Explaining the gender gap in radical right voting: A cross-national investigation in 12 Western European countries
- 855 Downloads
It is common wisdom in radical right research that men are over-represented among the radical right electorate. We explore whether a radical right gender gap exists across 12 Western European countries and examine how this gap may be explained. Using the European Values Study (2010), we find a radical right gender gap that remains substantial after controlling for socioeconomic and political characteristics. However, our results indicate strong cross-national variation in the size of the gap. Explanations for these differences are explored by looking at the outsider image and the populist discourse style of the radical right parties, which are hypothesised to keep women from voting for the radical right. Our results do not confirm this expectation: differences in party characteristics do not account for cross-national differences in the gender gap. Implications of these findings and suggestions for further research are discussed.
Keywordsradical right gender cross-national party characteristics
The research presented in this article is part of the project ‘Mobilizing “the People”? Populist Radical Right Parties and The Active Citizen’, funded by the NWO Graduate Training Program Grant (2008/2009) awarded to the research school Interuniversity Center for Social Science Theory and Methodology (ICS).
- Coffé, H. (2005) Extreem rechts in Vlaanderen en Wallonië. Roeselare, Belgium: Roularta Books.Google Scholar
- ESS. (2010) European social survey wave 4 (edn. 3.0), http://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/, accessed 20 December 2011.
- European Values Study (EVS) (2010) European Values Study 2008 4th wave, integrated dataset, ZA4800 data file version 2.0.0. Retrieved 20 June 2011, from: Cologne, Germany: GESIS Data Archive.Google Scholar
- Fennema, M. (2005) Populist parties of the right. In: J. Rydgren (ed.) Movements of Exclusion: Radical Right-Wing Populism in the Western World. Hauppage, NY: Nova Science, pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
- Gilligan, C. (1982) In a Different Voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Hox, J. (2002) Multilevel Analysis: Techniques and Applications. London: Lawrence Elbaum Ass.Google Scholar
- Immerzeel, T., Lubbers, M. and Coffé, H. (2011) Expert Judgement Survey of European Political Parties 2010. Utrecht, the Netherlands: NWO, Department of Sociology, Utrecht University.Google Scholar
- Kitschelt, H. (1995) The Radical Right in Western Europe: A Comparative Analysis. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
- Mayer, N. (2002) Ces Français qui votent Le Pen. Saint-Amand-Montrond, France: Flammarion.Google Scholar
- Moors, H., Balogh, L., van Donselaar, J. and De Graaff, B. (2009) Polarisatie en radicalisering in Nederland. Tilburg, the Netherlands: IVA Beleidsonderzoek en advies.Google Scholar
- Olzak, S. (1992) Dynamics of Ethnic Competition and Conflict. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Papadopoulos, Y. (2002) National Populism in Western Europe: An Ambivalent Phenomenon. Lausanne, Switzerland: Institut d’Études Politiques et Internationales.Google Scholar
- Roth, D. (1989) Sind die Republikaner die fünfte Partei? Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte 41–42 (89): 10–20.Google Scholar
- Studlar, D.T., McAllister, I. and Hayes, B.C. (1998) Explaining the gender gap in voting: A cross-national analysis. Social Science Quarterly 79 (4): 779–798.Google Scholar
- Tannen, D. (1990) You Just Don’t Understand. Women and Men in Conversation. New York: Morrow.Google Scholar