Comparative European Politics

, Volume 12, Issue 2, pp 141–159 | Cite as

Issue framing in the European Commission: State aid policy and the single market

  • Umut Aydin
Original Article
First Online:

Abstract

State aid rules of the European Union regulate member states’ subsidies to industry and grant the European Commission extensive powers to monitor compliance with these rules. Until the 1980s, the Commission was reluctant to use these powers and state aid control in the Community remained weak. Since then, its control over member state aid has increased gradually, resulting in more extensive investigative powers, and on average, lower levels of state aid in the EU. In this article, I argue that the European Commission's strategic framing of the state aid issue played a significant role in the transformation of the policy in the late 1980s and the 1990s. As a policy entrepreneur, the Commission framed the issue of state aids in relation to market integration in the 1980s and the Economic and Monetary Union in the 1990s, and thus helped shape the interests of the member states and economic actors and paved the way for the gradual tightening of state aid control.

Keywords

competition policy European Commission issue framing single market state aid subsidies 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research is partially supported by FONDECYT Project no. 11121357. I thank the two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments.

References

  1. Aujac, H. (1986) An introduction to French industrial policy. In: W.J. Adams and C. Stoffaes (eds.) French Industrial Policy. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, pp. 13–35.Google Scholar
  2. Aydin, U. (2007) Promoting industries in the global economy: Subsidies in OECD countries, 1989 to 1995. Journal of European Public Policy 14 (1): 115–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baumgartner, F.R. and Jones, B.D. (1993) Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  4. Benford, R.D. and Snow, D.A. (2000) Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology 26 (1): 611–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bermeo, N. (1990) The politics of public enterprise in Portugal, Spain and Greece. In: E.N. Suleiman and J. Waterbury (eds.) The Political Economy of Public Sector Reform and Privatization. Boulder: Westview Press, pp. 137–162.Google Scholar
  6. Blauberger, M. (2009) Of ‘good’ and ‘bad’ subsidies: European state aid control through soft and hard law. West European Politics 32 (4): 719–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Buerkle, T. (1994) EU losing the subsidy battle. New York Times October 13.Google Scholar
  8. Chari, R.S. and Cavatorta, F. (2002) Economic actors’ political activity in ‘overlap issues’: Privatization and EU state aid control. West European Politics 25 (4): 119–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cini, M. (2000) Administrative culture in the European Commission: The cases of competition and environment. In: N. Nugent (ed.) At the Heart of the Union: Studies of the European Commission. New York: St. Martin's, pp. 73–90.Google Scholar
  10. Cini, M. (2001) The soft law approach: Commission rule-making in the EU's state aid regime. Journal of European Public Policy 8 (2): 192–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cini, M. and McGowan, L. (2009) Competition Policy in the European Union, 2nd edn. New York: St Martin's.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Commission of the European Communities. (1985) Completing the internal market, http://europa.eu/documents/comm/white_papers/pdf/com1985_0310_f_en.pdf, accessed 30 June 2008.
  13. Commission of the European Communities. (1988a) First survey on state aids in the European Community, http://aei.pitt.edu/3100/01/000073_1.pdf, accessed 1 September 2008.Google Scholar
  14. Commission of the European Communities. (1988b) Europe 1992: The Overall Challenge [Cecchini Report], SEC (88)524 final, Brussels.Google Scholar
  15. Commission of the European Communities. (1995) XXVth Report on Competition Policy, http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/annual_reports/, accessed 10 September 2010.
  16. Commission of the European Communities. (Various years) State aid scoreboard, http://ec.europa.eu/competition/state_aid/studies_reports/studies_reports.html, accessed 30 June 2008.
  17. Cooke, S. (1993a) How state aid boosts the flagging airlines. Management Today, 1 April.Google Scholar
  18. Cooke, S. (1993b) State steel – A soft touch. Management Today, 1 May.Google Scholar
  19. Daviter, F. (2007) Policy framing in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy 14 (4): 654–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dinan, D. (2005) Ever Closer Union: An Introduction to European Integration. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  21. Dudley, G. and Richardson, J. (1997) Competing policy frames in EU policy making: The rise of free market ideas in EU steel policy 1985–1996. European Integration online Papers (EIoP) 1 (13): 1–13.Google Scholar
  22. Economist. (1992) Steering the EC's industry. January 25, pp. 65–68.Google Scholar
  23. Ehlermann, C.-D. (1994) State aids under European Community competition law. Fordham International Law Journal 18 (2): 410–447.Google Scholar
  24. Ehlermann, C.-D. and Everson, M. (2001) Panel three: The prospects for the decentralization of EU state aid control. In: C.-D. Ehlermann and M. Everson (eds.) European Competition Law Annual 1999. Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing, pp. 469–666.Google Scholar
  25. Eur-Lex. (2012) Access to European Law, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm, accessed 24 February 2012.
  26. European Court of Justice. (1980) Case 730/79 Philip Morris Holland BV v Commission of the European Communities, European Court Reports - 02671, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:61979J0730:EN:HTML, accessed 3 December 2012.
  27. Fligstein, N. (2001) Institutional entrepreneurs and cultural frames: The case of the European Union's single market program. European Societies 3 (3): 261–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ford, R. and Suyker, W. (1990) Industrial Subsidies in the OECD Economies. OECD Department of Economics and Statistics Working Papers No. 74.Google Scholar
  29. Fox, E.M. (2002) State aids control and the distortion of competition- unbundling ‘distortion. In: B.E. Hawk (ed.) Annual Proceedings of the Fordham Corporate Law Institute. New York: Juris Publishing, pp. 91–99.Google Scholar
  30. Goyder, D.G. (2003) EC Competition Law. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Hayward, J. (1986) The State and the Market Economy: Industrial Patriotism and Economic Intervention in France. Brighton: Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  32. Hayward, J. (1995) Europe's endangered industrial champions. In: J. Hayward (ed.) Industrial Enterprise and European Integration. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–20.Google Scholar
  33. Hayward, J. (1997) Changing partnerships: Firms and the French state. Modern & Contemporary France 5 (2): 155–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kapstein, J. (1989) ‘Subsidy’ becomes a dirty word. Business Week 3111, 19 June, p. 48.Google Scholar
  35. Kassim, H. (1997) French autonomy and the European Union. Modern & Contemporary France 5 (2): 167–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kohler-Koch, B. (2000) Framing: The bottleneck of constructing legitimate institutions. Journal of European Public Policy 7 (4): 513–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lavdas, K.A. and Mendrinou, M.M. (1999) Politics, Subsidies and Competition: The new politics of state intervention in the European Union. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  38. Le Galès, P. (2001) Est Maître Des Dieux Celui Qui Les Organise: How rules change when national and European policy domains collide. In: A. Stone Sweet, W. Sandholtz and N. Fligstein (eds.) The Institutionalization of Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 137–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Majoras, D.P. (2006) State intervention: A state of displaced competition. George Mason Law Review 13 (6): 1175–1187.Google Scholar
  40. McGowan, L. (2010) The Antitrust Revolution in Europe: Exploring the European Commission's Cartel Policy. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mederer, W. (1996) The future of state aid control. Competition Policy Newsletter 2 (3): 12–14.Google Scholar
  42. Mintrom, M. and Vergari, S. (1996) Advocacy coalitions, policy entrepreneurs, and policy change. Policy Studies Journal 24 (3): 420–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nylander, J. (2001) The Construction of a market: A frame analysis of the liberalization of the electricity market in the European Union. European Societies 3 (3): 289–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Padoa-Schioppa Group. (1987) Efficiency, Stability and Equity: A Strategy for the Evolution of the Economic System of the European Community, Report of the study group appointed by the Commission of the European Communities, http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/emu_history/documentation/chapter12/19870410en149efficiencstabil_a.pdf, accessed 2 December 2012.
  45. Peters, A. and Fisher, P. (2004) The failures of economic development incentives. Journal of the American Planning Association 70 (1): 27–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Quaglia, L. (2004) Italy's policy toward European monetary integration: Bringing ideas back in? Journal of European Public Policy 11 (6): 1096–1111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Radaelli, C.M. (1995) The role of knowledge in the policy process. Journal of European Public Policy 2 (2): 153–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rein, M. and Schön, D. (1993) Reframing policy discourse. In: F. Fischer and J. Forester (eds.) The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning. Durham: Duke University Press, pp. 144–166.Google Scholar
  49. Schmidt, V. (1997) Running on empty: The end of dirigisme in French economic leadership. Modern & Contemporary France 5 (2): 229–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schmidt, V.A. (1996) From State to Market? New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Smith, M.P. (1996) Integration in small steps: The European commission and member-state aid to industry. West European Politics 19 (3): 563–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Smith, M.P. (1998) Autonomy by the rules: The European commission and the development of state aid policy. Journal of Common Market Studies 36 (1): 55–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Smyrl, M. (1998) When (and how) do the commission's preferences matter? Journal of Common Market Studies 36 (1): 79–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Snow, D.A. and Benford, R.D. (1992) Master frames and cycles of protest. In: A.D. Morris and C. McClurg Mueller (eds.) Frontiers of Social Movement Theory. New Haven: Yale University Press, pp. 133–155.Google Scholar
  55. Spaak, P.-H. (1956) The Brussels Report on the General Common Market (Spaak Report). Brussels.Google Scholar
  56. Thatcher, M. (2003) From industrial policy to a regulatory state: Contrasting institutional change in Britain and France. In: J. Hayward and A. Menon (eds.) Governing Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 313–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Thomas, K.P. (2000) Competing for Capital: Europe and North America in a Global Era. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Thomas, K.P. (2011) Investment Incentives and the Global Competition for Capital. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tiberghien, Y. (2007) Entrepreneurial States: Reforming Corporate Governance in France, Japan, and Korea. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Trebilcock, M.J., Chandler, M. and Howse, R. (1990) Trade and Transitions: A Comparative Analysis of Adjustment Policies. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Triandafyllidou, A. and Fotiou, A. (1998) Sustainability and modernity in the European Union: A frame theory approach to policy-making. Sociological Research Online no. 1, http://www.socresonline.org.uk/3/1/2.html, accessed 10 June 2010.
  62. Tucker, E. and Graham, R. (1999) French push for Brussels post faces opposition. Financial Times, 13 April, p. 1.Google Scholar
  63. Wendon, B. (1998) The Commission as image-venue entrepreneur in EU social policy. Journal of European Public Policy 5 (2): 339–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wilks, S. and McGowan, L. (1996) Competition policy in the European Union: Creating a federal agency? In: B. Doern and S. Wilks (eds.) Comparative Competition Policy. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 225–267.Google Scholar
  65. Wolf, D. (2005) State aid control at the national, European, and international level. In: M. Zürn and C. Joerges (eds.) Law and Governance in Postnational Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 65–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wolf, J. (1990) A game of Italy v the rest in EC state aid stakes. The Guardian, 15 October.Google Scholar
  67. Wolf, J. and Cornelius, A. (1990) Renault told to repay Pounds 600 m in state aid. The Guardian May 23.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Umut Aydin
    • 1
  1. 1.Instituto de Ciencia Política, Pontificia Universidad Católica de ChileSantiagoChile

Personalised recommendations