Unreported Employment and Envelope Wages in Mid-Transition: Comparing Developments and Causes in the Baltic Countries
This paper compares the prevalence and determinants of unreported employment in the three Baltic countries in 1998 and 2002 using a hitherto little used data set. The prevalence of unreported employment varies substantially across the three countries and across the two sampling years. Microeconometric estimations show that firm-related characteristics, such as sectoral activity, firm size and employment changes, are important determinants of unreported employment in all three countries. The impact of socio-demographic factors, such as gender, age and education, is generally less important and varies across countries and time. Only a small part of the changes in unreported employment between 1998 and 2002 can be accounted for by changes in firm-specific factors and socio-demographic characteristics. Exploratory calculations suggest that the gain for individuals undertaking unreported employment is modest or non-existent, in particular among individuals who engage regularly in such activities. This suggests that the many of the recipients of envelope wages may have few alternatives to accepting unreported employment.
Keywordsunreported employment informal employment envelope wages
JEL ClassificationsH26 H24 D19
The authors would like to thank two anonymous referees, David Grigorian and Martti Randveer for excellent comments. Pekka Ylöstalo from the Finnish Ministry of Labour kindly provided the Working Life Barometer data set and answered many questions. All errors remain the responsibility of the authors. The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of Bank of Estonia.
- Antila, J and Ylostalo, P . 1999: Working life barometer in the Baltic States 1999. Labour Policy Studies, No. 214, Ministry of Labour, Helsinki, Finland.Google Scholar
- Antila, J and Ylostalo, P . 2003: Working life barometer in the Baltic States 2002. Labour Policy Studies, No. 247, Ministry of Labour, Helsinki, Finland.Google Scholar
- Arias, O and Khamis, M . 2008: Comparative advantage, segmentation and informal earnings: A marginal treatment effects approach. IZA Discussion Paper, no. 3916.Google Scholar
- Commission. 2007a: Undeclared work in the European Union. Special Eurobarometer, No. 284, European Commission.Google Scholar
- Commission. 2007b: Taxation trends in the European Union. Data for the EU member states and Norway. Eurostat Statistical books, European Commission. Office for the Official Publications of the European Communities: Luxembourg.Google Scholar
- Cowell, F . 1990: Cheating the government: The economics of evasion. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- Cramer, JS . 1999: Predictive performance of the binary logit model in unbalanced samples. The Statistician 48 (1): 85–94.Google Scholar
- EKI. 2005: Varimajandus Eestis [The Estonian shadow economy]. Estonian Institute of Economic Research, http://www.ki.ee/publikatsioonid/valmis/Varimajandus_Eestis_2004(elanike_hinnangute_alusel).pdf.
- Fabrizio, S and Mody, A . 2008: Breaking the impediments to budgetary reforms: Evidence from Europe. IMF Working Paper, WP/08/82, International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
- Kriz, K, Meriküll, J, Paulus, A and Staehr, K . 2008: Why do individuals evade payroll and income taxation in Estonia? In: Pickhardt, M and Shinnick, E (eds). Shadow Economy, Corruption and Governance. Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, pp. 240–264.Google Scholar
- Masso, J, Eamets, R and Philips, K . 2006: Job flows and worker flows in the Baltic States: Labour reallocation and structural changes. In: Paas, T. and Eamets, R. (eds). Labor Market Flexibility, Flexicurity and Employment. Nova Science Publishers: New York.Google Scholar
- Meriküll, J and Staehr, K . 2008: Unreported employment and tax evasion in mid-transition: Comparing developments and causes in the Baltic States. Working Paper of Eesti Pank, no. 6/2008.Google Scholar
- OECD. 2000: Baltic States. A regional economic assessment. OECD Economic Surveys, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development: Paris.Google Scholar
- OECD. 2008: OECD employment outlook. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Ch. 2 (Declaring Work or Staying Underground: Informal Employment in Seven OECD Countries), http://browse.oecd.bookshop.org/oecd/pdfs/browseit.Google Scholar
- Schneider, F . 2002: The size and development of the shadow economies of 22 transition and 21 OECD countries. IZA Discussion Paper, No. 514.Google Scholar
- Sedlenieks, K . 2003: Cash in an envelope: Corruption and tax avoidance as an economic strategy in contemporary Riga. In: Arnstberg, K-O and Boren, T (eds). Everyday Economy in Russia, Poland and Latvia. Almqvist & Wiksell: Stockholm, pp. 37–52.Google Scholar
- Sinning, M, Hahn, M and Bauer, T . 2008: The blinder-oaxaca decomposition for nonlinear regression models. Stata Journal 8 (4): 480–492.Google Scholar
- Smith, A and Stenning, A . 2006: Beyond household economies: Articulations and spaces of economic practice in postsocialism. Progress in Human Geography 30 (1): 1–14.Google Scholar
- Williams, C . 2008b: Illegitimate wage practices in Eastern Europe: The case of ‘envelope wages’. Journal for East European Management Studies 13 (3): 65–83.Google Scholar
- WLB. 1998: Working Life Barometer dataset for 1998. WLB: Helsinki.Google Scholar
- WLB. 2002: Working Life Barometer dataset for 2002. WLB: Helsinki.Google Scholar
- World Bank. 2009: Governance matters 2009. Worldwide governance indicators, 1996–2008, http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/index.asp.
- World Values Survey. 1999: http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/ (Online Data Analysis → 1999–2004 → Estonia , Latvia , Lithuania  → 7. Religion and morale → Justification of social behaviours → Cheating on taxes (F116)).