The European Journal of Development Research

, Volume 22, Issue 2, pp 141–153 | Cite as

What Happened to Doha in Geneva?

Re-engineering the WTO's Image While Missing Key Opportunities
  • James Scott
  • Rorden Wilkinson
Invited Essay

Abstract

This article offers an account and analysis of the World Trade Organization's (WTO) 7th Ministerial Conference – a meeting that, although ‘successfully’ concluded, failed to address a series of key issues in the increasingly moribund Doha Round of trade negotiations. We begin with an account of the meeting that offers an insight into the ‘colour’ of these biennial gatherings. The article then identifies and explores the primary consequences of pursuing an agenda designed not to focus on the core issues in the Doha Round but instead to ensure that the meeting is a ‘success’. Here we draw attention to the increasingly problematic nature of the Round's ‘development’ content, the thorny issue of agricultural liberalization and the problems posed for developing countries when their industrial counterparts pursue trade objectives through regional and bilateral means. In the concluding section, we consider the way forward for both the Doha Round and the WTO as an institution.

Cet essai invité offre un compte-rendu et une analyse de la 7ème conférence ministérielle de l′Organisation mondiale du commerce, une réunion qui, bien qu’ayant été formellement conclue de manière « satisfaisante », n′a pas abordé les questions clés associées aux négociations commerciales du Cycle – de plus en plus moribond – de Doha. Nous commençons avec une description de la réunion même, afin de donner une idée de la tonalité de ces rassemblements bisannuels. Nous identifions et explorons ensuite les conséquences du fait que la conférence ait poursuivi un ordre du jour qui n′avait pas pour but de se pencher sur les questions fondamentales du Cycle de Doha, mais plutôt d′assurer que la réunion serait un « succès ». Nous poursuivons notre analyse en attirant l′attention sur la nature de plus en plus problématique du contenu des négociations du Cycle de Doha, le problème épineux de la libéralisation agricole et les problèmes rencontrés par les pays en voie de développement quand leurs partenaires industriels poursuivent des objectifs commerciaux par des moyens régionaux et bilatéraux. En guise de conclusion, nous considérons le futur du Cycle de Doha ainsi que de l′OMC en tant qu′institution.

Keywords

trade liberalization development World Trade Organization Global Governance Doha Round 

References

  1. Ackerman, F. (2005) The Shrinking Gains from Trade: A Critical Assessment of Doha Round Projections. Medford, MA: Tufts University. Global Development and Environment Institute Working Paper no. 05–01.Google Scholar
  2. Action Aid. (2008) Impact of Agro-Import Surges in Developing Countries. Johannesburg: Action Aid International.Google Scholar
  3. Anania, G. (2009) How Would a WTO Agreement on Bananas Affect Exporting and Importing Countries? ICTSD Programme on Agricultural Trade and Sustainable Development. Geneva, Switzerland: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson, K. and Martin, W. (2005) Agricultural Trade Reform and the Doha Development Agenda. Washington DC: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Associated Press. (2009) Geneva: Police use tear gas on WTO protest. 29 November.Google Scholar
  6. Beattie, A. (2009) Retread required. Financial Times, Asia Edition, 1 December: 7.Google Scholar
  7. Clapp, J. (2007) WTO agriculture negotiations and the global south. In: D. Lee and R. Wilkinson (eds.) The WTO after Hong Kong: Progress in, and Prospects for, the Doha Development Agenda. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 37–55.Google Scholar
  8. Conway, E. (2009a) WTO head Pascal Lamy keeps faith in world trade talks. Daily Telegraph, online edition, 21 November.Google Scholar
  9. Conway, E. (2009b) US warning over world trade talks. Daily Telegraph, 2 December: 5.Google Scholar
  10. El-Said, M. (2007) Free trade, intellectual property and trips-plus world. Liverpool Law Review 28 (1): 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gallagher, K. and Wise, T. (2009) Cleaning the house at the WTO. guardian.co.uk, 1 December, http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2009/dec/01/wto-dohatradetalks.
  12. International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development. (2009) Bridges daily update day 3: Members aim for Doha ‘Stocktaking’ in March. 3 December, http://ictsd.org/i/trade-and-sustainable-development-agenda/63939/.
  13. International Cotton Advisory Committee. (2002) Production and Trade Policies Affecting the Cotton Industry. Washington DC: International Cotton Advisory Committee.Google Scholar
  14. Ismail, F. (2009) An assessment of the WTO Doha Round, July–December 2008. World Trade Review 8 (4): 579–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Narlikar, A. and Wilkinson, R. (2004) Collapse at the WTO: A Cancún post-mortem. Third World Quarterly 25 (3): 447–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Oxfam. (2002) Cultivating Poverty: The Impact of US Cotton Subsidies on Africa. Oxford: Oxfam. Oxfam Briefing Paper no. 30.Google Scholar
  17. Polaski, S. (2006) Winners and Losers: Impact of the Doha Round on Developing Countries. Washington DC: CEIP.Google Scholar
  18. Ravallion, M. (2001) On the Urbanization of Poverty. Washington DC: World Bank. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series no. 2586.Google Scholar
  19. Reuters. (2009) Calls grow to smash WTO deal into digestible pieces. 3 December, http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE5B229G20091203.
  20. Scott, J. (2007) How the poor pay for the US Trade deficit and why it matters for the Doha Development Agenda. In: D. Lee and R. Wilkinson (eds.) The WTO After Hong Kong. London: Routledge, pp. 97–117.Google Scholar
  21. Scott, J. (2008) The use and misuse of trade simulations. The Journal of World Trade 42 (1): 87–103.Google Scholar
  22. South Centre. (2009) The Proposed Special Safeguard Mechanism (SSM) in the WTO: Is it still ‘Special’? (Draft document). Geneva: South Centre.Google Scholar
  23. Stewart, H. (2009) Ten years on, Seattle rioters win by default. The Observer, 29 November: Business Section: 2.Google Scholar
  24. Wilkinson, R. (2004) Crisis in Cancún. Global Governance 10 (2): 149–155.Google Scholar
  25. Wilkinson, R. (2006a) The WTO: Crisis and the Governance of Global Trade. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Wilkinson, R. (2006b) The WTO in Hong Kong: What it really means for the Doha Development Agenda. New Political Economy 11 (2): 291–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wise, T.A. and Gallagher, K.P. (2006) Doha Round and Developing Countries: Will the Doha Deal Do More Harm than Good? Research and Information System for Developing Countries Policy Brief no. 22.Google Scholar
  28. WTO. (2004) Doha Work Programme: Decision Adopted by the General Council on 1 August 2004. Document WT/L/579.Google Scholar
  29. WTO. (2009a) Provisional Agenda. Document WT/MIN(09)/W/2.Google Scholar
  30. WTO. (2009b) Council for Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights – Annual Report (2009) of the Council for TRIPS – Addendum. Document IP/C/52/Add.1.Google Scholar
  31. WTO. (2009c) Work Programme on Electronic Commerce: Report to the 17 November 2009 Meeting of the General Council. Document WT/GC/W/613.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • James Scott
    • 1
  • Rorden Wilkinson
    • 1
  1. 1.Brooks World Poverty Institute, University of ManchesterManchester

Personalised recommendations