Disentangling the Impact of Wars and Sanctions on International Trade: Evidence from Former Yugoslavia
Abstract
Wars and sanctions tend to reduce the trade of the countries involved. However, these events often occur concurrently, which complicates the assessment of their effects. This article studies the case of the former Yugoslavia to disentangle the respective effects of these events. We show that the wars and sanctions caused a reduction in trade not only between the countries involved but also with other countries. Moreover, the impact of the sanctions on trade volume is more pronounced than the impact of war. Finally, we show that the effects of both war and sanctions persisted for several years after they ended.
Keywords
economic sanctions wars international trade former YugoslaviaJEL Classifications
F14 F51 C23 D74Notes
Acknowledgements
I thank two anonymous referees and the editor, Paul Wachtel, for many valuable comments that significantly improved the paper. I am grateful to José de Sousa, Octavio Escobar and the participants at ETSG Conference in Copenhagen for helpful comments. The usual disclaimer applies.
References
- Acemoglu, D and Yared, P . 2010: Political limits to globalization. American Economic Review 100 (2): 83–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Anderson, J and Marcouiller, D . 2002: Insecurity and the pattern of trade. Review of Economics and Statistics 84 (2): 342–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Anderson, JE and Van Wincoop, E . 2003: Gravity with gravitas: A solution to the border effect puzzle. American Economic Review 93 (1): 170–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Anderton, CH and Carter, JR . 2001: The impact of war on trade: An interrupted time-series study. Journal of Peace Research 38 (4): 445–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Arad, RW and Hillman, AL . 1979: Embargo threat, learning and departure from comparative advantage. Journal of International Economics 9 (2): 265–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Arellano, M and Bond, S . 1991: Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies 58 (2): 277–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Askari, H, Forrer, J, Teegen, H and Yang, J . 2004: U.S. economic sanctions: An empirical study. International Trade Journal 18 (1): 23–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Azam, JP and Saadi-Sedik, T . 2004: Aid versus sanctions for taming oppresors: Theory and case study of the Iraqi Kurds. Defense and Peace Economics 15 (4): 343–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Babetskaia-Kukharchuk, O and Maurel, M . 2004: Russia's accession to the WTO: The potential for trade increase. Journal of Comparative Economics 32 (4): 680–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Baier, SL and Bergstrand, JH . 2007: Do free trade agreements actually increase members’ international trade? Journal of International Economics 71 (1): 72–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Barbieri, K and Levy, JS . 1999: Sleeping with the enemy: The impact of war on trade. Journal of Peace Research 36 (4): 463–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bazler-Madzar, M . 2000: Ekonomska integracija na teritoriji bivse Jugoslavije: na putu ka evropskoj integraciji. Ekonomski Institut: Beograd, p. 240.Google Scholar
- Bhagwati, JN and Srinivasan, TN . 1976: Optimal trade policy and compensation under endogeneous uncertainty: The phenomenon of trade disruption. Journal of International Economics 6 (4): 317–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Blomberg, SB and Hess, GD . 2006: How much does violence tax trade? Review of Economics and Statistics 88 (4): 599–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Blundell, R and Bond, S . 1998: Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics 87 (1): 115–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bussman, M . 2010: Foreign direct investment and militarized interstate conflict. Journal of Peace Research 47 (2): 143–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Caruso, R . 2003: The impact of international economic sanctions on trade: An empirical analysis. Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy 9 (2): 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Chang, YC, Polachek, SW and Robst, J . 2004: Conflict and trade: The relationship between geographic distance and international interactions. Journal of Socio-economics 33 (4): 491–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Collier, P . 1999: On the economic consequences of civil wars. Oxford Economic Papers 51 (1): 168–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Combes, PP, Lafourcade, M and Mayer, T . 2005: The trade creating effects of business and social networks: Evidence from France. Journal of International Economics 66 (1): 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- de Groot, HLF, Linders, GJ, Rietveld, P and Subramanian, U . 2004: The institutional determinants of bilateral trade patterns. Kyklos 57 (1): 103–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- de Sousa, J and Lamotte, O . 2007: Does political disintegration lead to trade disintegration: Evidence from transition countries. Economics of Transition 15 (4): 825–843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ding, W . 1991: Yugoslavia: Costs and benefits of Union and interdependence of regional economies. Comparative Economic Studies 33 (4): 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Disdier, AC and Mayer, T . 2007: Je t’aime, moi non plus: Bilateral opinions and international trade. European Journal of Political Economy 23 (4): 1140–1159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Eaton, J and Engers, M . 1999: Sanctions: Some simple analytics. American Economic Review 89 (2): 409–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Egger, P . 2002: An econometric view of the estimation of gravity models and the calculation of trade potentials. World Economy 25 (2): 297–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Eichengreen, B and Irwin, D . 1998: The role of history in bilateral trade flows. In: Frankel, JA (ed). The Regionalisation of the World Economy. University of Chicago Press: Chicago.Google Scholar
- Elliott, KA and Hufbauer, GC . 1999: Same song, same refrain? Economic sanctions in the 1990's. American Economic Review 89 (2): 403–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Evenett, SJ . 2002: The impact of economic sanctions on South African exports. Scottish Journal of Political Economy 49 (5): 557–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Federal Statistical Office of the SFR of Yugoslavia. 1989: Jugoslavja 1918–1988 Statisticki Godisnjak. Federal Statistical Office of the SFRY: Belgrade.Google Scholar
- Federal Statistical Office of the SFR of Yugoslavia. 1990a: Statisticki Godisnjak Jugoslavije. Federal Statistical Office of the SFRY: Belgrade.Google Scholar
- Federal Statistical Office of the SFR of Yugoslavia. 1990b: Statistics of Foreign Trade of the SFR Yugoslavia – Year 1989. Federal Statistical Office of the SFRY: Belgrade.Google Scholar
- Fontagné, L, Pajot, M and Pasteels, JM . 2002: Potentiels de commerce entre économies hétérogènes: un petit mode d’emploi des modèles de gravité. Economie et Prévision 152–53 (1–2): 115–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gasiorowski, M and Polachek, SW . 1982: Conflict and interdependence. Journal of Conflict Resolution 26 (4): 709–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Glick, R and Taylor, AM . 2010: Collateral damage: Trade disruption and the economic impact of war. Review of Economics and Statistics 92 (1): 102–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gowa, J and Mansfield, E . 1993: Power politics and international trade. The American Political Science Review 87 (2): 408–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gray, PH . 1986: Non competitive goods and gains of trade. International Trade Journal 1 (2): 107–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Guiso, L, Sapienza, P and Zingales, L . 2009: Cultural biases in economic exchange. Quarterly Journal of Economics 124 (3): 1095–1131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hegre, H, Oneal, JR and Russett, B . 2010: Trade does promote peace: New simultaneous estimates of the reciprocal effects of trade and conflict. Journal of Peace Research 47 (6): 763–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Herbst, J . 1990: War and the state in Africa. International Security 14 (4): 117–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hufbauer, GC and Oegg, B . 2003: The impact of economic sanctions on U.S. trade: Andrew Rose's gravity model. International Economics Policy Brief 03-4. Institute for International Economics: Washington.Google Scholar
- Hufbauer, GC, Schott, JJ, Ann Elliott, K and Oegg, B . 1990: Economic Sanctions Reconsidered. Institute for International Economics: Washington.Google Scholar
- International Monetary Fund (IMF). 1994: International Financial Statistics. IMF: Washington DC.Google Scholar
- Kaempfer, WH and Lowenberg, AD . 1988: The theory of international economic sanctions: A public choice approach. American Economic Review 78 (4): 786–793.Google Scholar
- Kaempfer, WH and Lowenberg, AD . 2007: The political economy of economic sanctions. In: Sandler, T and Hartley, K (eds). Handbook of Defense Economics. Vol. 2, Defense in a Globalized World Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
- Keshk, OMG, Pollins, B and Reuveny, R . 2004: Trade still follows the flag: The primacy of politics in a simultaneous model of interdependence and armed conflict. Journal of Politics 66 (4): 1155–1179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kim, HM and Rousseau, D . 2005: The classical liberals were half right (or half wrong): New tests of the ‘Liberal Peace’, 1960–88. Journal of Peace Research 42 (5): 523–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kimura, H and Todo, Y . 2010: Is foreign aid a vanguard of foreign direct investment? A gravity-equation approach. World Development 38 (4): 482–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kinne, BJ . 2012: Multilateral trade and militarized conflict: Centrality, openness, and asymmetry in the global trade network. Journal of Politics 74 (1): 308–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Knight, M, Loayza, N and Villanueva, D . 1996: The peace dividend: Military spending cuts and economic growth. IMF Staff Papers 43 (1): 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kraft, E . 1992: Evaluating regional policy in Yugoslavia. Comparative Economic Studies 34 (3–4): 11–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Levy, JS and Barbieri, K . 2005: Trading with the enemy during wartime. Security Studies 13 (3): 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Li, Q and Vashchilko, T . 2010: Dyadic military conflict, security alliances, and bilateral FDI flows. Journal of International Business Studies 41 (5): 759–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Limao, N and Venables, AJ . 2001: Infrastructure, geographical disadvantage, transport costs and trade. World Bank Economic Review 15 (3): 451–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mansfield, E and Bronson, R . 1997: Alliances, preferential trading arrangements, and international trade. American Political Science Review 91 (1): 94–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Maoz, Z . 2009: The effects of strategic and economic interdependence on international conflict across level of analysis. American Journal of Political Science 53 (1): 223–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Martin, P, Mayer, T and Thoenig, M . 2008: Make trade not war? Review of Economic Studies 75 (3): 865–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Martin, P, Mayer, T and Thoenig, M . 2010: The geography of conflicts and free trade agreements. CEPR Discussion Paper 7740.Google Scholar
- Matyas, L . 1997: Proper econometric specification of the gravity model. World Economy 21 (3): 363–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Morrow, JD, Siverson, RM and Tabares, T . 1998: The political determinants of international trade: The major powers, 1907–90. American Political Science Review 92 (3): 649–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Polachek, SW . 1978: Dyadic dispute: An economic perspective. Papers of the Peace Science Society 28: 67–80.Google Scholar
- Polachek, SW . 1980: Conflict and trade. Journal of Conflict Resolution 24 (1): 55–78.Google Scholar
- Polachek, SW . 1992: Conflict and trade: An economics approach to political international interactions. In: Isard, W and Anderton, C (eds). Economics of Armies Reduction and the Peace Process. Elsevier: New York.Google Scholar
- Polachek, SW . 2010: Current research and future directions in peace economics: Trade gone awry. Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy 16 (2); Article 4.Google Scholar
- Polachek, SW and Seiglie, C . 2007: Trade, peace and democracy: An analysis of dyadic dispute. In: Sandler, T and Hartley, K. (eds). Handbook of Defense Economics. Vol. 2, Defense in a Globalized World Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
- Pollins, BM . 1989a: Does trade follow the flag? American Political Science Review 83 (2): 465–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pollins, BM . 1989b: Conflict, cooperation and commerce: The effect of international political interactions on bilateral trade flows. American Journal of Political Science 33 (3): 737–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rauch, J . 2001: Business and social networks in international trade. Journal of Economic Literature 39 (4): 1177–1203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rauch, J and Trindade, V . 2002: Ethnic Chinese networks in international trade. Review of Economics and Statistics 84 (1): 116–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Redding, S and Venables, AJ . 2004: Economic geography and international inequality. Journal of International Economics 62 (1): 53–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Reuveny, R and Kang, H . 1996: International trade, political conflict/cooperation and Granger causality. American Journal of Political Science 40 (3): 943–970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Reuveny, R and Kang, H . 2003: A simultaneous-equations model of trade, conflict and cooperation. Review of International Economics 11 (2): 279–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Roodman, D . 2009: How to xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. STATA Journal 9 (1): 86–136.Google Scholar
- Rose, A . 2005: Which international institutions promote international trade? Review of International Economics 13 (4): 682–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rose, A . 2007: The foreign service and foreign trade: Embassies as export promotion. The World Economy 30 (1): 22–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Slavov, ST . 2007: Innocent or not-so-innocent bystanders: Evidence from the gravity model of international trade about the effects of UN sanctions on neighbour countries. The World Economy 30 (11): 1701–1725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Van Bergeijk, P . 1989: Success and failure of economic sanctions. Kyklos 42 (3): 385–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Vicard, V . 2012: Trade, conflict, and political integration: Explaining the heterogeneity of regional trade agreements. European Economic Review 56 (1): 54–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar