Advertisement

Comparative European Politics

, Volume 14, Issue 6, pp 717–734 | Cite as

Better the devil you know: Threat effects and attachment to the European Union

  • Stratos Patrikios
  • Laura Cram
Original Article

Abstract

The EU is facing unprecedented challenges and significant threats to its economic and political security. Austerity, the Eurozone crisis, rising immigration and heightened fear of terrorism all present serious challenges to the process of integration. How does this context of insecurity impact on what the EU means to its citizens? Will the public become increasingly Eurosceptic or will they discover a hitherto unrecognised attachment to the EU as the prospect of its collapse becomes real? Psychological research has demonstrated that individual exposure to threat decreases cognitive capacity, inducing a tendency towards rigidity or conservatism – a tendency to cling to the ‘devil you know’. So what might this mean for the European integration process? Using experimental techniques drawn from political psychology, the authors find a dual threat effect. The EU symbol has a negative (anti-EU) effect on EU-related attitudes when presented in neutral context. This is consonant with conceptualisations of the EU as a threat to national cultural and political norms. In contrast, however, visual priming of participants with EU symbols has a positive (pro-EU) effect on related attitudes when symbols are presented in a context that implies a subtle but imminent threat to the benefits of EU membership.

Keywords

identity threat context visual cues attitudes European Union 

References

  1. Anderson, C.J. (1998) When in doubt use proxies: Attitudes to domestic politics and support for the EU. Comparative Political Studies 31(5): 569–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Billig, M. (1995) Banal Nationalism. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Blalock, H. (1967) Toward a Theory of Minority-group Relations. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  4. Bloom, W. (1990) Personal Identity, National Identity and International Relations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bruter, M. (2003) Winning hearts and minds for Europe: The impact of news and symbols on civic and cultural European identity. Comparative Political Studies 36(10): 1148–1179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bruter, M. (2009) Time bomb? The dynamic effect of news and symbols on political identity of European citizens. Comparative Political Studies 42(12): 1498–1536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Butz, D.A., Plant, E.A. and Doerr, C.E. (2007) Liberty and justice for all? Implications of exposure to the U.S. flag for intergroup relations. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin 33(3): 396–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Butz, D.A. (2009) National symbols as agents of psychological and social change. Political Psychology 30(5): 779–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Campbell, D.E. (2006) Religious ‘threat’ in contemporary presidential elections. Journal of Politics 68(1): 104–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carter, T.J., Ferguson, M.J. and Hassin, R.R. (2011) A single exposure to the American flag shifts support towards republicanism up to 8 months later. Psychological Science 22(8): 1011–1018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Castiglione, D. (2009) Political identity in a community of strangers. In: J.T. Checkel and P.J. Katzenstein (eds.) European Identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 29–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cram, L. (2001) Imagining the union: A case of banal Europeanism? In: H. Wallace (ed.) Interlocking Dimensions of European Integration. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 231–246.Google Scholar
  13. Cram, L. (2012) Does the EU need a navel ? Implicit and explicit identification with the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies 50(1): 71–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cram, L. and Patrikios, S. (forthcoming) Visual primes and EU identity: Designing experimental research. In: K. Lynggaard, K. Löfgren and I. Manners (eds.) Research Methods in European Union Studies. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  15. Deutsch, K. et al (1957) Political Community and the North Atlantic Area. New York: Greenwood.Google Scholar
  16. Diez Medrano, J. (2008) Europeanization and the Emergence of a European Society. IBEI Working Papers, 12, pp. 1–21.Google Scholar
  17. Ehrlinger, J. et al (2011) How exposure to the confederate flag affects willingness to vote for Barack Obama. Political Psychology 32(1): 131–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ferguson, M.J. and Hassin, R.R. (2007) On the automatic association between America and aggression for news watchers. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin 33(12): 1632–1647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gabel, M.J. (1998) Public support for European integration: An empirical test of five theories. Journal of Politics 60(2): 333–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gilboa, A. and Bodner, E. (2009) What are your thoughts when the national anthem is playing? An empirical exploration. Psychology of Music 37(4): 459–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hassin, R.R., Ferguson, M.J., Kardosh, R., Porter, S.C., Carter, T.J. and Dudareva, V. (2009) Précis of implicit nationalism. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1167: 135–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hassin, R.R., Ferguson, M.J., Shidlovski, D. and Gross, T. (2007) Subliminal exposure to national flags affects political thought and behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104 (50), pp. 19757–19761.Google Scholar
  23. Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. (2004) Does identity or economic rationality drive public opinion on European integration? Political Science and Politics 37(3): 415–420.Google Scholar
  24. Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. (2005) Calculation, community and cues: Public opinion on European integration. European Union Politics 6(4): 419–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. (2008) A postfunctional theory of European integration: From permissive consensus to constraining dissensus. British Journal of Political Science 39(1): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jost, J.T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A.W. and Sulloway, F.J. (2003) Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin 129(3): 339–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kemmelmeier, M. and Winter, D. (2008) Sowing patriotism, but reaping nationalism? Consequences of exposure to the American flag. Political Psychology 29(6): 859–879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Key, V.O. (1943) Southern Politics in State and Nation. Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee Press.Google Scholar
  29. Lavine, H., Lodge, M. and Freitas, K. (2005) Threat, authoritarianism, and selective exposure. Political Psychology 26(2): 219–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lubbers, M. (2008) Regarding the Dutch ‘Nee’ to the European constitution: A test of the identity, utilitarian and political approaches to voting ‘no'. European Union Politics 9(1): 59–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lubbers, Marcel and Scheepers, P. (2005) Political versus instrumental euro-scepticism: Mapping scepticism in European countries and regions. European Union Politics 6(2): 223–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Manners, I. (2011) Symbolism in European integration. Comparative European Politics 9(3): 243–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mclaren, L.M. (2002) Public support for the European Union: Cost/benefit analysis or perceived cultural threat? The Journal of Politics 64(02): 551–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mclaren, L.M. (2006) Identity, Interests and Attitudes to European Integration. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McNamara, K.R. (2010) Constructing authority in the European Union. In: D.D. Avant, M. Finnemore and S.K. Sell (eds.) Who Governs the Globe?. Cambridge, US: Cambridge University Press, pp. 153–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mols, F. and Haslam, S.A. (2008) Understanding EU attitudes in multi-level governance contexts: A social identity perspective. West European Politics 31(3): 442–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pantoja, A.D. and Segura, G.M. (2012) Fear in California : And loathing contextual threat and political sophistication among Latino voters. Political Behaviour 25(3): 265–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Priban, J. (2009) The juridification of European identity, its limitations and the search of EU democratic politics. Constellations 16(1): 44–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Risse, T. (2010) A Community of Europeans? Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Sanchez-Cuenca, I. (2000) The political basis for support for European integration. European Union Politics 1(2): 147–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sherif, M., Harvey, B., White, J., Hood, W.R. and Sherif, C.W. (1961) lntergroup Cooperation and Competition: The Robbers Cave Experiment. Norman, OK: University Book Exchange.Google Scholar
  42. Sherif, M. and Sherif, C.W. (1953) Groups in Harmony and Tension: An Introduction to Studies in lntergroup Relations. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  43. Smith, A. (1995) Nations and Nationalism in a Global Era. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  44. Staw, B.M., Sandelands, L.E. and Dutton, J.E. (2007) Threat rigidity effects in organizational behaviour: A multilevel analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly 26(4): 501–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tajfel, H. and Turner, J.C. (1979) An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In: W.G. Austin and S. Worchel (eds.) The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole, pp. 33–47.Google Scholar
  46. Thórisdóttir, H. and Jost, J.T. (2011) Closed mindedness mediates the effects of threat on political conservatism. Political Psychology 32(5): 785–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Trenz, H.-J. (2004) Media coverage on European governance. Testing the performance of national newspapers. European Journal of Communication 19(3): 291–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Trenz, H.-J. (2006) ‘Banaler Europäismus’: eine latente Kategorie der Europäisierung politischer Kommunikation. In: W.R. Langenbucher and M. Latzer (eds.) Europäische Öffentlichkeit und medialer Wandel: eine transdisziplinäre Perspektive. Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, pp. 192–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Turner, J.C., Hogg, M.A., Oakes, P.J., Reicher, S.D. and Wetherell, M.S. (1987) Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-categorization Theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stratos Patrikios
    • 1
  • Laura Cram
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Government and Public PolicyGlasgowUK
  2. 2.School of Social and Political Science, Politics and International RelationsEdinburghUK

Personalised recommendations