The European Journal of Development Research

, Volume 27, Issue 4, pp 481–487 | Cite as

Strategic Governance for Inclusive Development

Introduction

Abstract

The global academic and policy debate on inclusive development is rising. Conceptual and theoretical contributions are made from multiple disciplinary angles. A driving force behind this is the disheartening trend of growing inequality, which juxtaposes economic success stories in countries that were previously low-income. How to strategically govern societies towards more inclusive development within an interactive governance constellation, for positive or normative reasons, is a major challenge. This special issue brings together the latest empirical and theoretical studies that consider strategic governance and inclusive development in inter-relationship. Most of these contributions stem from research undertaken under the guidance of Professor Baud at the Governance and Inclusive Development group at the University of Amsterdam. The strategic governance for inclusive development research agenda pursues interdisciplinarity, transdisciplinarity and plurality of knowledge in the field of international development studies.

Keywords

strategic governance inclusive development inequality interdisciplinarity transdisciplinarity plurality 

Abstract

Le débat académique et politique mondial sur le développement inclusif devient de plus en plus fréquent. Des contributions conceptuelles et théoriques venant de diverses disciplines sont apportées. Une force motrice à l’origine de cela est la tendance décourageante vers une inégalité croissante, qui juxtapose les histoires de réussites économiques dans des pays qui étaient auparavant à faible revenu. La question de comment gouverner de façon stratégique des sociétés pour un développement plus inclusif, au sein d’une constellation de gouvernance interactive, est un défi majeur, pour des raisons positives ou normatives. Ce numéro spécial rassemble les dernières études empiriques et théoriques qui considèrent les liens entre la gouvernance stratégique et le développement inclusif. La plupart de ces contributions proviennent de recherches menées sous la direction du professeur Isa Baud du groupe Gouvernance et Développement Inclusif de l’Université d’Amsterdam. La gouvernance stratégique pour le programme de recherche du développement inclusif poursuit l’interdisciplinarité, la transdisciplinarité et la pluralité des connaissances dans le domaine des études du développement international.

References

  1. Bavinck, M., Karuppiah, S. and Jentoft, S. (2015) Contesting inclusiveness: The anxieties of mechanised fishers over social boundaries in Chennai, South India. European Journal of Development Research 27 (4): 589–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baud, I.S.A. (1992) Gender and forms of production. Labour intensive industries in India and Mexico. Economic and Political Weekly 27 (34): 1811–1818.Google Scholar
  3. Baud, I.S.A., de Bruijne, G.A. and Raju, S. (1997) Human resource development, gender and labour market segmentation. In: V. Benei and L. Kennedy (eds.) Industrial Decentralization and Urban Development, Pondy Papers in Social Sciences, No. 23. Pondicherry, India: Institut Francais de Pondicherry, pp. 123–129.Google Scholar
  4. Baud, I.S.A. (2004) Learning from the South; Placing Governance in International Development Studies. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Inaugural address University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  5. Baud, I.S.A. and Nainan, N. (2008) Negotiated spaces for representation in Mumbai: Ward committees, advanced locality management and the politics of middle-class activism. Environment and Urbanization 20 (October): 483–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baud, I.S.A. and Post, J. (2003) Realigning Actors in an Urbanized World. Governance and Institutions from a Development Perspective. London: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  7. Baud, I.S.A. and de Wit, J. (2009) New Forms of Urban Governance in India Shifts, Models, Networks and Contestations. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  8. Baud, I. et al. (2013) The Development of Kalyan Dombivili: Fringe City in a Metropolitan Region. City Report. Bonn: EADI – chance2sustain.Google Scholar
  9. Baud, I.S.A. (2015) The emerging middle classes in India: Mobilizing for inclusive development? European Journal of Development Research 27 (2): 230–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Collier, P., Hoeffler, A. and Rohner, D. (2008) Beyond greed and grievance: Feasibility of civil war. Oxford Economic Papers 61 (1): 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cramer, C. (2005) Inequality and conflict. A review of an age-old concern. Identities, conflict and cohesion programme paper 11. Geneva: UNRISD.Google Scholar
  12. De Haan, A. (2015) Inclusive Growth: Beyond safety nets? European Journal of Development Research 27 (4): 606–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dietz, T. et al. (2013) PADev Guidebook. Participatory Assessment of Development. Amsterdam and Leiden, The Netherlands: University of Amsterdam: AISSR.Google Scholar
  14. EEA (2011) Global Governance – The Rise of Non-State Actors. A Background Report for the SOER 2010 Assessment of Global Megatrends, EEA Technical Report No. 4/2011. Copenhagen, Denmark: European Environment Agency.Google Scholar
  15. Gupta, J., Pfeffer, K., Verrest, H. and Ros-Tonen, M.A.F. (2015) Geographies of Urban Governance: Advanced Theories, Methods and Practices. Cham, Switzerland: Springer (in press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gupta, J., Pouw, N.R.M. and Ros-Tonen, M.A.F. (2015) Towards an elaborated theory of inclusive development. European Journal of Development Research 27 (4): 541–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Holmqvist, G. (2012) Inequality and identity: Causes of war? Discussion Paper 72, Nordiska Afrikainstitutet, Uppsala.Google Scholar
  18. Hordijk, M.A. and Baud, I.S.A. (2011) Inclusive adaptation: Linking participatory learning and knowledge management to urban resilience. In: K.O. Zimmermann (ed.) Resilient Cities, Cities and Adaptation to Climate Change. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
  19. Koster, M., Jaffe, R. and de Koning, A. (eds.) (2015) Special Issue: Citizenship agendas in and beyond the nation-state. Citizenship Studies 19 (2).Google Scholar
  20. Krugman, P. (2014) Inequality and economic performance. New York Times 12 February, http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/12/02/inequality-and-economic-performance/?_r=0.
  21. Lintelo, te.D. (2011) Inequality and Social Justice. Roundtable Consultation Summary. MDG Achievement Fund, Institute of Development Studies, Sussex, UK.Google Scholar
  22. Lopes Cardozo, M.T.A., Sawyer, J. and Simoni, M.L.T. (2015) Machismo and Mamitas at school: Exploring the agency of teachers for social and gender justice in Bolivian education. European Journal of Development Research 27 (4): 574–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. OECD (2011) Divided we Stand. Why Inequality Keeps Rising. Paris, France: OECD.Google Scholar
  24. OECD (2012) Perspectives on Global Development 2012: Social Cohesion in a Shifting World. Paris, France: OECD.Google Scholar
  25. Peyroux, E. (2015) Discourse of urban resilience and 'Inclusive Development' in the johannesburg growth and development strategy 2040. European Journal of Development Research 27 (4): 560–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pfeffer, K., Verrest, H. and Poorthuis, A. (2015) Big Data for better urban life? — An exploratory study of critical urban issues in two Caribbean cities: Paramaribo (Suriname) and Port of Spain (Trinidad and Tobago). European Journal of Development Research 27 (4): 505–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Piketty, T. (2014) Capital in the 21st Century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Pouw, N.R.M. and Baud, I.S.A. (eds.) (2012) Local Governance and Poverty in Developing Nations. (Routledge studies in development and society) New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Rawls, J. (1971) A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Robertson, R. (1997) What is glocalization? Presentation at the ‘conference on globalization and indigenous culture’, Institute for Japanese Culture and Classics, Kokugakuin University, Japan.Google Scholar
  31. Ros-Tonen, M.A.F., Van Leynseele, Y.-P.B., Laven, A. and Sunderland, T. (2015) Landscapes of social inclusion: Inclusive value-chain collaboration through the lenses of food sovereignty and landscape governance. European Journal of Development Research 27 (4): 523–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sen, A. (2010) The Idea of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Sutherland, C., Scott, D. and Hordijk, M. (2015) Urban water governance for more inclusive development: A reflection on the ‘waterscapes’ of Durban, South Africa. European Journal of Development Research 27 (4): 488–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Torfing, J., Peters, B.G., Pierre, J. and Sørensen, E. (eds.) (2012) Interactive Governance. Advancing the Paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. UNICEF (2011) Global Inequality: Beyond the Bottom Billion – A Rapid Review of Income Distribution in 141 Countries. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  36. Verrest, H. (2007) Home-Based Economic Activities and Caribbean Urban Livelihoods: Vulnerability, Ambition and Impact in Paramaribo and Port of Spain. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Verrest, H. and Jaffe, R.K. (2012) Bipolar antagonism and multipolar coexistence: Framing difference and shaping fear in two Caribbean cities. Social and Cultural Geography 13 (6): 625–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations