Advertisement

Comparative European Politics

, Volume 14, Issue 6, pp 761–780 | Cite as

Determinants of civil society influence: The case of international development and humanitarian NGOs in the Czech Republic and Hungary

  • Balázs Szent-Iványi
  • Simon Lightfoot
Original Article

Abstract

Accession to the EU has had ambiguous effects on civil society organizations (CSOs) in the East Central European countries. A general observation is that accession has not led to the systematic empowerment of CSOs in terms of growing influence on national policy making. This article investigates the determinants of successful CSO advocacy by looking at international development and humanitarian NGOs (NGDOs) in the Czech Republic and Hungary. Reforms in the past decade in the Czech Republic have created an international development policy largely in line with NGDO interests, while Hungary’s ministry of foreign affairs seems to have been unresponsive to reform demands from civil society. The article argues that there is clear evidence of NGDO influence in the Czech Republic on international development policy, which is because of the fact that Czech NGDOs have been able solve problems of collective actions, while the Hungarian NGDO sector remains fragmented. They also have relatively stronger capacities, can rely on greater public support and can thus present more legitimate demands towards their government.

Keywords

foreign aid civil society organizations NGDOs development policy new member states EU accession 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The writing of this paper was supported by the EU’s FP7 Marie Curie Programme (project INTDEPNEW). The authors are grateful to all the government, EU officials and NGO representatives who agreed to be interviewed. Charlie Burns and two anonymous reviewers provided helpful and insightful comments and the paper is much improved as a result. The editors at CEP provided excellent editorial guidance. The views expressed here are our own, as are any mistakes.

References

  1. Batory, A. and Cartwright, A. (2011) Re-visiting the partnership principle in cohesion policy: The role of civil society organizations in structural funds monitoring. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 49(4): 697–717.Google Scholar
  2. Börzel, T. (2010) Why you don’t always get what you want: EU enlargement and civil society in Central and Eastern Europe. Acta Politica 45(1–2): 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Börzel, T. and Buzogány, A. (2010) Governing EU accession in transition countries: The role of non-state actors. Acta Politica 45(1–2): 158–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bruszt, L. (2008) Multi-level governance – The eastern versions. Regional and Federal Studies 18(5): 607–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bučar, M. (2012) Involving civil society in the international development cooperation of ‘new’ EU member states: The case of Slovenia. Perspectives on European Politics and Society 13(1): 83–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carmin, J. and Fagan, A. (2010) Environmental mobilisation and organisations in postsocialist Europe and the former Soviet Union. Environmental Politics 19(5): 689–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. CONCORD (2007) AidWatch 2007: Hold the Applause! EU Governments Risk Breaking Aid Promises. Brussels: CONCORD.Google Scholar
  8. Drążkiewicz-Grodzicka, E. (2013) From recipient to donor: The case of Polish development cooperation. Human Organization 72(1): 65–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eurobarometer (2005) Attitudes towards Development Aid. Brussles: European Commission.Google Scholar
  10. Fagan, A. (2005) Taking stock of civil-society development in post-communist Europe: Evidence from the Czech Republic. Democratization 12(4): 528–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. FoRS (2012) Zpráva FoRS o zahraniční rozvojovéspolupráci ČR za rok 2011. Prague: FoRS.Google Scholar
  12. Hódosi, R. (2012) Mit tesz Magyarország a fejlődő országokért? Stratégiai fordulópont előtt a magyar nemzetközi fejlesztési együttműködés. Budapest: HAND.Google Scholar
  13. Horký, O. (2010) Development cooperation in the Czech foreign policy. In: M. Kořan (ed.) Czech Foreign Policy in 2007–2009: Analysis. Prague: Institute of International Relations, pp. 347–361.Google Scholar
  14. Horký, O. (2012) The transfer of the Central and Eastern European ‘transition experience’ to the south: Myth or reality? Perspectives on European Politics and Society 13(1): 17–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hungarian MFA (2012) Magyarország 2012. évi nemzetközi fejlesztési és humanitárius segítségnyújtási tevékenységéről. Budapest: Ministry of Foreign Affairs.Google Scholar
  16. Johansson, K.-E., Elgström, O., Kimanzu, N., Nylund, J.-E. and Persson, R. (2010) Trends in development aid, negotiation processes and NGO policy change. Voluntas 21(3): 371–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kiss, J. (2007) A magyar nemzetközi fejlesztéspolitika a számok tükrében. Budapest: HAND.Google Scholar
  18. Kiss, J. (2011) A magyar NEFE a válság éveiben. Budapest: HAND.Google Scholar
  19. Kutter, A. and Trappmann, V. (2010) Civil society in Central and Eastern Europe: The ambivalent legacy of accession. Acta Politica 45(1–2): 41–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lancaster, C. (2006) Foreign Aid: Diplomacy, Development, Domestic Politics. Chicago, IL: University Of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lundsgaarde, E. (2013) The Domestic Politics of Foreign Aid. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Lister, M. and Carbone, M. (2006) New Pathways in International Development. Gender and Civil Society in EU Policy. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  23. OECD (2007) DAC Special Review of the Czech Republic. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  24. Palubinskas, G. (2003) Democratization: The development of nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) in Central and Eastern Europe. Public Administration & Management 8(3): 150–163.Google Scholar
  25. Paragi, B. (2010) Hungarian development policy. In: P. Hoebink (ed.) European Development Cooperation – In Between the Local and the Global. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Petrova, T. and Tarrow, S. (2007) Transactional and participatory activism in the emerging European polity: The puzzle of East-Central Europe. Comparative Political Studies 40(1): 74–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Publish What You Fund (2013) Aid Transparency Index, http://ati.publishwhatyoufund.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/2013-Aid-Transparency-Index.pdf, accessed 5 September 2014.
  28. Roth, S. (2007) Sisterhood and solidarity? Women’s organizations in the expanded European Union. Social Politics 14(4): 460–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Selmeczi, A. (2013) The Role of the Hungarian Civil Society in Development Assistance and Aid Effectiveness, CEU Centre for Policy Studies Policy Paper, available online: http://cps.ceu.hu/sites/default/files/field_attachment/news/node-34908/PolicyPaper_CPS_Selmeczi_CSO_FinalDraft_11March2013.pdf.
  30. Sládková, Z. (2011) Czech Republic and its Official Development Assistance. FoRS Briefing Paper, 2/2011.Google Scholar
  31. Szent-Iványi, B. (2012) Hungarian international development co-operation: Context, stakeholders and performance. Perspectives on European Politics and Society 13(1): 50–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Szent-Iványi, B. and Lightfoot, S. (2015) New Europe’s New Development Aid. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Szent-Iványi, B. and Tétényi, A. (2008) Transition and foreign aid policies in the Visegrád countries. A path dependant approach. Transition Studies Review 15(3): 573–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Topolánek, M. (2006) Projev premiéra Mirka Topolánka na výroční poradě vedoucích zastupitelských úřadů ČR v Černínském paláci dne 7. září 2006, http://www.vlada.cz/scripts/detail.php?id=18863, accessed 20 August 2015.
  35. Vachudova, M. (2005) Europe Undivided: Democracy, Leverage and Integration after Communism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Vaughan, D. (2006) Simon Panek: A former student leader remembers the drama of November 1989, http://www.radio.cz/en/section/one-on-one/simon-panek-a-former-student-leader-remembers-the-drama-of-november-1989.
  37. Wallace, C., Pichler, F. and Haerpfer, C. (2012) Is Eastern Europe different? Changing patterns of civil society in Europe and America 1995–2005. East European Politics and Societies 26(3): 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zázvorková, M. (2011) The Involvement of Development NGOs from Visegrad Countries in the Financial Instruments of the European Commission. Prague: FoRS.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Languages and Social Sciences, Aston UniversityBirminghamUK
  2. 2.Department of World Economy, Corvinus University of BudapestBudapestHungary
  3. 3.School of Politics and International Studies (POLIS), University of LeedsLeedsUK

Personalised recommendations