Comparative Economic Studies

, Volume 56, Issue 3, pp 469–489 | Cite as

Intra-regional Equalization and Growth in Russia

  • Jorge Martinez-Vazquez
  • Andrey Timofeev


Throughout the 1999–2008 growth streak, the dynamics of the economic recovery have been very uneven across Russian regions. Therefore, the determinants of regional economic growth are likely to have a strong sub-national level component. In this paper we examine the potential role played by the fiscal equalization performed by regional governments among their constituent localities. Our empirical results strongly suggest that intra-regional fiscal equalization has a substantial impact on regional growth. Specifically, we find the following policy tradeoff: one standard deviation higher level of intra-regional equalization translates into between 0.18 and 0.45 of a standard deviation lower rate of regional growth.


Russia equalization grants growth 

JEL Classifications

H73 H77 P25 P35 


  1. Albouy, D . 2012: Evaluating the efficiency and equity of federal fiscal equalization. Journal of Public Economics 96 (9–10): 824–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexeev, M and Kurlyandskaya, G . 2003: Fiscal federalism and incentives in a Russian region. Journal of Comparative Economics 31 (1): 20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berkowitz, D and DeJong, DN . 2003: Policy reform and growth in post-soviet Russia. European Economic Review 47 (2): 337–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berkowitz, D and DeJong, DN . 2005: Entrepreneurship and post-socialist growth. Oxford Bulletin of Economics & Statistics 67 (1): 25–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berkowitz, D and DeJong, DN . 2011: Growth in post-soviet Russia: A tale of two transitions. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 79 (1–2): 133–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boadway, R . 2004: The theory and practice of equalization. CESifo Economic Studies 50 (1): 211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown, JD, Earle, JS and Gehlbach, S . 2009: Helping hand or grabbing hand? State bureaucracy and privatization effectiveness. American Political Science Review 103 (02): 264–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Buchanan, JM . 1950: Federalism and fiscal equity. The American Economic Review 40 (4): 583–99.Google Scholar
  9. Desai, RM, Freinkman, L and Goldberg, I . 2005: Fiscal federalism in rentier regions: Evidence from Russia. Journal of Comparative Economics 33 (4): 814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Energy Information Administration. 2009: World crude oil prices., accessed 16 October 2009.
  11. Fisher, RC and Papke, LE . 2000: Local government responses to education grants. National Tax Journal 53 (1): 153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gaidar, Y . 2007: Collapse of an empire: Lessons for modern Russia. translated by Bouis, AW Brookings Institution Press: Washington DC.Google Scholar
  13. Golubchikov, O . 2007: Re-scaling the debate on Russian economic growth: Regional restructuring and development asynchronies. Europe-Asia Studies 59 (2): 191–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Goskomstat. 2008: Russian statistical yearbook. Goskomstat: Moscow.Google Scholar
  15. Jin, H, Qian, Y and Weingast, BR . 2005: Regional decentralization and fiscal incentives: Federalism, Chinese style. Journal of Public Economics 89 (9–10): 1719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Martinez-Vazquez, J and Timofeev, A . 2008: Regional-local dimension of Russia’s fiscal equalization. Journal of Comparative Economics 36 (1): 157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Martinez-Vazquez, J and Timofeev, A . 2010: ‘The long and winding road to local fiscal equity in the United States: A fifty year retrospective’. International Studies Program Working Paper Series, at AYSPS, GSU paper1027, International Studies Program, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University.Google Scholar
  18. Martinez-Vazquez, J, Timofeev, A and Boex, J . 2006: Reforming regional-local finance in Russia. WBI Learning Resources Series. World Bank: Washington D.C.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Matheson, T . 2005: Does fiscal redistribution discourage local public investment? Evidence from transitional Russia. Economics of Transition 13 (1): 139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Qiao, B, Martinez-Vazquez, J and Xu, Y . 2008: The tradeoff between growth and equity in decentralization policy: China’s experience. Journal of Development Economics 86 (1): 112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tresch, RW . 2002: Public finance: A normative theory. Elsevier Science, Academic Press: San Diego, CA and London.Google Scholar
  22. Tsui, K . 2005: Local tax system, intergovernmental transfers China’s local fiscal disparities. Journal of Comparative Economics 33 (1): 173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Webb, S . 1920: Grants in aid: A criticism and a proposal. Longmans, Green and co: London, New York.Google Scholar
  24. World Bank. 2007: Russian Economic Report #15. November 2007. The World Bank Group.Google Scholar
  25. Zhuravskaya, EV . 2000: Incentives to provide local public goods: Fiscal federalism, Russian style. Journal of Public Economics 76 (3): 337–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Comparative Economics 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jorge Martinez-Vazquez
    • 1
  • Andrey Timofeev
    • 1
  1. 1.International Center for Public Policy, Georgia State UniversityAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations