Advertisement

The European Journal of Development Research

, Volume 28, Issue 5, pp 826–846 | Cite as

Fungibility of Smallholder Agricultural Credit: Empirical Evidence from Pakistan

  • Abid Hussain
  • Gopal Bahadur Thapa
Original Article

Abstract

This study attempts to estimate credit fungibility (CF) and analyses its factors, using the primary data of 208 smallholders from Punjab province of Pakistan. Findings revealed that smallholders used a significant proportion of obtained credit on non-agricultural purposes. Among three groups of smallholders compared, that is, lower smallholders (⩽1.0 acre), middle smallholders (1.01–2.50 acres) and upper smallholders (2.51–5.00 acres), lower smallholders used nearly one-third of their obtained credit for non-agricultural purposes in spite of their highest dependency on credit to carry out their agricultural activities. In contrast, the other two groups of smallholders, whose dependency on credit was relatively low, had used a comparatively lower proportion of the credit for non-agricultural activities. The study also found that non-fixed assets and landholding size are the key factors of CF. Other factors such as non-farm income, household size, repayments of old loans, illiteracy and credit source also affected CF significantly, but with notable variations across the groups.

Keywords

credit fungibility smallholders agricultural credit food security Pakistan 

Abstract

Cette étude tente d’estimer la fongibilité du crédit (FC) et d’en analyser les facteurs, en utilisant les données primaires de 208 petits exploitants de la province du Pendjab au Pakistan. Les résultats ont révélé que les petits exploitants utilisent une part importante du crédit obtenu à des fins non-agricoles. Parmi les trois groupes de petits exploitants comparés, c’est-à-dire les petits exploitants inférieurs (⩽0,40 hectare), moyens (de 0,41 à 1,00 hectares) et supérieurs (de 1,01 à 2,0 hectares), les petits exploitants inférieurs ont utilisé près d’un tiers de leur crédit à des fins non-agricoles en dépit de leur plus forte dépendance sur crédit pour mener à bien leurs activités agricoles. Au contraire, les deux autres groupes de petits exploitants, dont la dépendance sur le crédit était relativement faible, ont utilisé une proportion du crédit relativement plus petite pour des activités non-agricoles. L’étude a également révélé que les actifs non-immobilisés et la taille des exploitations sont les facteurs clés de la fongibilité du crédit. D’autres facteurs tels que le revenu non agricole, la taille du ménage, les remboursements d’anciens prêts, l’analphabétisme et la source du crédit affectent égalementla fongibilité du crédit de manière significative, mais avec des variations notables entre les groupes.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to appreciate Higher Education Commission of Pakistan for providing funding support for this study. Immense cooperation was extended by smallholders, local contact persons, namely, Masood Tahir, Zahid Hussain Meo and Mehar Sarfraz Khan, Chaudhry Tanvir Talib and officials of the District Revenue Office and financial institutions officials during the entire period of field survey. The authors extend their sincere thanks to all of them.

References

  1. Abedullah, M.N., Khalid, M. and Kouser, S. (2009) Role of agriculture credit in the growth of livestock sector: A case study of Faisalabad. Pakistan Veterinary Journal 29(2): 81–84.Google Scholar
  2. ACO (2000) Census of Agriculture 2000. Agricultural Census Organization, Statistics Division, Government of Pakistan, Islamabad, Pakistan.Google Scholar
  3. ADB (2005) An Evaluation of Small-Scale Freshwater Rural Aquaculture Development for Poverty Reduction, Operation Evaluation Department. Manila, Philippines: Asian Development Bank.Google Scholar
  4. Akram, W. (2008) Constraint’s analysis of agricultural credit use: Implications for poverty reduction in Pakistan. A PhD dissertation, Department of Economics, University of Sargodha, Pakistan.Google Scholar
  5. Aromolaran, A.B. (2004) Household income, women’s income share and food calorie intake in south western Nigeria. Food Policy 29(5): 507–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beegle, K., Carletto, C. and Himelein, K. (2012) Relaibility of recall in agricultural data. Journal of Development Economics 98(1): 34–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brandt, P.T. and Schneider, C.J. (2004) So the reviewer told you to use a selection model? Selection models and the study of international relations. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, 15–18 April, University of Texas at Dallas, USA.Google Scholar
  8. Bushway, S., Johnson, B.D. and Slocum, L.A. (2007) Is the magic still there? The use of the Heckman two-step correction for selection bias in criminology. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 23(2): 151–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cohen, J. (1968) Integrating the real and financial via the linkage of financial flow. Journal of Finance 23(1): 2–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cohen, J. (1970) Direct versus indirect controls as instruments of monetary policy. Quarterly Review of Economics and Business 10(3): 25–34.Google Scholar
  11. Cole, S. (2009) Fixing market failure or fixing elections? Agricultural credit in India. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 1(1): 219–250.Google Scholar
  12. DOIP (2009) Pre-investment Study on Toba Tek Singh District 2009. Lahore, Pakistan: Directorate of Industries Punjab, Lahore, Government of Punjab.Google Scholar
  13. Ellis, F. (1993) Peasant Economics: Farm Households in Agrarian Development. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Ellis, F. (1992) Agriculture Policies in Developing Countries Book Chapter No. 7, Credit Policy, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 152–174.Google Scholar
  15. Feder, G., Lau, L.J., Lin, J.Y. and Xiaopeng, L. (1989) Agricultural credit and farm performance in China. Journal of comparative Economics 13(4): 508–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Garrett, J.L. and Ruel, M.T. (1999) Are determinants of rural and urban food security and nutritional status different? Some insights from Mozambique. World Development 27(11): 1955–1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gibbs, M., Linder, R.K. and Fischer, A.J. (1986) Reliability of two survey techniques: A study of innovation discovery by farmers. The Statistician 35(4): 429–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. GOP-DOA (2009) Crop Reporting Service. Lahore, Pakistan: Directorate of Agriculture, Government of Punjab.Google Scholar
  19. Greene, W.H. (2003) Econometric Analysis. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, USA: Prentice Hall, Pearson Education, Inc.Google Scholar
  20. Heckman, J. (1976) The common structure of statistical models of truncation, sample selection and limited dependent variables and a simple estimator for such models. Annals of Economic and Social Measurement 5(4): 475–492.Google Scholar
  21. Heckman, J. (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47(1): 153–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hulme, D. (2000) Impact assessment methodologies for microfinance: Theory, experience and better practice. World Development 28(1): 79–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hussain, A. and Thapa, G.B. (2012) Smallholders’ access to agricultural credit in Pakistan. Food Security 4(1): 73–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hussain, A., Zulfiqar, F. and Saboor, A. (2014) Changing food patterns across the seasons in rural Pakistan: Analysis of food variety, dietary diversity and calorie intake. Ecology of food and nutrition 53(2): 119–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Irfan, M., Arif, G.M., Ali, M. and Nazli, H. (1999) The Structure of Informal Credit Market in Pakistan. PIDE. Research Report 168, Islamabad, Pakistan.Google Scholar
  26. Mahajan, V. and Ramola, B.G. (1996) Financial Services for the Rural Poor and Women in India: Access and Sustainability. Gender and Poverty (GAP) Team, Asia Technical Department’s Human Resources and Social Development Division (ASTHR)-India Department’s Agricultural Division (SA2AG).Google Scholar
  27. Malik, S.J. (1999) Poverty and Rural Credit: The Case of Pakistan. Islamabad, Pakistan: Pakistan Institute of Development Economics.Google Scholar
  28. Malik, S.J. and Nazli, H. (1999) Rural Poverty and Credit Use: Evidence from Pakistan. The Pakistan Development Review 38(4): 699–716.Google Scholar
  29. Meyer, R.L. (1990) Analyzing the farm level impact of agricultural credit: Discussion. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 72(5): 1158–1160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Moffitt, R. (1999) New developments in econometric methods for labor market analysis. In: O. Ashenfelter and D. Card (eds.) Handbook of Labor Economics 3(1999): 1367–1397Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  31. Moll, H.A.J., Staal, S.J. and Ibrahim, M.N.M. (2007) Smallholder dairy production and markets: A comparison of production systems in Zambia, Kenya and Sri Lanka. Agricultural Systems 94(2): 593–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Muhumuza, W. (1997) The interface between structural adjustment, poverty and state managed credit programmes in Uganda. Makerere Political Science Review 2.Google Scholar
  33. Niroula, S.G. and Thapa, G.B. (2005) Impact and causes of land fragmentation, and lessons learned from land consolidation in South Asia. Land Use Policy 22: 358–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Odedokun, M.O. (1996) International evidence on the effect of directed credit programmes on efficiency of resource allocation in developing countries: The case of development bank lending. Journal of Development Economics 48(2): 449–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Odoemenem, I.U., Alimba, J.O. and Ezike, K.N.N. (2008) Assessing capital resource mobilization and allocation efficiency of small scale cereal crop farmers in Benue State, Nigeria. Indian Journal of Science and Technology 1(5): 1–8.Google Scholar
  36. Pakistan Statistics Division (2006) Pakistan Statistical Year Book 2006. Islamabad, Pakistan: Federal Bureau of Statistics, Government of Pakistan.Google Scholar
  37. PBS (2012a) Methodology of Price Collection and Computing Price Indices. Islamabad, Pakistan: Pakistan Bureau of Statistics.Google Scholar
  38. PBS (2012b) Revision of Base of the Consumer Price Index (CPI) and Wholesale Prcie Index (WPI) from 2000-01 to 2007-08. Islamabad, Pakistan: Pakistan Bureau of Statistics.Google Scholar
  39. PCGI (2001) Agricultural Credit, Cooperation and Crop Insurance. Report on the Working Group for Formulation of the Tenth Five Year Plan (2002–2007), Planning Commission of India, New Delhi, India.Google Scholar
  40. PCO (1998) District Statistics of Toba Tek Singh. Population Census Organization, Statistics Division, Government of Pakistan, Islamabad, Pakistan.Google Scholar
  41. Pensupar, K. (2003) An assessment of the restructuring agricultural production system project (RAPS) in Det Udom district, Thailand. A PhD dissertation, School of Environment, Resources and Development, Asian Institute of Technology, Thailand.Google Scholar
  42. Qureshi, S.A., Nabi, I. and Faruqee, R.R. (1996) Rural Finance for Growthnand Poverty Alleviation in Pakistan. Washington DC: World Bank Policy. Research Working Paper 1593.Google Scholar
  43. Rahman, A. (1999) Micro-credit initiative for equitable and sustainable development: Who pays? World Development 27(1): 67–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ram, K.A., Tsunekawa, A., Sahad, D.K. and Miyazaki, T. (1999) Subdivision and fragmentation of land holdings and their implication in desertification in the Thar Desert, India. Journal of Arid Environments 41(4): 463–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Saddik, I. (1995) Credit and Investment in Egyptian Agriculture: Future Perspectives in the Light of the Economic Liberalization Policies. CIHEAM- Option Mediterraneennes, Ser. B/N09, 1995-Egyptionam Agriculture Profile, pp. 79–94, Paris, France.Google Scholar
  46. SBP (2004) State Bank of Pakistan: Evolution, functions, and organization. Arby, M.F. (ed.) State Bank of Pakistan-Printing Press, Karachi, Pakistan, http://www.sbp.org.pk/about/sbp_efo.pdf, accessed 12 January 2014.
  47. SBP (2005) Prudential Regulations for Agriculture Financing, Banking Policy and Regulation Department. Karachi, Pakistan: State Bank of Pakistan.Google Scholar
  48. SBP (2009) District-wise Agriculture Credit Data from July 2008 to June 2009. Karachi, Pakistan: Agricultural Credit Department, State Bank of Pakistan.Google Scholar
  49. SBP (2010a) Handbook on Best Practices in Agri/Rural Finance. Karachi, Pakistan: Agricultural Credit Department, State Bank of Pakistan.Google Scholar
  50. SBP (2010b) Document of Definitions. Karachi, Pakistan: Agricultural Credit Department, State Bank of Pakistan.Google Scholar
  51. SBP (2010c) Streamlining of Agricultural Lending Procedures and Documentation. Karachi, Pakistan: Agricultural Credit Department, State Bank of Pakistan. ACD circular no. 02, 11 August.Google Scholar
  52. SBP (2011) Prudential Regulations for Small and Medium Enterprises Financing. Karachi, Pakistan: Banking Policy & Regulations Department, State Bank of Pakistan.Google Scholar
  53. Sharma, M. and Zeller, M. (1997) Repayment performance in group-based credit programs in Bangladesh: An empirical analysis. World Development 25(10): 1731–1742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Siddiqi, M.W., Haq, M. and Baluch, K.N. (2009) Institutional credit: A policy tool for enhancement of agricultural income of Pakistan. International Research Journal of Arts & Humanities 37, ISSN: 1016-9342.Google Scholar
  55. Smith, J. and Thomas, D. (2003) Remembrances of things past: Test–retest reliability of retrospective migration histories. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 166(1): 23–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Stolzenberg, R.M. and Relles, D.A. (1990) Theory testing in a world of constrained research design: The significance of Heckman’s censored sampling bias correction for non-experimental research. Sociological Methods & Research 18(4): 395–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. van Dijk, T. (2003) Scenarios of Central European land fragmentation. Land Use Policy 20(2): 149–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wattanutchariya, S. and Jitsanguan, T. (1992) Increasing the scale of small-farm operations in Thailand. Food & Fertilizer Technology Center for the Asian and Pacific Region, http://www.agnet.org/library.php?func=view&id=20110726143050&type_id=4, accessed 28 June 2012.
  59. WB (2008) Agriculture for Development, World Development Report 2008, The World Bank, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  60. Yadav, S., Otsuka, K. and David, C.C. (1992) Segmentation in rural financial markets: The case of Nepal. World Development 20(3): 423–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Yamane, T. (1967) Statistics: An Introductory Analysis 2nd edn. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  62. Zulfiqar, F. and Hussain, A. (2014) Forecasting wheat production gaps to assess the state of future food security in Pakistan. J Food Nutr Disor 3(3): 1–6.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Abid Hussain
    • 1
  • Gopal Bahadur Thapa
    • 2
  1. 1.International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD)KathmanduNepal
  2. 2.School of Environment, Resources and Development, Asian Institute of TechnologyBangkokThailand

Personalised recommendations