European Journal of Information Systems

, Volume 25, Issue 5, pp 465–471 | Cite as

Four common multicommunicating misconceptions

  • Ann-Frances Cameron
  • Jane Webster
  • Henri Barki
  • Ana Ortiz de Guinea
Issues and Opinion

Abstract

Multicommunicating (MC) represents a form of multitasking in which employees such as IS analysts and managers engage in multiple conversations at the same time (e.g., by sending texts while on a telephone call). MC can occur either during group meetings or during one-on-one conversations: the present paper focuses on the latter, termed dyadic MC. MC is increasingly prevalent in the workplace and is often useful in today’s business world, for example by making it possible to respond in a timely manner to urgent communications. Nonetheless, the efficacy of MC behaviors can also be questioned as they have been found to negatively affect performance and workplace relationships, as well as causing stress. During our investigations of this phenomenon, we often heard IS practitioners say ‘So what? I do this all the time, it’s no problem!’ which suggests that certain misconceptions regarding MC behaviors may be prevalent. Arising from research findings in multiple disciplines, we examine four such practitioner beliefs regarding MC behaviors: MC makes employees more accessible, it enhances productivity, it is required in most jobs, and rudeness is not an issue when MC. Further, we suggest recommendations to IS employees and managers so that they can better manage MC.

Keywords

multicommunicating multitasking accessibility rudeness productivity habits 

References

  1. Adler RF and Benbunan-Fich R (2014) The effects of task difficulty and multitasking on performance. Interacting with Computers 27(4), 430–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alsop R (2014) The high cost of workplace rudeness. [WWW document] http://www.bbc.com/capital/story/20140401-how-rude-why-polite-pays (accessed 5 September 2015).
  3. Appelbaum SH, Marchionni A and Fernandez A (2008) The multi-tasking paradox: perceptions, problems and strategies. Management Decision 46(9), 1313–1325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bailey BP and Konstan JA (2006) On the need for attention-aware systems: measuring effects of interruption on task performance, error rate, and affective state. Computers in Human Behavior 22(4), 685–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bass BM (1991) From transactional to transformational leadership: learning to share the vision. Organizational Dynamics 18(3), 19–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cameron A-F, Barki H and Plante C (2012) Professional or faux pas? Effects of multicommunicating on the analyst-user relationship. Paper presented at the 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Science (HICSS), Maui, HI.Google Scholar
  7. Cameron A-F and Webster J (2005) Unintended consequences of emerging communication technologies: instant messaging in the workplace. Computers in Human behavior 21(1), 85–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cameron A-F and Webster J (2011) Relational outcomes of multicommunicating: integrating incivility and social exchange perspectives. Organization Science 22(3), 754–771, doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cameron A-F and Webster J (2013) Multicommunicating: juggling multiple conversations in the workplace. Information Systems Research 24(2), 352–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cardon PW and Dai Y (2014) Mobile phone use in meetings among Chinese professionals: perspectives on multicommunication and civility. Global Advances in Business Communication 3(1), 2.Google Scholar
  11. Corbett K (2013) Three-quarters of smartphone users check mobile before getting out of bed – O2 media research. [WWW document] http://www.businessandleadership.com/marketing/item/41839-three-quarters-of-smartphon (accessed 5 September 2015).
  12. Dennis AR, Rennecker JA and Hansen S (2010) Invisible whispering: restructuring collaborative decision making with instant messaging. Decision Sciences 41(4), 845–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Duhigg C (2012) The Power of Habit: Why We do What We Do in Life and Business. Random House LLC, New York.Google Scholar
  14. González VM and Mark G (2004) Constant, constant, multi-tasking craziness: managing multiple working spheres. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
  15. Grandhi S and Jones Q (2010) Technology-mediated interruption management. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 68(5), 288–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Heathcote A, Eidels A, Houpt J, Colman J, Watson J and Strayer D (2014) Multi-tasking in working memory. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 32nd annual conference of the cognitive science society, Quebec City, Canada.Google Scholar
  17. Lieberman MD and Rosenthal R (2001) Why introverts can’t always tell who likes them: multitasking and nonverbal decoding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 80(2), 294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Marien H, Aarts H and Custers R (2012) Being flexible or rigid in goal-directed behavior: when positive affect implicitly motivates the pursuit of goals or means. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 48(1), 277–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Marulanda-Carter L and Jackson TW (2012) Effects of e-mail addiction and interruptions on employees. Journal of Systems and Information Technology 14(1), 82–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mosbergen D (2013) More than 60 percent of British women check their phones during sex: Survey. [WWW document] http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/24/phones-during-sex-british-survey_n_3640820.html (accessed 5 September 2015).
  21. Ophir E, Nass C and Wagner AD (2009) Cognitive control in media multitaskers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106(37), 15583–15587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Perlow LA (1999) The time famine: toward a sociology of work time. Administrative Science Quarterly 44(1), 57–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Perlow LA and Porter JL (2009) Making time off predictable – and required. Harvard Business Review 87(10), 102–109, 142.Google Scholar
  24. PM has ‘no recollection’ of texting in front of Queen (2009) [WWW document] http://www.stuff.co.nz/141907/PM-has-no-recollection-of-texting-in-front-of-Queen (accessed 5 September 2015).
  25. Reinsch NL, Turner JW and Tinsley CH (2008) Multicommunicating: a practice whose time has come? Academy of Management Review 33(2), 391–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rennecker J and Godwin L (2005) Delays and interruptions: a self-perpetuating paradox of communication technology use. Information and Organization 15(3), 247–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rohrer D and Pashler HE (2003) Concurrent task effects on memory retrieval. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 10(1), 96–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Stephens KK (2012) Multiple conversations during organizational meetings development of the multicommunicating scale. Management Communication Quarterly 26(2), 195–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Strayer DL and Watson JM (2012) Supertaskers and the multitasking brain. Scientific American Mind 23(1), 22–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Su NM and Mark G (2008) Communication chains and multitasking. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Florence, Italy.Google Scholar
  31. Te’eni D (2009) Comment: the wiki way in a hurry – the ICIS anecdote. MIS Quarterly 33(1), 20–22.Google Scholar
  32. The problem of cell phone distracted driving [WWW document] http://www.nsc.org/learn/NSC-Initiatives/Pages/distracted-driving-problem-of-cell-phone-distracted-driving.aspx (accessed 5 September 2015).
  33. Turner JW and Reinsch NL (2007) The business communicator as presence allocator: multicommunicating, equivocality, and status at work. Journal of Business Communication 44(1), 36–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wajcman J and Rose E (2011) Constant connectivity: rethinking interruptions at work. Organization Studies 32(7), 941–961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wallis C, Steptoe S and Cole W (2006) Help! I’ve lost my focus. Time Magazine 167(2), 47–53.Google Scholar
  36. Wasson C (2004) Multitasking during virtual meetings. People and Strategy 27(4), 47.Google Scholar
  37. Watson JM and Strayer DL (2010) Supertaskers: profiles in extraordinary multitasking ability. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 17(4), 479–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Webster J (1993) From the word processor to the micro: gender issues in the development of information technology in the office. In Gendered by Design? Information Technology and Office Systems (Green E, Owen J and Pain D, Eds), Taylor & Francis, Washington DC.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The OR Society 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ann-Frances Cameron
    • 1
  • Jane Webster
    • 2
  • Henri Barki
    • 1
  • Ana Ortiz de Guinea
    • 1
  1. 1.HEC MontréalMontréalCanada
  2. 2.Queen’s UniversityKingstonCanada

Personalised recommendations