Advertisement

Comparative European Politics

, Volume 14, Issue 6, pp 781–801 | Cite as

All the same? Examining the link between three kinds of political dissatisfaction and protest

  • Henrik Serup ChristensenEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Several studies have noted a surge in political dissatisfaction but there is no agreement on the consequences for democracy. This disagreement is often treated as a question of degree of dissatisfaction but can also suggest the existence of different kinds of political dissatisfaction. This article therefore examines the existence of difference kinds of political dissatisfaction and the link to protest participation, since this is frequently tied to political dissatisfaction. The data used comes from the fourth round of the European Social Survey from 2008 and includes 25 democratic European countries and with 47489 respondents. The results suggest the existence of three distinct and discrete types of political disatisfaction. Only one of these is linked to protest, a behaviour frequently performed by satisifed citizens. These results show the potential of treating political dissatisfaction as a problem of kind rather than degree.

Keywords

Political disenchantment Political dissatisfaction Protest Democracy 

References

  1. Almond, G.A. and Verba, S. (1963/1965) The Civic Culture – Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Boston and Toronto: Little, Brown and Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnes, S.H. et al (1979) Political Action: Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  3. Bengtsson, Å. and Christensen, H.S. (2014) Ideals and actions: Do citizens’ patterns of political participation correspond to their process preferences? Government and Opposition, FirstView: doi:10.1017/gov.2014.29.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, T.A. (2006) Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  5. Campbell, A., Gurin, G. and Miller, W.E. (1954) The Voter Decides. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.Google Scholar
  6. Christensen, H.S. (2011) Political activities on the internet – Slacktivism or political participation by other means? First Monday, 16(2), http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3336/2767.
  7. Citrin, J. (1974) Comment: The political relevance of trust in government. The American Political Science Review 68(3): 973–988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crozier, M., Huntington, S.P. and Watanuki, J. (1975) The Crisis of Democracy: Report on the Governability of Democracies to the Trilateral Commission. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Dalton, R.J. (2004) Democratic Challenges, Democratic Choices – The Erosion of Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dalton, R.J., van Sicle, A. and Weldon, S. (2010) The individual – Institutional nexus of protest behaviour. British Journal of Political Science 40(1): 51–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Easton, D. (1965) A Systems Analysis of Political Life. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  12. ESS Round 4: European Social Survey Round 4 Data. (2008) Data file edition 4.2. Norwegian Social Science Data Services, Norway – Data Archive and distributor of ESS data.Google Scholar
  13. Gamson, W.A. (1968) Power and Discontent. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.Google Scholar
  14. Gamson, W.A. and Sifry, M.L. (2013) The # Occupy movement: An introduction. The Sociological Quarterly 54(2): 1533–8525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Geissel, B. (2008) Reflections and findings on the critical citizens: Civic education – What for? European Journal of Political Research 47(1): 34–63.Google Scholar
  16. Hardin, R. (1999) Do we want trust in government? In: M.E. Warren (ed.) Democracy & Trust. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 22–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hay, C. (2007) Why We Hate Politics. Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
  18. Hay, C. and Stoker, G. (2009) Revitalising politics: Have we lost the plot? Representation 45(3): 225–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hibbing, J.R. and Theiss-Morse, E. (2002) Stealth Democracy – Americans’ Beliefs about How Government Should Work. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hirschman, A.O. (1970) Exit, Voice, and Loyalty – Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge, US: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Inglehart, R. (1997) Modernization and Postmodernization – Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Kahne, J. and Westheimer, J. (2006) The limits of political efficacy: Educating citizens for a democratic society. PS: Political Science & Politics 39(2): 289–296.Google Scholar
  23. Klingemann, H.D. and Fuchs, D. (eds.) (1995) Citizens and the State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Levi, M. and Stoker, L. (2000) Political trust and trustworthiness. Annual Review of Political Science 3(1): 475–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mair, P. (2006) Ruling the void? The hollowing of Western democracy. New Left Review 42: 25–51.Google Scholar
  26. Marien, S., Hooghe, M. and Quintelier, E. (2010) Inequalities in non-institutionalised forms of political participation: A multilevel analysis of 25 countries. Political Studies 58(2): 187–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Micheletti, M. (2003) Political Virtue and Shopping: Individuals, Consumerism, and Collective Action. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Norris, P. (ed.) (1999) Critical Citizens – Global Support for Democratic Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Norris, P. (2011) Democratic Deficit – Critical Citizens Revisited. Cambridge, US: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Norušis, M. (2012) IBM SPSS Statistics 19 Statistical Procedures Companion. Boston, MA: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
  31. Pateman, C. (1970) Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Quaranta, M. (2013) Measuring political protest in Western Europe: Assessing cross-national equivalence. European Political Science Review 5(3): 457–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rosanvallon, P. (2008) Counter-Democracy – Politics in the Age of Distrust. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Stoker, G. (2006) Why Politics Matters – Making Democracy Work. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  35. Stoker, G. (2010) The rise of political disenchantment. In: C. Hay (ed.) New Directions in Political Science: Responding to the Challenges of an Interdependent World. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 43–63.Google Scholar
  36. Taibo, C. (2013) The Spanish indignados: A movement with two souls. European Urban and Regional Studies 20(1): 155–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Teorell, J., Torcal, M. and Montero, J. (2007) Political participation – Mapping the terrain. In: J. van Deth, J.R. Montero and A. Westholm (eds.) Citizenship and Involvement in European Democracies – A Comparative Analysis. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 334–357.Google Scholar
  38. Torcal, M. and Montero, J.R. (eds.) (2006) Political Disaffection in Contemporary Democracies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Van Aelst, P. and Walgrave, S. (2001) Who is that (Wo)man in the street? From the normalisation of protest to the normalisation of the protester. European Journal of Political Research 39(4): 461–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Verba, S., Schlozman, K.L. and Brady, H.E. (1995) Voice and Equality – Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, US: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Webb, P. (2013) Who is willing to participate? Dissatisfied democrats, stealth democrats and populists in the United Kingdom. European Journal of Political Research 52(6): 747–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wolfsfeld, G. (1986) Political action repertoires: The role of efficacy. Comparative Political Studies 19(1): 104–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political Science, Åbo Akademi UniversityTurkuFinland

Personalised recommendations