European Political Science

, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 176–190 | Cite as

Authoritarian Consolidation

  • Christian Göbel


Authoritarian consolidation is conceptualised as a deliberate state project to improve a regime's capabilities for governing society. It is hypothesised that the durability of an authoritarian regime increases to the extent that regime elites manage to substitute coercion for governing by organisation, regulation and the management of discourses. This provides them with a broader – and less costly – range of options to address social problems and regime challenges than merely intimidating or cracking down on opponents.


authoritarian consolidation government effectiveness state infrastructural power political terror 



For valuable comments and suggestions I am grateful to Björn Alpermann, André Bank, Axel Hadenius, Thomas Heberer, Geir Helgesen, Patrick Köllner, David Kühn, Daniel Lambach, Julia Leininger, Philippe Schmitter, Jan Teorell, Michael Wahman and the participants of the workshop ‘Authoritarian Consolidation’, Duisburg, 14–15 May 2009. Financial support by the Research Programme ‘Change of Contemporary Societies’ of the Department of Social Sciences, University of Duisburg-Essen, is gratefully acknowledged, as is the logistical help of Alexandra Kessler and Christian Sprenger.


  1. Anderson, B.R. (1983) Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism, London: Verso.Google Scholar
  2. Bank, A. (2009) ‘Die Renaissance des Autoritarismus: Erkenntnisse und Grenzen neuerer Beiträge der Comparative Politics und Nahostforschung’, Hamburg Review of Social Sciences 4 (1): 10–41.Google Scholar
  3. Bayart, J.-F. (1993) The State in Africa: The Politics of the Belly, London, New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  4. Beblawi, H. and Luciani, G. (eds.) (1987) The Rentier State, London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  5. Bratton, M. and van de Walle, N. (1997) Democratic Experiments in Africa: Regime Transitions in Comparative Perspective, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brownlee, J. (2007a) Authoritarianism in an Age of Democratization, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brownlee, J. (2007b) ‘Hereditary succession in modern autocracies’, World Politics 59 (4): 595–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carothers, T. (2002) ‘The end of the transition paradigm’, Journal of Democracy 13 (1): 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cai, Y. (2008) ‘Power structure and regime resilience: Contentious politics in China’, British Journal of Political Science 38: 411–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Diamond, L.J. (1996) ‘Is the third wave over?’ Journal of Democracy 7 (3): 20–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Diamond, L.J. (1999) Developing Democracy: Toward Consolidation, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Engel, U. and Erdmann, G. (2007) ‘Neopatrimonialism reconsidered: Critical review and elaboration of an elusive concept’, Commonwealth and Comparative Politics 45 (1): 95–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Evans, P.B. (1992) ‘The State as Problem and Solution: Predation, Embedded Autonomy and Adjustment’, in S. Haggard and R. Kaufman (eds.) The Politics of Economic Adjustment: International Constraints, Distributive Politics, and the State, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 139–181.Google Scholar
  14. Evans, P.B. (1995) Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Fund for Peace. (2009) ‘The Failed States Index’, Foreign Policy 173: 80–83.Google Scholar
  16. Gandhi, J. (2008) Political Institutions under Dictatorship, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gandhi, J. and Przeworski, A. (2007) ‘Authoritarian institutions and the survival of autocrats’, Comparative Political Studies 40 (11): 1279–1301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Geddes, B. (1999) ‘What do we know about democratization after twenty years?’ Annual Review of Political Science, (2): 115–144.Google Scholar
  19. Geddes, B. (2003) Paradigms and Sand Castles. Theory Building and Research Design in Comparative Politics, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gilley, B. (2006) ‘The meaning and measure of state legitimacy: Results for 72 countries’, European Journal of Political Research 45 (3): 499–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gramsci, A., Hoare, Q. and Nowell-Smith, G. (1971) Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci, London: Lawrence & Wishart.Google Scholar
  22. Hadenius, A. and Teorell, J. (2007) ‘Pathways from authoritarianism’, Journal of Democracy 18 (1): 143–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hay, C. (2001) ‘What place for ideas in the structure-agency debate? Globalisation as a “Process without a Subject” ’, available at
  24. Hegre, H., Ellingsen, T., Gates, S. and Gleditsch, N.P. (2001) ‘Towards a democratic civil peace? Democracy, political change, and civil war 1816–1992’, American Political Science Review 95 (1): 33–48.Google Scholar
  25. Hinnebusch, R. (2006) ‘Authoritarian persistence, democratization theory and the Middle East: An overview and critique’, Democratization 13 (3): 373–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Huntington, S.P. (1991) The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century, Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
  27. Ikenberry, G. and Kupchan, C.A. (1990) ‘Socialization and hegemonic power’, International Organization 44 (3): 283–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jessop, B. (2008) State Power. A Strategic-Relational Approach, Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  29. Jourde, C. (2007) ‘The international relations of small Neoauthoritarian States: Islamism, Warlordism, and the framing of stability’, International Studies Quarterly 51: 481–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Karl, T.L. (1995) ‘The hybrid regimes of Central America’, Journal of Democracy 6 (3): 72–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Karl, T.L. (2005) ‘From democracy to democratization and back: Before transitions from authoritarian rule’, Stanford: Center on Democracy, Development, and the Rule of Law Working Paper No. 45, September 2005.Google Scholar
  32. Köllner, P. (2008) ‘Autoritäre Regime – Ein Überblick über die jüngere Literatur’, Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft 2008 (2): 351–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Levitsky, S. and Way, L.A. (2006a) ‘Linkage and Leverage: How do International Factors Change Domestic Balances of Power’, in A. Schedler (ed.) Electoral Authoritarianism. The Dynamics of Unfree Competition, Boulder: Lynne Rienner, pp. 199–216.Google Scholar
  34. Levitsky, S. and Way, L.A. (2006b) ‘Linkage versus leverage: Rethinking the international dimension of regime change’, Comparative Politics 38 (4): 379–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Li, L. (2004) ‘Political trust in rural China’, Modern China 30 (2): 228–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Li, L. (2008) ‘Political trust and petitioning in the Chinese countryside’, Comparative Politics 40 (2): 209–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Linz, J.J. and Stepan, A. (1996) ‘Toward consolidated democracies’, Journal of Democracy 7 (2): 14–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lukes, S. (2004) Power: A Radical View, Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  39. Magaloni, B. (2008) ‘Credible power-sharing and the longevity of authoritarian rule’, Comparative Political Studies 41 (4/5): 715–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mainwaring, S., O’Donnell, G. and Valenzuela, A. (1992) ‘Introduction’, in S. Mainwaring, G. O’Donnell and A. Valenzuela (eds.) Issues in Democratic Consolidation: The New South American Democracies in Comparative Perspective, Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  41. Mann, M. (1984) ‘The autonomous power of the state. Its origins, mechanisms and results’, Archives Européennes de Sociologie 25 (2): 185–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Merkel, W. (1999) Systemtransformation: Eine Einführung in die Theorie und Empirie der Transformationsforschung, Opladen: Leske + Budrich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Migdal, J.S. (1996) ‘The State in Society: An Approach to Struggles for Domination’, in J. S. Migdal, A. Kohli and V. Shue (eds.) State power and social forces: domination and transformation in the Third World, Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Migdal, J.S. (2001) State in Society: Studying How States and Societies Transform and Constitute One Another, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Political Terror Scale. (2009) ‘1976–2008 political terror scale ratings’, available at, accessed 20 February 2010.
  46. Pridham, G. (1990) ‘Southern European Democracies on the Road to Consolidation: A Comparative Assessment of the Role of Political Parties’, in G. Pridham (ed.) Securing Democracy: Political Parties and Democratic Consolidation in Southern Europe, New York: Chapman and Hall Inc, pp. 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Puddington, A. (2008) ‘Freedom in retreat: is the tide turning?’, available at, accessed 24 February 2010.
  48. Pye, L.W. (1985) Asian Power and Politics: The Cultural Dimensions of Authority, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Schedler, A. (1998) ‘What is democratic consolidation?’ Journal of Democracy 9 (2): 91–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schedler, A. (2006) ‘The Logic of Electoral Authoritarianism’, in A. Schedler (ed.) Electoral Authoritarianism. The Dynamics of Unfree Competition, Boulder: Lynne Rienner, pp. 1–23.Google Scholar
  51. Schlumberger, O. (2004) ‘Political liberalization, authoritarian regime stability, and imitative institution-building: towards a formal understanding’, paper presented at the Fifth Mediterranean Social and Political Research Meeting of the Robert Schuman Centre, European University Institute, Florence, Italy.Google Scholar
  52. Schlumberger, O. (2008) Autoritarismus in der arabischen Welt: Ursachen, Trends und internationale Demokratieförderung, Baden-Baden: Nomos.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schmitter, P.C. (1995) ‘The Consolidation of Political Democracies’, in G. Pridham (ed.) Transitions to Democracy: Comparative Perspectives from Southern Europe, Latin America and Eastern Europe, Aldershot: Dartmouth, pp. 535–569.Google Scholar
  54. Schneider, B.R. (1995) ‘Democratic consolidations: Some broad comparisons and sweeping arguments’, Latin American Research Review 30: 215–234.Google Scholar
  55. Scott, J.C. (1998) Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Slater, D. (2003) ‘Iron cage in an iron fist. Authoritarian institutions and the personalization of power in Malaysia’, Comparative Politics 36: 81–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Soifer, H. (2008) ‘State infrastructural power: Approaches to conceptualization and measurement’, Studies in Comparative International Development 43 (3–4): 231–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Soifer, H. and vom Hau, M. (2008) ‘Unpacking the strength of the state: The utility of state infrastructural power’, Studies in Comparative International Development 43 (3–4): 219–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Svolik, M.W. (2008) ‘Authoritarian reversals and democratic consolidation’, American Political Science Review 102 (2): 153–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Svolik, M.W. (2009) ‘Power sharing and leadership dynamics in authoritarian regimes’, American Journal of Political Science 53 (2): 477–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tilly, C. (2007) Democracy, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Ulfelder, J. (2007) ‘Natural-resource wealth and the survival of autocracy’, Comparative Political Studies 40 (8): 995–1018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Weber, E. (1976) Peasants into Frenchmen: The Modernization of Rural France, 1870–1914, Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Wood, R.M. and Gibney, M. (2010) ‘The Political Terror Scale (PTS): A re-introduction and a comparison to CIRI’, Human Rights Quarterly 32 (2): 367–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. World Bank. (2009) ‘Governance matters 2009’, Worldwide Governance Indicators, 1996–2008, available at,, accessed 24 February 2010.
  66. Yom, S.L. and Al-Momani, M.H. (2008) ‘The international dimensions of authoritarian regime stability: Jordan in the post-cold war era’, Arab Studies Quarterly 30 (1): 39–60.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© European Consortium for Political Research 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christian Göbel
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for East and South East Asian Studies, Lund UniversityLundSweden

Personalised recommendations