The European Journal of Development Research

, Volume 27, Issue 4, pp 589–605 | Cite as

Contesting Inclusiveness: The Anxieties of Mechanised Fishers Over Social Boundaries in Chennai, South India

  • Maarten Bavinck
  • Subramanian Karuppiah
  • Svein Jentoft
Original Article

Abstract

As fisheries generally take place in a common pool resource in which exclusion is by definition difficult, they are a unique entry point to investigating the inclusive development concept. This article discusses the debates and interactions between owners of mechanized fishing boats in Chennai, India, over entry into their ocean fisheries. For the time period under consideration (1995-2014), we demonstrate that the discussion over social boundaries to the profession continued unabated, with moderate and more extreme views alternating and poorer owners standing opposed to the boat-owning elite. Interactive governance theory provides the framework of analysis. We conclude that governors – whether of the state or of the fishing population – need to balance between different policy objectives and between the imperatives of inclusion and exclusion to improve governability.

Keywords

inclusive development fisheries governance India social boundaries 

Abstract

Etant donné que la pêche implique généralement une ressource commune qui par definition rend l’exclusion difficile, elle est un point d’entrée unique pour enquêter sur le concept de développement inclusif. Cet article examine les débats et les interactions entre les propriétaires de bateaux de pêche mécanisés à Chennai, en Inde, à propos de l’entrée dans le domaine de la pêche en haute mer. Au cours de la période observée (1995-2014), nous démontrons que la discussion sur les frontières sociales à la profession SE poursuit sans relâche, avec des vues modérées alternant avec des vues plus extrêmes et les propriétaires les plus pauvres s’opposant à l’élite propriétaire de bateaux. La théorie de la gouvernance interactive fournit un cadre d’analyse. Nous concluons que les gouverneurs – qu’ils soient ceux de l’Etat ou ceux de la communauté de pêcheurs – doivent trouver un équilibre entre différents objectifs politiques et entre les impératifs de l’intégration ainsi que de l’exclusion pour améliorer la gouvernabilité.

References

  1. Bailey, C. (1985) Blue revolution: The impact of technological innovation on third world fisheries. The Rural Sociologist 5 (4): 259–266.Google Scholar
  2. Bailey, C. and Jentoft, S. (1990) Hard choices in fisheries development. Marine Policy 14 (4): 333–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baud, I. and Nainan, N. (2008) ‘Negotiated spaces’ for representation in Mumbai: Ward committees, advanced locality management and the politics of middle-class activism. Environment & Urbanization 20 (2): 483–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bavinck, M. (2001a) Marine Resource Management. Conflict and Regulation in the Fisheries of the Coromandel Coast. New Delhi, India: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Bavinck, M. (2001b) Caste panchayats and regulation of fisheries in Tamil Nadu. Economic and Political Weekly 36 (13): 1088–1094.Google Scholar
  6. Bavinck, M. (2003) The spatially splintered state: Myths and realities in the regulation of marine fisheries in Tamil Nadu, India. Development and Change 34 (4): 633–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bavinck, M. (2005) Understanding fisheries conflicts in the South – A legal pluralist perspective. Society and Natural Resources 18 (9): 805–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bavinck, M. (2011) Governance, poverty and social justice in the coastal fisheries of India. In: N.R.M. Pouw and I.S.A. Baud (eds.) Local Governance and Poverty in Developing Nations. Routledge Studies in Development and Society New York: Routledge, pp. 115–136.Google Scholar
  9. Bavinck, M. (2015) Handling fishery conflicts in the context of legal pluralism – A case-study analysis of street-level bureaucracy in Tamil Nadu. India. In: M. Bavinck and A. Jyotishi (eds.) Conflict, Negotiations and Natural Resource Management – A Legal Pluralism Perspective from India. London: Routledge, pp. 111–127.Google Scholar
  10. Bavinck, M. (forthcoming) Enhancing the wellbeing of Tamil fishing communities: The role of self-governing ur panchayats along the coromandel coast, India. In: D. Johnson, T. Acott, N. Stacey and J Urquhart (eds.) The Social and Cultural Contributions of Small-Scale Fisheries. Dordrecht, MA: Springer.Google Scholar
  11. Bavinck, M. and Gupta, J. (2014) Pluralism in freshwater and marine governance: A challenge for earth system governance architecture. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 11: 78–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bavinck, M. and Karunaharan, K. (2006) A history of nets and bans: Restrictions on technical innovation along the Coromandel Coast of India. Maritime Studies – MAST 5 (1): 45–59.Google Scholar
  13. Bavinck, M. et al. (2008) Time-zoning for the safe-guarding of capture fisheries: A closed season in Tamil Nadu, India. Marine Policy 32: 369–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bavinck, M., Chuenpagdee, R., Jentoft, S. and Kooiman, J. (eds) (2013) Governability – Theory and Applications for Fisheries. MARE Publication Series Dordrecht, MA: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Benda-Beckmann, F. von (2002) Who is afraid of legal pluralism? Journal of Legal Pluralism 34 (47): 37–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Benda-Beckmann, F. von, von Benda-Beckmann, K. and Wiber, M.G. (eds.) (2006) The properties of property. In: Changing Properties of Property. New York/Oxford: Berghahn, pp. 1–39.Google Scholar
  17. Benda-Beckmann, F. von, von Benda-Beckmann, K. and Griffiths, A. (eds.) (2009) The Power of Law in a Transnational World – Anthropological Enquiries. New York/Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  18. Bharathi, B.S. (1999) Coromandel Fishermen – Ethnography of Pattanavar sub-Caste. Pondicherry, India: Pondicherry Institute of Linguistics and Culture.Google Scholar
  19. Campling, L., Havice, E. and McCall-Howard, P. (2012) The political economy and ecology of capture fisheries: Market dynamics, resource access and relations of exploitation and resistance. Journal of Agrarian Change 12 (2-3): 177–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cardwell, E. and Gear, R. (2013) Transferable quotas, efficiency and crew ownership in Whalsay, Shetland. Marine Policy 40: 160–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Coulthard, S., Johnson, D. and McGregor, A. (2011) A social wellbeing approach to poverty and sustainability in the context of the global fisheries crisis. Global Environmental Change 21 (2): 453–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Davis, A. and Ruddle, K. (2012) Massaging the misery – Recent approaches to fisheries governance and the betrayal of small-scale fisheries. Human Organization 71 (3): 244–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Durrenberger, P. (1992) It’s all Politics: Alabama’s Seafood Industry. Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  24. Fuller, C. (2003) Caste. In: V. Das (ed.) The Oxford Companion to Sociology and Social Anthropology. New Delhi, India: Oxford University Press, pp. 476–501.Google Scholar
  25. Hardin, G. (1968) The tragedy of the commons. Science 162 (3859): 1243–1248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hardin, G. (1974) Living on a lifeboat. Bioscience 24 (10): 561–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jentoft, S. (2011) Legal pluralism and the governability of fisheries and coastal systems. Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 2011 (64): 149–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jentoft, S. (2013) Social justice in the context of fisheries – A governability challenge. In: M. Bavinck, R. Chuenpagdee, S. Jentoft and J. Kooiman (eds.) Governability of Fisheries and Aquaculture – Concepts and Approaches. Dordrecht, MA: Springer, pp. 45–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jentoft, S. and Chuenpagdee, R. (ed.) (2015) Interactive Governance for Small-Scale Fisheries. Global Reflections. Dordrecht, MA: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kooiman, J. and Bavinck, M. (2005) The governance perspective. In: J. Kooiman, M. Bavinck, S. Jentoft and R. Pullin (eds.) Fish for Life: Interactive Governance for Fisheries. MARE Publication Series Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 11–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kooiman, J. (2003) Governing as Governance. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  32. Kooiman, J. and Jentoft, S. (2009) Meta-governance: Values, norms and principles, and the making of hard choices. Public Administration 87 (4): 818–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kooiman, J., Bavinck, M., Jentoft, S. and Pullin, R. (eds.) (2005) Fish for Life: Interac-Tive Governance for Fisheries. MARE Publication Series Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kurien, J. (1978) Entry of big business into fishing, its impact on fish economy. Economic and Political Weekly 13 (36): 1557–1565.Google Scholar
  35. Kurien, J. (2001) People and the sea: A ‘tropical-majority’ world perspective. Maritime Studies (MAST) 1 (1): 9–26.Google Scholar
  36. Lamont, M. (2001) Symbolic boundaries: Overview. In: N.J. Smelser and P.B. Baltes (eds.) International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, pp. 15341–15347.Google Scholar
  37. Lamont, M. and Molnár, V. (2002) The study of boundaries in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology 28: 167–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mandelbaum, D.G. (1970) Society in India. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  39. Ostrom, E. (1990) Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ostrom, E. (2005) Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Platteau, J.P. (1989) The dynamics of fisheries development in developing countries: A general overview. Development and Change 20 (4): 565–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Platteau, J.P. (2004) Monitoring elite capture in community-driven development. Development and Change 35 (2): 223–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rawls, J. (1971) A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Ribot, J. and Peluso, N.L. (2003) A theory of access. Rural Sociology 68 (2): 153–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schlager, E. and Ostrom, E. (1993) Property-rights regimes and coastal fisheries: An empirical analysis. In: T.L. Anderson and R.T. Simmons (eds.) The Political Economy of Customs and Culture: Informal Solutions to the Commons Problem. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 13–41.Google Scholar
  46. Thurston, E. and Rangachari, K. (1987 [1909]) Castes and tribes of Southern India. Vol. 6 reprint New Delhi, India: Asian Educational Services.Google Scholar
  47. Vanderlinden, J. (1972) Le pluralisme juridique, Essai de synthèse. In: J. Gilissen (ed.) Le pluralism juridique. Brussels, Belgium: Editions de l’Universite´ de Bruxelles, pp. 19–36.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maarten Bavinck
    • 1
  • Subramanian Karuppiah
    • 2
  • Svein Jentoft
    • 3
  1. 1.University of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Fisheries Co-management, Chennai Fishing Harbour, Fisheries Management Resource Centre (FishMARC)Tamil NaduIndia
  3. 3.University of TromsøTromsøNorway

Personalised recommendations