Advertisement

Contemporary Political Theory

, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 58–79 | Cite as

National finitude and the paranoid style of the one

  • Andrea Mura
Article

Abstract

This article inquires into the clinical figure of paranoia and its constitutive role in the articulation of the nation-state discourse in Europe, uncovering a central tension between a principle of integrity and a dualist spatial configuration. A conceptual distinction between ‘border’ (finis) and ‘frontier’ (limes) will help to expose the political effects of such a tension, unveiling the way in which a solid and striated organisation of space has been mobilised in the topographic antagonism of the nation, sustaining the phantasm of a self-enclosed, self-sufficient finitude.

Keywords

paranoia nation finitude Jacques Lacan borders frontiers 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Research Council under the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007–2013)/ERC grant agreement no. 249379.

References

  1. Anderson, B. (1983) Imagined Communities: Reflection on the Origin of the Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  2. Asad, T. (2003) Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Augustine of Hippo. De Vera Religione.Google Scholar
  4. Balibar, E. and Wallerstein, I. (1991) Race, Nation and Class. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  5. Benveniste, E. (1969) Vocabulaire des Institutions Indo-europeennes: Pouvoir, droit, religion. Paris: Les editions des minuit.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, W. (2010) Walled States, Waning Sovereignty. Brooklyn, NY: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  7. Davis, D.B. (1969) The Slave Power Conspiracy and the Paranoid Style. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Delanty, G. (1995) Inventing Europe: Idea, Identity, Reality. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Derrida, J. (2005) On Touching – Jean-Luc Nancy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Esposito, R. (2008) Bios: Biopolitics and Philosophy. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  11. Ferrara, P. (2011–2012) Limes. Il confine nell’era postglobale. Sophia III (2): 183–194.Google Scholar
  12. Foucault, M. (1977–1978 [2009]) Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège de France 1977–1978. New York: Picador/Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  13. Foucault, M. (1984) What is enlightenment? (Qu’est-ce que les Lumières?). In: P. Rabinow (ed.) The Foucault Reader. New York: Pantheon Books, pp. 32–50.Google Scholar
  14. Freeman, D. and Freeman, J. (2008) Paranoia: The 21st Century Fear. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Freud, S. (1917 [1955]) A Difficulty in the Path of Psycho-Analysis: Volume 17 of The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud. London: Hogarth.Google Scholar
  16. Freud, S. (1921 [1955]) Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego: Volume 17 of The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud. London: Hogarth.Google Scholar
  17. Gentili, D. (2008) Confini, frontiere, muri. Lettera Internazionale 98 (IV Trimestre): 16–18.Google Scholar
  18. Grosrichard, A. (1979 [1998]) The Sultan’s Court: European Fantasies of the East. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  19. Hardt, M. and Negri, A. (2000) Empire. London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Hobbes, T. (1651 [2004]) De Cive. Whitefish, MT: Kessinger Publishing.Google Scholar
  21. Hofstadter, R. (1964) The Paranoid Style in American Politics and Other Essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Horace . Epistles.Google Scholar
  23. Lacan, J. (ed.) (1948 [2006]) Aggressiveness in psychoanalysis. In: Écrits: The First Complete Edition in English. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, pp. 82–101.Google Scholar
  24. Lacan, J. (ed.) (1949 [2006]) The mirror stage as formative of the I function. In: Écrits: The First Complete Edition in English. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, pp. 75–81.Google Scholar
  25. Lacan, J. (1951 [1953]) Some reflections on the ego. International Journal of Psychoanalysis XXXIV, 1953: 11–17.Google Scholar
  26. Lacan, J. (1955–1956 [1993]) The Seminar. Book III. The Psychoses, 1955–1956. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Lacan, J. (1956–1957 [1994]) Le Séminaire. Livre IV. La relation d’objet, 1956–57. Paris: Seuil, 1994.Google Scholar
  28. Lacan, J. (1956 [2006]) Response to Jean Hyppolite’s commentary on Freud’s ‘verneinung’. In: Écrits: The First Complete Edition in English. Translated by B. Fink. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, pp. 318–333.Google Scholar
  29. Lacan, J. (1959–1960 [1992]) The Seminar. Book VII. The Ethics of Psychoanalysis, 1959–60. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Lacan, J. (1972–1973 [1998]) Seminar Book XX – Encore. On Feminine Sexuality – The Limits of Love and Knowledge. New York: Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  31. Laclau, E. and Mouffe, C. (1985) Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  32. Laclau, E. (2005) On Populist Reason. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  33. Marson, A. (2008) Archetipi di territorio. Firenze, Italy: Alinea.Google Scholar
  34. Melman, C. (1994) Paranoia. The Letter: Lacanian Perspectives on Psychoanalysis 1 (Summer): 136–148.Google Scholar
  35. Melman, C. (2002) L’homme sans gravité: Jouir à tout prix. Paris: Denoël.Google Scholar
  36. Nancy, J.L. (2002) L’intrus. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Ovid . Fasti.Google Scholar
  38. Plutarch . The Life of Romulus, The Parallel Lives.Google Scholar
  39. Ramsay, R. (2008) Politics and Paranoia. Hove, UK: Picnic Publishing.Google Scholar
  40. Recalcati, M. (2007a) Paranoia e Ambivalenza. In: S. Forti and M. Revelli (eds.) Paranoia e politica. Torino, Italy: Bollati Boringhieri.Google Scholar
  41. Recalcati, M. (ed.) (2007b) Forme contemporanee del totalitarismo. Torino, Italy: Bollati Boringhieri.Google Scholar
  42. Robins, R.S. and Post, J. (1997) Political Paranoia: The Psychopolitics of Hatred. New Haven, CN: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Said, E. (1978) Orientalism. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.Google Scholar
  44. Santner, E.L. (2011) The Royal Remains: The People’s Two Bodies and the Endgames of Sovereignty. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schiavone, A. (2008) Limes. La politica dei Confini dell’Impero romano. In: C. Altini and M. Borsari (eds.) Frontiere, Politiche e mitologie dei confine europei. Modena, Italy: Fondazione Collegio San Carlo, pp. 27–39.Google Scholar
  46. Schmitt, C. (1942 [1997]) Land and Sea. Washington DC: Plutarch Press.Google Scholar
  47. Schmitt, C. (1950 [2003]) The Nomos of the Earth in the International Law of the Jus Publicum Europaeum. New York: Telos Press Publishing.Google Scholar
  48. Shapiro, M.J. (1997) s. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  49. Smith, A. (1986) The Ethnic Origins of Nations. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  50. Turner, F.J. (1921) The Frontier in American History. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
  51. Whittaker, C.R. (1994) Frontiers of the Roman Empire. A Social and Economic Study. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Žižek, S. (1990) Eastern Europe’s Republics of Gilead. New Left Review I (183): 50–62.Google Scholar
  53. Žižek, S. (1993) Tarrying with the Negative: Kant, Hegel, and the Critique of Ideology. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Žižek, S. (1996) The seven veils of paranoia, or, why does the paranoiac need two fathers? Constellations 3 (2): 139–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrea Mura
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Social Science, Open UniversityUK

Personalised recommendations