British Politics

, Volume 9, Issue 4, pp 472–493 | Cite as

Divorced but still co-habiting? Britain’s Prevent/community cohesion policy tension

  • Paul Thomas
Original Article
First Online:

Abstract

The relationship between Britain’s Prevent programme and wider multiculturalist policies of community cohesion has provoked much discussion but there has been less focus on how this relationship has been experienced at the local operational level. This article utilises available empirical data to analyse the nature of this policy relationship, arguing that Prevent has progressively side-lined and ‘crowded out’ cohesion practice at both the local and national level to the detriment of both counter-terrorism and community relations. Although questioning the need for Prevent, local authorities reluctantly operationalised it through a ‘marriage’ with an initially equally resourced cohesion programme but the conceptual flaws and political weight of Prevent generated a perception and reality of enhanced securitisation and the side-lining of cohesion. The political solution of the 2011 Prevent Review was an organisational ‘divorce’ between the two policies and the government departments responsible for them. The article argues, however, that such separation was never possible at the local level and that they continue to co-habit in an unequal and loveless relationship. Despite some positive aspects, the 2011 Review has led to an increasingly securitised and still flawed Prevent, while community cohesion has officially been disowned by the Coalition government.

Keywords

Prevent terrorism Muslims cohesion multiculturalism policy 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Alexander, C. (2004) Imagining the Asian gang: Ethnicity, masculinity and youth after the riots. Critical Social Policy 24 (4): 526–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. All-Party Parliamentary Group on Homeland Security (APPGHS) (2011) Keeping Britain Safe: An Assessment of UK Homeland Security Strategy. London: The Henry Jackson Society.Google Scholar
  3. Association of West Yorkshire Authorities (2008a) Report from the West Yorkshire Community Cohesion Good Practice Event. Wakefield, UK: AWAY.Google Scholar
  4. Association of West Yorkshire Authorities (2008b) Cohesion in West Yorkshire. Wakefield, UK: AWAY.Google Scholar
  5. BBC News (2013) English Defence League Rally Bomb Plotters Jailed, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-22841573, accessed 15 July 2013.
  6. Birt, Y. (2009) Promoting virulent envy – Reconsidering the UK’s terrorist prevention strategy. Royal United Services Institute (RUSI) Journal 154 (4): 52–58.Google Scholar
  7. Boffey, D. and Doward, J. (2013) Woolwich attack: Coalition failing to tackle extremism, says Hazel Blears. The Observer, 25th May, http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/may/25/woolwich-attack-hazel-blears-attacks-coalition, accessed 25 May 2013.
  8. Braun, A., MaGuire, M. and Ball, S. (2010) Policy enactments in the UK secondary school: Examining policy, practice and school positioning. Journal of Education Policy 25 (4): 547–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Browne, K. (2013) Gender, Prevent and British Muslims. Public Spirit series on the legacy and future of Prevent, http://www.publicspirit.org.uk/gender-prevent-and-british-muslims-2/.
  10. Cameron, D. (2011) Speech to the Munich Security Conference, 5 February.Google Scholar
  11. Cantle, T. (2001) Community Cohesion – A Report of the Independent Review Team. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  12. Cantle, T. and Thomas, P. (2014) Taking the Think Project Forward: The Need for Preventative Anti-Extremism Educational Work. Swansea, UK: Ethnic Youth Support Team.Google Scholar
  13. Cavanagh, M. (2011) Terror prevent strategy is muddled – and potentially dangerous. The New Statesman 9 June, http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/the-staggers/2011/06/strategy-groups-government, accessed 13 October 2013.
  14. Commission on Integration and Cohesion (COIC) (2007) Our Shared Futures. London: DCLG.Google Scholar
  15. Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG) (2007a) Preventing Violent Extremism: Winning Hearts and Minds. London: DCLG.Google Scholar
  16. DCLG (2007b) Preventing Violent Extremism: Guidance Note for Government Offices and Local Authorities in England. London: DCLG.Google Scholar
  17. DCLG (2008) Prevent Pathfinder Fund – Mapping of Project Activities 2007/08. London: DCLG.Google Scholar
  18. DCLG (2009) Rt. Hon John Denham, MP, Ministerial Speech to National Prevent Conference. Birmingham, 8 December.Google Scholar
  19. DCLG (2012) Creating the Conditions for Integration. London: DCLG.Google Scholar
  20. Department of Innovation, Universities and Skills (DIUS) (2008) Promoting Good Campus Relations, Fostering Shared Values and Preventing Violent Extremism in Universities and Higher Education Colleges. London: DIUS.Google Scholar
  21. Dodd, V. (2009) MPs investigate anti-extremism programme after spying claims. The Guardian 19 October.Google Scholar
  22. Dodd, V. (2010) MPs demand investigation into Muslim ‘spy’ allegations against Prevent. The Guardian 30 March.Google Scholar
  23. Eatwell, R. (2006) Community cohesion and cumulative extremism in contemporary Britain. The Political Quarterly 77 (2): 204–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gupta, D. (2008) Understanding Terrorism and Political Violence. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Her Majesty’s Government (HMG) (2011) Prevent Strategy. London: The Stationary Office.Google Scholar
  26. Her Majesty’s Government (HMG) (2013) Tackling Extremism in the UK: Report from the Prime Minister’s Task Force on Tackling Radicalisation and Extremism. London: HM Government. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/ file/263181/ETF_FINAL.pdf, accessed 16 December 2013.Google Scholar
  27. Her Majesty’s Treasury (2012) Freedom of Information Act 2000: Prevent Strategy (E.J.Peatfield; Ref: 12/592). London: Her Majesty’s Treasury, https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/spending_on_the_ prevent_strategy?unfold=1, accessed 20 May 2014.Google Scholar
  28. Hewitt, S. (2008) The British War on Terror: Terrorism and Counter-Terrorism on the Home Front Since 9/11. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  29. Hewstone, M., Tausch, N., Hughes, J. and Cairns, E. (2007) Prejudice, intergroup contact and identity: Do neighbourhoods matter? In: M. Wetherell, M. Lafleche and R. Berkley (eds.) Identity, Ethnic Diversity and Community Cohesion. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  30. Home Office (2003a) CONTEST: The Government’s Counter-Terrorism Strategy. London: The Home Office.Google Scholar
  31. Home Office (2003b) Building a Picture of Community Cohesion – A guide for Local Authorities and their Partners. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  32. Home Office (2005) Improving Opportunity, Strengthening Society: The Government’s Strategy to Increase Race Equality and Community Cohesion. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  33. Home Office (2009) CONTEST 2 – The United Kingdom’s Strategy for Countering International Terrorism. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  34. House of Commons Communities and Local Government Committee (2010) Preventing Violent Extremism: Sixth Report of Session 2009–10. London: The Stationary Office.Google Scholar
  35. House of Commons Home Affairs Select Committee (2012) Roots of Violent Radicalisation; Nineteenth Report of Session 2010–12. London: The Stationary Office.Google Scholar
  36. Husband, C. and Alam, Y. (2011) Social Cohesion and Counter-Terrorism: A policy Contradiction? Bristol, UK: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Iacopini, G., Stock, L. and Junge, K. (2011) Evaluation of Tower Hamlets Prevent Projects. London: Taivstock Institute.Google Scholar
  38. Knight, S. (2010) Preventing violent extremism in Britain. Financial Times Magazine 26 February.Google Scholar
  39. Kundnani, A. (2002) The Death of Multiculturalism. London: Institute of Race Relations, http://www.irr.org.uk/2002/april/ak000001.html, accessed 13 November 2002.
  40. Kundnani, A. (2009) Spooked: How Not to Prevent Violent Extremism. London: Institute of Race Relations.Google Scholar
  41. Kundnani, A. (2012) Radicalisation: The journey of a concept. Race and Class 54 (2): 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lamb, J.B. (2012) Preventing violent extremism: A policing case study of the West Midlands. Policing 7 (1): 88–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Law, I. (1996) Racism, Ethnicity and Social Policy. London: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  44. Levitas, R. (2005) The Inclusive Society? Social Exclusion and New Labour, 2nd edn. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  45. Lewis, H. and Craig, G. (2014) Multiculturalism is never talked about! Community cohesion and local policy contradictions in England. Policy and Politics 42 (1): 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Local Government Association (2008) Strategic Issues: Preventing Violent Extremism. London: LGA.Google Scholar
  47. Lowndes, V. and Thorp, L. (2010) In: R. Eatwell and M. Goodwin (eds.) Preventing. Violent Extremism – Why Local Context Matters. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 123–141.Google Scholar
  48. Malik, K. (2009) From Fatwa to Jihad: The Rushdie Affair and its Legacy. London: Atlantic.Google Scholar
  49. McGhee, D. (2006) The new commission for equality and human rights: Building community cohesion and revitalising citizenship in contemporary Britain. Ethnopolitics 5 (2): 145–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. McGhee, D. (2010) Security, Citizenship and Human Rights: Shared Values in Uncertain Times. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Meer, N. and Modood, T. (2009) The ‘multicultural state we’re in: Muslims, ‘multiculture’ and the ‘civic re-balancing of British multiculturalism’. Political Studies 57 (3): 473–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Modood, T. et al (1997) Ethnic Minorities in Britain – Diversity and Disadvantage’. London: PSI.Google Scholar
  53. Monro, S., Razaq, U., Thomas, P. and Mycock, A. (2010) Regional Improvement and Efficiency Partnerships: Community Cohesion and Prevent Pilot – A Report for Local Government Yorkshire and the Humber. Huddersfield, UK: University of Huddersfield.Google Scholar
  54. Neville-Jones, P. (2009) Fight radicalisation with inclusiveness. The Guardian, http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/oct/20/prevent-radicalisation-inclusiveness, accessed 4 February 2010.
  55. Noxolo, P. and Huysmans, J. (eds.) (2009) Community, Citizenship and the ‘War on Terror’: Security and Insecurity. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. O’Toole, T., Jones, S. and DeHanas, D. (2012) The New Prevent: Will it Work? Can it Work? A Working Paper From the Muslim Participation in Contemporary Governance Project. Bristol: University of Bristol.Google Scholar
  57. O’Toole, T., DeHanas, D., Modood, T., Meer, N. and Jones, S. (2013a) Taking Part: Muslim Participation in Contemporary Governance. Bristol, UK: University of Bristol.Google Scholar
  58. O’Toole, T., Jones, S., DeHanas, D. and Modood, T. (2013b) Prevent after TERFOR: Why local context still matters, public spirit series on the legacy and future of Prevent, http://www.publicspirit.org.uk/the-importance-of-local-context-for-preventing-extremism/, accessed 8 January 2014.
  59. Phillips, T. (2005) After 7/7: Sleepwalking to Segregation. Speech given to the Manchester Council for Community Relations, 25 September.Google Scholar
  60. Ragazzi, F. (2012) Policed Multiculturalism: Counter-Radicalization and the Government Through Community. Paper to the CRONEM Conference, University of Surrey, 26 June.Google Scholar
  61. Ratcliffe, P. (2012) Community cohesion: Reflections on a flawed paradigm. Critical Social Policy 32 (2): 262–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Runneymede Trust (2012) Response to ‘Creating the Conditions for Integration’. London: Runneymede Trust.Google Scholar
  63. Sniderman, P. and Hagendoorn, L. (2009) When Ways of Life Collide: Multiculturalism and its Discontents in The Netherlands. Woodstock, UK: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Solomos, J. (2003) Race and Racism in Britain, 3rd edn. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  66. Thomas, P. (2007) Moving on from anti-racism? Understandings of ‘community cohesion’ held by youth workers. Journal of Social Policy 36 (3): 435–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Thomas, P. (2008) Evaluation of the Kirklees Preventing Violent Extremism Pathfinder: Issues and Lessons From the First Year. Huddersfield, UK: The University of Huddersfield.Google Scholar
  68. Thomas, P. (2009) Between two stools? The government’s preventing violent extremism agenda. The Political Quarterly 80 (2): 482–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Thomas, P. (2010) Failed and friendless – The government’s preventing violent extremism agenda. British Journal of Politics and International Relations 12 (3): 442–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Thomas, P. (2011) Youth, Multiculturalism and Community Cohesion. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Thomas, P. (2012) Responding to the Threat of Violent Extremism – Failing to Prevent. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
  72. Thomas, P. and Sanderson, P. (2011) Unwilling citizens? Muslim young people and national identity. Sociology 45 (6): 1028–1044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Travis, A. (2001) Blunkett in race row over culture tests. The Guardian 10 December.Google Scholar
  74. Turley, A. (2009) Stronger Together: A New Approach to Preventing Violent Extremism. London: New Local Government Network.Google Scholar
  75. Vermeulen, F. and Bovenkerk, F. (2012) Engaging with Violent Islamic Extremism. Local policies in West European cities. Den Haag: Eleven International Publishers.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Thomas
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Education and Professional Development, University of HuddersfieldQueensgateUK

Personalised recommendations