Advertisement

The European Journal of Development Research

, Volume 28, Issue 4, pp 660–689 | Cite as

Organizational and Institutional Barriers to the Effectiveness of Public Expenditures: The Case of Agricultural Research Investments in Nigeria and Ghana

  • Catherine Ragasa
Original Article

Abstract

Where investments in agricultural research do not yield positive impact on incomes and food security, organizational and institutional bottlenecks can be critical factors. We illustrate this point by using the cases of Ghana and Nigeria, two of the largest agricultural research systems in sub-Saharan Africa. This article combines elements of organizational design, institutional analysis and innovation systems literature to empirically measure organizational performance and its determinants. Findings suggest weak monitoring and impact-orientation in sample research organizations. Unstable funds, weak infrastructure and unconducive work environment are binding constraints in increasing research productivity and outreach in Ghana and Nigeria. Different priorities for these two countries emerged from this article: quality of human resources seems to be the priority for Ghana, while adequacy of physical resources and implementation of organizational management systems seem to be the priority for Nigeria.

Keywords

agricultural research system public investment organization institution Africa 

Abstract

Lorsque les investissements dans la recherche agricole n’aboutissent pas à un impact positif sur les revenus et la sécurité alimentaire, les goulets d'étranglement organisationnels et institutionnels peuvent être des facteurs critiques. Nous illustrons ce point en utilisant les cas du Ghana et du Nigeria, deux des plus grands systèmes de recherche agricole en Afrique Sub-saharienne. Ce document combine des éléments de conception organisationnelle, d'analyse institutionnelle, et de la littérature des systèmes d'innovation pour mesurer de façon empirique la performance organisationnelle et de ses déterminants. Les résultats suggèrent la faiblesse du suivi et de l’orientation vers l'impact dans les organisations de recherche de l'échantillon. Des financements instables, la faiblesse des infrastructures et un environnement de travail peu propice sont des contraintes incontournables dans l’augmentation de la productivité de la recherche et de sensibilisation au Ghana et au Nigeria. Des priorités différentes pour ces deux pays ont émergé de cet article: qualité des ressources humaines semble être la priorité pour le Ghana, alors que pour le Nigeria, la priorité semble être l’adéquation des ressources physiques et la mise en œuvre de systèmes de gestion organisationnelle.

References

  1. Alene, A., Manyong, V.M., Abele, S. and Sanogo, D. (2007) Assessing the Impact of Agricultural Research on Rural Livelihoods: Achievements, Gaps, and Options. Ibadan, Nigeria: IITA.Google Scholar
  2. Alene, A. and Mwalughali, J. (2012) The effectiveness of crop improvement programs in Sub-Saharan Africa from the perspectives of varietal output and adoption: The case of cassava, cowpea, maize, and Soybean. Draft Technical Report for DIVA Project, IITA, Ibadan, Nigeria.Google Scholar
  3. Alston, J.M., Chan-Kang, C., Marra, M.C., Pardey, P.G. and Wyatt, T.J. (2000) A meta analysis of rates of return to agricultural R&D: Ex Pede Herculem? IFPRI Research Report No. 113. Washington, DC: IFPRI.Google Scholar
  4. ARCN (Agricultural Research Council of Nigeria) (2010) Technologies Generated by the National Agricultural Research Institutes between 1997 and 2008. Abuja, Nigeria: ARCN.Google Scholar
  5. ASTI website. at http://www.asti.cgiar.org/ghana and http://www.asti.cgiar.org/nigeria, accessed 15 January 2015.
  6. Bantilan, M.C.S., Chandra, S., Mehta, P.K. and Keatinge, J.D.H. (2004) Dealing with diversity in scientific outputs: Implications for international research evaluation. Research Evaluation 13(2): 87–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beintema, N., Stads, G.-J., Fuglie, K. and Heisey, P. (2012) ASTI Global Assessment of Agricultural R&D Spending Developing Countries Accelerate Investment. Washington DC: IFPRI.Google Scholar
  8. Beintema, N. and Stads, G.-J. (2014) Taking Stock of National Agricultural R&D Capacity in Africa South of the Sahara: ASTI Synthesis Report. Washington DC: IFPRI.Google Scholar
  9. Byerlee, D. (2004) Enhancing accountability and impacts of agricultural research systems in developing countries. In: New Directions for a Diverse Planet: Proceedings of the 4th International Crop Science Congress. Brisbane, Australia, 26 September, 1 October.Google Scholar
  10. Clark, N. (2005) Science Policy and Agricultural Research in Africa: A Capacity Building Needs Assessment. New Partnership for Africa’s Development. http://www.nepadst.org/doclibrary/pdfs/doc25_022005.pdf.
  11. DIVA (Diffusion of Improved Varieties in Africa) (2012) CGIAR DIVA project. ASTI (Agricultural Science and Technology Initiative) website at http://www.asti.cgiar.org/diiva#0, accessed 20 October 2013.
  12. Eicher, C. (2001) Africa’s unfinished business: building sustainable agricultural research systems. Department of Agricultural Economics Staff Paper Series 2001-10, Michigan State University.Google Scholar
  13. Famoye, F. and Singh, K. (2006) Zero-inflated generalized poisson regression model with an application to domestic violence data. Journal of Data Science 4: 117–130.Google Scholar
  14. Fan, S., Fang, C. and Zhang, X. (2001) How agricultural research affects urban poverty in developing countries: The case of China.Environment and Production Technology Division Discussion Paper No. 83. Washington DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.Google Scholar
  15. Fan, S., Omilola, B. and Lambert, M. (2009) Public spending for agriculture in Africa: Trends and composition. ReSAKSS Working Paper No. 28.Washington DC: Regional Strategic Analysis and Knowledge Support System (ReSAKSS), International Food Policy Research Institute.Google Scholar
  16. FAO and WFP (World Food Programme) (2009) Responding to the food crisis: Synthesis of medium-term measures proposed in inter-agency assessments. Rome: FAO. http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/ISFP/SR_Web.pdf, accessed 5 March 2012.
  17. Flaherty, K., Essegbey, G.O. and Asare, R. (2010) Ghana: Recent Developments in Agricultural Research. ASTI Country Note. Washington DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.Google Scholar
  18. Fuglie, K. (2012) Productivity growth and technology capital in the global agricultural economy. In: K. Fuglie, S.L. Wang and V. Eldon Ball (eds.) Productivity Growth in Agriculture: An International Perspective. Oxfordshire, UK: CAB International.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Goldstein, H. (2003) Multilevel Statistical Models, 3rd edn. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
  20. Gregory, B.T., Harris, S.G., Armenakis, A.A. and Shook, C.L. (2009) Organizational culture and effectiveness: A study of values, attitudes, and organizational outcomes. Journal of Business Research 62(7): 673–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hall, A., Sulaiman, V.R., Clark, N. and Yoganand, B. (2003) From measuring impact to learning institutional lessons: An innovations systems perspective on improving the management of international agricultural research. Agricultural Systems 78(2): 213–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hazell, P. (2010) An assessment of the impact of agricultural research in South Asia since the green revolution. In: R. Evenson and P. Pingali (eds.) Handbook of Agricultural Economics 4 Chapter 68 Amsterdam, the Netherlands: North Holland.Google Scholar
  23. Henri, J. (2006) Organizational culture and performance measurement systems. Accounting, Organizations and Society 31: 77–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. IAC (Inter Academy Council). 2004. Inventing a Better Future – A Strategy for Building Worldwide Capacities in Science and Technology. Amsterdam: InterAcademy Council.Google Scholar
  25. Lipton, M. (1988) The place of agricultural research in the development of sub-Saharan Africa. World Development 16(10): 1231–1257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lorenz, E. and Lundvall, B.A. (2010) Accounting for creativity in the European Union: A multi-level analysis of individual competence, labour market structure, and systems of education and training. Cambridge Journal of Economics 35: 251–269.Google Scholar
  27. Manning, N., Mukherjee, R. and Gokcekus, O. (2000) Public Officials and Their Institutional Environment: An Analytical Model for Assessing the Impact of Institutional Change on Public Sector Performance. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 2427. Washington DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  28. Marshall, J. and McLean, A. (1988) Reflection in action: Exploring organizational culture. In P. Reason (ed.) Human Inquiry in Action. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  29. Omilola, B. and Lambert, M. (2010) Weathering the storm: Agricultural development, investment, and poverty in Africa following the recent food price crisis. IFPRI Discussion Paper No. 965. Washington DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.Google Scholar
  30. Peterson, W., Gijsbers, G. and Wilks, M. (2003) An organizational performance assessment system for agricultural research organizations: Concepts, methods, and procedures. ISNAR Research Management Guidelines No. 7. The Hague: International Service for National Agricultural Research.Google Scholar
  31. Quinn, R.E. and Rohrbaugh, J. (1983) A spatial model of effectiveness criteria: Towards a competing values approach to organizational analysis. Management Science 29: 363–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ragasa, C. et al. (2013a) Patterns of Adoption of Improved Maize Technologies in Ghana. GSSP Working Paper 34. Accra, Ghana: IFPRI.Google Scholar
  33. Ragasa, C. et al. (2013b) Patterns of Adoption of Improved Rice Technologies in Ghana. GSSP Working Paper 35. Accra, Ghana: IFPRI.Google Scholar
  34. Raina, R. (2003) Institutions and organizations enabling reforms in Indian agricultural research and policy. International Journal of Technology Management and Sustainable Development 2(2): 97–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Spielman, D. and Birner, R. (2008) How innovative is your agriculture? Using innovation indicators and benchmarks to strengthen national agricultural innovation systems. World Bank Agriculture and Rural Development Discussion Paper 41. Washington DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  36. Thirtle, C., Lin, L. and Piesse, J. (2003) The impact of research-led agricultural productivity growth on poverty reduction in Africa, Asia, and Latin America. World Development 31(12): 1959–1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. UNCTAD (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development) (2011) Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy Review – Ghana. Geneva, Switzerland: UNCTAD.Google Scholar
  38. van Rheenen, T. et al. (2012) Agricultural Research in Ghana. GSSP Working Paper. Accra, Ghana.Google Scholar
  39. Walker, T. et al. (2008) Strategic guidance for ex post impact assessment of agricultural research. Report prepared for the Standing Panel on Impact Assessment, Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research Science Council. Rome: CGIAR Science Council Secretariat.Google Scholar
  40. Wooldridge, J. (2002) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Massachussets: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  41. World Bank (2007) World Development Report 2008 – Agriculture for Development. Washington DC: World Bank.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Catherine Ragasa
    • 1
  1. 1.International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Development Strategy and Governance DivisionWashington, District of ColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations