Advertisement

Comparative European Politics

, Volume 9, Issue 3, pp 269–291 | Cite as

In from the cold? Left parties and government involvement since 1989

  • Tim BaleEmail author
  • Richard Dunphy
Original Article

Abstract

Radical left parties – particularly their involvement in government either as full coalition partners or support parties to minority social democratic administrations – have not received as much attention as their counterparts on the far right of the political spectrum or, indeed, the Greens. This interview-based study, which focuses on the calculations made by left parties with a chance of getting involved in governing, suggests that this needs to change. It argues that, whatever the origins of these left parties, such calculations can fruitfully be explored by characterising them – just as we have begun to characterise the calculations of Green and radical right parties – as the kind of trade-offs between policy, office and votes that more mainstream political actors have been making ever since democracy was established in Europe. Similarly, other factors that impact on the calculations made by radical left parties thinking about government are unlikely to be exclusive to them. They include a history of coalition building at the subnational level, the views of trade unions, personal relationships with other party leaders, and finally their reading of how government involvement has impacted on their counterparts in other countries.

Keywords

left party government formation niche parties communist coalition 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the referees for their comments on an earlier version and to acknowledge that funding for this research was kindly provided by a Joint Activities Grant from the British Academy.

References

  1. Adams, J., Clark, M., Ezrow, L. and Glasgow, G. (2006) Are niche parties fundamentally different from mainstream parties? The causes and the electoral consequences of Western European Parties’ policy shifts, 1976–1998. American Journal of Political Science 50: 513–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arter, D. (2002) Communists we are no longer, Social Democrats we can never be: The evolution of the Leftists parties in Finland and Sweden. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 18 (3): 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bale, T. and Bergman, T. (2006) A taste of honey is worse than none at all? Coping with the generic challenges of support party status in Sweden and New Zealand. Party Politics 12 (2): 189–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bell, D.S. (ed.) (1993) Western European Communists and the Collapse of Communism. Oxford, UK: Berg.Google Scholar
  5. Bell, D.S. (2004) The French Communist Party within the left and alternative movements. Modern and Contemporary France 12 (1): 23–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bosco, A. (2001) Four actors in search of a role: The Southern European communist parties. In: P.N. Diamandouros and R. Gunther (eds.) Parties, Politics and Democracy in the New Southern Europe. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Botella, J. and Ramiro, L. (eds.) (2003) The Crisis of Communism and Party Change. The Evolution of West European Communist and Post-Communist Parties. Barcelona, Spain: ICPS.Google Scholar
  8. Bull, M. and Heywood, P. (eds.) (1994) West European Communist Parties after the Revolutions of 1989. London: Macmillan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. de Lange, S.L. (2008) From Pariah to power. The government participation of radical right-wing populist parties in West European Democracies. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Antwerp.Google Scholar
  10. De Winter, L. (2002) Parties and government formation, portfolio allocation and policy definition. In: K.R. Luther and F. Müller-Rommel (eds.) Political Parties in the New Europe – Political and Analytical Challenges. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp. 171–206.Google Scholar
  11. Downs, W. (1998) Coalition Government, Subnational Style: Multiparty Politics in Europe's Regional Parliaments. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Druckman, J.N. and Roberts, A. (2005) Context and coalition bargaining: Comparing portfolio allocation in Eastern and Western Europe. Party Politics 11 (5): 535–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dumont, P. and Bäck, H. (2006) Why so few, and why so late? Green parties and the question of governmental participation. European Journal of Political Research 45 (s.1): 35–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dunphy, R. (2004) Contesting Capitalism? Left Parties and European Integration. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Dunphy, R. (2007) In search of an identity: Finland's left alliance and the experience of coalition government. Contemporary Politics 13 (1): 37–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dunphy, R. and Bale, T. (2007) Red flag still flying? Explaining AKEL – Cyprus's communist anomaly. Party Politics 13: 287–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gapper, S. (2002) From Eastern European communist successor to Western European socialist party? Germany's party of democratic socialism in a comparative context, 1990–2002. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Birmingham.Google Scholar
  18. George, A.L. and Bennett, A. (2005) Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  19. Hudson, K. (2000) European Communism Since 1989: Towards a New European Left? London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hough, D. and Verge, T. (2009) A sheep in wolf's clothing or a gift from heaven? Left-left coalitions in comparative perspective. Regional and Federal Studies 19 (1): 37–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jungar, A.-C. (2002) A case of a surplus majority government: The Finnish rainbow coalition. Scandinavian Political Studies 25 (1): 57–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kitschelt, H. (1988) The rise of left-libertarian parties in western democracies: Explaining innovation in competitive party systems. World Politics 40: 194–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Luebbert, G. (1986) Comparative Democracy: Policy Making and Governing Coalitions in Europe and Israel. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Luther, K.R. (2009) Governing with right-wing populists and managing the consequences: Schüssel and the FPÖ. In: G. Bischof and F. Plasser (eds.) The Schüssel Years in Austria. New Brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  25. Mahoney, J. (2007) Qualitative methodology and comparative politics. Comparative Political Studies 40 (2), pp. 122–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mair, P. and Mudde, C. (1998) The party family and its study. Annual Review of Political Science 1: 211–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. March, L. (2008) Contemporary Far Left Parties in Europe: From Marxism to the Mainstream. Bonn/Berlin, Germany: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.Google Scholar
  28. March, L. and Mudde, C. (2005) What's left of the radical left? The European radical left after 1989: Decline and mutation. Comparative European Politics 3: 23–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Marijnissen, J. (2007) SP leader addresses Norwegian socialist left, http://international.sp.nl/bericht/15987/070324-sp_leader_addresses_norwegian_socialist_left.html.
  30. Müller, W. and Strøm, K. (eds.) (1999) Policy, Office, or Votes? How Political Parties in Western Europe Make Hard Decisions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pridham, G. and Verney, S. (1991) The coalitions of 1989–90 in Greece: Inter-party relations and democratic consolidation. West European Politics 14 (4): 42–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rihoux, B. and Rüdig, W. (eds.) (2006) The Greens in power. special issue of the European Journal of Political Research 45: 1–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ştefuriuc, I. and Verge, T. (2008) Small and divided parties in multi-level settings: Opportunities for regional government participation, the case of Izquierda Unida in Spain. South European Society and Politics 13 (2): 155–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Strøm, K., Müller, W.C. and Bergman, T. (eds.) (2008) Cabinets and Coalition Bargaining: The Democratic Life Cycle in Western Europe. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Tansey, O. (2007) Process tracing and elite interviewing: A case for non-probability sampling. PS: Political Science & Politics 40 (4): 765–772.Google Scholar
  36. Tavits, M. (2008) The role of parties’ past behavior in coalition formation. American Political Science Review 102 (4): 495–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Warwick, P.V. (1996) Coalition government membership in West European parliamentary democracies. British Journal of Political Science 26: 488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Willerton, J.P. and Carrier, M. (2005) Coalition management in the face of ideological and institutional constraint: The case of France's Gauche Plurielle. French Politics 3: 4–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Politics and Contemporary European Studies, University of SussexBrightonUK
  2. 2.School of Humanities, University of DundeeDundeeScotland

Personalised recommendations