership of International Organizations’, in R.A.W. Rhodes and P. ’t Hart (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Political Leadership, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 595–609.Google Scholar
  41. Rinaldi, D. (2014) ‘Commissioners as Competitors – Competition and Policy Coherence in the Juncker’s Commission’, Blog of the College of Europe, available at:, accessed 12 September 2014.
  42. Schimmelfennig, F. (2014) ‘The Spitzenkandidaten Plot: The European Parliament as a Strategic Competence Maximizer’, Dublin European Institute blog, available at:
  43. Spiegel, P. (2014a) ‘Europe’s Leaders Divided on How to Pick Next EC President’. Financial Times 2 January, available at:
  44. Spiegel, P. (2014b) ‘Who Will Gain Power in the EU’s Post “Earthquake” World?’ Financial Times 27 May, available at:
  45. Wagstyl, S. (2014) ‘Merkel Swaps Back to Supporting Juncker’. Financial Times 30 May, available at:
  46. Westlake, M. (2015) ‘Chronicle of an Election Foretold: The Longer-Term Trends leading to the ‘Spitzenkandidaten’ procedure and the Election of Jean-Claude Juncker as European Commission President’, LSE ‘Europe in Question’ Discussion Paper Series, No. 102/2016, January 2016.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© European Consortium for Political Research 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • hussein kassim
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Politics, Philosophy, Language and Communication Studies, The University of East AngliaNorwichUK

Personalised recommendations