British Politics

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 115–133 | Cite as

Friends with benefits: A temporal comparison of electoral pact negotiations in the British context

Forward Thinking
First Online:

Abstract

Electoral pacts between British political parties have been mooted more often than folk memory or current academic literature would suggest. There has been little attempt to tackle them empirically, and comparative theory on pre-electoral coalitions is formative at best. This article uses a comparative framework to historically trace three cases where pre-electoral coalitions have been seriously discussed by British political parties – one that was eventually fully operational, and two that ultimately were not formed. It posits a strong role for party leaders and elite-level dynamics in explaining the success and failure of negotiations between parties, and finds them to be an enduring example of intra-party collective decision making. There also exists a clear divide between success and failure in negotiations dependent on whether pacts are perceived to be electorally expedient, or intrinsically damaging to short and long-term party goals. These are based on contrasting interpretive standpoints on the constraints of Westminster and voter perceptions of coalitions.

Keywords

electoral pacts inter-party politics coalition negotiations conservative party liberal democrats 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The work on this article was made possible by support from the Economic and Social Research Council – grant reference number ref ES/J500124/1. Thanks also to the Conservative Party Archives at the Bodleian, Oxford, for facilitating access, and Sir David Butler, for allowing access to his private papers for deep background.

References

  1. Addison, P. (2013) Churchill on the Home Front 1900–1955. London: FaberFinds.Google Scholar
  2. Andeweg, R. (2011) From puzzles to prospects for coalition theory. In: R. Andeweg, L. De Winter and P. Dumont (eds.) Puzzles of Government Formation. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Ashdown, P. (2001) The Ashdown Diaries: 1988–1997. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  4. Axelrod, R. (1970) Conflict of Interest. Chicago, IL: Markham.Google Scholar
  5. Bale, T. (2015) Five Year Mission: The Labour Party Under Ed Miliband. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bates, R., Grief, A., Levi, M., Rosenthal, J. and Weingast, B. (1998) Analytic Narratives. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bingham Powell, G. (2000) Elections as Instruments of Democracy. Connecticut: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bogdanor, V. (1992) Electoral pacts. In: D. Kavanagh (ed.) Electoral Politics. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 165–187.Google Scholar
  9. Bogdanor, V. (2011) The Coalition and the Constitution. London: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  10. Boles, N. (2010) Which Way’s Up? London: Biteback.Google Scholar
  11. Bonham Carter, V. (2000) In: M. Pottle (ed.) Daring to Hope: The Diaries and Letters of Violet Bonham Carter, 1946–1969. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
  12. Butler, D. and Stokes, D. (1974) Political Change in Britain. New York: St Martin’s Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Butler, R. (1950) First Sub-Committee on Liberal Co-Operation, [Report], Conservative Party Archives (CPA) CCO 20/2/1 Bodleian Library: Oxford.Google Scholar
  14. Butler, R. (1950) Letter from Rab Butler to Churchill [Letter], CPA, CCO 20/2/1 Bodleian Library, Oxford.Google Scholar
  15. Cable, V. (2015) Vince cable on the lib dem collapse, New Statesman 20 May.Google Scholar
  16. Campbell, A. (2010) Diaries Volume 1: Prelude to Power 1994–1997. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
  17. Churchill, W. (1951) Letter from Churchill to Woolton [Letter], Conservative Party Archives, CCO 20/2/1 Bodleian Library, Oxford.Google Scholar
  18. Coetzee, R. (2015) The liberal democrats must reunite, rebuild or remain on opposition, The Guardian 22 May.Google Scholar
  19. Conservative Central Office (1950) Public Opinion and Political Trend Summary June [Report], CPA, CCO 180/20/2, Bodleian Library: Oxford.Google Scholar
  20. Conservative Central Office (1951) Public Opinion and Political Trend Summary November [Report], CPA, CCO 180/20/2, Bodleian Library, Oxford.Google Scholar
  21. Crewe, I. (1982) Is Britain’s two-party system really about to crumble? Electoral Studies 1(3): 275–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Crewe, I. and King, A. (1995) SDP. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Crossman, R. (1985) Introduction to Bagehot’s the english constitution. In: A. King (ed.) The British Prime Minister. London: Palgrave MacMillan, pp. 175–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dodds, E. (1950) Editorial. Huddersfield Examiner 8 May: 15.Google Scholar
  25. Douglas, R. (2005) Liberals. London: Hambledon.Google Scholar
  26. Dorey, P. (2008) The Labour Party and Constitutional Reform. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dunleavy, P. (2006) The westminster model and the distinctiveness of British politics. In: P. Dunleavy, R. Heffernan, P. Cowley and C. Hay (eds.) Developments in British Politics 8. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 315–342.Google Scholar
  28. Dutton, D. (2013) History of the Liberal Party Since 1900. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Duverger, M. (1963) Political Parties. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  30. Evans, G., Curtice, J. and Norris, P. (1998) New labour, new tactical voting? British Elections and Parties Review 8(1): 65–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Golder, S. (2006) The Logic of Pre-Electoral Coalition Formation. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University.Google Scholar
  32. Grice, A. (2014) Five More Years of Coalition Government The Independent 4 March.Google Scholar
  33. Grofman, B., Bowler, S. and Blais, A. (eds.) (2009) Evidence for Duverger’s law from four countries. In: Duverger’s Law of Plurality Voting: The Logic of Party Competition in Four Countries. New York: Springer, pp. 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hall, P. and Taylor, R. (1996) Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political Studies 44(5): 936–957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hay, C. (2006) Constructivist institutionalism. In: R.A.W. Rhodes, S.A. Binder and B.A. Rockman (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 56–74.Google Scholar
  36. Hay, C. (2004) Theory, stylized heuristic or self-fulfilling prophecy? The status of rational choice theory in public administration. Public Administration 82(1): 39–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Helm, T. (2014) Ukip pact backed by nearly half of Conservative activists The Guardian 1 February.Google Scholar
  38. Hunter, I. (2004) Winston and Archie. London: Politicos.Google Scholar
  39. Jenkins, R. (1991) A Life at the Centre. London: Politicos.Google Scholar
  40. Jenkins, R. (1985) Partnership of Principle. London: Martin Secker & Warburg.Google Scholar
  41. Kaminski, M. (2001) Coalitional stability in multi-party system: Evidence from Poland. American Journal of Political Science 45(2): 294–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kandiah, M. (1992) Lord Woolton’s Chairmanship of the Conservative Party, 1946–1951, PhD Thesis, Exeter: University of Exeter.Google Scholar
  43. Laakso, M. and Taagepera, R. (1979) Effective number of parties: A measure with application to western europe. Comparative Political Studies 12(1): 3–27.Google Scholar
  44. Laver, M. (1997) Private Desires, Political Action. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  45. Laver, M. and Schofield, N. (1990) Multiparty Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Laver, M. and Shepsle, K. (1990) Coalitions and cabinet government. American Political Science Review 84(3): 873–890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Leach, S. and Game, C. (2000) Hung Authorities, Elected Mayors and Cabinet Government. York, UK: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
  48. Linstead, H. (1950) Area Chairman Report- London [Report]. CPA CCO 20/2/1 Bodleian Library: Oxford.Google Scholar
  49. Lucas, C. (2015) My challenge to Labour: Embrace a progressive, multiparty politics, The Guardian 17 June.Google Scholar
  50. Macmillan, H. (1950) Draft Speech [Letter]. CPA CCO 20/2/1 Bodleian Library: Oxford.Google Scholar
  51. Macmillan, H. (1969) Tides of Fortune: 1945–55. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  52. Mandelson, P. (2010) The Third Man. London: Harper Press.Google Scholar
  53. Martin, L. and Stevenson, R. (2001) Government formation in parliamentary democracies. American Journal of Political Science 45(1): 33–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Michels, R. (2001) Political Parties. Ontario, Canada: Botache Books.Google Scholar
  55. Moran, C. (1966) Winston Churchill: The Struggle for Survival. London: Constable.Google Scholar
  56. Müller, W. and Strøm, K. (1999) Policy, Office, or Votes? Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Owen, D. (1991) Time to Declare. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  58. Piersenne, S. (1950) Approach to Liberals [Memorandum] CPA CCO 3/2/112 Bodleian Library: Oxford.Google Scholar
  59. Piersenne, S. (1950) Relations with the Liberal Party Chur 2/64/248 Cambridge: Churchill Archives.Google Scholar
  60. Powell, J. (2010) The New Machievelli. London: Random House.Google Scholar
  61. Prescott, J. (2011) Alternative Vote Debate. 5 April, BBC Daily Politics, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-12978716, accessed 14 January 2015.
  62. Rawnsley, A. (2001) Servants of the People. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  63. Reid, J. (2011) John Reid unveils ‘Labour NO to AV’ campaign poster, 29 March, ITV News Interview, http://www.itnsource.com/shotlist/ITN/2011/03/29/R29031115/?v=2, accessed 14 January 2015.
  64. Rentoul, J. (1999) Tony Blair 1994-. In: K. Jeffreys (ed.) Leading Labour. London: I.B. Tauris, pp. 208–228.Google Scholar
  65. Richards, D. and Smith, M. (2001) New labour, the constitution and reforming the state. In: S. Ludlam and M. Smith (eds.) New Labour in Government. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 145–166.Google Scholar
  66. Richards, D. and Smith, M. (2015) The Strange Resurrection of the British Political Tradition, LSE British Politics and Policy, http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/the-strange-resurrection-of-the-british-political-tradition/, accessed 1 August 2015.
  67. Richards, S. (2010) Whatever it Takes. London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  68. Riker, W. (1984) The Theory of Political Coalitions. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood.Google Scholar
  69. Rodgers, W. (2000) Fourth Among Equals. London: Politicos.Google Scholar
  70. Salisbury, R. (1951) Letter to Lord Woolton [Letter] MS Woolton 20 Folios 128–131, Lord Woolton Papers, Bodleian Library: Oxford.Google Scholar
  71. Sartori, G. (1976) Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Schlesinger, J. (1985) The new American political party. The American Political Science Review 79(4): 1152–1169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Seldon, A. (2005) Blair. London: Free Press.Google Scholar
  74. Sparrow, A. (2011) Farage says Ukip could offer Tories electoral pact in return for referendum. The Guardian 19 December.Google Scholar
  75. Straw, J. (2005) There are no short-cuts in democracy, The Guardian 12 May.Google Scholar
  76. The Times (1950) Editorial. 27 February.Google Scholar
  77. Toye, R. (2007) I am a liberal as much as a Tory. Journal of Liberal History 54: 38–45.Google Scholar
  78. Von Neumann, J. and Morgenstern, O. (1953) Theory of Games and Economic Behaviour. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  79. Watt, D. (1981) The painful business of pulling the centre together, The Times 22 May.Google Scholar
  80. Wilson, R. (2010) 5 Days to Power. London: Biteback.Google Scholar
  81. Woolton, M. (1950) An Anti-Socialist Front [Speech Draft] CPA CCO 20/2/1, Bodleian Library: Oxford.Google Scholar
  82. Woolton, M. (1949) Confidential Chairman’s Report’ [Report] Woolton Papers MS Woolton 20 Folio 98 Bodleian Library: Oxford.Google Scholar
  83. Young, H. (2008) The Hugo Young Papers. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Politics and International Relations, Queen Mary University of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations