Comparative European Politics

, Volume 8, Issue 1, pp 55–73 | Cite as

European integration by daylight

  • Jonathan White
Original Article

Abstract

It has become common to highlight the desirability of a more ‘politicised’ European Union (EU) so as to counter the low visibility of its policymaking and the disaffection this may breed. Endorsing this view, the article argues existing contributions to the topic tend to give insufficient attention to the relationship between institutional settings and everyday life, and to underplay the significance of how political actors interpret and reproduce the social and political world. The article explores how one might reconsider these questions, drawing on some of the insights of cultural and pragmatic sociology to suggest that the important obstacles to further politicisation may be rooted in contemporary political culture. A contribution is thereby intended both to the topic in question and to a wider effort to supplement institutional perspectives in EU studies with those drawn from sociology.

Keywords

European union (EU) politicisation political culture cultural sociology 

References

  1. Bartolini, S. (2005) Restructuring Europe: Centre Formation, System Building and Political Structuring between the Nation-State and the European Union. Oxford: OUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bartolini, S. (2006) Should the Union be ‘Politicised’? Prospects and Risks. Notre Europe Working Paper: Politics: The Right or the Wrong Sort of Medicine for the EU?Google Scholar
  3. Bellamy, R. and Castiglione, D. (2003) Legitimizing the euro-‘polity’ and its ‘regime’: The normative turn in EU studies. European Journal of Political Theory 2 (1): 7–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beyers, J. and Kerremans, B. (2004) Bureaucrats, politicians, and societal interests: How is European policy making politicized? Comparative Political Studies 37 (10): 1119–1150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boltanski, L. and Chiapello, E. (2006) The New Spirit of Capitalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  6. Boltanski, L. and Thévenot, L. (2006) On Justification: Economies of Worth. Princeton: PUP.Google Scholar
  7. Bourdieu, P. (1991) Language and Symbolic Power, In: J.B. Thompson (ed.); Translated by G. Raymond and M. Adamson. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  8. Burnham, P. (2001) New labour and the politics of depoliticisation. British Journal of Politics and International Relations 3 (2): 127–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chalmers, D. (2009) Gauging the Cumbersomeness of EU Law. LSE Europe in Question Series (LEQS), Paper 2.Google Scholar
  10. Chryssochoou, D. (2000) Meta-theory and the study of the European Union: Capturing the normative turn. Journal of European Integration 22 (2): 123–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. de Wilde, P. (2007) Politicisation of European Integration: Bringing the Process into Focus. ARENA Working Papers 18.Google Scholar
  12. Dobson, L. (2004) Conceptions of freedom and the European constitution. In: L. Dobson and A. Follesdal (eds.) Political Theory and the European Constitution. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Favell, A. (2005) Review article: Europe's identity problem. West European Politics 28 (5): 1109–1116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Favell, A. (2006) The sociology of EU politics. In: K.E. Jorgensen, M. Pollack and B. Rosamond (eds.) The Handbook of EU Politics. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Fligstein, N. (2008) Euroclash: the EU, European Identity, and the Future of Europe. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
  16. Furedi, F. (2005) Politics of Fear. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  17. Gamson, W. (1992) Talking Politics. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
  18. Hay, C. (2007) Why We Hate Politics. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  19. Hayward, J. (1996) Conclusion: Has European unification by stealth a future? In: Hayward (ed.) Elitism, Populism and European Politics. Oxford: OUP, pp. 252–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hix, S. (2002) Parliamentary behaviour with two principals: Preferences, parties and voting in the European parliament. American Journal of Political Science 46 (3): 688–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hix, S. (2008) What's Wrong with the European Union and How to Fix it. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  22. Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. (2009) A postfunctional theory of European integration: From permissive consensus to contraining dissensus. British Journal of Political Science 39 (1): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ladrech, R. (2007) National political parties and European governance: The consequences of ‘missing in action. West European Politics 30 (5): 945–960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lamont, M. and Molnár, V. (2002) The study of boundaries in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology 28: 167–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lamont, M. and Thévenot, L. (eds.) (2000) Rethinking Comparative Cultural Sociology. Cambridge: CUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lipset, S. and Rokkan, S. (eds.) (1967) Party Systems and Voter Alignments. New York: Free.Google Scholar
  27. Lord, C. (2006) The aggregating function of political parties in EU decision-making. Living Reviews in European Governance 1 (2): 1–24.Google Scholar
  28. Mair, P. (2007) Political opposition and the European Union. Government and Opposition 42 (1): 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mair, P. (2008) The challenge to party government. West European Politics 31 (1): 211–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Marks, G., Wilson, C.J. and Ray, L. (2002) National political parties and European integration. American Journal of Political Science 46 (3): 585–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Meyer, T. and Hinchman, L. (2002) Media Democracy: How the Media Colonise Politics. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
  32. Mouffe, C. (2005) On the Political. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  33. Muirhead, R. (2006) A defence of party spirit. Perspectives on Politics 4 (4): 713–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pettit, P. (1997) Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  35. Reckwitz, A. (2002) Towards a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory 5 (2): 243–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sewell, W.H. (2005) Refiguring the ‘social’ in social science: An interpretivist manifesto. In: W.H. JR. Sewell (ed.) Logics of History: Social Theory and Social Transformation. London: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Silber, I.F. (2003) Pragmatic sociology as cultural sociology: Beyond repertoire theory? European Journal of Social Theory 6 (4): 427–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Thévenot, L., Moody, M. and Lafaye, C. (2000) Forms of valuing nature: Arguments and modes of justification in French and American environmental disputes. In: Lamont and Thévenot (eds.) Rethinking Comparative Cultural Sociology. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
  39. Tsakatika, M. (2007) Governance vs politics: The European union's constitutive ‘democratic deficit. Journal of European Public Policy 14 (6): 867–885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. van der Eijk, C. and Franklin, M.N. (2004) Potential for contestation on European matters at national elections in Europe. In: G. Marks and M.R. Steenbergen (eds.) European Integration and Political Conflict. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
  41. White, J. (2009) Thematization and collective positioning in everyday political talk. British Journal of Political Science 39 (4): 699–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. White, J. (2010a) Europe and the common. Political Studies 58 (1): 104–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. White, J. (2010b) Europe in the political imagination. Journal of Common Market Studies 48 (4), in press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jonathan White
    • 1
  1. 1.European Institute, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton StreetLondonUK

Personalised recommendations