Advertisement

The European Journal of Development Research

, Volume 24, Issue 2, pp 242–260 | Cite as

Korea's Search for a Global Role between Hard Economic Interests and Soft Power

  • Thomas Kalinowski
  • Hyekyung Cho
Original Article

Abstract

South Korea has been a rising economic power for some decades. It exhibits several behavioral traits associated with rising powers such as issue leadership and opportunity seeking. Korea aims to be an issue leader in the field of development, although it seeks to secure the foundations for further sustained economic growth. In this article, we investigate Korea's global strategy since the 1990s, aiming to translate its economic clout into global political influence. The focus is placed on a critical evaluation of the approach under the current Lee Myung Bak administration since 2008. This article examines the domestic factors that have led Korea to pursue its strategies of securing influence, including most notably the legacy of the mercantilist developmental state. The article raises cautionary concerns about the capacity of Korea to adopt a foreign policy that moves beyond economic self-interest and plays an active role in the creation of global public goods.

Keywords

international relations international political economy development international organizations middle power Korea 

Abstract

La Corée du Sud est depuis quelques décennies une puissance économique montante. Elle présente plusieurs caractéristiques associées aux puissances émergentes, telles que le leadership thématique ou la recherche d’opportunités. La Corée souhaite jouer le rôle de leader thématique en matière de développement, et cherche dans le même temps à assurer les fondations d’une croissance économique durable. Dans cet article, nous examinons la stratégie globale mise en place par la Corée depuis les années 90 pour que sa montée économique se traduise par une plus grande influence politique sur la scène internationale. Plus spécifiquement, nous proposons une évaluation critique de l’approche depuis 2008 de l’administration actuelle de Lee Myung Bak. Nous examinons les facteurs internes qui ont conduit la Corée à poursuivre ses stratégies d’influence, en nous intéressant en particulier à l’héritage du modèle de développement mercantiliste. Cet article soulève des questions concernant la capacité de la Corée de mener une politique étrangère qui ne serve pas ses seuls intérêts économiques, mais joue un rôle actif dans la création de biens publics mondiaux.

References

  1. Acharya, A. (2009) Constructing a Security Community in Southeast Asia: ASEAN and the Problem of Regional Order. New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  2. Ahn, D. (2003) Korea in the GATT/WTO dispute settlement system: Legal battle for economic development. Journal of International Economic Law 6 (3): 597–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amsden, A.H. (1989) Asia's Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Borger, J. (2008) Rich countries launch great land grab to safeguard food supply. Guardian 22 November.Google Scholar
  5. Cammack, P. (2011) The G20, the crisis, and the rise of global developmental liberalism. Third World Quarterly 33 (1): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carmody, P. (2012) Another BRIC in the wall: South Africa's developmental impact and contradictory rise in Africa and beyond. European Journal of Development Research 24 (2): 223–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. CDIC. (2010) Reform Plan for Korean International Development Cooperation.Google Scholar
  8. Cerny, P.G. (1997) Paradoxes of the competition state: The dynamics of political globalization. Government and Opposition 32 (2): 251–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chang, H.-J., Park, H.-J. and Yoo, C.G. (1998) Interpreting the Korean crisis: Financial liberalisation, industrial policy and corporate governance. Cambridge Journal Economics 22 (6): 735–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chin, G.T. (2010) Remaking the architecture: The emerging powers, self-insuring and regional insulation. International Affairs 86 (3): 693–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cho, H. and Kalinowski, T. (2010) Bank nationalization, restructuring and reprivatization. The case of Korea since the Asian financial crisis. Korea Observer 41 (1): 1–30.Google Scholar
  12. Choe, S.-h. (2005) South Korea's ‘balancer’ policy attacked. International Herald Tribune 9 April.Google Scholar
  13. Chun, H.-M., Munyi, E.N. and Lee, H. (2010) South Korea as an emerging donor: Challenges and changes on its entering OECD/DAC. Journal of International Development 22 (6): 788–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chung, W.T. (2010) The Research for Expanding Overseas Advancement of Energy Facilities and Technologies: Central Asia and Africa Region. KEEI Research Papers 10 (21).Google Scholar
  15. Cooper, A.F. (1997) Niche Diplomacy: Middle Powers after the Cold War. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cooper, A.F. (2011) The G20 and its regional critics: The search for inclusion. Global Policy 2 (2): 203–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cooper, A.F. and Antkeiwicz, A. (2008) Emerging Powers and Global Governance. Waterloo, Canada: Wilfried Laurier University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Dent, C.M. and Randerson, C. (1996) Korean foreign direct investment in Europe: The determining forces. The Pacific Review 9 (4): 531–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Deyo, F.C. (1987) The Political Economy of the New Asian Industrialism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Easterly, W.R. (2001) The Effect of IMF and World Bank Programmes on Poverty. Helsinki, Finland: United Nations University World Institute for Development Economics Research.Google Scholar
  21. Easterly, W.R. (2006) The White Man's Burden: Why the West's Efforts to Aid the Rest Have Done So Much Ill and So Little Good. New York: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  22. Euh, Y.-d. (2010) From ‘Korea discount’ to Korea premium. The Korea Times 4 June, http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/biz/2011/12/300_67073.html.
  23. Evans, P. (1995) Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Evans, P. (1998) Transferable lessons? Re-examining the institutional prerequisites of East Asian economic policies. Journal of Development Studies 34 (6): 66(21).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Evans, P., Rueschemeyer, D. and Skocpol, T. (1985) Bringing the state back in. Cambridge [Cambridgeshire], NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. G20. (2009) Leaders’ Statement. The Pittsburgh Summit, 24–25 September, http://www.g20.org/Documents/pittsburgh_summit_leaders_statement_250909.pdf, accessed 20 January 2010.
  27. G20. (2010a) G20 Seoul Communique Annex, http://www.g20.org/Documents2010/11/seoulsummit_annexes.pdf, accessed 12 November 2010.
  28. G20. (2010b) The G20 Seoul Summit Leaders’ Declaration. 11–12 November, http://www.g20.org/Documents2010/11/seoulsummit_declaration.pdf, accessed 12 November 2010.
  29. Haggard, S. (2000) The Political Economy of the Asian Financial Crisis. Washington DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
  30. Hirschman, A.O. (1958) The Strategy of Economic Development. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Huelsz, C. (2009) Middle Power Theories and Emerging Powers in International Political Economy: A Case Study of Brazil. Manchester: University of Manchester.Google Scholar
  32. Hur, S.-K., Jha, S., Park, D. and Quising, P. (2010) Did Fiscal Stimulus Lift Developing Asia Out of the Global Crisis? A Preliminary Empirical Investigation. ADB Economics Working Paper Series (215).Google Scholar
  33. IEO/IMF. (2003) The IMF and Recent Capital Account Crises: Indonesia, Korea, Brazil. Washington DC: Independent Evaluation Office. International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
  34. IMF. (2010a) Factsheet. The IMF's Flexible Credit Line (FCL), http://www.imf.org/external/np/exr/facts/fcl.htm, accessed 20 January 2011.
  35. IMF. (2010b) Factsheet. The IMF's Precautionary Credit Line (PCL), http://www.imf.org/external/np/exr/facts/pcl.htm, accessed 20 January 2011.
  36. IMF. (2011) IMF.Stat, http://imfstatext.imf.org, accessed 26 April 2011.
  37. Jeong, S.-i. (2004) Crisis and Restructuring in East Asia: The Case of the Korean Chaebol and the Automotive Industry. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Johnson, C.A. (1982) MITI and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy, 1925–1975. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Johnson, C.A. (1995) Japan, Who Governs? The Rise of the Developmental State, 1st edn. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  40. Jordaan, E. (2003) The concept of a middle power in international relations: Distinguishing between emerging and traditional middle powers. Politikon 30 (1): 165–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jordaan, E. (2012) South Africa, multilateralism, and the global politics of development. European Journal of Development Research 24 (2): 283–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Jung, W. (2010) Korean Development Cooperation Model. Seongnam, Korea: KOICA.Google Scholar
  43. Kalinowski, T. (2008) Korea's recovery since the 1997/98 financial crisis: The last stage of the developmental state. New Political Economy 13 (4): 447–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kalinowski, T. (2010) Can Korea be a bridge between developing and developed countries in the G20 and beyond? In: T. Fues and P. Wolff (eds.) G20 and Global Development. How can the New Summit Architecture Promote pro-poor Growth and Sustainability? Bonn, Germany: DIE-GDI.Google Scholar
  45. Kalinowski, T. (2011a) East Asia in the global governance of finance. In: M. Metzger (ed.) Global Financial Stability: A Dialogue on Regulation and Cooperation. Selected Expert Papers from the Dialogue Forums 2010. Berlin, Germany: Deutsche Gesellschaft fuer Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ).Google Scholar
  46. Kalinowski, T. (2011b) Regulating International Finance and the Evolving Imbalance of Capitalisms since the 1970s. MPIfG Discussion Paper 11(10).Google Scholar
  47. Kalinowski, T. and Cho, H. (2009) The political economy of financial market liberalization in South Korea: State, big business, and foreign investors. Asian Survey 49 (2): 221–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kang, C. (2000) Segyehwa reform of the South Korean developmental state. In: S. Kim (ed.) Korea's Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 76–101.Google Scholar
  49. Kaplinsky, R. and Morris, M. (2009) Chinese FDI in Sub-Saharan Africa: Engaging with large dragons. European Journal of Development Research 21 (4): 551–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. KDI. (2011) Knowledge Sharing Program, http://www.ksp.go.kr, accessed 1 November 2011.Google Scholar
  51. KEXIM. (2011) Foreign investment statistics database, http://www.koreaexim.go.kr, accessed 14 November 2011.
  52. Kim, B.K. and Vogel, E.F. (2011) The Park Chung Hee Era: The Transformation of South Korea. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kim, C.N. (2007) The Korean Presidents: Leadership for Nation Building. Norwalk: EastBridge.Google Scholar
  54. Kim, E.M. (1997) Big Business, Strong State: Collusion and Conflict in South Korean Development, 1960–1990. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  55. Kim, E.M. (2000) Globalization of the South Korean chaebol. In: S.S. Kim (ed.) Korea's Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 102–125.Google Scholar
  56. Kim, J.M. and Rhee, D.K. (2009) Trends and determinants of South Korean outward foreign direct investment. The Copenhagen Journal of Asian Studies 27 (1): 126–154.Google Scholar
  57. Kim, L. (2004) The multifaceted evolution of Korean technological capabilities and its implications for contemporary policy. Oxford Development Studies 32 (3): 341–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Kim, S. (2008) South Korea may use price controls to cool inflation. Bloomberg 15 July, http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=a.9i_ixgslIw.
  59. Kim, S. (2011) Bridging troubled worlds? An analysis of the ethical case for South Korean Aid. Journal of International Development 23 (6): 802–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. KOICA. (2006) Annual Report Seongnam. KOICA.Google Scholar
  61. KOICA. (2008) Annual Report Seongnam. KOICA.Google Scholar
  62. KOICA. (2011) KOICA Database, http://stat.koica.go.kr/, accessed 1 November 2011.
  63. Lee, D.S. (2010) Strategies for Oil Industry in the Future: Crude Oil Procurement. Korea Energy Economics Institute (KEEI) Research Papers 10 (24).Google Scholar
  64. Lee, H.-j. (2008) Per capita income dips below the $20k level. Korea JoongAng Daily 10 December, http://koreajoongangdaily.joinsmsn.com/news/article/article.aspx?aid=2898404.
  65. Lee, M.B. (2010a) Full text of president Lee's special address at Davos forum. Yonhap News Agency, http://english.yonhapnews.co.kr/business/2010/01/28/31/0502000000AEN20100128008700315F.HTML.
  66. Lee, M.B. (2010b) Radio and Internet address to the nation by President Lee Myung-bak. 12 July, http://www.korea.net/news.do?mode=detail&guid=48324.
  67. List, F. (1856) National System of Political Economy. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott & co.Google Scholar
  68. Magnall, D. (2010) US-Korea economic relations: A Washington perspective. In: KEI and KIEP (eds.) Korea's Economy, Vol. 26. Washington DC and Seoul: KEI and KEIP, pp. 41–44.Google Scholar
  69. Ministry of Knowledge Economy. (2008) Overseas energy development statistics, http://www.mke.go.kr/common/popup/pop_oil.jsp, accessed 14 December 2011.
  70. Ministry of Knowledge Economy. (2009) Press Release 11 May 2009. http://www.mke.go.kr/news/coverage/bodoView.jsp?pCtx=1&seq=50709, accessed 20 November 2011.
  71. Ministry of Knowledge Economy. (2010) Energy policies: Promote overseas energy development projects, http://www.mke.go.kr/info/resource/resource_05.jsp, accessed 20 November 2011.
  72. MOFAT. (2011) FTA status of ROK, http://www.mofat.go.kr/ENG/policy/fta/status/overview/index.jsp?menu=m_20_80_10, accessed 30 November 2011.
  73. MOSF. (2008) Press Release, 21 October: Proposed measures to overcome uncertainties in the international financial markets, http://english.mosf.go.kr/pre/view.do?bcd=N0001&seq=2010&bPage=1, accessed 26 April 2011.
  74. MOSF. (2009) Action plan for Korean economic development experience sharing program.Google Scholar
  75. Nomura, A. (2011) Korean public pension fund's investment in overseas energy resources. Nomura Journal of Capital Markets 2 (4): 1–4.Google Scholar
  76. Nye, J.S. (1990) Soft power. Foreign Policy (80): 153–171.Google Scholar
  77. Nye, J.S. (2004) Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics, 1st edn. New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
  78. OECD. (2010) OECD Factbook 2010. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  79. OECD. (2011a) Busan partnership for effective development co-operation, http://www.aideffectiveness.org/busanhlf4/en/about/key-documents.html, accessed 28 December 2011.
  80. OECD. (2011b) Development aid: Net official development assistance (ODA) 2011, http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/aid-oda-table-2011-1-en, accessed 28 December 2011.
  81. OECD. (2011c) Korea ODA at a glance, http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/18/26/47363951.gif, accessed 28 December 2011.
  82. OECD. (2011d) Real gross domestic product – forecasts, 2011, http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/gdp-kusd-gr-table-2011-1-en, accessed 28 December 2011.
  83. Park, K.-h. (2010) Korea's role in global development. In: T.B. Institution (ed.) Brookings Northeast Asia Commentary. Washington DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  84. Parker, J. (2009) The Madagascar model. The Economist 13 November.Google Scholar
  85. Payne, A. (2010) How many Gs are there in ‘global governance’ after the crisis? The perspectives of the ‘marginal majority’ of the world's states. International Affairs 86 (3): 729–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Presidential Committee for the G20 Summit, K. (2010) Development Issue Paper, http://www.boell.org/downloads/Development_Issue_Paper.pdf, accessed 17 November 2011.
  87. Ravenhill, J. (2010) The ‘new East Asian regionalism’: A political domino effect. Review of International Political Economy 17 (2): 178–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Sachwald, F. (2001) Going Multinational: The Korean Experience of Direct Investment. London, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  89. Sachwald, F. (2004) FDI and the Economic Status of Korea: The Hub Strategy in Perspective. Washington DC: Korea Economic Institute.Google Scholar
  90. SAPRIN. (2004) Structural Adjustment: The SAPRIN Report: The Policy Roots of Economic Crisis, Poverty, and Inequality. London, NY: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  91. Scott, J., vom Hau, M. and Hulme, D. (2010) Beyond the BICs: Identifying the ‘Emerging Middle Powers’ and Understanding their Role in Global Poverty Reduction. Brooks World Poverty Institute Working Paper Series 137.Google Scholar
  92. Seo, E. and Sim, W. (2011) South Korea battles record inflation with rate rise and price controls. Bloomberg 14 January, http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-01-13/bank-of-korea-raises-interest-rate-after-government-vowed-to-damp-prices.html.
  93. Singh, K. (2010) Emerging markets consider capital controls to regulate speculative capital flows, http://www.voxeu.org/index.php?q=node/5267, accessed 6 October 2010.
  94. Smith, D.A. (1997) Technology, commodity chains and global inequality: South Korea in the 1990s. Review of International Political Economy 4 (4): 734–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Stamm, A. (2004) Schwellen-und Ankerländer als Akteure einer globalen Partnerschaft: Überlegungen zu einer Positionsbestimmung aus deutscher entwicklungspolitischer Sicht. German Development Institute Discussion Papers (1).Google Scholar
  96. Stubbs, R. (1999) War and economic development: Export-oriented industrialization in East and Southeast Asia. Comparative Politics 31 (3): 337–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Stubbs, R. (2005) Rethinking Asia's Economic Miracle: The Political Economy of War, Prosperity, and Crisis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  98. Taylor, I. (2006) China's oil diplomacy in Africa. International Affairs 82 (5): 937–959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. The Economist. (2010) Capital controls in South Korea The won that got away, http://www.economist.com/node/16381310, accessed 3 December 2010.
  100. Truman, E.M. (2010) The G-20 and International Financial Institution Governance. Peterson Institute for International Economics Working Paper Series 10 (12).Google Scholar
  101. UNCTAD. (2010) FDI World Report. Geneva.Google Scholar
  102. UNCTAD. (2011) UNCTAT STAT, http://unctadstat.unctad.org, accessed 16 December 2011.
  103. vom Hau, M., Scott, J. and Hulme, D. (2012) Beyond the BRICs: Alternative strategies of influence in the global politics of development. European Journal of Development Research 24 (2): 187–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Wade, R. (1993) Managing trade: Taiwan and South Korea as challenges to economics and political science. Comparative Politics 25 (2): 147–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Wade, R. (1996) Japan, the World bank, and the art of paradigm maintenance: The East Asian miracle in political perspective. New Left Review (217): 3–37.Google Scholar
  106. Wade, R. (2004) Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  107. Weber, M. (1980) Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft: Grundriss d. verstehenden Soziologie (5., rev. Aufl. ed.). Tübingen, Germany: Mohr.Google Scholar
  108. Williamson, J. (1990) What Washington means by policy reform. In: J. Williamson (ed.) Latin American Adjustment: How much has Happened, Vol. 7. Washington DC: Institute for International Economics, pp. 7–20.Google Scholar
  109. Wolf, M. (2004) Why Globalization Works. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  110. Woo-Cumings, M. (1991) Race to the Swift: State and Finance in Korean Industrialization. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  111. Woo-Cumings, M. (1999) The Developmental State. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  112. Zhu, Z. (2007) Small power, Big ambition: South Korea's role in Northeast Asian security under president Roh Moo-hyun. Asian Affairs 34 (2): 67–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas Kalinowski
    • 1
  • Hyekyung Cho
    • 2
  1. 1.Graduate School of International Studies, Ewha Womans UniversitySeoul
  2. 2.Financial Economy InstituteSeoul

Personalised recommendations