British Politics

, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 51–67 | Cite as

UK party leaders are ‘preeminent’, but can also be ‘predominant’: Cameron and the Conservatives, 2005–2010

  • Richard Heffernan
Original Article

Abstract

The power of the party leader, because it is such a moveable feast, is hard to measure, understand or theorise. This article, using Cameron’s leadership of the Conservative party in opposition as a case study, contends that the modern party leader (singular) can play by far the leading role within their party and parliamentary leadership (plural). Opposition party leaders have the potential to be powerful (that is they will be ‘preeminent’) because they (1) lead the ‘shadow government’; (2) have the right of proposal and veto over party policy and electoral strategy; (3) have a powerful private office which is able to lead and direct the party both within and without parliament; and (4) control the party’s ‘official’ news media operation, which can represent the leader’s policy preferences as the party’s policy preferences. But the preeminent leader will be considerably empowered (that is, they will become ‘predominant’) when they possess and make use of four personal power resources (and they will be disempowered if they do not): (1) having a reputation for being ‘leadership material’; (2) being associated with actual or anticipated political success; (3) being electorally popular; and (4) having a high standing in his or her parliamentary party. Under certain contextual circumstances the modern electoral professional, office-seeking UK party leader can be both preeminent and predominant. Even if they lack the entirely free hand to do whatever they want, such a party leader will ‘lead’, not simply ‘follow’ their party. The leadership style of Cameron, building upon that of Thatcher and Blair, was not his singular invention, but rather a reaction to and a trend-setter of far-reaching transformations wrought in the form of the UK political party.

Keywords

British politics political parties party leadership 

References

  1. Bale, T. (2008) A bit less bunny hugging and a bit more bunny boiling? Qualifying conservative party change under David Cameron. British Politics 3 (3): 270–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bale, T. (2009) Cometh the hour, cometh the Dave: How far is the conservative party’s revival all down to David Cameron. Political Quarterly 18 (2): 222–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bale, T. (2010) The Conservative Party from Thatcher to Cameron. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bale, T. and Webb, P. (2011) The conservative party. In: N. Allen and J. Bartle (eds.) Britain at The Polls 2010. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. BBC News. (2007) ‘Cameron steps up grammar’s attack’, 22 May, http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/6679005.stm.
  6. Blair, T. (2007) Speech on Public Life and the Media, 6th June, http://uk.reuters.com/article/idUKZWE24585220070612.
  7. Blair, T. (2010) The Journey. London: Random House.Google Scholar
  8. Campbell, A. (2010) The Alastair Campbell Diaries: Volume One Prelude to Power. London: Hutchingson.Google Scholar
  9. Campbell, J. (2003) Margaret Thatcher: Volume Two – The Iron Lady. London: Jonathin Cape.Google Scholar
  10. Childs, S. and Webb, P. (2012) Sex, Gender and the Conservative Party: From Iron Lady to Kitten Heels. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clarke, H., Sanders, D., Stewart, M. and Whiteley, P. (2004) Political Choice in Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clarke, H., Sanders, D., Stewart, M. and Whiteley, P. (2009) Performance Politics and the British Voter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clarke, H., Sanders, D., Stewart, M. and Whiteley, P. (2011) Valence politics and electoral choice in Britain. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties 21 (2): 237–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Curtice, J. (2009) Back in contention? The conservatives’ electoral prospects. Political Quarterly 80 (2): 172–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Daalder, H. and Mair, P. (eds.) (1983) Western European Party Systems. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  16. Dalton, R.J. and Wattenberg, M. (2002) Parties Without Partisans. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Denham, A. and O’Hara, K. (2007) Cameron’s ‘mandate’: Democracy, legitimacy and conservative leadership. Parliamentary Affairs 60 (3): 409–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Evans, S. (2008) Consigning its past to history? David Cameron and the conservative party. Parliamentary Affairs 62 (2): 291–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Goodman, P. (2011) ‘George Osborne grows up’, ConservativeHome, 28 July, http://conservativehome.blogs.com/thetorydiary/2011/07/george-osborne-grows-up.html#tp.
  20. Gould, P. (1998) The Unfinished Revolution: How the Modernisers Saved the Labour Party. London: Little Brown.Google Scholar
  21. Grice, E. (2010) Alastair Campbell: ‘I want my kids to think I've been a good dad’, Daily Telegraph, 3 February, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/7139496/Alastair-Campbell-I-want-my-kids-to-think-Ive-been-a-good-dad.html.
  22. Gunther, R., Montero, J.R. and Linz, J. (eds.) (2002) Political Parties: Old Concepts and New Challenges. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Heffernan, R. (2003) Prime ministerial predominance? Core executive politics in the UK. British Journal of Politics and International Relations 5 (3): 347–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Heffernan, R. (2005) Exploring (and explaining) the prime minister. British Journal of Politics and International Relations 7 (4): 605–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Heffernan, R. (2006) The prime minister and the news media: Political communication as a leadership resource. Parliamentary Affairs 59 (3): 582–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Heffernan, R. (2009) Political parties. In: M. Flinders, and A. Gamble, C. Hay and M. Kenny (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of British Politics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Heffernan, R. (2013) There’s no need for the -ization: The prime minister is merely prime ministerial. Parliamentary Affairs, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  28. Heppell, T. and Hill, M. (2009) Transcending thatcherism? Ideology and the conervative party leadership mandate of David Cameron. Political Quarterly 80 (3): 388–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hurst, G. (2006) Charles Kennedy: A Tragic Flaw. London: Politicos.Google Scholar
  30. Jones, D. (2008) Cameron on Cameron. London: Fourth Estate.Google Scholar
  31. Katz, R. and Mair, P. (2002) The ascendancy of the party in public office: Party organisational change in twentieth century democracies. In: R. Gunther, J.R. Montero and J. Linz (eds.) Political Parties: Old Concepts and New Challenges. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Kavanagh, D. and Cowley, P. (2010) The British General Election of 2010. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  33. Kuhn, R. (2007) Politics and the Media in Britain. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Laws, D. (2010) Twenty Two Days in May. London: Biteback.Google Scholar
  35. Mandelson, P. (2010) The Third Man: Life at the Heart of New Labour. London: HarperPress.Google Scholar
  36. Mayer, C. (2008) ‘David Cameron: The UK’s next leader?’ Time, 11 September, http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1840461-2,00.html#ixzz0gYY8T23s.
  37. Mughan, A. (2009) Partisan dealignment, party attachments and leader effects. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 19 (4): 413–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Müller, W. and Strøm, K. (ed.) (1999) Policy, Office or Votes? How Political Parties in Western Europe Make Hard Choices. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Panebianco, A. (1988) Political Parties: Organisation and Power. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Parker, G. (2011) ‘Osborne’s long game’, Financial Times, 19 March.Google Scholar
  41. Poguntke, T. and Webb, P. (eds.) (2005) The Presidentialization of Politics: A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Snowden, P. (2010) Back from the Brink: The Inside Story of the Tory Resurrection. London: Harper Press.Google Scholar
  43. Swanson, D. and Mancini, P. (1996) Politics, Media, and Modern Democracy: An International Study of Innovations in Electoral Campaigning and their Consequences. Westport, CT: The Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  44. Watt, N. (2011) ‘George Osborne - The man who would be prime minister’, The Observer, 27 November, http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2011/nov/27/george-osborne-chancellor-prime-minister.
  45. Webb, P. (2004) Party responses to the changing electoral market in Britain. In: P. Mair, W.C. Muller and F. Plasser (eds.) Political Parties and Electoral Change. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard Heffernan
    • 1
  1. 1.Politics and International Studies, The Open UniversityUK

Personalised recommendations