Comparative European Politics

, Volume 6, Issue 3, pp 262–284 | Cite as

Housing, Global Finance, and American Hegemony: Building Conservative Politics One Brick at a Time

  • Herman Schwartz
Article

Abstract

How did US housing markets articulate both with global financial flows and US domestic politics? During the long 1990s, the US economy benefited from a system of global financial arbitrage in which the US economy as a whole borrowed short term, at low interest rates, from the rest of the world, while lending back long term at higher returns. A temporarily self-sustaining housing market boom in the US based on declining nominal interest rates emerged from these flows. This boom favored employment and gross domestic product (GDP) growth in the US at the expense of some but not all advanced economies. The more that housing market financial structures in an economy approximated those in the US (wide-spread homeownership, high levels of mortgage debt to GDP, low transaction costs for mortgage refinance, and mortgage loan securitization), the better that economy performed in GDP and employment terms during the 1990s. While falling interest rates could have benefited all economies, US style housing markets proved better at translating disinflation into new aggregate demand. This situation consolidates voter preferences around a continued low inflation environment, continuation of US financial arbitrage, and maintenance of high housing prices.

Keywords

capital markets housing hegemony macro-economy welfare state 

References

  1. Borio, C. (1995) ‘The structure of credit to the non-government sector and the transmission mechanism of monetary policy: a cross-country comparison’, BIS Working Papers, no. 24.Google Scholar
  2. Case, K.E., Quigley, J.M. and Shiller, R.J. (2001) ‘Comparing wealth effects: the stock market versus the housing market’, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 8606, http://www.nber.org/papers/w8606.
  3. Dumenil, G. and Levy, D.L. (2004) ‘Neo-liberal income trends’, New Left Review 30 (November–December): 105–133.Google Scholar
  4. Engelhardt, G.V. (2005) Housing Trends among Baby Boomers, Washington DC: Research Institute for Housing in America.Google Scholar
  5. European Mortgage Foundation (1994) Annual Report.Google Scholar
  6. European Mortgage Foundation (2007) Mortgage Finance Gazette. Brussels: European Mortgage Foundation.Google Scholar
  7. Federal Reserve Bank (2004) Flow of Funds, Washington DC: Federal Reserve Bank, on-line database.Google Scholar
  8. Fellowes, M. and Mabanta, M. (2007) ‘Borrowing to get ahead and behind: the credit boom and bust in lower-income markets’, Brookings Institutions Survey Series, May.Google Scholar
  9. FNMA (2005) ‘Annual report’, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  10. Freddie Mac (2005) ‘Annual report’, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  11. Germain, R. (1997) The International Organization of Credit, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Greenspan, A. and Kennedy, J. (2005) ‘Estimates of home mortgage originations, repayments, and debt on one-to-four-family residences’, Federal Reserve Board working paper 2005: 41.Google Scholar
  13. Harvard University Joint Center for Housing Studies (2008) The State of the Nation's Housing, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University JCHS.Google Scholar
  14. Kenworthy, L. (2002) ‘Corporatism and Unemployment in the 1980s and 1990s’, American Sociological Review 67 (3): 367–388.Google Scholar
  15. Ludwig, A. and Slok, T. (2002) ‘Impact of changes in stock prices and house prices on consumption in OECD countries’, IMF Working Paper 02/01.Google Scholar
  16. McConnell, M.M., Peach, R.W. and Al-Haschimi, A. (2003) ‘After the Refinancing boom: will consumers scale back their spending?’ Current Issues in Economics and Finance 9 (12): 1–7.Google Scholar
  17. OECD (2005) OECD Factbook. http://www.sourceOECD.org.
  18. Schwartz, H. (2001) ‘The Danish ‘Miracle’: luck, pluck or stuck?’ Comparative Political Studies 34 (2): 131–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Schwartz, H. (2009) Subprime Nation? American Economic Power, Global Capital Flows and Housing, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Setser, B. (2006) ‘The deterioration in the US income balance has just begun’, available at http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2006/09/26/the-deterioration-in-the-us-income-balance-has-just-begun/.
  21. US Bureau of Labor Statistics (2004) ‘Consumer expenditure survey 2004’, 9, http://www.bls.gov/cex/csxann04.pdf.
  22. US Department of the Treasury (2005) ‘Report on foreign holdings of US portfolio securities’, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  23. US Department of the Treasury (2007) ‘Report on foreign holdings of US portfolio securities’, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  24. Warnock, F.E. and Warnock, V.C. (2006) ‘International capital flows and U.S. interest rates’, FRB International Finance Discussion Paper No. 840.Google Scholar
  25. Wilson, S. (2006) ‘Not my taxes!: explaining tax resistance and its implications for Australia's welfare state’, Australian Journal of Political Science 41 (4): 517–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan Ltd 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Herman Schwartz
    • 1
  1. 1.Politics DepartmentPO Box 400787, University of VirginiaCharlottesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations