Advertisement

Crime Prevention and Community Safety

, Volume 17, Issue 4, pp 233–248 | Cite as

Crime concentration theory

  • Graham Farrell
Original Article

Abstract

A range of concepts and lexicon of terms denote crime’s tendency to concentrate. The most established are repeat offending, repeat and near repeat victimization, geographical hotspots, and hot products. Complementary terms include hot dots, hot places, hot targets, super-targets, risky facilities, risky routes, crime sprees and spates. This study charts the relationships, offers a potentially unifying concept and examines the causal mechanisms by which crime becomes concentrated. It is concluded that further effort to integrate concepts and explanations relating to concentrations of crime may provide insights useful to theory, policy and practice.

Keywords

crime concentration repeat victimization hot products hotspots near repeats event linkage analysis 

References

  1. Andresen, M.A. and Malleson, N. (2011) Testing the stability of crime patterns: Implications for theory and practice. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 48 (1): 58–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Averdijk, M. (2010) Individuals Victimization Patterns Over Time. Alblasserdam, The Netherlands: Haveka.Google Scholar
  3. Barr, R. and Pease, K. (1990) Crime placement, displacement and deflection. In: M. Tonry and N. Morris (eds.) Crime and Justice: A Review of Research. Vol. 12. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 277–318.Google Scholar
  4. Block, R.L. and Block, C.R. (1994) Space, place and crime: Hot spot areas and hot places of liquor-related crime. In: J. Eck and D. Weisburd (eds.) Crime and Place, Volume 4 of Crime Prevention Studies. New York: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
  5. Blumstein, A., Cohen, J., Roth, J.A. and Visher, C.A. (1986) (eds.) Criminal Careers and “Career Criminals”. Washington DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bouhana, N., Johnson, S.D. and Porter, M. (2014) Consistency and specificity in burglars who commit prolific residential burglary: Testing the core assumptions underpinning behavioural crime linkage. Legal and Criminological Psychology. doi:10.1111/lcrp.12050 1–18.Google Scholar
  7. Bowers, K.J. (2014) Risky facilities: Crime radiators or crime absorbers? A comparison of internal and external levels of theft. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 30 (3): 389–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Braga, A.A. and Clarke, R.V. (2014) Explaining high-risk concentrations of crime in the city: Social disorganization, crime opportunities, and important next steps. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 5 (4): 480–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bridgeman, C. and Hobbs, L. (1997) Preventing repeat victimisation: The police officers’ guide. London: Home Office Police Policy Directorate, http://www.popcenter.org/problems/domestic_violence/PDFs/Bridgeman&Hobbs_1997.pdf, accessed 12 April 2013.
  10. Canter, D.V. (2004) Offender profiling and investigative psychology. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling 1 (1): 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chainey, S., Tomson, L. and Uhlig, S. (2008) The utility of hotspot mapping for predicting spatial patterns of crime. Security Journal 21 (1–2): 4–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clarke, R.V. (1999) Hot products: Understanding, anticipating and reducing demand for stolen goods. London: Home Office. Police research series paper 112.Google Scholar
  13. Cohen, L. and Felson, M. (1979) Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review 44 (4): 588–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eck, J.E. and Weisburd, D. (eds.) (1995) Crime places in crime theory. In: Crime and Place. Monsey, New York: Criminal Justice Press, pp. 1–34.Google Scholar
  15. Eck, J.E., Clarke, R.V. and Guerette, R.T. (2007) Risky facilities: Crime concentration in homogenous sets of establishments and facilities. In: G. Farrell, K.J. Bowers, S.D. Johnson and M. Townelsey (eds.) Imagination for Crime Prevention: Essays in Honour of Ken Pease, volume 21 of Crime Prevention Studies. New York: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
  16. Ekblom, P. (1994) Proximal circumstances: A mechanism-based classification of crime prevention. Crime Prevention Studies 2: 185–232.Google Scholar
  17. Everson, S. (2003) Repeat victimisation and prolific offending: Chance or choice? International Journal of Police Science and Management 5: 180–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Farrell, G. (2005) Progress and prospects in the prevention of repeat victimisation. In: N. Tilley (ed.) The Handbook of Crime Prevention and Community Safety. Cullompton, UK and Devon, UK: Willan, pp. 145–172.Google Scholar
  19. Farrell, G., Clark, K., Ellingworth, D. and Pease, K. (2005) Of targets and supertargets: A routine activity theory of high crime areas. Internet Journal of Criminology 1–25.Google Scholar
  20. Farrell, G., Ellingworth, D. and Pease, K. (1996) High crime rates, repeat victimization, and routine activities. In T. Bennett (ed.) Preventing Crime and Disorder. Cambridge, UK: Institute of Criminology, pp. 276–296.Google Scholar
  21. Farrell, G. and Sousa, W. (2001) Repeat victimization and hot spots: The overlap and its implications for crime control and problem-oriented policing. In: G. Farrell and K. Pease (eds.) Repeat Victimization. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press, pp. 221–240.Google Scholar
  22. Farrell, G., Tseloni, A., Wiersema, B. and Pease, K. (2001) Victim careers and ‘career victims’. In: G. Farrell and K. Pease (eds.) Repeat Victimization. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press, pp. 241–254.Google Scholar
  23. Groff, L. and LaVigne, N. (2001) Mapping an opportunity surface of residential burglary. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 38 (3): 257–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hough, M. and Tilley., N. (1998) Getting the grease to the squeak: Research lessons for crime prevention. London: Home Office. Home Office Crime Detection and Prevention Series Paper 85.Google Scholar
  25. Johnson, S.D. (2010) A brief history of the analysis of crime concentration. European Journal of Applied Mathematics 21 (4/5): 349–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Johnson, S.D. et al (2007a) Space-time patterns of risk: A cross national assessment of residential burglary victimization. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 23 (3): 201–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Johnson, S.D., Birks, D.J., McLaughlin, L., Bowers, K.J. and Pease, K. (2007b) Prospective Crime Mapping in Operational Context. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  28. Johnson, S.D., Bowers, K.J. and Hirschfield, A. (1997) New insights into the spatial and temporal distribution of repeat victimisation. British Journal of Criminology 37 (2): 224–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Karstedt, S. (2014) Global hotspots of violence: Intervention and prevention in the top 20 most violent countries. Paper presented to Conference on Global Violence Reduction 2014. World Health Organisation and University of Cambridge; September 17–19, Cambridge, http://www.griffith.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0018/701316/reduction-of-violence.pdf.
  30. Kinney, J.B., Brantingham, P.L., Wuschke, K., Kirk, M.G. and Brantingham, P.J. (2008) Crime attractors, generators and detractors: Land use and urban crime opportunities. Built Environment 34 (1): 62–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kurland, J., Johnson, S.D. and Tilley, N. (2014) Offences around stadiums: A natural experiment on crime attraction and generation. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 51 (1): 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lauritsen, J.L. and Laub, J.H. (2007) Understanding the link between victimization and offending: New reflections on an old idea. In: M. Hough and M. Maxfield (eds.) Surveying Crime in the 21st Century. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
  33. La Vigne, N. (1994) Gasoline drive-offs: Designing a less convenient environment. In R.V. Clarke (ed.) Crime Prevention Studies. Vol. 2. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press, pp. 91–114.Google Scholar
  34. Levy, M.P. and Tartaro, C. (2010) Repeat victimization: A study of auto theft in Atlantic city using the WALLS variables to measure environmental indicators. Criminal Justice Policy Review 21 (3): 296–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Li, X., Han, J., Lee, J.-G. and Gonzalez, H. (2007) Traffic density-based discovery of hot routes in road networks. Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Spatial and Temporal Databases, Boston, MA, Jul 2007, http://www.xiaolei.org/research/pubs/sstd07.pdf, accessed 12 April 2013.
  36. Lindstrom, P. (1997) Patterns of school crime: A replication and empirical extension. British Journal of Criminology 37 (1): 121–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mailley, J., Garcia, R., Whitehead, S. and Farrell, G. (2008) Phone theft index. Security Journal 21 (3): 212–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Matthews, R., Pease, C. and Pease, K. (2001) Repeated bank robbery: Theme and variations. In: G. Farrell and K. Pease (eds.) Repeat Victimization. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press, pp. 153–164.Google Scholar
  39. Melnyk, T., Bennella, C., Gauthiera, D.J. and Gauthier, D. (2010) Another look at across-crime similarity coefficients for use in behavioural linkage analysis: an attempt to replicate Woodhams, Grant and Price (2007). Psychology, Crime and Law 17 (4): 359–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Morgan, F. (2001) Repeat burglary in a Perth suburb: Indicator of short-term or long-term risk? In: G. Farrell and K. Pease (eds.) Repeat Victimization. Monsey, New York: Criminal Justice Press, pp. 83–118.Google Scholar
  41. Morgan, F. and Clare, J. (2010) Survey of assaults on police officers. Unpublished report. University of Western Australia.Google Scholar
  42. Pease, K. (1998) Repeat Victimisation: Taking Stock. London: Police Research Group, Home Office.Google Scholar
  43. Pease, K. and Laycock, G. (1996) Revictimization: Reducing the heat on hot victims. Research in Action. Washington DC: National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
  44. Pease, K. and Tseloni, A. (2014) Using Modeling to Predict and Prevent Victimization. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Polvi, N., Looman, T., Humphreys, C. and Pease, K. (1991) The time-course of repeat burglary victimisation. British Journal of Criminology 31 (4): 411–414.Google Scholar
  46. Ratcliffe, J.H. (2004) The hotspot matrix: A framework for the spatio-temporal targeting of crime reduction. Police Practice and Research 5 (1): 5–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ratcliffe, J.H. and Rengert, G.F. (2008) Near repeat patterns in Philadelphia shootings. Security Journal 21 (1–2): 58–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Reiss, A.J. (1980) Victim proneness in repeat victimization by type of crime. In: S.E. Feinberg and A.J. Reiss (eds.) Indicators of Crime and Criminal Justice: Quantitative Studies. Washington DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.Google Scholar
  49. Sherman, L.W. (1995) Hot spots of crime and criminal careers of places. In: J.E. Eck and D. Weisburd (eds.) Crime and Place. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press, pp. 35–52.Google Scholar
  50. Sherman, L.W., Gartin, P.R. and Buerger, M.E. (1989) Hot spots of predatory crime: Routine activities and the criminology of place. Criminology 27 (1): 27–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Short, M.B., D’Orsogna, M.R., Brantingham, P.J. and Tita, G.E. (2009) Measuring and modelling repeat and near repeat burglary effects. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 25 (3): 325–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Smith, M.J. (2005) The Problem of Robbery of Taxi Drivers. Problem-Oriented Policing Guide 34. Washington DC: Office of Community-Oriented Policing Service, US Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  53. Sparks, R., Genn, H. and Dodd, D. (1977) Surveying Victims. Wiley: London.Google Scholar
  54. Summers, L. (2010) Virtual repeats and near repeats. In: B. Fisher and S. Lab (eds.) Encyclopedia of Victimology and Crime Prevention. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE, pp. 1043–1047.Google Scholar
  55. Tilley, N. and Laycock, G. (2002) Working out what to do: Evidence-based crime reduction. London: Home Office. Crime Reduction Research Series Paper 11.Google Scholar
  56. Tompson, L., Partridge, H. and Shepherd, N. (2009) Hot routes: Developing a new technique for the spatial analysis of crime. Crime Mapping: A Journal of Research and Practice 1 (1): 77–96.Google Scholar
  57. Townsley, M., Homel, R. and Chaseling, J. (2003) Infectious burglaries: A test of the near repeat hypothesis. British Journal of Criminology 43: 615–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Trickett, A., Osborn, D., Seymour, J. and Pease, K. (1992) What is different about high crime areas? British Journal of Criminology 32 (1): 81–90.Google Scholar
  59. Velasco, M. and Boba, R. (2000) Tactical crime analysis and geographic information systems: Concepts and examples. Crime Mapping News 2 (2): 1–4.Google Scholar
  60. Wellsmith, M. and Burrell, A. (2005) The influence of purchase price and ownership levels on theft targets: The example of domestic burglary. British Journal of Criminology 45 (5): 741–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Whiteacre, K., Teheide, D. and Biggs, B. (2015) Metal theft and repeat victimization. Crime Prevention and Community Safety 17 (3): 139–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wolfgang, M.E., Figlio, R.M. and Sellin, T. (1972) Delinquency in a Birth Cohort. London: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Wu, L., Xu, X., Ye, X. and Zhu, X. (2014) Repeat and near-repeat burglaries and offender involvement in a large Chinese city. Cartography and Geographic Information Science 42 (2): 178–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Graham Farrell
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Criminal Justice Studies, School of Law, University of LeedsLeedsUK

Personalised recommendations