Comparative European Politics

, Volume 15, Issue 6, pp 944–968 | Cite as

Gendered policy preferences? Candidates’ views on political issues in a comparative perspective

  • Anouk Lloren
  • Jan Rosset
Original Article


This article examines whether gender affects candidates’ position on the economic and cultural dimensions of political competition in nine West European countries. Using data from the Comparative Candidate Survey, we find that female candidates hold, on average, more liberal views than their male party colleagues. These gender differences vary according to the nature of issues. Female candidates are more liberal than their party colleagues on the cultural dimension, but we find no systematic differences in policy preferences on economic issues. Moreover, gender differences vary according to parties’ ideological position on the left–right scale with a more pronounced gender gap in right-wing parties. Our findings contribute to the literature on female candidates and on the impact of women in politics more broadly.


gender gap electoral candidates policy preferences West European politics 



We thank Joscha Legewie, Mark Kayser, Daniela Koller, the anonymous reviewers as well as the participants of the "Gender & politics panel" of the 2014 Annual Conference of the Swiss Political Science Association for their valuable comments on earlier drafts of this article. Both authors gratefully acknowledge support from the Swiss National Science Foundation through its career funding schemes.


  1. Bakker, R., Jolly, S. and Polk, J. (2012) Complexity in the European party space: Exploring dimensionality with experts. European Union Politics 13(2): 219–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Campbell, R. (2004) Gender, ideology and issue preference: Is there such a thing as a political women’s interest in Britain? The British Journal of Politics & International Relations 6(1): 20–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Campbell, R. and Lovenduski, J. (2005) Winning Women’s Votes? The Incremental Track to Equality Parliamentary Affairs 58(4): 837–853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Campbell, R. (2006) Gender and the Vote in Britain: Beyond the Gender Gap? Essex, England: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
  5. Campbell, R. and Childs, S. (2010) ‘Wags’ ‘Wives’ and ‘Mothers’ But what about Women Politicians? Parliamentary Affairs 63(4): 760–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Campbell, R., Childs, S. and Lovenduski, J. (2010) Do women need women representatives? British Journal of Political Science 40(1): 171–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Campbell, R. and Childs, S. (2013) To the left, to the right’ representing conservative women’s interests. Party Politics, advanced online publication 25 June, doi:1354068813491536.Google Scholar
  8. Caul, M. (1999) Women’s representation in parliament: The role of political parties. Party Politics 5(1): 79–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. CCS (2013) Comparative Candidates Survey – 2005–2012 [Dataset – Cumulative File]. Lausanne, Switzerland: Distributed by FORS.Google Scholar
  10. Childs, S. (2004a) New Labour’s Women MPs: Women Representing Women. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Childs, S. (2004b) A feminised style of politics? Women MPs in the house of commons. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations 6(1): 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Childs, S. and Webb, P. (2011) Sex, Gender and the Conservative party. Conservative Party: From Iron Lady to Kitten Heels. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  13. Council of European Union (2010) The Gender Pay Gap in the Member states of the European Union: Quantitative and Qualitative Indicators. Brussels: Belgian Presidency Report 2010.Google Scholar
  14. Dabelko, K.L. and Herrnson, P.S. (1997) Women’s and men’s campaigns for the U.S. house of representatives. Political Research Quarterly 50(1): 121–135.Google Scholar
  15. Dalton, R.J. (2009) Economics, environmentalism and party alignments: A note on partisan change in advanced industrial democracies. European Journal of Political Research 48(2): 161–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dolan, K. (2005) Do women candidates play to gender stereotypes? Do men candidates play to women? Candidate sex and issues priorities on campaign websites. Political Research Quarterly 58(1): 31–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dow, J.K. (2001) A comparative spatial analysis of majoritarian and proportional elections. Electoral Studies 20(1): 109–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Duverger, M. (1951) Les Partis Politiques. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
  19. Esping-Andersen, G. (2009) The Incomplete Revolution: Adapting to Women’s New Roles. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  20. Erikson, L. (1997) Might more women make a difference? Gender, party and ideology among Canada’s parliamentary candidates. Canadian Journal of Political Science 30(4): 663–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. ESS (European Social Survey) (2013) Exploring public attitudes, informing public policy. Selected findings from the first five rounds,
  22. Gabel, M.J. and Huber, J.D. (2000) Putting parties in their place: Inferring party left-right ideological positions from party manifestos data American Journal of Political Science 44(1): 94–103.Google Scholar
  23. Galligan, Y. and Tremblay, M. (2005) Sharing Power: Women, Parliament, Democracy. London: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  24. Gidengil, E., Hennigar, M., Blais, A. and Nevitte, N. (2005) Explaining the gender gap in support for the new right. The case of Canada. Comparative Political Studies 38(10): 1171–1195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gilligan, C. (1998) In A Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Givens, T.E. (2004) The radical right gender gap. Comparative Political Studies 37(1): 30–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Herrnson, P.S., Lay, C.J. and Stokes, A.K. (2003) Women running ‘as women’: Candidate gender, campaign issues, and voter-targeting strategies. Journal of Politics 65(1): 244–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Herrnson, P.S. and Lucas, J.C. (2006) The fairer sex? Gender and negative campaigning in U.S. elections. American Politics Research 41(1): 69–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Inglehart, R. (1977) The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles Among Western Publics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Inglehart, R. and Norris, P. (2003) Rising Tide: Gender Equality & Cultural Change Around the World. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kalyvas, S.N. and Van Kersbergen, K. (2010) Christian democracy. Annual Review of Political Science 13(June): 183–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kittilson, M.C. (2011) Women, parties and platforms in post-industrial democracies. Party Politics 17(1): 66–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Koch, J.W. (2001) When parties and candidates collide: Citizen perceptions of house candidates’ positions on abortion. Public Opinion Quarterly 65(1): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kohler, U. and Kreuter, F. (2009) Data Analysis Using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.Google Scholar
  35. Kriesi, H., Grande, E., Lachat, R., Dolezal, M., Bornschier, S. and Frey, T. (2006) Globalization and the transformation of the national political space: Six European countries compared. European Journal of Political Research 45(6): 921–956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lijphart, A. (1994) Electoral Systems and Party Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lloren, A. (2014) Women’s substantive representation: Defending feminist interests or women’s electoral preferences? The Journal of Legislative Studies, doi:10.1080/13572334.2014.966643.Google Scholar
  38. Lloren, A. (2015) Pour qui luttent les femmes? De la représentation des intérêts des femmes au Parlement suisse. Zürich, Switzerland: Seismo, Coll. Questions de genre.Google Scholar
  39. Lovenduski, J. and Norris, P. (2003) Westminster women: The politics of presence. Political Studies 51(1): 84–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Manow, P. and Emmenegger, P. (2012) Religion and the gender gap: Women’s changed political preferences from the 1970s to 2010. ZeS Arbeitspapier 1: 1–47.Google Scholar
  41. Meier, P., Rihoux, B., Erzel, S., Lloren, A. and Van Ingelgom, V. (2006) Partis belges et égalité de sexe. Une évolution lente mais sûre? Analyse de l’intégration de la dimension de genre au sein des partis politiques belges. Bruxelles, Belgium: Institut pour l’Egalité des Femmes et des Hommes.Google Scholar
  42. Norris, P. and Lovenduski, J. (1989) Women candidates for parliament: Transforming the agenda? British Journal of Political Science 19(1): 106–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Phillips, A. (1995) The Politics of Presence. Oxford; New York: Oxford political theory; Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  44. Poggione, S. (2004) Exploring gender differences in state legislators’ policy preferences. Political Research Quarterly 57(2): 305–314.Google Scholar
  45. Rattinger, H. et al (2012) Candidate Campaign Survey. Cologne, Germany: GESIS Data Archive.Google Scholar
  46. Sander-Staudt, M. (2014) Care ethics. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy,
  47. Sandor, E. (2011) European Company Survey 2009. Part-time Work in Europe. Denmark: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions.Google Scholar
  48. Scheve, K. and Statsavage, D. (2006) Religion and preferences for social insurance. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 1(3): 255–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schwindt-Bayer, L.A. (2011) Women who win: Social backgrounds, paths to power, and political ambition in Latin American legislatures. Politics & Gender 7(1): 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Skjeie, H. (1991) The rhetoric of difference: On women’s inclusion into political elites. Politics and Society 19(2): 233–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Steenbergen, M.R. and Jones, B.S. (2002) Modeling multilevel data structures. American Journal of Political Science 46(1): 218–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Stubager, R. (2010) The development of the education cleavage: Denmark as a critical case. West European Politics 33(3): 505–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Swers, M.L. (2002) The Difference Women Make. The Policy Impact of Women in Congress. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  54. Wängnerud, L. (2009) Women in parliaments: Descriptive and substantive representation. Annual Review of Political Science 12(June): 51–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Weldon, L.S. (2002) Beyond bodies: Institutional sources of representation for women in democratic policymaking. Journal of Politics 64(4): 1153–1174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wiliarty, S.E. (2010) The CDU and the Politics of Gender in Germany: Bringing Women to the Party. Cambridge, USA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anouk Lloren
    • 1
  • Jan Rosset
    • 2
  1. 1.Département de science politique et relations internationales, Université de GenèveGenèveSwitzerland
  2. 2.University of Mannheim, MZESMannheimGermany

Personalised recommendations