Advertisement

Contemporary Political Theory

, Volume 15, Issue 4, pp 339–357 | Cite as

Plato’s open secret

  • Demetra Kasimis
Article
  • 204 Downloads

Abstract

The Republic’s noble lie is widely read as an endorsement of political difference that opposes the democratic ideals of its Athenian setting. Once the text’s exclusionary political realities and rhetorical structure are attended to, however, the passages no longer appear as the template for an essentialist politics or the act of political deception they are typically taken to be. What they do is lay bare the ‘artifice’ (mēchanē) by which regimes – including classical Athens – produce membership status as a ‘natural’ category. Plato presents the regulatory fiction that one’s political ‘kind’ (genos) expresses a pre-given status as an open secret. Given the privileged awareness he affords the reader, the noble lie may be fruitfully read as revealing – not concealing – that the ‘natural’ distinctions of an exclusionary citizenship politics are the effects of willful political power. This narrative strategy takes on specific significance in the context of the blood-based membership politics of Athens, which had its own noble lie. Accordingly, Plato’s text is shown to provoke insights into questions of democratic difference usually assumed beyond its purview. The Republic is read as exposing the workings of an essentialist politics it is typically thought instead to originate and prescribe.

Keywords

Plato noble lie difference nature democracy citizenship 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author wishes to thank the editors of Contemporary Political Theory, especially Lisa Disch and Samuel Chambers, and two anonymous reviewers for their extremely helpful feedback. Previous versions benefited from presentations at the University of Chicago, Princeton University, Georgetown University and Yale University. The author owes special thanks to Mark Bauer, Mary Dietz, Jill Frank, Larry George, Adom Getachew, Emily Greenwood, Melissa Lane, John Lombardini, Nino Luraghi, Patchen Markell, John McCormick, Sara Monoson, Ella Myers, Paul North, Tracey Rosen, Claudio Sansone, Joel Schlosser, Christopher Skeaff, Christine Smallwood, Christina Tarnopolsky and Linda Zerilli for reading or talking about this article with her. For his wonderful insights into and unwavering belief in this reading, she is especially grateful to Philip Baker.

References

  1. Andrew, E. (1989) Equality of opportunity as the Noble Lie. History of Political Thought X(4): 577–595.Google Scholar
  2. Beardslee, J.W. ([1918] 1987) The use of physis in fifth-century greek literature. In: E. Hoffman, J.W. Beardslee and O. Johrens (eds.) Early Greek Thought: Three Studies. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
  3. Blok, J.H. (2009) Perikles’ citizenship law: A New perspective. Historia Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte 58(2): 141–170.Google Scholar
  4. Brisson, L. (1997) Plato, the Myth Maker, Translated by G. Naddaf Chicago, IL and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  5. Carey, C. (1997) Trials from Classical Athens. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carmola, K. (2003) Noble Lying: Justice and Intergenerational Tension in Plato’s Republic. Political Theory 31(1): 39–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chambers, S. (2009) A queer politics of the democratic miscount. Borderlands E-Journal 8(2): 1–23.Google Scholar
  8. Davies, J.K. (1977–1978) Athenian citizenship: The descent group and the alternatives. Classical Journal 73: 105–21.Google Scholar
  9. Fausto-Sterling, A. (2000) Sexing the Body. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  10. François, A. (2008) Open Secrets: The Literature of Uncounted Experience. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Frank, J. (2004) Citizens, slaves, and foreigners: Aristotle on human nature. American Political Science Review 98(1): 91–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Frank, J. (2013) By nature and by design. The Review of Politics 75(4): 685–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gleason, M. (1990) The semiotics of gender: Physiognomy and self-fashioning in the second century. In: D. Halperin, J. Winkler and F. Zeitlin (eds.) Before Sexuality: The Construction of Erotic Experience in the Ancient Greek World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Hall, J. (2002) Hellenicity: Between Ethnicity and Culture. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  15. Hesk, J. (2000) Deception and Democracy in Classical Athens. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Holmes, B. (2012) Gender: Antiquity and Its Legacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Kamen, D. (2013) Status in Classical Athens. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kasimis, D. (2013) The tragedy of blood-based membership: Secrecy and the politics of immigration in Euripides' Ion. Political Theory 41(2): 231–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kurke, L. (1995) Herodotus and the language of metals. Helios 22(1): 35–64.Google Scholar
  20. Lape, S. (2010) Race and Identity in the Classical Athenian Democracy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Loraux, N. (1993) Children of Athena. Translated by C. Levine. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Loraux, N. (2000) Born of the Earth. Translated by S. Stewart. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Markovits, E. (2009) The Politics of Sincerity: Plato, Frank Speech, and Democratic Judgment. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Menn, S. (2006) On Plato’s ΠΟΛΙΤΕΙΑ. Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy, Cleary and Gurtler (eds.). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  25. Monoson, S.S. (2000) Plato’s Democratic Entanglements. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Nails, D. (2012) Plato’s Republic in its Athenian context. History of Political Thought XXXIII(1): 1–22.Google Scholar
  27. Ogden, D. (1996) Greek Bastardy in the Classical and Hellenistic Periods. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  28. Page, C. (1991) The truth about lies in Plato’s Republic. Ancient Philosophy 11(1): 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pelling, C. (2009) Bringing autochthony up-to-date: Herodotus and Thucydides. Classical World 102(4): 471–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Plato. (1969) Plato in Twelve Volumes. Translated by P. Shorey. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Plato. (2000) In: Ferrari, G.R.F. (eds.) Translated by T. Griffith, The Republic. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Plato. (2012) Republic. Translated by C. Rowe. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  33. Plato. (2013) Republic. Translated by C. Emlyn-Jones and W. Preddy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Popper, K. (1971) The Open Society and Its Enemies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Rancière, J. (2003) The Philosopher and His Poor. Translated by J. Drury. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Rancière, J. (2006) Hatred of Democracy. Translated by S. Corcoran. London: Verso Books.Google Scholar
  37. Reinhard, K. (2012) Introduction. In: A. Badiou (eds.) Plato’s Republic: A Dialogue in 16 Chapters. Translated by S. Spitzer. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Rosenstock, B. (1994) Athena’s cloak: Plato’s critique of the democratic city in the Republic. Political Theory 22(3): 363–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rosivach, V. (1987) Autochthony and the Athenians. The Classical Quarterly 37(2): 294–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Roy, J. (2014) Autochthony in ancient Greece. In: J. McInerney (eds.) A Companion to Ethnicity in the Ancient Mediterranean. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  41. Schofield, M. (2007) The Noble Lie. In: G.R.F. Ferrari (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Plato’s Republic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Seery, J. (1988) Politics as ironic community: On the themes of descent and return in Plato’s Republic. Political Theory 16(2): 229–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shklar, J. (1969) Men and Citizens: A Study of Rousseau's Social and Political Thought. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Stevens, J. (1999) Reproducing the State. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Strauss, L. (1978) The City and Man. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  46. Tarnopolsky, C. (2009) Plato’s Mimetic Republic: A Preliminary Treatment of Plato’s Preliminary Treatment of the Gennaion Pseudos. Paper Presented at Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
  47. Von Reden, S. (1995) The Piraeus – a world apart. Greece & Rome 42(1): 24–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wallach, J. (2001) The Platonic Political Art: A Study of Critical Reason and Democracy. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State Press.Google Scholar
  49. Winkler, J. (1990) Laying down the law: The oversight of men’s sexual behavior in Athens. In: D. Halperin, J. Winkler and F. Zeitlin (eds.) Before Sexuality: The Construction of Erotic Experience in the Ancient Greek World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Demetra Kasimis
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Political Science, University of ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations