Advertisement

Bring the Poor Back In! Inequalities, Welfare and Politics

Abstract

This lecture addresses the political impact of the Great Recession in a context of rising inequalities and retrenching welfare states. Do hard times fuel apathy or revolt, abstention or support for the extremes, and more particularly, in the European context, for thriving radical rights? To answer these questions, I shall take the case of France, in the 2012 presidential election, the first post-crisis one. I shall focus on the poor, the disadvantaged: those hardest hit by the recession.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Price includes VAT for USA

Subscribe to journal

Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.

US$ 131

This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.

Notes

  1. 1.

    Results available at http://www.ifop.fr/media/poll/1191-1-study_file.pdf.

  2. 2.

    Available at http://www.cee.sciences-po.fr/fr/recherche/les-analyses-electorales/lenquete-electorale-francaise-2012.html.

  3. 3.

    Report of the National Evaluation Committee of the RSA available at: http://www.solidarite.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/rapport_RSA_15dec2011_vf-2.pdf, accessed 28 December 2013.

  4. 4.

    Available at http://www.inegalites.fr/spip.php?article444&id_rubrique=123&id_groupe=9&id_mot=76, accessed 30 December 2013.

  5. 5.

    These eleven questions were selected on the basis of a factorial correspondence analysis of the answers to forty-two questions exploring the different dimensions of precariousness (gender, age, citizenship, education, employment, type of household, housing, social protection, perceived health, income, financial difficulties, sports and leisure activities, social insertion, access to health care, childhood trauma etc.), first on a large sample of the population examined in the Health Medical Centers of the Social security then on samples drawn from the general population in 2005–2006. The first major axis that comes out of the FCA is an axis of precariousness ranging from the most advantaged to the most disadvantaged. The eleven questions kept are the most correlated to the factor, explaining 91 per cent of the variance (Sass et al, 2006).

  6. 6.

    For a similar analysis, see Schwartz’s (2009) study of bus drivers in Marseille, and the ‘petits moyens’or ‘little middle ones’, studied by Cartier et al (2008).

References

  1. Amossé, T. and Chardon, O. (2006) ‘Les travailleurs non qualifiés: une nouvelle classe sociale?’, Économie et Statistique (393–394): 203–229.

  2. APSA. (2004) ‘American Democracy in an Age of Rising Inequality’, Task Force on Inequality and American Democracy, available at: http://www.apsanet.org/imgtest/taskforcereport.pdf, accessed 28 December 2013.

  3. Bartels, L. (2014) ‘Ideology and Retrospection in Electoral Responses to the Great Recession’, in L. Bartels and N. Bermeo (eds.) Mass Politics in Tough Times: Opinions, Votes and Protest in the Great Recession, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 185–223.

  4. Bègue, M. (2007) ‘Le rapport au politique des personnes en situation défavorisée. Une comparaison européenne’ (France, Grande Bretagne, Espagne), Ph.D. dissertation, Paris, Sciences Po.

  5. Betz, H.-G. (1994) Radical Right-Wing Populism in Western Europe, London: Palgrave MacMillan.

  6. Bontout, O. (2011) ‘L’articulation des indicateurs de pauvreté français et européens’, Paris, DREES (Direction Recherches Etudes Evaluations Statistiques du Ministère des Affaires Sociales), available at: http://www.cnle.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/DREES-Olivier_Bontout_indicateurs_europeens_et_francais.pdf, accessed 30 January 2014.

  7. Bornschier, S. and Kriesi, H. (2012) ‘The Populist Right, the Working Class, and the Changing Face of Class Politics’, in J. Rydgren (ed.) Class Politics and the Radical Right, London and New York: Routledge, pp. 10–29.

  8. Braconnier, C. and Dormagen, J.-Y. (2007) La démocratie de l’abstention, Paris: Gallimard.

  9. Braconnier, C., Dormagen, J.-Y. and Verrier, B. (2007) Non-inscrits, mal-inscrits et abstentionnistes: diagnostic et pistes pour une réforme de l'inscription sur les listes électorales, Paris: La Documentation française.

  10. Brehm, J. (1993) The Phantom Respondents: Opinion Surveys and Political Representation, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

  11. Cartier, M., Coutant, I., Masclet, O. and Siblot, Y. (2008) La France des petits moyens. Enquête sur la banlieue pavillonnaire, Paris: La Découverte.

  12. Castel, R. (2003) L’Insécurité sociale. Qu’est-ce qu’être protégé?, Paris: Seuil.

  13. Cusack, T., Iversen, T. and Rehm, P. (2008) ‘Economic Shocks, Inequality and Popular Support for Redistribution’, in P. Beramendi and C. Anderson (eds.) Democracy, Inequality and Representation, New York: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 203–231.

  14. Della Porta, D. (2012) ‘Mobilizing against the crisis, mobilizing for ‘another democracy’: comparing two global waves of protest’, Interface 4(1): 74–277, available at: http://www.interfacejournal.net/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Interface-4-1-Della-Porta.pdf.X, accessed 30 December 2013.

  15. Emmenegger, P., Häusermann, S., Palier, B. and Seeleib-Kaiser, M. (eds.) (2012) The Age of Dualization: The Changing Face of Inequality in De-industrializing Societies, New York: Oxford University Press.

  16. Esping Andersen, G. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  17. Forsé, M. and Galland, O. (eds.) (2011) Les Français face aux inégalités et à la justice sociale, Paris: Armand Colin.

  18. Gallego, A. (2008) ‘Unequal political participation in Europe’, International Journal of Sociology 37 (4): 10–25.

  19. Gaxie, D. (1978) Le cens caché, Paris: Seuil.

  20. Haüsermann, S. and Schwander, H. (2012) ‘Varieties of Dualization? Labor Market Segmentation and Insider-Outsider Divides across Regimes’, in P. Emmenegger, S. Häusermann, B. Palier and M. Seeleib-Kaiser (eds.) The Age of Dualization: The Changing Face of Inequality in De-industrializing Societies, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 27–51.

  21. INSEE. (2011) ‘Les revenus et le patrimoine des ménages’, Paris, INSEE (collection INSEE Références)..

  22. Karamichas, J. (2012) ‘Mobilizations against the politics of austerity in Greece’. Paper presented at the conference ‘Political Consequences of Economic Crisis: Voting and Protesting in Europe since 2008’, 17–18 April, Georgetown University, available at: http://www.academia.edu/3676663/Mobilizations_against_the_politics_of_austerity_in_Greece, accessed 28 December 2013.

  23. Kriesi, H. et al. (2008) West European Politics in the Age of Globalization, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  24. Kriesi, H. (2014) ‘The Political Consequences of the Economic Crisis in Europe Electoral Punishment and Popular Protest’, in N. Bermeo and L. Bartels (eds.) Mass Politics in Tough Times: Opinions, Votes and Protest in the Great Recession, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 297–333.

  25. Lancelot, A. (1968) L’abstentionnisme électoral en France, Paris: A. Colin.

  26. Landais, C. (2007) ‘Les hauts revenus en France (1998–2006): Une explosion des inégalités?’, Paris, School of Economics, available at: http://www.inegalites.fr/IMG/pdf/hautsrevenuslandais.pdf, accessed 28 December 2013.

  27. Lazarsfeld, P.F., Jahoda, M. and Zeisel, H. (2002) 1st edn. 1933, Marienthal: The Sociography of an Unemployed Community, Somerset, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

  28. Lindvall, J and Rueda, D. (2012) ‘Insider-Outsider Politics: Party Strategies and Political Behavior in Sweden’, in P. Emmenegger, S. Häusermann, B. Palier and M. Seleib-Kaiser (eds.) The Age of Dualization: The Changing Face of Inequality in De-industrializing Societies, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 277–303.

  29. Mayer, N. (2014) ‘The Electoral Impact of the Crisis on the French Working Class: More to the Right?’, in N. Bermeo and L. Bartels (eds.) Mass Politics in Tough Times: Opinions, Votes and Protest in the Great Recession, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 266–297.

  30. Mayer, N. (2012) ‘From Jean-Marie to Marine Le Pen: Electoral Change on the Far Right’, Parliamentary Affairs. Special Issue ‘French Presidential and Parliamentary Elections 2012’ 66 (1): 160–178.

  31. Meltzer, A.H. and Richard, S.F. (1981) ‘A rational theory of the size of government’, Journal of Political Economy 89 (5): 914–927.

  32. OECD. (2008) Growing Unequal: Income Distribution and Poverty in OECD Countries, Paris: OECD Publishing, doi: 10.1787/9789264044197-en.

  33. OECD. (2011) Divided We Stand: Why Inequality Keeps Rising, Paris: OECD Publishing, doi:10.1787/9789264119536-en.

  34. Oskarson, M. (2007) The Political Sociology of the Welfare State: Institutions, Social Cleavages, and Orientations, Stanford: Stanford University Press.

  35. Paugam, S. (2005) Les formes élémentaires de la pauvreté, Paris: PUF.

  36. Pierru, E. (2003) L’ombre des chômeurs. Chronique d’une indignité sociale et politique depuis les années 30, Amiens: Université de Picardie Jules Verne.

  37. Piven, F.F. and Cloward, R.A. (1977) Poor People’s Movements: Why They Succeed Why They Fail, New York: Blackwell.

  38. Rueda, D. (2005) ‘InsiderOutsider politics in industrialized democracies: The challenge to social democratic parties’, American Political Science Review 99 (1): 61–67.

  39. Rueda, D. and Pontusson, J. (2010) ‘Individual Preferences for Redistribution in Western Europe: Self-Interest, Political Articulation, Altruism and Identity’, available at: http://www.yale.edu/leitner/resources/papers/RuedaYale2010.pdf, accessed 28 December 2013.

  40. Sass, C., Guéguen, R., Abric, L., Dauphinot, V., Dupré, C., Giordanella, J.-P., Girard, F., Guenot, C., Labbe, E., La Rosa, E., Magnier, P., Martin, E., Royer, B., Rubirola, M. and Gerbau, L. (2006) ‘Le score Epices: un score individuel de précarité. Construction du score et mesure des relations avec des données de santé, dans une population de 197 389 personnes’, Bulletin Epidémiologique Hebdomadaire (14): 93–100.

  41. Schäfer, A. (2013) ‘Liberalization, Inequality and Democracy’s Discontent’, in A. Schäfer and W. Streeck (eds.) Politics in the Age of Austerity, Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 196–218.

  42. Schwander, H. and Haüsermann, S.H. (2013) ‘Who is in and who is out? A risk-based conceptualization of insiders and outsiders’, Journal of European Social Policy 23 (3): 248–269.

  43. Schwartz, O. (2009) Vivons-nous encore dans une société de classe? Trois remarques sur la société française contemporaine, La vie des Idées, available at: http://www.laviedesidees.fr/IMG/pdf/20090922_schwartz.pdf, accessed 30 December 2013.

  44. Solt, F. (2008) ‘Economic inequality and democratic political engagement’, American Journal of Political Science 52 (1): 48–60.

  45. Standing, G. (2011) The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class, London: Bloomsbury.

  46. Verba, S. and Nie, N. (1972) Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality, New York: Harper and Row.

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Jan Rovny who made me aware, very recently, of the paper he is preparing with his wife Allison on a similar issue ‘Blank and Not Blue: Outsiders at the Ballot Box’, of Oskarson’s (2007) ordinal index of social risk and Schwander and Haüsermann’s (2013) continuous measure of outsiderness.

Author information

Additional information

Text of the Plenary Lecture titled ‘Inequalities, Welfare and Politics’ given in Bordeaux, on 5 September, for the 7th General Conference of the European Consortium for Political Research (ECPR).

Presentation available at http://www.cee.sciences-po.fr/en/research/election-analysis/votpauvr.html, accessed 26 December 2013.

An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/eps.2014.16.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

mayer, n. Bring the Poor Back In! Inequalities, Welfare and Politics . Eur Polit Sci 13, 187–200 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1057/eps.2014.4

Download citation

Keywords

  • inequalities
  • poverty
  • social precariousness
  • political participation
  • radical right