Advertisement

The European Journal of Development Research

, Volume 26, Issue 1, pp 142–159 | Cite as

Financing the Clean Development Mechanism through Debt-for-Efficiency Swaps? Case Study Evidence from a Uruguayan Wind Farm Project

  • Danny CassimonEmail author
  • Martin Prowse
  • Dennis Essers
Original Article

Abstract

As one of Kyoto’s three flexibility mechanisms, the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) allows the issuance of Certified Emission Reduction credits from offset projects in non-Annex I countries. As little attention has been paid to how CDM projects are financed, this article assesses whether offset schemes with public bodies should utilise debt swaps as a form of funding. Specifically, we examine whether a debt-for-efficiency swap between Uruguay and Spain within a wind power project increased project finance and generated greater development co-benefits. We assess the transaction using a simple evaluative framework: whether it delivered additional resources to the debtor country and/or government budget; whether it delivered more resources for climate change mitigation; whether it had a sizeable effect on overall debt burdens (creating ‘indirect’ benefits); and whether it aligned with government policy and systems (elements of the new aid approach). We find evidence that cautions against using the Spanish–Uruguayan case as a model for future debt-for-efficiency swaps.

Keywords

clean development mechanism debt swaps climate finance Uruguay Spain 

Abstract

Parmi les trois mécanismes de flexibilité du Protocole de Kyoto, le Mécanisme de Développement Propre (MDP) permet la diffusion des crédits de carbone provenant des projets compensatoires dans des pays non-Annexe I. Manque de réflexion sur les modes de financement des projets MDP, cet article vise à évaluer l’utilisation, par des bailleurs de fonds officiels comme intervention d’aide publique au développement, des opérations de conversion de la dette officielle comme mode de financement utile. Plus particulièrement, nous examinons dans quel mesure une opération de conversion de dette au bénéfice des économies d’énergie entre l’Uruguay et l’Espagne dans le secteur d’énergie éolienne, inclue dans un projet MDP, a bénéficié au financement du projet et à la disponibilité des ressources additionnelles pour le pays débiteur et pour la mitigation climatique, a créé des avantages complémentaires sur le plan du développement, et s’inscrit dans la nouvelle approche « d’alignement » de l’aide au développement aux politiques et systèmes du pays récepteur. Nos résultats mettent en garde contre l’adoption du cas espagnol-uruguayen comme modèle exemplaire pour des opérations futures de conversion de dette au bénéfice des énergies propres dans le cadre MDP.

Notes

Acknowledgements

An earlier draft version of this article was presented at the 2011 EADI/DSA joint Conference on Rethinking Development in an Age of Scarcity and Uncertainty at the University of York. The authors wish to thank Ana de Vicente Lancho of the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Finance and Roberto Aiello of the World Bank Carbon Finance Unit for providing useful documentation on the debt swap agreement under consideration here. Helpful comments and suggestions of two anonymous referees are also gratefully acknowledged. The opinions expressed in this article, as well as any remaining errors, are those of the authors only.

References

  1. Adler, G. and Eble, S. (2008) External financial linkages: What drives Uruguayan sovereign spreads? In: IMF, Uruguay: Selected Issues. Washington DC: IMF. Country Report 08/46, pp. 30–40.Google Scholar
  2. Buckley, R.P. (1997) The transformative potential of a secondary market: Emerging markets debt trading from 1983 to 1989. Fordham International Law Journal 21 (4): 1152–1238.Google Scholar
  3. Buckley, R.P. (ed.) (2011) Debt-for-Development Exchanges: History and New Applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bulow, J. and Rogoff, K. (1991) Sovereign repurchases: No cure for overhang. Quarterly Journal of Economics 106 (4): 1219–1235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cassimon, D., Prowse, M. and Essers, D. (2011a) The pitfalls and potential of debt-for-nature swaps: A US-Indonesian case study. Global Environmental Change 21 (1): 93–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cassimon, D., Essers, D. and Renard, R. (2011b) An assessment of debt-for-education swaps: Case studies on swap initiatives between Germany and Indonesia and between Spain and El Salvador. Comparative Education 47 (2): 139–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cassimon, D., Renard, R. and Verbeke, K. (2008) Assessing debt-to-health swaps: A case study on the Global Fund Debt2Health Conversion Scheme. Tropical Medicine and International Health 13 (9): 1188–1195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cassimon, D. and Vaessen, J. (2007) Theory, practice and potential of debt for development swaps in the Asian and Pacific region. Economic Systems 31 (1): 12–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chauvin, N.D. and Kraay, A. (2005) What has 100 Billion Dollars Worth of Debt Relief Done for Low-Income Countries? Washington DC: World Bank. Working Paper.Google Scholar
  10. Claessens, S. and Diwan, I. (1994) Recent experience with commercial bank debt reduction: Has the ‘menu’ outdone the market? World Development 22 (2): 201–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cordella, T., Ricci, L.A. and Ruiz-Arranz, M. (2005) Debt Overhang or Debt Irrelevance? Revisiting the Debt-Growth Link. Washington DC: IMF. Working Paper 05/223.Google Scholar
  12. Cosio-Pascal, E. (2008) The Emerging of a Multilateral Forum for Debt Restructuring: The Paris Club. Geneva: UNCTAD. Discussion Paper 192.Google Scholar
  13. Development Finance International (2009) Debt relief to combat climate change. Paper Prepared for the Joint Ministerial Forum on Debt Sustainability. London: Commonwealth Secretariat.Google Scholar
  14. Feyzioglu, T., Swaroop, V. and Zhu, M. (1998) A panel data analysis of the fungibility of foreign aid. World Bank Economic Review 12 (1): 29–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Filmus, D. and Serrani, E. (2009) Development, Education and Financing: Analysis of Debt Swaps of Social Investment as an Extra-Budgetary Education Financing Instrument. Buenos Aires/Madrid, Spain: Fundación SES/OEI.Google Scholar
  16. Gamarra, B., Pollock, M. and Primo Braga, C.A. (2009) Debt relief to low-income countries: A retrospective. In: C.A. Primo Braga and D. Dömeland (eds.) Debt Relief and Beyond: Lessons Learned and Challenges Ahead. Washington DC: World Bank, pp. 11–33.Google Scholar
  17. Hansen, S. (1989) Debt for nature swaps: Overview and discussion of key issues. Ecological Economics 1 (1): 77–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Heller, P. (2005) Fiscal space: What it is and how to get it. Finance and Development 42 (2): 32–33.Google Scholar
  19. IDA, IMF (2011) Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) Initiative and Multilateral Debt Relief Initiative (MDRI): Status of Implementation and Proposals for the Future of the HIPC Initiative. Washington DC: IMF.Google Scholar
  20. IMF (2003) Appendix II: Uruguay: An assessment of the debt exchange operation. In: IMF, Uruguay: Washington DC: IMF. Country report 03/247, pp. 41–57.Google Scholar
  21. IMF (2008) Uruguay: Ex Post Evaluation of Exceptional Access under the 2005 Stand-By Arrangement. Washington DC: IMF. Country Report 08/47.Google Scholar
  22. Jha, R. and Schatan, C. (2001) Debt for nature: A swap whose time has gone? Santiago: ECLAC, Working Paper LC/MEX/L.497.Google Scholar
  23. Kaiser, J. and Lambert, A. (1996) Debt Swaps for Sustainable Development: A Practical Guide for NGOs. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.Google Scholar
  24. Kolshus, H., Vevatne, J., Torvanger, A. and Aunan, K. (2001) Can the clean development mechanism attain both cost-effectiveness and sustainable development objectives? Oslo: CICERO, Working Paper 2001: 8.Google Scholar
  25. Krugman, P. (1988) Financing versus forgiving a debt overhang. Journal of Development Economics 29 (3): 253–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lema, A. and Lema, R. (2013) Technology transfer in the clean development mechanism: Insights from wind power. Global Environmental Change 23 (1): 301–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lovejoy, T.E. (1984) Aid debtor nations’ ecology. New York Times 4 October: A31.Google Scholar
  28. Michaelowa, A. and Michaelowa, K. (2011) Coding error or statistical embellishment? The political economy of reporting climate aid. World Development 39 (11): 2010–2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ndikumana, L. (2004) Additionality of debt relief and debt forgiveness, and implications for future volumes of official assistance. International Review of Economics and Finance 13 (3): 325–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Olsen, K.H. (2007) The clean development mechanism’s contribution to sustainable development: A review of the literature. Climatic Change 84 (1): 59–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Paulsson, E. (2009) A review of the CDM literature: From fine-tuning to critical scrutiny? International Environmental Agreements 9 (1): 63–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pechak, O., Mavrotas, G. and Diakoulaki, D. (2011) Role and contribution of the clean development mechanism to the development of wind energy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15 (7): 3380–3387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ruiz, M. (2007) Debt Swaps for Development: Creative Solution or Smoke Screen? Brussels, Belgium: Eurodad.Google Scholar
  34. Schneider, L. (2007) Is the CDM Fulfilling Its Environmental and Sustainable Development Objectives? An Evaluation of the CDM and Options for Improvement. Berlin, Germany: Öko-Institut.Google Scholar
  35. Sheikh, P.A. (2010) Debt-for-Nature Initiatives and The Tropical Forest Conservation Act: Status and Implementation. Washington DC: CRS. Report for Congress (30 March 2010 update).Google Scholar
  36. Sturzenegger, F. and Zettelmeyer, J. (2005) Haircuts: Estimating investor losses in sovereign debt restructurings, 1998–2005. Washington DC: IMF, Working Paper 05/137.Google Scholar
  37. UNEP (2007) Overview of UNEP’s CDM activities: Enhancing a more equitable regional distribution of CDM project activities. Roskilde: Risø Centre, UNEP.Google Scholar
  38. UNFCCC (1992) United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, FCCC/INFORMAL/84.Google Scholar
  39. UNFCCC (1997) Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations framework convention on climate change. Conference of the Parties 3rd Session; December 1997, Kyoto.Google Scholar
  40. UNFCCC (2002) Modalities and procedures for a clean development mechanism, as defined in Article 12 of the Kyoto Protocol, In: UNFCCC, Report of the Conference of the Parties on its Seventh Session, held At Marrakesh from 29 October to 10 November 2001 – Part two: Action taken by the Conference of the Parties, FCCC/CP/2001/13/Add.2, pp. 20–49.Google Scholar
  41. UNFCCC (2008) Clean Development Mechanism 2008 in Brief. Bonn: Climate Change Secretariat, UNFCCC.Google Scholar
  42. van der Gaast, W., Begg, K. and Flamos, A. (2009) Promoting sustainable energy technology transfers to developing countries through the CDM. Applied Energy 86 (2): 230–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Vera, J.M. (2007) Experiencias Y Resultados De Los Canjes De Deuda Por Educación En Iberoamérica. Madrid, Spain: SEGIB.Google Scholar
  44. World Bank (2009a) Carbon Finance Guide for Task Team Leaders. Washington DC: Carbon Finance Unit, World Bank.Google Scholar
  45. World Bank (2009b) Public Attitudes Toward Climate Change: Findings from a Multi-Country Poll. Washington DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  46. World Bank (2010) World Development Report 2010: Development and Climate Change. Washington DC: World Bank.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Development Policy and Management (IOB), University of AntwerpAntwerpBelgium
  2. 2.Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource ManagementUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations