Advertisement

European Political Science

, Volume 9, Supplement 1, pp S50–S60 | Cite as

Electronic Publishing, Knowledge Sharing and Open Access: A New Environment for Political Science

  • Mauro CaliseEmail author
  • Rosanna de Rosa
  • Xavier Fernández i Marín
Original Article

Abstract

In this article, we present an overview of the major changes occurring in electronic publishing, with a focus on open access. We shall argue that the notion itself of publication is undergoing a deep transformation, as it is no longer the monopoly of a limited number of specialised companies and institutions, but, through the web, it has become an option available to an infinite number of collective and individual actors.

Keywords

e-research electronic publishing digital environment open access 

References

  1. Abelson, A. (2008) ‘Open access publishing: the future of scholarly journal publishing’, MIT Faculty Newsletter 21 (2): 10–11.Google Scholar
  2. APE, Academy Publishing in Europe. (2009) ‘The impact of publishing’, A short conference Report, 20–21 January, Berlin-Brandenburg Academy of Science.Google Scholar
  3. Borgman, C.L. (2007) Scholarship in the Digital Age: Information, Infrastructure, and the Internet, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  4. Calise, M. and De Rosa, R. (2008) ‘E-Research: An introduction to on-line political science sources for beginners (and skeptics)’, International Political Science Review 5: 595–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Calise, M. and Lowi, T.J. (2010) Hyperpolitics: An Interactive Dictionary of Political Science Concepts, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, available at www.hyperpolitics.net.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Crow, R. (2006) ‘Publishing cooperatives: An alternative for non-profit publishers’, FirstMonday 11: 9 available at http://firstmonday.org/.Google Scholar
  7. Duderstadt, J.J. (2001) ‘The future of the university in the digital age’, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 145: 54–72.Google Scholar
  8. Harley, D., Acord, S., Earl-Novell, S., Lawrence, S. and King, C.J. (2010) Assessing the Future Landscape of Scholarly Communication: An Exploration of Faculty Values and Needs in Seven Disciplines, UC Berkeley: Center for Studies in Higher Education, available at http://escholarship.org/uc/cshe_fsc.Google Scholar
  9. Harnad, S. (2008) ‘The access/impact problem and the green and gold roads to open access: An update’, Serial Review 34: 36–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ithaka Report, by Brown, L., Griffths, R. and Rascoff, M. (2007) ‘University Publishing in a Digital Age’, available at http://www.ithaka.org/.
  11. Jankowski, N.W. (ed.) (2009) ‘The Contours and Challenges of e-Research’, E-Research: Transformations in Scholarly Practice, Introduction, New York: Routledge, pp. 3–34.Google Scholar
  12. Kaase, M. (2000) ‘Political science and the internet’, International Political Science Review/Revue internationale de science politique 21 (3): 265–282.Google Scholar
  13. Keating, M. (2009) ‘Putting European political science back together again’, European Political Science Review 1 (2): 297–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. King, G. (2009) ‘The Changing Evidence Base of Social Science Research’, in G. King, K. Schlozman and N. Nie (eds.) The Future of Political Science: 100 Perspectives, New York: Routledge, available at http://gking.harvard.edu/files/evbase.pdf.Google Scholar
  15. Klingemann, H.-D. (2008) ‘Capacities: Political science in Europe’, West European Politics 31 (1–2): 370–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Laponce, J.A. (2004) ‘Minority languages and globalization’, Nationalism and Ethnic Politics 10 (1): 15–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. May, C. (2005) ‘The academy's new electronic order? Open source journals and publishing political science’, European Political Science 4: 14–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Meyer, E., and Schroeder, R. (2009) ‘Sifting through the online web of knowledge’, Scientific Publication 3.0, available at interdisciplines.org/liquidpub/papers/4.
  19. Nentwich, M. (2008) ‘Political science on the web: Prospects and challenges’, European Political Science 7: 220–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. PEER Behavioural Research Report. (2009) ‘Authors and users vis-à-vis journals and repositories baseline report’, available at www.peerproject.eu.
  21. Sparc. (2008) ‘Open doors and open minds: what faculty authors can do to ensure open access to their work through their institution’, Science Commons White Paper, available at http://www.arl.org/sparc/publications/opendoors_v1.shtml.
  22. Sparc. (2010) ‘Public Access to Federally Funded Research: Comments’, available at Sparc website http://www.arl.org/sparc/openaccess/.
  23. Suber, P. (2010) ‘SPARC Open Access Newsletter’, January 2010 issue 141, available at http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/newsletter/01-02-10.htm.
  24. Thompson, J.B. (2005) Books in the Digital Age, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  25. Waltham, M. (2009) ‘The future of scholarly journals publishing among social science and humanities associations’, HSS Journals Publishing Report, available at www.nhalliance.org/bm~doc/hssreport.pdf.
  26. Ware, M. (2009a) ‘Web 2.0 scholarly communication’, Mark Ware Consulting, April, available at http://mrkwr.wordpress.com/articles/.
  27. Ware, M. (2009b) ‘The STM Report, an overview of scientific and scholarly journal publishing’, Mark Ware Consulting, STM publishers, September.Google Scholar
  28. Willinsky, J. (2006) The Access Principle. The Case for Open Access to Research and Scholarship, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  29. Wischenbart, R. (2010) ‘Ranking of global publishing industry 2009’, Publishing Research Quarterly 26 (1): 16–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Consortium for Political Research 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mauro Calise
    • 1
    Email author
  • Rosanna de Rosa
    • 1
  • Xavier Fernández i Marín
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of Naples IINaplesItaly
  2. 2.Universitat Pompeu FabraBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations