Comparative European Politics

, Volume 7, Issue 3, pp 396–407 | Cite as

Explaining democracy in Europe

Review Article
First Online:
  • 31 Downloads

Abstract

This response to the three reviews of Democracy in Europe addresses questions of democracy, institutions, and methodology. It first shows that naming the EU a ‘regional state’ enables us not only to define a new international form but also to envision new rules by which the EU could operate more effectively and democratically. Next it demonstrates that the book's qualitatively developed typology, which classifies the member-states of the EU along a continuum from simple to compound, yields descriptive inferences that need no quantitative operationalization, although it does not rule this out. It then considers how far we can take the argument about ‘institutional fit,’ with the causal inference that the EU is more disruptive to simple polities than to compound ones. It concludes with a discussion of the methodological approach of ‘discursive institutionalism’ by contrast with historical institutionalism, and of the importance of ideas and discourse for democracy in Europe.

Keywords

democracy typology discursive institutionalism qualitative methodology European Union France Germany 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Bache, I. (2008) Europeanization and Multilevel Governance. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  2. Brady, H.E. and Collier, D. (eds.) (2004) Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  3. Collier, D., Mahoney, J. and Seawright, J. (2004) Claiming Too Much: Warnings about Selection Bias. In: H. Brady and D. Collier (eds.) Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  4. Hix, S. (2008) What's Wrong with the European Union and How to Fix It. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  5. Lijphart, A. (1984) Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Lijphart, A. (1999) Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Schmidt, V.A. (2000) Values and Discourse in the Politics of Adjustment. In: F.W. Scharpf and V. Schmidt (eds.) Welfare and Work in the Open Economy Volume I: From Vulnerability to Competitiveness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Schmidt, V.A. (2002) The Futures of European Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Schmidt, V.A. (2006a) Democracy in Europe: The EU and National Polities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Schmidt, V.A. (2006b) Give peace a chance: Reconciling the four (not three) institutionalisms. Paper prepared for presentation at the Annual Meetings of the American Political Science Association; 31 August–3 September, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
  11. Schmidt, V.A. (2008a) Discursive institutionalism: The explanatory power of ideas and discourse. Annual Review of Political Science 11: 303–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Schmidt, V.A. (2008b) A ‘menu Europe’ will prove far more palatable. Comment in the Financial Times, 22 July: p. 13.Google Scholar
  13. Streeck, W. and Thelen, K. (eds.) (2005) Beyond Continuity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of International RelationsBoston UniversityBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations