Continuity and Change in Belgium's Caretaker Administration
- 25 Downloads
- 2 Citations
Abstract
The fact that Belgian politicians did not succeed in forming a government coalition following the June 2010 elections did not prevent public managers and civil servants to guarantee the continuity of government operations. Leading civil servants, whether as departmental managers or as ministerial advisors simply continued to function. Complying with caretaker government conventions, they followed a line of permanence and caution, while urgent matters occasionally released the break on new policy initiatives. It has to be noted that the absence of a federal government for more than a year did not lead to strong negative effects in the delivery of government programmes. Yet, in absence of a political mandate for change, civil servants and public managers cannot implement policy adaptations or drastic reforms that are considered as necessary for the long-term stability of the Belgian economic and social system.
Keywords
Belgium civil servants public management caretaker governmentReferences
- Brans, M., de Visscher, C. and Vancoppenolle, D. (2009) ‘Administrative Reforms in Belgium: Maintenance or Modernisation’, in M. Brans, L. De Winter and W. Swenden (eds.) The Politics of Belgium: Institutions and Policy Under Bipolar and Centrifugal Federalism, London: Routledge, pp. 117–136.Google Scholar
- Brans, M. and Steen, T. (2007) ‘From Incremental to Copernican Reform? Changes to the Position and Role of Senior Servants in the Belgian Federal Administration’, in E.C. Page and V. Wright (eds.) From the Active to the Enabling State: The Changing Role of Top Officials in European Nations, Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 63–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pressman, J.L. and Wildavsky, A.B. (1984) Implementation: How Great Expectations from Washington are Dashed in Oakland, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar