European Journal of Information Systems

, Volume 19, Issue 6, pp 668–686 | Cite as

Effects of visual and textual information in online product presentations: looking for the best combination in website design

  • Carlos Flavián Blanco
  • Raquel Gurrea Sarasa
  • Carlos Orús Sanclemente
Original Article


Online product presentation constitutes a key challenge for marketers and designers who want to satisfy consumers’ needs. Visual and textual product information affect recognition and knowledge about the product. This research examines whether the presence (vs absence) of a product image and textual information in a schematic mode (vs paragraph mode) affect users’ recall and perceptions of the quality of the electronic products’ information. The moderating role of user's familiarity with the website and product also may play a role; the evolution of these variables likely will determine trends in e-commerce research. The results show that a schematic display of textual information improves perceptions of information quality. When a picture of the product appears together with textual information, users remember more information and consider it easier to remember if that information appears schematically. However, without a product picture, users allocate more resources to process paragraph information and therefore recall more information and perceive it as easier to recall. The degrees of familiarity also have important directional effects on these relationships.


product presentation visual information textual information information quality recall user familiarity 


  1. Agarwal R and Venkatesh V (2002) Assessing a firm's web presence: a heuristic evaluation procedure for the measurement of usability. Information Systems Research 13 (2), 168–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahn T, Ryu S and Han I (2007) The impact of web quality and playfulness on user acceptance of online retailing. Information and Management 44, 263–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aladwani AM and Palvia PC (2002) Developing and validating an instrument for measuring user-perceived web quality. Information and Management 39, 467–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alba J, Lynch J, Weitz B, Janiszawski C, Lutz R, Sawyer A and Wood S (1997) Interactive home shopping: consumer, retailer, and manufacturer incentives to participate in electronic marketplaces. Journal of Marketing 61 (3), 38–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Alba JW and Cooke ADJ (2004) When absence begets inference in conjoint analysis. Journal of Marketing Research 41 (4), 382–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Alba JW and Hutchinson JW (1987) Dimensions of consumer expertise. Journal of Consumer Research 13, 411–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Anderson JC and Gerbing DW (1988) Structural equation modelling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin 103, 411–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bagozzi RP (1994) Structural equation model in marketing research: basic principles. In Principles of Marketing Research (BAGOZZI RP, Ed.), pp 317–385, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  9. Benbunan-Fich R (2001) Using protocol analysis to evaluate the usability of a commercial web site. Information and Management 39, 151–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Berens G, Van Riel CBM and Van Bruggen GH (2005) Corporate associations and consumer product responses: the moderating role of corporate brand dominance. Journal of Marketing 69 (July), 35–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bettman JR (1979) An Information Processing Theory of Consumer Choice. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.Google Scholar
  12. Bettman JR and Park CW (1980) Effects of prior knowledge and experience and phase of the choice process on consumer decision processes. A protocol analysis. Journal of Consumer Research 7, 234–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Broemer P (2001) Ease of recall moderates the impact of relationship-related goals on judgments of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 37, 261–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Caruso EM (2008) Use of experienced retrieval ease in self and social judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 44 (1), 148–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Casaló L, FlaviÁn C and Guinalíu M (2008) The role of perceived usability, reputation, satisfaction and consumer familiarity on the website loyalty formation process. Computers in Human Behavior 24 (2), 325–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chau PYK, Au G and Tam KY (2000) Impact of information presentation modes on online shopping: an empirical evaluation of a broadband interactive shopping service. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce 10 (1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Childers TL, Carr CL, Peck J and Carson S (2001) Hedonic and utilitarian motivations for online retail shopping behaviour. Journal of Retailing 77, 511–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Childers TL and Viswanathan M (2000) Representation of numerical and verbal product information in consumer memory. Journal of Business Research 47, 109–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Churchill GA (1979) A paradigm for developing better measures for marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research 16 (1), 64–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cordell VV (1997) Consumer knowledge measures as predictors in product evaluation. Psychology and Marketing 14 (3), 241–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cronbach LJ (1970) Essentials of Psychological Testing. Harper and Row, New York.Google Scholar
  22. Drossos D, Giaglis GM, Lekakos G, Kokkinaki F and Stavraki MG (2007) Determinants of effective sms advertising: an experimental study. Journal of Interactive Advertising 7 (2), 16–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Engel JF, Blackwell RD and Miniard PW (1995) Consumer Behavior. International Edition. The Dyrden Press, Orlando.Google Scholar
  24. Eroglu SA, Machleit KA and Davis LM (2001) Atmospheric qualities of online retailing: a conceptual model and implications. Journal of Business Research, Special Issue on Retail Strategy and Consumer Decision Research 54 (2), 177–184.Google Scholar
  25. European Interactive Advertising Association – EIAA (2008) Europe online 2007. [WWW document]
  26. Everard A and Galletta DF (2003) Effect of presentation flaws on users’ perception of quality of on-line stores’ web sites: is it perception that really counts? In Proceedings of the Second Annual Workshop on HCI Research in MIS (SCHOOL OF INFORMATION STUDIES, SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY, Ed.), Seattle WA, United States.Google Scholar
  27. Flavián C, Guinalíu M and Gurrea R (2006) The role played by perceived usability, satisfaction and consumer trust on website loyalty. Information & Management 43, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Flavián C and Gurrea R (2008) Reading newspapers on the Internet: the influence of web sites’ attributes. Internet Research 18 (1), 26–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Frambach RT, Roest HCA and Krishnan TV (2007) The impact of consumer internet experience on channel preference and usage intentions across the different stages of the buying process. Journal of Interactive Marketing 21 (2), 26–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Galletta DF, Henry RM, McCoy S and Polak P (2006) When the wait isn’t so bad: the interacting effects of website delay, familiarity, and breadth. Information Systems Research 17 (1), 20–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gefen D (2000) E-commerce: the role of familiarity and trust. OMEGA: The International Journal of Management Science 28, 725–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gefen D and Straub DW (2004) Consumer trust in B2C e-commerce and the importance of social presence: experiments in e-products and e-services. OMEGA: The International Journal of Management Science 32, 407–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Geyskens I, Steenkamp JBEM and Kumar N (1999) A meta-analysis of satisfaction in marketing channel relationships. Journal of Marketing Research 36 (May), 223–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Griffith DA (2001) An examination of the influences of store layout in online retailing. Journal of Business Research 58, 1391–1396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Griffith DA, Krampf RF and Palmer JW (2001) The role of interface in electronic commerce: consumer involvement with print versus on-line catalogs. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 5 (4), 135–153.Google Scholar
  36. Gursoy D (2001) Development of a traveler's information search behavior model. Ph.D. Thesis, Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University [WWW document]
  37. Hair JFJR, Anderson RE, Tatham RL and Black WC (1998) Multivariate Data Analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
  38. Helander MG and Khalid HM (2000) Modeling the customer in electronic commerce. Applied Ergonomics 31, 609–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ho CI and Lee YL (2002) The development of an e-travel service quality scale. Tourism Management 28, 1434–1449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hodkinson C and Kiel G (2003) Understanding web information search behavior: an exploratory model. Journal of End User Computing 15 (4), 27–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hoffman DL and Novak TP (1996) Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments: conceptual foundations. Journal of Marketing 60 (July), 50–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hoque AY and Lohse GL (1999) An information search cost perspective for designing interfaces for electronic commerce. Journal of Marketing Research 36 (3), 387–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hong W, Thong JYL and Tam KY (2004) Designing product listing pages on e-commerce websites: an examination of presentation mode and information format. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 61, 481–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Huang P, Lurie NH and Mitra S (2009) Searching for experience on the web: an empirical examination of consumer behavior for search and experience goods. Journal of Marketing 73 (2), 55–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Huizingh EKRE (2000) The content and design of web sites: an empirical study. Information and Management 37, 123–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Jahng J, Jain H and Ramamurthy K (2002) Personality traits and effectiveness of product information in e-business systems. European Journal of Information Systems 11, 181–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Jahng J, Jain H and Ramamurthy K (2007) Effects of interaction richness on consumer attitudes and behavioral intentions in e-commerce: some experimental results. European Journal of Information Systems 16, 254–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Jarvenpaa SL and Dickson GW (1988) Graphics and managerial decision making: research-based guidelines. Communications of the ACM 31 (6), 764–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Jarvenpaa SL and Todd PA (1997) Consumer reactions to electronic shopping on the World Wide Web. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 1 (2), 59–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Johnson MD, Herrmann A and Bauer HH (1999) The effects of price bundling on consumer evaluations of product offerings. International Journal of Research in Marketing 16 (2), 129–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kaltcheva VD and Weitz BA (2006) When should a retailer create an exciting store environment? Journal of Marketing 70 (January), 107–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Keeker K (1997) Improving web site usability and appeal. [WWW document]
  53. Khakimdjanova L and Park J (2005) Online visual merchandising practice of apparel e-merchants. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 12, 307–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kim DJ, Ferrin DL and Rao HR (2008) A trust-based consumer decision-making model in electronic commerce: the role of trust, perceived risk, and their antecedents. Decision Support Systems 44, 544–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Kim EB and Eom SB (2002) Designing effective cyber store user interface. Industrial Management and Data Systems 102 (5), 241–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Kim M and Lennon S (2008) The effects of visual and verbal information on attitudes and purchase intentions in internet shopping. Psychology and Marketing 25 (2), 146–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Kim S and Stoel L (2004) Apparel retailers: website quality dimensions and satisfaction. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 11 (2), 109–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lee J, Lee HS and Wang P (2004) An interactive visual interface for online product catalogs. Electronic Commerce Research 4, 335–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Lee W and Benbasat I (2003) Designing an electronic commerce interface: attention and product memory as elicited by web design. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 2, 240–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Lian JW and Lin TM (2008) Effects of consumer characteristics on their acceptance of online shopping: comparisons among different product types. Computers in Human Behavior 24, 48–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Liang TP and Lai HJ (2002) Effect of store design on consumer purchases: van empirical study of on-line bookstores. Information and Management 39, 431–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Lin JCC and Liu H (2000) Towards an understanding of the behavioural intention to use a web site. International Journal of Information Management 20, 197–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Liu C and Arnett K (2000) Exploring the factors associated with web site success in the context of electronic commerce. Information and Management 38, 23–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Liu SS and Stout PA (1987) Effects of message modality and appeal on advertising acceptance. Psychology & Marketing 4 (3), 167–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Lohse GL and Spiller P (1999) Internet retail store design: how the user interface influences traffic and sales. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 5 (2), [WWW document]
  66. Lurie NH and Mason C (2007) Visual representation: implications for decision making. Journal of Marketing 71 (1), 160–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Lynch J and Ariely D (2000) Wine online: search costs affect competition on price, quality and distribution. Marketing Science 38, 83–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Macinnis D and Price L (1987) The role of imagery in information processing: review and extension. Journal of Consumer Research 13, 473–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Mandel N and Johnson EJ (2002) When web pages influence choice: effects of visual primes on experts and novices. Journal of Consumer Research 29 (2), 235–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Martin BAS, Sherrard MJ and Wentzel D (2005) The role of sensation seeking and need for cognition on web-site evaluations: a resource-matching perspective. Psychology & Marketing 22 (2), 108–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Menon G and Raghubir P (2003) Ease-of-retrieval as an automatic input in judgments: a mere-accessibility framework? Journal of Consumer Research 30 (2), 230–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Miller GA (1956) The magical number seven: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychology Review 63, 81–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Miranda SM and Sauders CS (2003) The social construction of meaning: an alternative perspective on information sharing. Information Systems Research 14 (1), 83–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Mu E and Galletta DF (2007) The effects of the meaningfulness of salient brand and product-related text and graphics on web site recognition. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research 8 (2), 115–127.Google Scholar
  75. Muylle S, Moenaert R and Despontin M (2004) The conceptualization and empirical validation of web site user satisfaction. Information and Management 41 (5), 543–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Nunnally JC (1978) Psychometric Theory, 2nd edn, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  77. Nurosis MJ (1993) SPSS for Windows Base System Users Guide. Release 6.0 Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
  78. Ofir C, Raghubir P, Brosh G, Monroe KB and Heiman A (2008) Memory-based store price judgments: the role of knowledge and shopping experience. Journal of Retailing 84 (4), 414–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Paivio A (1986) Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  80. Park DH, Lee J and Han I (2007) The effect of on-line consumer reviews on consumer purchasing intention: the moderating role of involvement. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 11 (4), 125–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Park J, Lennon SJ and Stoel L (2005) Online product presentation: effects on mood, perceived risk, and purchase intention. Psychology and Marketing 22 (9), 695–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Pavlou PA and Stewart DW (2000) Measuring the effects and effectiveness of interactive advertising: a research agenda. Journal of Interactive Advertising 1 (1), 62–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Peracchio LA and Meyers-Levy J (1997) Evaluating persuasion-enhancing techniques from a resource-matching perspective. Journal of Consumer Research 24 (2), 178–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Peterson RA and Merino MC (2003) Consumer information search behavior and the Internet. Psychology & Marketing 20 (2), 99–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Petty RE and Cacioppo JT (1986) The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 19, 123–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Petty RE, Cacioppo JT and Schumann D (1983) Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: the moderating role of involvement. Journal of Consumer Research 10 (2), 135–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Ranganathan C and Ganapathy S (2002) Key dimensions of B2C websites. Information and Management 39, 457–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Ratneshwar SA, Shocker D and Stewart DW (1987) Toward understanding the attraction effect. The implications of product stimulus meaningfulness and familiarity. Journal of Consumer Research 13, 520–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Richard MO (2005) Modelling the impact of internet atmospherics on surfer behaviour. Journal of Business Research 58, 1632–1642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Robins D and Holmes J (2008) Aesthetics and credibility in web site design. Information Processing & Management 44, 386–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Sadoski M and Paivio A (2004) A dual coding theoretical model of reading. In Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading (RUDDELL RB and UNRAU NJ, Eds), 5th edn, pp 1329–1362, International Reading Association, Newark, DE.Google Scholar
  92. Sanjosé-Cabezudo R, Gutiérrez-Arranz AM and Gutiérrez-Cillán J (2009) The combined influence of central and peripheral routes in the online persuasion process. CyberPsychology & Behavior 12 (3), 299–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Schlosser AE (2003a) Computers as situational cues: implications for consumer product cognitions and attitudes. Journal of Consumer Psychology 13, 103–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Schlosser AE (2003b) Experiencing products in the virtual world: the role of goal and imagery in influencing attitudes versus purchase intentions. Journal of Consumer Research 30 (2), 184–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Schlosser AE, White TB and Lloyd SM (2006) Converting web site visitors into buyers: how web site investment increases consumer trusting beliefs and online purchase intentions. Journal of Marketing 70 (2), 133–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Schwarz N, Bless H, Strack F, Klumpp G, Rittenauer-Schatka H and Simons A (1991) Ease of retrieval as information: another look at the availability heuristic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 61, 195–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Singh SN, Dalal N and Spears N (2005) Understanding web home page perception. European Journal of Information Systems 14, 288–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Swaminathan V, Lepkowska-White E and Rao BP (1999) Browsers or buyers in cyberspace? An investigation of factors influencing electronic exchange. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 5 (December) [WWW document]
  99. Szymanski DM and Hise RT (2000) E-satisfaction: an initial examination. Journal of Retailing 76 (3), 309–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Tegarden DP (1999) Business information visualization. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 1 (4), [WWW document]
  101. Thorbjørnsen H, Supphellen M, Nysveen H and Pedersen PE (2002) Building brand relationships online: a comparison of two interactive applications. Journal of Interactive Marketing 16 (3), 17–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Värlander S (2007) Online information quality in experiential consumption: an exploratory study. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 14, 328–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Wan HA (2000) Opportunities to enhance a commercial website. Information and Management 38 (1), 15–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Wells JD, Fuerst WL and Palmer JW (2005) Designing consumer interfaces for experiential tasks: an empirical investigation. European Journal of Information Systems 14, 273–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Yang SC, Hung WC, Sung K and Farn CK (2006) Investigating initial trust toward e-tailers from the elaboration likelihood model perspective. Psychology & Marketing 23 (5), 429–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Zhou KZ and Nakamoto K (2007) How do enhanced and unique features affect new product preference? The moderating role of product familiarity. Journal of the Academy Marketing Science 35, 53–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Zviran M, Glezer C and Avni I (2006) User satisfaction from commercial web sites: the effect of design and use. Information and Management 43, 157–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Operational Research Society 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carlos Flavián Blanco
    • 1
  • Raquel Gurrea Sarasa
    • 1
  • Carlos Orús Sanclemente
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Economics and Business Studies, University of ZaragozaZaragozaSpain

Personalised recommendations