European Political Science

, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp 11–19 | Cite as

Rival Universalisms in Transatlantic Relations: Obama's Exceptionalism Meets Europe's Low Profile

  • Cristina Barrios
Symposium

Abstract

This article offers the central argument that universalisms – defined as narratives of identity and role-playing in International Relations (IR) – depict different roles and identities for the United States and the European Union (EU). On the one hand, America's universalism depicts the democratic city upon a hill that leads in the world by example and with power, hard and soft. On the other, Europe's universalism is a utopia (an ideal plan) and a fragile balance between supranationalism and intergovernmentalism, putting forward consensual but ambiguous notions of ‘civilian’ and ‘normative’ power. Despite ample evidence of its international primacy and potential, the EU insists on keeping a low profile in IR. As a result of these trends, the rhetoric of the West and common values on the basis of transatlantic relations are clearly undermined.

Keywords

transatlantic relations European Union universalism civilian power 

References

  1. Baldwin, D.A. (2002) ‘Power and International Relations’, in W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse and B.A. Simmons (eds.) Handbook of International Relations, London: SAGE, pp. 177–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berenskoetter, F. and Williams, M.J. (eds.) (2007) Power in World Politics, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Bobbio, N. (2003) Teoria general de la politica, Madrid: Trotta.Google Scholar
  4. Brands, H.W. (1998) What America Owes the World: The Struggle for the Soul of Foreign Policy, Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown, C. (1997) ‘Universal human rights: A critique’, International Journal of Human Rights 1 (2): 41–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cox, M. (2005) ‘Beyond the west: Terrors in transatlantia’, European Journal of International Relations 11 (2): 203–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Deudney, D. (2008) Keynote address, London: BISA US foreign policy working group annual conference, 18 September.Google Scholar
  8. Diez, T. (2005) ‘Constructing the self and changing others: Reconsidering “normative power Europe”’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies 33 (3): 615–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Duchene, F. (1973) ‘The European Community and the Uncertainties’, in M. Kolistamm and W. Hager (eds.) A Nation Writ Large: Foreign Policy Problems Before the European Communities, London: Macmillan, pp. 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. European Commission. (2009) ‘EU fills new top jobs’ in EU explained, 11 November.Google Scholar
  11. Hassner, P. and Vaisse, J. (2003) Washington et le monde -dilemmes d’une superpuissance, Paris: Autrement.Google Scholar
  12. Hersant, Y. and Durant-Bogaert, F. (2000) Europes -de l’antiquite au XXe siecle, Paris: Robert Laffont.Google Scholar
  13. Ikenberry, G.J. (2006) Liberal Order and Imperial Ambition: Essays on American Power and World Politics, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  14. Jorgensen, K.E. (1998) ‘The European Union's Performance in World Politics: How Should We Measure Success?’, in J. Zielonka (ed.) Paradoxes of European Foreign Policy, The Hague: Kluwer Law International, pp. 87–101.Google Scholar
  15. Kagan, R. (2002) ‘Power and weakness’, Policy Review 113: 3–28.Google Scholar
  16. Laidi, Z. (2005) La norme sans la force -l’enigme de la puissance europeenne, Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.Google Scholar
  17. Lipset, S.M. (1996) American Exceptionalism – A Double-edged Sword, New York, London: Norton.Google Scholar
  18. Lockhart, C. (2003) The Roots of American Exceptionalism: History, Institutions and Culture, 1st edn, New York; Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mandelbaum, M. (2002) The Ideas that Conquered the World: Peace, Democracy and Free Markets in the Twenty-first Century, New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
  20. Manners, I. (2002) ‘Normative power Europe: A contradiction in terms?’ Journal of Common Market Studies 40 (2): 235–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Moravcsik, A. (2005) ‘The Paradox of US Human Rights Policy’, in M. Ignatieff (ed.) American Exceptionalism and Human Rights, Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, pp. 147–197.Google Scholar
  22. Nicolaidis, K. (2006) ‘The clash of universalisms – Or why Europe needs a post-colonial ethos’, Paper presented at Sciences-Po conference: Are European preferences shared by others? Paris.Google Scholar
  23. Nye, J. (1990) Bound to Lead: The Changing Nature of American Power, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  24. Obama, B.H. (2009) ‘Speech in Cairo: A new beginning’, http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/NewBeginning/, accessed 10 December 2009, Cairo, 4 June.
  25. Orbie, J. (2006) ‘Civilian power Europe – Review of the original and current debates’, Cooperation and Conflict 41 (1): 123–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Patten, C. (2008) Lecture: Is There a European Union Foreign Policy? London: London School of Economics, 22 May.Google Scholar
  27. Peterson, J. and Pollack, M. (eds.) (2003) Europe, America, Bush: Transatlantic Relations in the Twenty-first Century, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Slaughter, A.-M. (2007) The Idea That Is America – Keeping Faith with Our Values in a Dangerous World, New York: Perseus Books.Google Scholar
  29. Smith, M. (2004) ‘Between two worlds? The European Union, the United States, and world order’, International Politics 41 (1): 95–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Telò, M. (2006) Europe, a Civilian Power? European Union, Global Governance, World Order, Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© European Consortium for Political Research 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cristina Barrios
    • 1
  1. 1.London School of Economics and Political ScienceLondonUK

Personalised recommendations