European Journal of Information Systems

, Volume 21, Issue 5, pp 512–528 | Cite as

The benefits and dangers of enjoyment with social networking websites

Research Article

Abstract

Information Systems enjoyment has been identified as a desirable phenomenon, because it can drive various aspects of system use. In this study, we argue that it can also be a key ingredient in the formation of adverse outcomes, such as technology-related addictions, through the positive reinforcement it generates. We rely on several theoretical mechanisms and, consistent with previous studies, suggest that enjoyment can lead to presumably positive outcomes, such as high engagement. Nevertheless, it can also facilitate the development of a strong habit and reinforce it until it becomes a ‘bad habit’, that can help forming a strong pathological and maladaptive psychological dependency on the use of the IT artifact (i.e., technology addiction). We test and validate this dual effect of enjoyment, with a data set of 194 social networking website users analyzed with SEM techniques. The potential duality of MIS constructs and other implications for research and practice are discussed.

Keywords

enjoyment habit high engagement technology addiction social networking websites Facebook 

References

  1. Aboujaoude E (2010) Problematic internet use: an overview. World Psychiatry 9 (2), 85–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agarwal R and Karahanna E (2000) Time flies when you’re having fun: cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly 24 (4), 665–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Agarwal R and Prasad J (1998) A conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology. Information Systems Research 9 (2), 204–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ajzen I (2002) Residual effects of past on later behavior: habituation and reasoned action perspectives. Personality and Social Psychology Review 6 (2), 107–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson JC and Gerbing DW (1988) Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin 103 (3), 411–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Astin AW (1962) Bad habits and social deviation: a proposed revision in conflict theory. Journal of Clinical Psychology 18 (2), 227–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bayraktar F and Gün Z (2007) Incidence and correlates of internet usage among adolescents in North Cyprus. CyberPsychology & Behavior 10 (2), 191–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beard KW and Wolf EM (2001) Modification in the proposed diagnostic criteria for internet addiction. Cyberpsychology & Behavior 4 (3), 377–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Becker GS and Murphy KM (1988) A theory of rational addiction. Journal of Political Economy 96 (4), 675–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Beranuy M, Oberst U, Carbonell X and Chamarro A (2009) Problematic internet and mobile phone use and clinical symptoms in college students: the role of emotional intelligence. Computers in Human Behavior 25 (5), 1182–1187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bhattacherjee A, Perols J and Sanford C (2008) Information technology continuance: a theoretic extension and empirical test. Journal of Computer Information Systems 49 (1), 17–26.Google Scholar
  12. Billieux J, van der Linden M and Rochat L (2008) The role of impulsivity in actual and problematic use of the mobile phone. Applied Cognitive Psychology 22 (9), 1195–1210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Block JJ (2008) Issues for DSMV: internet addiction. American Journal of Psychiatry 165 (3), 306–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bourdeau L, Chebat J-C and Couturier C (2002) Internet consumer value of university students: e-mail-vs.-web users. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 9 (2), 61–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brown RIF (1997) A theoretical model of the behavioural addictions – applied to offending. In Addicted to Crime (Hodge JE, McMurran M and Hollin CR, Eds), pp 13–66, Wiley, Chichester, UK.Google Scholar
  16. Bruner O and Bruner K (2006) Playstation Nation: Protect Your Child From Game Addiction. Center Street, Hachette Book Group, NY.Google Scholar
  17. Byun S, Ruffini C, Mills JE, Douglas AC, Niang M, Stepchenkova S, Lee SK, Loutfi J, Lee JK, Atallah M and Blanton M (2009) Internet addiction: metasynthesis of 1996–2006 quantitative research. Cyberpsychology & Behavior 12 (2), 203–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Caplan SE (2005) A social skill account of problematic internet use. Journal of Communication 55 (4), 721–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Carter BL and Tiffany ST (1999) Meta-analysis of cue-reactivity in addiction research. Addiction 94 (3), 327–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cavaglion G (2009) Cyber-porn dependence: voices of distress in an Italian internet self-help community. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction 7 (2), 295–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cavaglion G and Rashty E (2010) Narratives of suffering among Italian female partners of cybersex and cyber-porn dependents. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity 17 (4), 270–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Charlton JP (2002) A factor-analytic investigation of computer ‘addiction’ and engagement. British Psychological Society 93 (3), 329–344.Google Scholar
  23. Charlton JP and Birkett PE (1999) An integrative model of factors related to computing course performance. Journal of Educational Computing Research 20 (3), 237–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Charlton JP and Danforth IDW (2007) Distinguishing addiction and high engagement in the context of online game playing. Computers in Human Behavior 23 (3), 1531–1548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Charlton JP and Danforth IDW (2010) Validating the distinction between computer addiction and engagement: online game playing and personality. Behaviour & Information Technology 29 (6), 601–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Chou C, Condron L and Belland JC (2005) A review of the research on internet addiction. Educational Psychology Review 17 (4), 363–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Chou C and Hsiao M (2000) Internet addiction, usage, gratification, and pleasure experience: the Taiwan college students’ case. Computers & Education 35 (1), 65–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Chou TJ and Ting CC (2003) The role of flow experience in cyber-game addiction. Cyberpsychology & Behavior 6 (6), 663–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Crowne DP and Marlowe D (1960) A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology 24 (4), 349–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Csikszentmihalyi M (1990) Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Harper & Row, New York.Google Scholar
  31. Cyr D, Head M and Ivanov A (2006) Design aesthetics leading to m-loyalty in mobile commerce. Information & Management 43 (8), 950–963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Daneback K, Cooper A and Mansson S-A (2005) An internet study of cybersex participants. Archives of Sexual Behavior 34 (3), 321–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Davis FD, Bagozzi RP and Warshaw PR (1992) Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 22 (14), 1111–1132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Davis RA (2001) A cognitive-behavioral model of pathological internet use. Computers in Human Behavior 17 (2), 141–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Davis RA, Flett GL and Besser A (2002) Validation of a new scale for measuring problematic internet use: implications for pre-employment screening. Cyberpsychology & Behavior 5 (4), 331–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. de Charms R (1968) Personal Causation: The Internal Affective Determinants of Behavior. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  37. de Guinea AO and Markus ML (2009) Why break the habit of a lifetime? Rethinking the roles of intention, habit, and emotion in continuing information technology use. MIS Quarterly 33 (3), 433–444.Google Scholar
  38. Dickson LM, Derevensky JL and Gupta R (2002) The prevention of gambling problems in youth: a conceptual framework. J Gambl Stud 18 (2), 97–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Dimmick J, Kline S and Stafford L (2000) The gratification niches of personal e-mail and telephone. Communication Research 27 (2), 227–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Dishman RK, Motl RW, Sallis JF, Dunn AL, Birnbaum AS, Welk GJ, Bedimo-Rung AL, Voorhees CC and Jobe JB (2005) Self-management strategies mediate self-efficacy and physical activity. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 29 (1), 10–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Echeburua E and de Corral P (2010) Addiction to new technologies and to online social networking in young people: a new challenge. Adicciones 22 (21), 91–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Faber RJ and O’Guinn TC (1992) A clinical screener for compulsive buying. Journal of Consumer Research 19 (3), 459–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Fenichel M (2011) Online behavior, communication, and experience. In Online Counseling (Kraus R, Stricker G and Speyer C, Eds) 2nd edn, pp 3–20, Academic Press, San Diego.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ferraro G, Caci B, D’Amico A and Di Blasi M (2007) Internet addiction disorder: an Italian study. Cyberpsychology & Behavior 10 (2), 170–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ghassemzadeh L, Shahraray M and Moradi A (2008) Prevalence of internet addiction and comparison of internet addicts and non-addicts in Iranian high schools. Cyberpsychology & Behavior: The Impact of the Internet, Multimedia and Virtual Reality on Behavior and Society 11 (6), 731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Glasser W (1976) Positive Addiction. Harper & Row, New York.Google Scholar
  47. Griffiths M (2000) Internet addiction – time to be taken seriously? Addiction Research & Theory 8 (5), 413–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Griffiths M, Parke J, Wood R and Rigbye J (2010) Online poker gambling in university students: further findings from an online survey. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction 8 (1), 82–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Griffiths M and Wood R (2000) Risk factors in adolescence: the case of gambling, videogame playing, and the internet. Journal of Gambling Studies 16 (2–3), 199–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Griffiths MD and Hunt N (1998) Dependence on computer games by adolescents. Psychological Reports 82 (2), 475–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Griffiths MD and Parke J (2002) The social impact of internet gambling. Social Science Computer Review 20 (3), 312–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hamann S (2001) Cognitive and neural mechanisms of emotional memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5 (9), 394–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Han DH, Bolo N, Daniels MA, Arenella L, Lyoo IK and Renshaw PF (2011) Brain activity and desire for internet video game play. Comprehensive Psychiatry 52 (1), 88–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Han DH, Kim YS, Lee YS, Min KJ and Renshaw PF (2010) Changes in cue-induced, prefrontal cortex activity with video-game play. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 13 (6), 655–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Herschlag M and Zwick R (2002) Internet auctions – popular and professional literature review. Quarterly Journal of Electronic Commerce 1 (2), 161–186.Google Scholar
  56. Hollender MH (1980) Alcoholism: disease or bad habit. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 41 (6), 185–185.Google Scholar
  57. Hu LT and Bentler PM (1999) Cut off criteria of fit indices in co-variance structure analysis; conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling 6 (1), 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Huang H and Leung L (2009) Instant messaging addiction among teenagers in China: shyness, alienation, and academic performance decrement. CyberPsychology & Behavior 12 (6), 675–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Hussain Z and Griffiths M (2009) Excessive use of massively multi-player online role-playing games: a pilot study. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction 7 (4), 563–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Iacovelli A and Valenti S (2009) Internet addiction's effect on likeability and rapport. Computers in Human Behavior 25 (2), 439–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Igbaria M, Schiffman SJ and Wieckowski TJ (1994) The respective roles of perceived usefulness and perceived fun in the acceptance of microcomputer technology. Behaviour and Information Technology 13 (6), 349–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Jenaro C, Flores N, Gómez-Vela M, González-Gil F and Caballo C (2007) Problematic internet and cell-phone use: psychological, behavioral, and health correlates. Addiction Research & Theory 15 (3), 309–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Kakabadse N, Porter G and Vance D (2007) Addicted to technology. Business Strategy Review 18 (4), 81–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Karaiskos D, Tzavellas E, Balta G and Paparrigopoulos T (2010) P02-232 – social network addiction: a new clinical disorder? European Psychiatry 25 (Supplement 1), 855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Khalifa M and Liu V (2007) Online consumer retention: contingent effects of online shopping habit and online shopping experience. European Journal of Information Systems 16 (6), 780–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Kim SS (2009) The integrative framework of technology use: an extension and test. MIS Quarterly 33 (3), 513–537.Google Scholar
  67. Ko C-H, Liu G-C, Hsiao S, Yen J-Y, Yang M-J, Lin W-C, Yen C-F and Chen C-S (2009) Brain activities associated with gaming urge of online gaming addiction. Journal of Psychiatric Research 43 (7), 739–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. La Barbera D, La Paglia F and Valsavoia R (2009) Social network and addiction. Cyberpsychology & Behavior 12 (5), 628–629.Google Scholar
  69. Langer EJ (1992) Matters of mind: mindfulness/mindlessness in perspective. Consciousness and Cognition 1 (3), 289–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. LaRose R (2010) The problem of media habits. Communication Theory 20 (2), 194–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. LaRose R, Kim J and Peng W (2010) Addictive, compulsive, problematic, or just another media habit? In A Netwroked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites (Papacharissi Z, Ed), pp 59–81, Routledge, Hoboken, NJ.Google Scholar
  72. LaRose R, Lin CA and Eastin MS (2003) Unregulated internet usage: addiction, habit, or deficient self-regulation? Media Psychology 5 (3), 225–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Limayem M and Cheung CMK (2011) Predicting the continued use of internet-based learning technologies: the role of habit. Behaviour & Information Technology 30 (1), 91–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Limayem M, Hirt SG and Cheung CMK (2007) How habit limits the predictive power of intention: the case of information systems continuance. MIS Quarterly 31 (4), 705–737.Google Scholar
  75. Lindell MK and Whitney DJ (2001) Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology 86 (1), 114–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Marlatt GA, Baer JS, Donovan DM and Kivlahan DR (1988) Addictive behaviors: etiology and treatment. Annual Review of Psychology 39 (1), 223–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Matthews N, Farnsworth B and Griffiths MD (2009) A pilot study of problem gambling among student online gamblers: mood states as predictors of problematic behavior. CyberPsychology & Behavior 12 (6), 741–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. McBride J and Derevensky J (2009) Internet gambling behavior in a sample of online gamblers. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction 7 (1), 149–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. McDaniel SR (2002) Investigating the roles of gambling interest and impulsive sensation seeking on consumer enjoyment of promotional games. Social Behavior and Personality 30 (1), 53–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Morahan-Martin J and Schumacher P (2000) Incidence and correlates of pathological internet use among college students. Computers in Human Behavior 16 (1), 13–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Morasco BJ, Weinstock J, Ledgerwood DM and Petry NM (2007) Psychological factors that promote and inhibit pathological gambling. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice 14 (2), 208–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. MSNBC Digital Network (2010) Judge: video game addiction suit can go on. [WWW document] http://www.Msnbc.Msn.Com/id/38890853/ns/us_news-crime_and_courts/ (accessed 24 August 2011).
  83. Neal DT, Wood W and Quinn JM (2006) Habits? A repeat performance. Current Directions in Psychological Science 15 (4), 198–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Niemz K, Griffiths M and Banyard P (2005) Prevalence of pathological internet use among university students and correlations with self-esteem, the general health questionnaire (GHQ), and disinhibition. CyberPsychology & Behavior 8 (6), 562–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Orbell S, Blair C, Sherlock K and Conner M (2001) The theory of planned behavior and ecstasy use: roles for habit and perceived control over taking versus obtaining substances. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 31 (1), 31–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Orbell S and Verplanken B (2010) The automatic component of habit in health behavior: habit as cue-contingent automaticity. Health Psychology 29 (4), 374–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Ouellette JA and Wood W (1998) Habit and intention in everyday life: the multiple processes by which past behavior predicts future behavior. Psychological Bulletin 124 (1), 54–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Pahnila S and Warsta J (2010) Online shopping viewed from a habit and value perspective. Behaviour & Information Technology 29 (6), 621–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Pavlou PA, Liang HG and Xue YJ (2007) Understanding and mitigating uncertainty in online exchange relationships: a principal-agent perspective. MIS Quarterly 31 (1), 105–136.Google Scholar
  90. Pempek TA, Yermolayeva YA and Calvert SL (2009) College students’ social networking experiences on Facebook. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 30 (3), 227–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Peters C and Bodkin CD (2007) An exploratory investigation of problematic online auction behaviors: experiences of eBay users. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 14 (1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Platt JJ (1986) Heroin Addiction: Theory, Research, and Treatment. Robert E. Kreiger, Malabar, FL.Google Scholar
  93. Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee J-Y and Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavior research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology 88 (5), 879–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Reddy S (2008) A disorder by any other name: excessive computer game playing. Virtual Mentor 10 (1), 30–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Reynolds WM (1982) Development of reliable and valid short forms of the Marlowe-Crowne social desirability scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology 38 (1), 119–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Ridgway NM, Kukar-Kinney M and Monroe KB (2008) An expanded conceptualization and a new measure of compulsive buying. Journal of Consumer Research 35 (4), 622–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Robinson TE and Berridge KC (1993) The neural basis of drug craving. An incentive-sensitization theory of addiction. Brain Research Reviews 18 (3), 247–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Robinson TE and Berridge KC (2001) Incentive-sensitization and addiction. Addiction 96 (1), 103–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Robinson TE and Berridge KC (2003) Addiction. Annual Review of Psychology 54 (1), 25–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Schwartz MF and Southern S (2000) Compulsive cybersex: the new tea room. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity 7 (1&2), 127–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Schwarz A and Chin W (2007) Looking forward: toward an understanding of the nature and definition of IT acceptance. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 8 (4), 230–243.Google Scholar
  102. Sharma R, Yetton P and Crawford J (2009) Estimating the effect of common method variance: The method-method pair technique with an illustration from tam research. MIS Quarterly 33 (3), 473–490.Google Scholar
  103. Sharot T and Phelps EA (2004) How arousal modulates memory: disentangling the effects of attention and retention. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 4 (3), 294–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Sheldon KM, Abad N and Hinsch C (2011) Two-process view of Facebook use and relatedness need-satisfaction: disconnection drives use, and connection rewards it. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 100 (4), 766–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Skoric MM, Teo LLC and Neo RL (2009) Children and video games: addiction, engagement, and scholastic achievement. CyberPsychology & Behavior 12 (5), 567–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Thong JYL, Hong S-J and Tam KY (2006) The effects of post-adoption beliefs on the expectation-confirmation model for information technology continuance. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 64 (9), 799–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Toobin J (2003) It's hard to prove video game caused shootings. Law center on the scene. [WWW document] http://www.Cnn.Com/2003/law/10/23/otsc.Toobin/ (accessed 24 August 2011).
  108. Turel O and Serenko A (2010) Is mobile email addiction overlooked? Communications of the ACM 53 (5), 41–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Turel O, Serenko A and Bontis N (2007) User acceptance of wireless short messaging services: deconstructing perceived value. Information & Management 44 (1), 63–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Turel O, Serenko A and Bontis N (2010) User acceptance of hedonic digital artifacts: a theory of consumption values perspective. Information & Management 47 (1), 53–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Turel O, Serenko A and Bontis N (2011a) Family and work-related consequences of addiction to organizational pervasive technologies. Information & Management 48 (2–3), 88–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Turel O, Serenko A and Giles P (2011b) Integrating technology addiction and use: an empirical investigation of online auction users. MIS Quarterly 35 (4), 1043–1061.Google Scholar
  113. van der Heijden H (2003) Factors influencing the usage of websites: the case of a generic portal in the Netherlands. Information & Management 40 (6), 541–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. van der Heijden H (2004) User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Quarterly 28 (4), 695–704.Google Scholar
  115. Venkatesh V (2000) Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research 11 (4), 342–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Venkatesh V, Brown SA, Maruping LM and Bala H (2008) Predicting different conceptualizations of system use: the competing roles of behavioral intention, facilitating conditions, and behavioral expectation. MIS Quarterly 32 (3), 483–502.Google Scholar
  117. Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB and Davis F (2003) User acceptance of information technology: towards a unified view. MIS Quarterly 27 (3), 425–478.Google Scholar
  118. Verdejo-García A, Bechara A, Recknor EC and Pérez-García M (2006) Executive dysfunction in substance dependent individuals during drug use and abstinence: an examination of the behavioral, cognitive and emotional correlates of addiction. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 12 (3), 405–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Verplanken B and Aarts H (1999) Habit, attitude, and planned behaviour: is habit an empty construct or an interesting case of goal-directed automaticity? European Review of Social Psychology 10 (1), 101–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Verplanken B, Aarts HAG and van Knippenberg A (1997) Habit, information acquisition, and the process of making travel mode choices. European Journal of Social Psychology 27 (5), 331–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Verplanken B and Orbell S (2003) Reflections on past behavior: a self-report index of habit strength. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 33 (6), 1313–1330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Wan CS and Chiou WB (2006) Psychological motives and online games addiction: a test of flow theory and humanistic needs theory for Taiwanese adolescents. Cyberpsychology & Behavior 9 (3), 317–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Webster J, Trevino LK and Ryan L (1993) The dimensionality and correlates of flow in human-computer interactions. Computers in Human Behavior 9 (4), 411–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Whang LSM, Lee S and Chang G (2003) Internet over-users’ psychological profiles: a behavior sampling analysis on internet addiction. Cyberpsychology & Behavior 6 (2), 143–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Williams ML and Podsakoff PM (1992) Effects of group-level and individual-level variation in leader behaviours on subordinate attitudes and performance. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology 65 (2), 115–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Wohl MJA, Young MM and Hart KE (2007) Self-perceptions of dispositional luck: relationship to DSM gambling symptoms, subjective enjoyment of gambling and treatment readiness. Substance Use & Misuse 42 (1), 43–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Wood RT and Williams RJ (2007) Problem gambling on the internet: implications for internet gambling policy in North America. New Media & Society 9 (3), 520–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Wood W, Quinn JM and Kashy DA (2002) Habits in everyday life: thought, emotion, and action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 83 (6), 1281–1297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Xu Z, Turel O and Yuan Y (2011) Online game addiction among adolescents: motivation and prevention factors. European Journal of Information Systems advance online publication, 29 November 2011; 10.1057/ejis.2011.56.Google Scholar
  130. Yang SC and Tung C-J (2007) Comparison of internet addicts and non-addicts in Taiwanese high school. Computers in Human Behavior 23 (1), 79–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Young K (1998a) Caught in the Net: How to Recognize the Signs of Internet Addiction – and a Winning Strategy for Recovery. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  132. Young K (1998b) Internet addiction: the emergence of a new clinical disorder. CyberPsychology & Behavior 1 (3), 237–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Young K (2010a) Internet addiction over the decade: a personal look back. World Psychiatry 9 (2), 91–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Young K (2010b) Understanding Gaming Addiction. Center for Internet Addiction Recovery, Bradford, PA, pp 1–30.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Operational Research Society 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Steven G. Mihaylo College of Business and Economics, California State UniversityFullertonU.S.A.
  2. 2.Faculty of Business Administration, Lakehead UniversityOntarioCanada

Personalised recommendations