The European Journal of Development Research

, Volume 26, Issue 5, pp 614–628

EU Donor Policies in Situations of Fragility: Promoting ‘Resilience’?

Original Article
  • 18 Downloads

Abstract

In recent policy papers on developmental statebuilding, for example in the European Report on Development in 2009, the concept of ‘resilience’ has been introduced as an alternative to ‘fragility’ and ‘fragile states’. This concept even offers the possibility of forging a ‘common European approach’. Although a considerable number of donor agencies (and, in particular, the European Commission since 2012) have adopted the concept and are applying it in some of their guidelines and strategies, the state of implementation in concrete interventions is unclear at present. Taking the development cooperation of the European Union and its member states in South Sudan as an example, this article assesses the current status of resilience in statebuilding efforts to be ambivalent: although there is little explicit reference to the concept in current country strategies and concrete programming, some components of resilience inform interventions.

Keywords

resilience fragility statebuilding European development policy South Sudan 

Abstract

Dans les récents documents sur le ‘state-building’ dans le contexte du développement, par exemple dans le Rapport sur le Développement 2009, le concept de résilience a été formulé comme un concept qui s’oppose à la fragilité et aux ‘Etats fragiles’. Ce concept pourrait offrir la possibilité de créer une ‘approche européenne commune’. Alors qu’un nombre considérable de bailleurs (et en particulier la Commission Européenne depuis 2012) se sont, depuis, emparés du concept et le déclinent dans leurs stratégies et documents d’orientation de l’aide, l’état des lieux de sa mise en œuvre pratique reste difficile à faire. En examinant de plus près l’exemple de la coopération de l’UE et de ses Etats-membres au Sud Soudan, cet article évalue l’importance de la résilience dans leurs tentatives de ‘state-building’ et conclue à une ambivalence: tandis qu’il y a peu de références très explicites dans les stratégies-pays et les programmes concrets, certaines composantes de la résilience transparaissent dans les interventions des bailleurs.

References

  1. Adger, W.N. (2007) Ecological and social resilience. In: G. Atkinson, S. Dietz and E. Neumayer (eds.) Handbook of Sustainable Development. Cheltenham, UK: Elgar, pp. 78–90.Google Scholar
  2. Aeberli, A. (2012) Decentralisation Hybridized: A Western Concept on its Way through South Sudan. Geneva, Switzerland: The Graduate Institute.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Auswärtiges Amt, BMVg and BMZ (2012) Für eine kohärente Politik der Bundesregierung gegenüber fragilen staaten. Ressortübergreifende leitlinien. August. Berlin: Deutsche Bundesregierung.Google Scholar
  4. Barltrop, R. (2011) Darfur and the International Community. The Challenge of Conflict Resolution in Sudan. London: Tauris.Google Scholar
  5. Bennett, J., Pantuliano, S., Fenton, W., Vaux, A., Barnett, C. and Brusset, E. (2010) Aiding the Peace: A Multi-Donor Evaluation of Support to Conflict Prevention and Peacebuilding Activities in Southern Sudan 2005–2010, Final Report – December 2010. The Hague, the Netherlands: Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs.Google Scholar
  6. Birkland, T.A. (2010) Federal disaster policy: Learning, priorities, and prospects for resilience. In: K. Comfort, A. Boin and C. Demchak (eds.) Designing Resilience: Preparing for Extreme Events. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 106–128.Google Scholar
  7. BMZ (2007) Entwicklungsorientierte Transformation bei fragiler Staatlichkeit und schlechter Regierungsführung. BMZ Konzepte no. 149. März Berlin, Germany: BMZ.Google Scholar
  8. BMZ (2009) Promoting Resilient States and Constructive State-Society Relations – Legitimacy, Transparency and Accountability. BMZ Special no. 168. Oktober Berlin, Germany: BMZ.Google Scholar
  9. BMZ (2013) Entwicklung für Frieden und Sicherheit: Entwicklungspolitisches Engagement im Kontext von Konflikt, Fragilität und Gewalt. BMZ-Strategiepapier 4/2013 Berlin, Germany: BMZ.Google Scholar
  10. Brunner, E. and Giroux, J. (2009) Examining Resilience: A Concept to Improve Societal Security and Technical Safety. Factsheet, CRN Report Zurich, Switzerland: Center for Security Studies.Google Scholar
  11. Chandler, D. (2012) Resilience and human security: The post-interventionist paradigm. Security Dialogue 43 (3): 213–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clark, H. (2013) Conflict and Development: Inclusive Governance, Resilient Societies. Lecture for Oxford Institute for Ethics, Law, and Armed Conflict. 11 February Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
  13. Clements, K.P. (2008) Traditional, Charismatic and Grounded Legitimacy. Study for the GTZ Sector Advisory Project Good Governance and Democracy. Brisbane, Australia: The University of Queensland.Google Scholar
  14. Clements, K.P., Boege, V., Brown, A., Foley, W. and Nolan, A. (2007) State building reconsidered: The role of hybridity in the formation of political order. Political Science 59 (1): 45–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Council of the European Union (2013) Council Conclusions on EU Approach to Resilience. 3241st Foreign Affairs Council Meeting. 28 May. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  16. De Waal, A. (2009) Mission without end? Peacekeeping in the African political marketplace. International Affairs 85 (1): 99–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Debiel, T., Klingebiel, S., Mehler, A. and Schneckener, U. (2005) Zwischen Ignorieren und Intervenieren. Strategien und Dilemmata externer Akteure in fragilen Staaten. Policy Paper, Stiftung Entwicklung und Frieden (SEF). No. 23 Bonn, Germany: Stiftung Entwicklung und Frieden.Google Scholar
  18. Denney, L. (2010) Thin security? The challenge of engaging informal security actors in DFID’s security sector reform programme in Sierra Leone. PhD thesis. Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth.Google Scholar
  19. DFID – Department for International Development (2005) Why We Need to Work More Effectively in Fragile States. London: DFID.Google Scholar
  20. DFID – Department for International Development (2010) Building Peaceful States and Societies: A DFID Practice Paper. London: DFID.Google Scholar
  21. DFID – Department for International Development (2011) Saving Lives, Preventing Suffering and Building Resilience: The UK Government’s Humanitarian Policy. London: DFID.Google Scholar
  22. DFID – Department for International Development (2012) DFID South Sudan: Operational Plan 2011–2015. London: DFID, updated July 2012, https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/attachment_data/file/67348/south-sudan-2011.pdf.
  23. Duffield, M. (2001) Global Governance and the New Wars: The Merging of Development and Security. London, New York: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  24. EC – European Commission (2012) The EU Approach to Resilience: Learning from Food Security Crises. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council, COM(2012) 586 Final Brussels, Belgium: European Commission.Google Scholar
  25. EC – European Commission (2013a) A Decent Life for All: Ending Poverty and Giving the World a Sustainable Future. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, COM(2013) 92 Final. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission.Google Scholar
  26. EC – European Commission (2013b) Action Plan for Resilience in Crisis Prone Countries 2013–2020. SWD(2013) 227 Final. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission.Google Scholar
  27. Embassy of the Kingdom of the Netherlands in South Sudan (2012) Multi Annual Strategic Plan South Sudan 2012–2015. Juba, South Sudan: Embassy of the Kingdom of the Netherlands in South Sudan.Google Scholar
  28. ERD – European Report on Development (2009) Overcoming Fragility in Africa: Forging a New European Approach. Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, European University Institute, Brussels, Belgium: European Communities.Google Scholar
  29. ERD – European Report on Development (2010) Social Protection for Inclusive Development. Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, European University Institute, Brussels, Belgium: European Communities.Google Scholar
  30. EU – European Union (2011) South Sudan Joint EU/MS Programming Document 2011–2013. Brussels, Belgium: European Union.Google Scholar
  31. FCO, DFID and Ministry of Defence (2008) The UK Approach to Stabilisation. Stabilisation Unit Guidance Notes. London: Stabilisation Unit.Google Scholar
  32. Fukuyama, F. (2004) State-Building: Governance and World Order in the 21st Century. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Gaillard, J.C. (2010) Vulnerability, capacity and resilience: Perspectives for climate and development policy. Journal of International Development 22 (2): 218–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ghani, A. and Lockhart, C. (2009) Fixing Failed States: A Framework for Rebuilding a Fractured World. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Grindle, M.S. (2007) Good enough governance revisited. Development Policy Review 25 (5): 553–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gunderson, L.H. and Holling, C.S. (2002) Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems. Washington DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  37. Hobsbawm, E. (1983) Introduction: Inventing traditions. In: E. Hobsbawm and T. Ranger (eds.) The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
  38. Hout, W. (2010) Between development and security: The European Union, governance and fragile states. Third World Quarterly 31 (1): 141–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jones, B. and Chandran, R. (2008) From Fragility to Resilience: Concepts and Dilemmas of State Building in Fragile States. Research Paper by the Center on International Cooperation at New York University and International Peace Academy for the OECD Fragile States Group. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  40. Kaplan, S. (2009) Enhancing Resilience in Fragile States. Background Paper to the European Report on Development 2009. Florence, Italy: European University Institute.Google Scholar
  41. Levine, S., Pain, A., Bailey, S. and Fan, L. (2012) The Relevance of ‘Resilience’? HPG Policy Brief 49. London: Overseas Development Institute.Google Scholar
  42. Loane, G. and Moyroud, C. (2001) Tracing Unintended Consequences of Humanitarian Assistance: The Case of Sudan. Field Study and Recommendations for the European Community Humanitarian Office. Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos.Google Scholar
  43. LSE (London School of Economics) and PwC (PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP) (2008) State-Building in Fragile Situations – How Can Donors Do No Harm and Maximise Their Positive Impact? Document Prepared for the OECD DAC Fragile States Group. Revised Version 2.0. Paris, France: OECD.Google Scholar
  44. Manyena, S.B. (2006) The concept of resilience revisited. Disasters 30 (4): 433–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Manyena, S.B. (2012) Disaster and development paradigms: Too close for comfort? Development Policy Review 30 (3): 327–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Marriage, Z. (2006) The comfort of denial: External assistance in Southern Sudan. Development and Change 37 (3): 479–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Martin-Breen, P. and Anderies, J.M. (2011) Resilience: A Literature Review. New York: The Rockefeller Foundation.Google Scholar
  48. McGillivray, M. (2005) Aid Allocation and Fragile States. Background Paper for the Senior Level Forum on Development Effectiveness in Fragile States. 13–14 January London: Lancaster House, Helsinki: United Nations University-World Institute for Development Economic Research.Google Scholar
  49. Migdal, J.S. (1988) Strong Societies and Weak States: State-Society Relations and State Capabilities in the Third World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Migdal, J.S. (2001) State in Society: Studying How States and Societies Transform and Constitute One Another. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. OECD – Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (2001) Helping Prevent Violent Conflict. The DAC Guidelines. Paris, France: OECD.Google Scholar
  52. OECD – Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (2007) Principles for Good International Engagement in Fragile States & Situations. Paris, France: OECD.Google Scholar
  53. OECD – Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (2008) Concepts and Dilemmas of State Building in Fragile Situations: From Fragility to Resilience. Paris, France: OECD.Google Scholar
  54. OECD – Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (2010) The State’s Legitimacy in Fragile Situations: Unpacking Complexity. Paris, France: OECD.Google Scholar
  55. OECD – Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (2011a) Supporting Statebuilding in Situations of Conflict and Fragility: Policy Guidance. DAC Guidelines and Reference Series. Paris, France: OECD.Google Scholar
  56. OECD – Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (2011b) From Power Struggles to Sustainable Peace: Understanding Political Settlements. Paris, France: OECD.Google Scholar
  57. Paris, R. (2011) Ordering the world: Academic research and policymaking on fragile states. International Studies Review 13 (1): 58–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Perrings, C. (2006) Resilience and sustainable development. Environment and Development Economics 11 (4): 417–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Pouligny, B. (2009) State-Society Relations and Intangible Dimensions of State ‘Resilience’ and State Building: A Bottom-Up Perspective. Paper for the European Report on Development. Florence, Italy: European University Institute.Google Scholar
  60. Reno, W. (2010) Complex operations in weak and failing states: The Sudan rebel perspective. Prism 1 (2): 111–122.Google Scholar
  61. Samy, A. (2012) CN-201 The Resilient Governance Initiative. Final Evaluation Report (Covering the period from 01 October 2008 to 31 September 2012). Bedford, UK: Cranfield University.Google Scholar
  62. Schomerus, M. and Allen, T. (2010) Southern Sudan at Odds with Itself: Dynamics of Conflict and Predicaments of Peace. London: LSE Destin.Google Scholar
  63. Stewart, F. and Brown, G. (2009) Fragile States. CRISE Working Paper No 51, Centre for Research on Inequality, Human Security and Ethnicity.Google Scholar
  64. The World Bank (2011) World Development Report 2011: Conflict, Security, and Development. Washington DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  65. Udenrigsministeriet (2011) Sydsudan: Sammenhængende Programstøtte til Sydsudan del II, 2012–2015. Copenhagen, Denmark: Udenrigsministeriet.Google Scholar
  66. UNDP (2012) Putting Resilience at the Heart of Development: Investing in Prevention and Resilient Recovery. Tokyo, Japan: United Nations Development Programme.Google Scholar
  67. UNISDR (2005) Hyogo Framework for Action 2005–2015: Building the Resilience of Nations and Communities to Disaster. Hyogo, Japan: World Conference on Disaster Reduction.Google Scholar
  68. USAID – US Agency for International Development (2005) Fragile States Strategy. Washington DC: USAID.Google Scholar
  69. USAID – US Agency for International Development (2012) Building Resilience to Recurrent Crisis: USAID Policy and Program Guidance. Washington DC: USAID.Google Scholar
  70. Van der Zwan, J. (2011) Evaluating the EU’s Role and Challenges in Sudan and South Sudan. London: IFP-EW.Google Scholar
  71. Walker, J. and Cooper, M. (2011) Genealogies of resilience: From systems ecology to the political economy of crisis adaptation. Security Dialogue 42 (2): 143–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Wilkinson, E. (2012) CN-201 The Resilient Governance Initiative. Annual Report 04: Implementation in Baglan Province (Covering the Period from 01 April 2011 to 31 March 2012). Bedford, UK: Cranfield University.Google Scholar
  73. Windle, G. (2011) What is resilience? A review and concept analysis. Clinical Gerontology Reviews 21 (2): 152–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.oiip – Austrian Institute for International AffairsViennaAustria
  2. 2.European University InstituteSan Domenico di Fiesole (FI)Italy

Personalised recommendations