Advertisement

The European Journal of Development Research

, Volume 22, Issue 4, pp 564–581 | Cite as

Variations of Late Socialist Development: Integration and Marginalization in the Northern Uplands of Vietnam and Laos

  • Rupert FriederichsenEmail author
  • Andreas Neef
Original Article

Abstract

This article analyzes the dynamics of integration and marginalization inherent in the development process experienced by the rural upland areas of Vietnam and Lao PDR. Focusing on the post-1980s reform period, we compare the two uplands areas along the three themes ethnic difference and hierarchy, development policies and market permeation. In both countries, the low and differential status of ethnic minorities is reflected in policy formulation and implementation, contradicting the official rhetoric and goal of unity and equality among ethnic groups. Market influences are increasingly permeating the uplands of both countries although to varying degrees, connecting them with not only national, but also global commodity markets, and leading to increasing differentiation within and between ethnic groups. These development trajectories integrate and marginalize ethnic minority groups and individuals simultaneously but differentially.

Cet article analyse les dynamiques d’intégration et de marginalisation liées au processus de développement qui a lieu dans les régions rurales montagneuses du Vietnam et du Laos. En nous concentrant sur la période de réformes postérieure aux années 80, nous effectuons une comparaison de deux régions montagneuses, autour de trois thèmes: différences ethniques et hiérarchie, politiques de développement, et pénétration de marché. Dans les deux pays, la situation– généralement défavorable– des minorités ethniques se reflète dans la formulation et la mise en œuvre des politiques, ce qui contredit le discours et l’objectif officiel de promotion de l’unité et de l’égalité entre les différents groupes ethniques. De plus, l’influence du marché se fait de plus en plus sentir dans les régions montagneuses des deux pays – bien qu’à des degrés différents – ce qui les met en contact avec des marchés non seulement nationaux mais aussi internationaux, et accroît de ce fait la différenciation tant au sein qu’entre les différents groupes ethniques. Ces trajectoires de développement intègrent et marginalisent les minorités ethniques et les individus de manière simultanée mais différenciée.

Keywords

integration marginalization uplands Vietnam Lao PDR rural development 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The financial support of the German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft – DFG) for conducting the field research in Vietnam is gratefully acknowledged. The field research in Laos was made possible through a grant from the Centre of Agriculture in the Tropics and Subtropics, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, and the Eiselen Foundation Ulm, Germany. We are also thankful for the financial and logistic support provided by IP-Consult, Stuttgart and the German Agency of Technical Cooperation (GTZ) during the fieldwork in Laos. The quality of this article has greatly benefited from the constructive comments of two anonymous reviewers.

References

  1. Asian Development Bank – ADB. (2002) Indigenous Peoples/Ethnic Minorities and Poverty Reduction: Viet Nam. Manila, Philippines: Asian Development Bank.Google Scholar
  2. Baird, I.G. and Shoemaker, B. (2007) Unsettling experiences: Internal resettlement and international aid agencies in Laos. Development and Change 38 (5): 865–888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bell, P.F. (1996) Development or maldevelopment? The contradictions of Thailand's economic growth. In: M. Parnwell (ed.) Uneven Development in Thailand. Aldershot, UK: Avebury, pp. 49–62.Google Scholar
  4. Bouapao, L. (2005) Rural Development in Lao PDR: Managing Projects for Integrated Sustainable Livelihoods. Chiang Mai, Thailand: Regional Center for Social Science and Sustainable Development.Google Scholar
  5. Castella, J.C. and Dang, D.Q. (eds.) (2002) Doi Moi in the Mountains: Land Use Changes and Farmers’ Livelihood Strategies in Bac Kan Province. Hanoi, Vietnam: Agriculture Publishing House.Google Scholar
  6. Chiengthong, J. (2003) The politics of ethnicity, indigenous culture and knowledge in Thailand, Vietnam and Lao PDR. In: J. Dore and M. Kaosa-ard (eds.) Social Challenges for the Mekong Region. Bangkok, Thailand: White Lotus, pp. 147–172.Google Scholar
  7. Corlin, C. (2004) Hmong and the land question in Vietnam: National policy and local concepts of the environment. In: N. Tapp, J. Michaud, C. Culas and G.Y. Lee (eds.) Hmong/Miao in Asia. Chiang Mai, Thailand: Silkworm Books, pp. 295–321.Google Scholar
  8. Dang, N.V., Chu, T.S. and Luu, H. (1993) Ethnic Minorities in Vietnam. Hanoi, Thailand: The Gioi Publishers.Google Scholar
  9. Duncan, C. (2004) Legislating modernity among the marginalized. In: C. Duncan (ed.) Civilizing the Margins: Southeast Asian Government Policies for the Development of Minorities. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 1–23.Google Scholar
  10. Evans, G. (2003) Laos: Minorities. In: C. Mackerras (ed.) Ethnicity in Asia. London: RoutledgeCurzon, pp. 210–224.Google Scholar
  11. Evrard, O. and Goudineau, Y. (2004) Planned resettlement, unexpected migration and cultural trauma in Laos. Development and Change 35 (5): 937–962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Friederichsen, R. (2009) Opening up Knowledge Production through Participatory Research? Agricultural Research for Vietnam's Northern Uplands. Frankfurt a. M., Berlin, Bruxelles, Germany: Peter Lang Verlag.Google Scholar
  13. Hardy, A. (2003) State visions, migrant decisions: Population movements since the end of the Vietnam War. In: Hy V. Luong (ed.) Postwar Vietnam: Dynamics of a Transforming Society. Singapore: ISEAS, pp. 107–138.Google Scholar
  14. Jamieson, N.L., Le T.C. and Rambo, A.T. (1998) The Development Crisis in Vietnam's Mountains. East-West Center Special Reports. Honolulu, HI: East-West Center.Google Scholar
  15. Kerkvliet, B.J.T. (2005) The Power of Everyday Politics: How Vietnamese Peasants Transformed National Policy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Keyes, C. (2002) Presidential address: ‘The peoples of Asia’-Science and politics in the classification of ethnic groups in Thailand, China, and Vietnam. The Journal of Asian Studies 61 (4): 1163–1203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Khong D. (2002) Population and Ethnodemography in Vietnam. Chiang Mai, Thailand: Silkworm Books.Google Scholar
  18. Le, T.C. and Rambo, A.T. (eds.) (2002) Bright Peaks, Dark Valleys: A Comparative Analysis of Environmental and Social Conditions and Development Trends in Five Communities in Vietnam's Northern Mountain Region. Hanoi, Vietnam: National Political Publishing House.Google Scholar
  19. Linquist, B.A., Keoboualapha, B., Sipseuth and Inthapanya, P. (2006) Rice production systems of Laos. In: J.M. Schiller, M.B. Chanphengxay, B. Linquist and S. Appa Rao (eds.) Rice in Laos. Los Baños, CA: International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), pp. 29–45.Google Scholar
  20. MacAlister, J.T. (1967) Mountain minorities and the Viet Minh: A key to the Indochina war. In: P. Kuhnstadter (ed.) Southeast Asian Tribes, Minorities, and Nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 771–844.Google Scholar
  21. McCaskill, D. and Kampe, K. (eds.) (1997) Development or Domestication? Indigenous Peoples of Southeast Asia. Chiang Mai, Thailand: Silkworm Books.Google Scholar
  22. McElwee, P. (2004) Becoming socialist or becoming Kinh? Government policies for ethnic minorities in the Socialist Republic of Viet Nam. In: C. Duncan (ed.) Civilizing the Margins: Southeast Asian Government Policies for the Development of Minorities. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 182–213.Google Scholar
  23. Michaud, J. (2000) The montagnards and the state in northern Vietnam from 1802 to 1975: A historical overview. Ethnohistory 47 (2): 333–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Milloy, M.J. and Payne, M. (1997) My way and the highway: Ethnic people and development in the Lao PDR. In: D. McCaskill and K. Kampe (eds.) Development or Domestication? Indigenous Peoples of Southeast Asia. Chiang Mai, Thailand: Silkworm Books, pp. 398–440.Google Scholar
  25. Minot, N. and Baulch, B. (2005) Spatial patterns of poverty in Vietnam and their implications for policy. Food Policy 30: 461–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Neef, A., Hager, J., Wirth, T., Schwarzmeier, R. and Heidhues, F. (2006) Land tenure and water rights in Thailand and Vietnam: Challenges for ethnic minorities in mountainous forest regions. Geographica Helvetica 61 (4): 255–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nguyen, D.L., Friederichsen, R. and Neef, A. (2006) The challenge of coordinating rural service provision and bridging the farmer/extensionist interface in northern upland Vietnam. Proceedings of the International Symposium ‘Towards Sustainable Land Use and Rural Development in Mountainous Regions’; 7–9 March, Chiang Mai, Thailand (on CD-rom).Google Scholar
  28. Ovesen, J. (2004) All Lao? Minorities in the Lao people's democratic republic. In: C. Duncan (ed.) Civilizing the Margins: Southeast Asian Government Policies for the Development of Minorities. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 214–240.Google Scholar
  29. Pelley, P. (1998) Barbarians’ and ‘younger brothers’: The remaking of race in postcolonial Vietnam. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 29 (2): 347–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Proschan, F. (2003) Vietnam's Ethnic Mosaic. In: Nguyen, V.H. and L. Kendall (eds.) Vietnam: Journeys of Body, Mind, and Spirit. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, pp. 53–69.Google Scholar
  31. Rambo, A.T. (1998) The composite swiddening agroecosystem of the Tay ethnic minority group in the Northwestern mountains of Vietnam. In: A. Patanothai (ed.) Land Degradation and Agricultural Sustainability: Case Studies from Southeast and Asia. Khon Khaen, Thailand: The Southeast Asian Universities Agroecosystem Network (SUAN), pp. 43–64.Google Scholar
  32. Rambo, A.T. and Jamieson, N.L. (2003) Upland areas, ethnic minorities, and development. In: Hy V. Luong (ed.) Postwar Vietnam: Dynamics of a Transforming Society. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, pp. 139–170.Google Scholar
  33. Rambo, A.T. and Tran D.V. (2001) Social organization and the management of natural resources: A case study of Tat hamlet, a Da Bac Tay ethnic minority settlement in Vietnam's northwestern mountains. Southeast Asian Studies 39 (3): 299–324.Google Scholar
  34. Rigg, J. (1997) Southeast Asia: The Human Landscape of Modernization and Development. London, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rigg, J. (2005) Living with Transition in Laos: Market Integration in Southeast Asia. London NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Rigg, J. (2006) Land, farming, livelihoods, and poverty: Rethinking the links in the rural South. World Development 34 (1): 180–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schein, L. (2000) Minority Rules: The Miao and the Feminine in China's Cultural Politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Scott, J.C. (2009) The Art of not Being Governed: An Anarchist History of upland Southeast Asia. New Haven, CT; London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Shi, W. 2008 Rubber Boom in Luang Namtha: A Transnational Perspective. Vientiane, Lao PDR. Unpublished report to RDMA (GTZ).Google Scholar
  40. Sikor, T. (1999) The political economy of decollectivization: A study of differentiation in and among Black Thai villages of northern Vietnam. PhD thesis, University of California.Google Scholar
  41. Tran, D.T. (2005) Maize production and selling maize in Son La. In: Tran, D.V. et al (eds.) Marketing and Agroforestry Development in Vietnam's Uplands. Hanoi, Vietnam: Agricultural Publishing House, pp. 212–227.Google Scholar
  42. Tran, D.V. (2004) Changes in the composite swiddening system in Tat Hamlet in Vietnam's Northern Mountains in response to integration into the market system. In: H. Furukawa, M. Nishibuchi, Y. Kono and Y. Kaida (eds.) Ecological Destruction, Health, and Development: Advancing Asian Paradigms. Kyoto, Japan: Kyoto University Press, pp. 453–465.Google Scholar
  43. Tran, D.V. et al (eds.) (2005) Marketing and Agroforestry Development in Vietnam's Uplands. Hanoi, Vietnam: Agricultural Publishing House.Google Scholar
  44. Vietnam Consultative Group. (2003) Vietnam Development Report 2004: Poverty. Hanoi, Vietnam: Asian Development Bank.Google Scholar
  45. Wezel, A., Steinmuller, N. and Friederichsen, R. (2002) Slope position effects on soil fertility and crop productivity and implications for soil conservation in upland Northwest Vietnam. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 91: 113–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wirth, T., Dao, C.T. and Neef, A. (2004) Traditional land tenure among the Black Thai and its implication on the land allocation in Yen Chau district, Son La province, Northwest Vietnam. In: G. Gerold, M. Fremerey and E. Guhardja (eds.) Land Use, Nature Conservation, and the Stability of Rainforest Margins in Southeast Asia. Berlin, NY: Springer, pp. 119–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Yukio, H. and Wichienkeeo, A. (eds.) (2002) Interethnic Relations in the Making of Mainland Southeast Asia and Southwestern China. Bangkok and Chiang Rai, Thailand: The Center of Ethnic Studies, Rajabhat Institute.Google Scholar
  48. Zingerli, C., Castella, J.C., Pham, H.M. and Pham, V.C. (2002) Contesting policies: Rural development versus biodiversity conservation in the Ba Be National Park Area, Vietnam. In: J.C. Castella and Dang Dinh Quang (eds.) Doi Moi in the Mountains: Land Use Changes and Farmers’ Livelihood Strategies in Bac Kan Province. Hanoi, Vietnam: Agricultural Publishing House, pp. 249–276.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Manchester Metropolitan UniversityManchester
  2. 2.Kyushu UniversityFukuoka

Personalised recommendations