Advertisement

European Political Science

, Volume 12, Issue 3, pp 333–349 | Cite as

Data Availability in Political Science Journals

  • sergiu gherghina
  • alexia katsanidou
Profession

Abstract

A characteristic of recent decades of scholarly work in the social sciences has been the increased amounts of empirical research. Access and availability of data are prerequisites for further research, replication work, and scientific development. As international peer-reviewed journals have gradually become the central forum for research debate, moves towards data sharing are dependent upon the policies of journals regarding data availability. This article examines contemporary data availability policies in political science and investigates the extent to which journals adopt such policies and their content. It also identifies a few factors associated with the existence of such policies.

Keywords

data availability replication policy political science 

Notes

Supplementary material

41304_2013_BFeps20138_MOESM1_ESM.xls (59 kb)
Supplementary Material

References

  1. Abbott, A. (2007) ‘Notes on replication’, Sociological Methods & Research 36 (2): 210–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, C. (2008) ‘The end of theory: The data deluge makes the scientific method obsolete’, Wired Magazine 16 (8), available at: http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/magazine/16-07/pb_theory.
  3. Bueno de Mesquita, B. (2003) ‘Getting firm on replication’, International Studies Perspectives 4 (1): 98–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Busenitz, L.W., West, III, G.P., Shepherd, D., Nelson, T., Chandler, G.N. and Zacharakis, A. (2003) ‘Entrepreneurship research in emergence: Past trends and future directions’, Journal of Management 29 (3): 285–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. (1998) Proposals for safeguarding good scientific practice, Bonn: Wiley-VCH.Google Scholar
  6. Dewald, W.G., Thursby, J.G. and Anderson, R.G. (1986) ‘Replication in empirical economics: The Journal of Money, Credit and Banking project’, American Economic Review 76 (4) (September): 587–603.Google Scholar
  7. Dietrich, D., Adamus, T., Miner, A. and Steinhart, G. (2012) ‘De-mystifying the data management requirements of research funders’, Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship 70 (1), DOI:10.5062/F44M92G2.Google Scholar
  8. Digital Curation Centre. (2012) ‘Overview of funders’ data policies’, available at: http://www.dcc.ac.uk/resources/policy-and-legal/overview-funders-data-policies, accessed 14 August 2012.
  9. Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC). (2010) ‘ESRC research data policy September 2010’, available at: http://www.esrc.ac.uk/_images/Research_Data_Policy_2010_tcm8-4595.pdf, accessed 14 August 2012.
  10. European Union. (2010) ‘Riding the wave: How Europe can gain from the rising tide of scientific data. Final report of the high level expert group on scientific data’, available at: http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/ict/e-infrastructure/docs/hlg-sdi-report.pdf, accessed 14 August 2012.
  11. Evanschitsky, H. (2010) ‘Replications of forecasting research’, International Journal of Forecasting 26 (1): 4–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fowler, L.L. (1995) ‘Replication as regulation’, PS: Political Science and Politics 28 (3): 478–481.Google Scholar
  13. Freese, J. (2007) ‘Replication standards in quantitative social science – why not sociology’, Sociological Methods and Research 36 (2): 153–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gibson, J.L. (1995) ‘Cautious reflections on a data archiving policy for political science’, PS: Political Science and Politics 28 (3): 473–476.Google Scholar
  15. Gleditsch, N.P. (2002) ‘Double-blind but more transparent’, Journal of Peace Research 39 (3): 259–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gleditsch, N.P. and Metelits, C. (2003) ‘Replication in international relations journals: Policies and practices’, International Studies Perspectives 4 (1): 72–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gleditsch, N.P., Metelits, C. and Strand, H. (2003a) ‘Posting your data: Will you be scooped or will you be famous’, International Studies Perspectives 4 (1): 89–97.Google Scholar
  18. Gleditsch, N.P., James, P., Ray, J.L. and Russett, B. (2003b) ‘Editors’ joint statement: Minimum replication standards for international relations journals’, International Studies Perspectives 4 (1): 105.Google Scholar
  19. Horton, L. and Katsanidou, A. (2011) ‘Purposing your survey: archives as a market regulator, or how can archives connect supply and demand?’ IASSIST Quarterly 35 (4): 18–23.Google Scholar
  20. James, P. (2003) ‘Replication policies and practices in International Studies Quarterly’, International Studies Perspectives 4 (1): 85–88.Google Scholar
  21. King, G. (1995) ‘Replication, replication’, PS: Political Science and Politics 28 (3): 443–499.Google Scholar
  22. King, G. (2003) ‘The future of the replication movement’, International Studies Perspectives 4 (1): 100–105.Google Scholar
  23. King, G. (2006) ‘Publication, publication’, PS: Political Science and Politics 39 (1): 119–125.Google Scholar
  24. Meir, K.J. (1995) ‘Replication: A view from the streets’, Political Science and Politics 28 (3): 456–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. National Institutes of Health. (2003) ‘What to include in an NIH application’, available at: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/data_sharing/data_sharing_guidance.htm#inc, accessed 14 August 2012.
  26. National Science Foundation. (2011) ‘NSF data management plan requirements’, available at: http://www.nsf.gov/eng/general/dmp.jsp, accessed 14 August 2012.
  27. Piwowar, H.A., Day, R.S. and Fridsma, D.B. (2007) ‘Sharing detailed research data is associated with increased citation rate’, PLoS ONE 2 (3): 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Research Councils UK. (2011) ‘RCUK common principles on data policy’, available at: http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/research/Pages/DataPolicy.aspx, accessed 14 August 2012.
  29. Russett, B. (2003) ‘The Journal of Conflict Resolution's policy on replication’, International Studies Perspectives 4 (1): 88–89.Google Scholar
  30. Scudder, G.D. and Hill, C.A. (1998) ‘A review and classification of empirical research in operations management’, Journal of Operations Management 16 (1): 91–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Consortium for Political Research 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.GESIS Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Unter Sachsenhausen 6-8CologneGermany

Personalised recommendations