Contemporary Political Theory

, Volume 7, Issue 4, pp 395–415 | Cite as

The Problems with Evil

  • Paul Formosa
Feature Article: Theory and Practice

Abstract

The concept of evil has been an unpopular one in many recent Western political and ethical discourses. One way to justify this neglect is by pointing to the many problems with the concept of evil. The standard grievances brought against the very concept of evil include: that it has no proper place in secular political and ethical discourses; that it is a demonizing term of hatred that leads to violence; that it is necessarily linked with outdated notions of body and sexuality; and that it only hinders rather than aids our ability to understand. I shall seek to argue in defence of the concept of evil against these charges. The upshot of this argument is that the language and concept of evil has a justified and important role to play in political and ethical discourses.

Keywords

Arendt, Hannah banality of evil demonizing evil taboo ‘War on Terror’ 

References

  1. Adorno, T.W. (2003) ‘Selections from “Minima Moralia”’, in R. Tiedemann (ed.) Can One Live after Auschwitz? A Philosophical Reader, Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 37–92.Google Scholar
  2. Agamben, G. (1999) Remnants of Auschwitz: The Witness and the Archive, New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  3. Arendt, H. (1965) Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil, New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  4. Arendt, H. (1967) The Origins of Totalitarianism, London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  5. Arendt, H. (1994) ‘Organized Guilt and Universal Responsibility’, in J. Kohn (ed.) Essays in Understanding, New York: Schocken Books, pp. 121–132.Google Scholar
  6. Aschheim, S.E. (1997) ‘Nazism, culture and the origins of totalitarianism: Hannah Arendt and the discourse of evil’, New German Critique 70 (Winter): 117–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bataille, G. (1986) Erotism: Death and Sensuality, M. Dalwood (trans.) San Francisco: City Lights.Google Scholar
  8. Bernstein, R.J. (1999) ‘Responsibility, judging and evil’, Revue Internationale de Philosophie 2 (208): 155–172.Google Scholar
  9. Bernstein, R.J. (2005) The Abuse of Evil: The Corruption of Politics and Religion since 9/11, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  10. Boethius (2001) Consolation of Philosophy, J.C Relihan (trans.) Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
  11. Card, C. (2002) The Atrocity Paradigm: A Theory of Evil, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clendinnen, I. (1999) Reading the Holocaust, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Cole, P. (2006) The Myth of Evil, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cushman, T. (2001) ‘The Reflexivity of Evil: Modernity and Moral Transgression in the War in Bosnia’, in J.L. Geddes (ed.) Evil after Postmodernism: Histories, Narratives, Ethics, London: Routledge, pp. 79–100.Google Scholar
  15. Doris, J.M. (2002) Lack of Character: Personality and Moral Behavior, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eagleton, T. (2003) After Theory, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  17. Fogelman, E. (1993) ‘Understanding Motivations in the Holocaust’, in S.S. Freidman (ed.) Holocaust Literature: A Handbook of Critical, Historical and Literary Writings, London: Greenwood Press, pp. 161–175.Google Scholar
  18. Formosa, P. (2006) ‘Moral responsibility for banal evil’, Journal of Social Philosophy 37 (4): 501–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Formosa, P. (2007a) ‘Barriers to evil’, Crossroads 1 (2): 49–52.Google Scholar
  20. Formosa, P. (2007b) ‘Understanding evil acts’, Human Studies 30 (2): 57–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Formosa, P. (2007c) ‘Kant on the radical evil of human nature’, The Philosophical Forum 38 (3): 221–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Formosa, P. (2007d) ‘Is radical evil banal? Is banal evil radical?’, Philosophy and Social Criticism 33 (6): 717–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Freud, S. (1946) Totem and Taboo, A.A. Brill (trans.) New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  24. Freud, S. (2004) Civilization and Its Discontents, D. McLintock (trans.) London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  25. Frierson, P. (2006) ‘Character and evil in Kant's moral anthropology’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 44 (4): 623–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Garrard, E. (1998) ‘The nature of evil’, Philosophical Explorations 1 (1): 46–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Garrard, E. (2002) ‘Evil as an explanatory concept’, The Monist 85 (2): 320–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Geddes, J.L. (2001) ‘Introduction’, in J.L. Geddes (ed.) Evil after Postmodernism: Histories, Narratives, Ethics, London: Routledge, pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
  29. Gillespie, M.A. (2006) ‘Where Did All the Evils Go?’, in R.W. Grant (ed.) Naming Evil, Judging Evil, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 15–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Glover, J. (2001) Humanity: A Moral History of the Twentieth Century, London: Pimlico.Google Scholar
  31. Gourevitch, P. (1998) We Wish to Inform You That Tomorrow We Will Be Killed with Our Families: Stories from Rwanda, New York: Farrar Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
  32. Haas, P.J. (1988) Morality after Auschwitz: The Radical Challenge of the Nazi Ethic, Philadelphia: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
  33. Haybron, D.M. (2002) ‘Moral monsters and saints’, The Monist 85 (2): 260–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kant, I. (1996) ‘Religion Within the Boundaries of Mere Reason’, in A. Wood and G. Di Giovanni (eds.) Religion and Rational Theology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 39–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kekes, J. (2005) The Roots of Evil, Cornell: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Landau, R.S. (1998) Studying the Holocaust: Issues, Readings and Documents, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Levi, P. (1959) If This Is a Man, S. Woolf (trans.) London: Orion Press.Google Scholar
  38. Midgley, M. (1984) Wickedness: A Philosophical Essay, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Morton, A. (2004) On Evil, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. Neiman, S. (2001) ‘Theodicy in Jerusalem’, in S.E. Aschheim (ed.) Hannah Arendt in Jerusalem, Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 65–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Neiman, S. (2002) Evil in Modern Thought: An Alternative History of Philosophy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Nietzsche, F. (2000) ‘The Genealogy of Morals’, in P Gay (ed.) Basic Writings of Nietzsche, New York: Modern Library, pp. 437–600.Google Scholar
  43. Nozick, R. (1989) The Examined Life: Philosophical Meditations, New York: Touchstone.Google Scholar
  44. Rawls, J. (1999) ‘The Domain of the Political and Overlapping Consensus’, in S. Freeman (ed.) Collected Papers, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, pp. 473–496.Google Scholar
  45. Schmitt, C. (1996) The Concept of the Political, G. Schwab (trans.) Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  46. Silber, J.R. (1960) ‘The Ethical Significance of Kant's Religion’, in Religion within the Limits of Reason Alone, New York: Harper Torchbooks.Google Scholar
  47. Singer, M. (2004) ‘The concept of evil’, Philosophy 79: 185–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Singer, P. (2004) The President of Good & Evil: The Ethics of George W. Bush, New York: Dutton.Google Scholar
  49. Staten, H. (2005) ‘“Radical Evil” Revised: Hitler, Kant, Luther, Neo-Lacanians’, in A.D. Schrift (ed.) Modernity and the Problem of Evil, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, pp. 12–28.Google Scholar
  50. Staub, E. (2003) The Psychology of Good and Evil, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Vetlesen, A.J. (2005) Evil and Human Agency: Understanding Collective Evildoing, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wong, D. (2006) ‘Evil and the Morality of Conviction’, in R.W. Grant (ed.) Naming Evil, Judging Evil, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 121–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Formosa
    • 1
  1. 1.Philosophy DepartmentUniversity of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations