British Politics

, Volume 7, Issue 3, pp 204–223 | Cite as

From ‘distribution of industry’ to ‘local Keynesianism’: The growth of public sector employment in Britain

  • Jim Tomlinson
Original Article


A striking feature of British economic and political development in the recent past has been the huge increase in employment reliant on state funding, especially in the less prosperous parts of the country. In many cities, direct public employment provides 30–40 per cent of all work, and private sector employment has hardly grown at all in the last 10 years. Despite widespread claims about the predominance of ‘neo-liberalism’ in recent British policy making, the state now provides more employment directly and indirectly than ever before in peacetime. This policy of ‘local Keynesianism’ has not been the outcome of an articulated political programme, but rather has arisen from the combination of a national policy of seeking to expand welfare provision from the proceeds of economic growth, with the striking incapacity of the private sector to create employment across much of Britain.


employment regional policy Keynesianism British economy New Labour 


  1. Armstrong, H. and Taylor, J. (2000) Regional Economics and Policy, 3rd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  2. Balls, E. (2002) Britain's New Regional Policy. London: Smith Institute.Google Scholar
  3. Barrell, R. (2011) Fiscal consolidation and the slimmer state. National Institute Economic Review 215: F4–F9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beatty, C. and Fothergill, S. (1996) Labour market adjustment in areas of chronic industrial decline: The case of UK coalfields. Regional Studies 30: 627–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beatty, C. and Fothergill, S. (1999) Incapacity Benefit and Unemployment. Sheffield, UK: CRESR.Google Scholar
  6. Beatty, C., Fothergill, S., Gore, T. and Herrington, A. (1997) The Real Level of Unemployment. Sheffield, UK: CRESR.Google Scholar
  7. Beatty, C., Fothergill, S. and Powell, R. (2007) The Real Level of Unemployment 2007. Sheffield, UK: CRESR.Google Scholar
  8. Blanchflower, D. and Oswald, A. (2004) Well-being over time in Britain and the USA. Journal of Public Economics 88: 1359–1386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blaug, M. (1997) Economic Theory in Retrospect, 5th edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Booth, A. (1982) The Second World War and the origins of modern regional policy. Economy and Society 11 (1): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Buchanan, J., Froud, J., Johal, S., Leaver, A. and Williams, K. (2009) Undisclosed and Unsustainable: Problems of the UK National Business Model. Manchester: CRESC. CRESC Working Paper no. 75.Google Scholar
  12. Budd, A. (2010) Fiscal policy under labour. National Institute Economic Review 212: R34–R48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Centre for Cities. (2009) Public Sector Cities. Trouble Ahead. London: Centre for Cities.Google Scholar
  14. Centre for Cities. (2010) Outlook for Cities. London: Centre for Cities.Google Scholar
  15. Clift, B. and Tomlinson, J. (2007) Credible Keynesianism? New Labour, macroeconomic policy and the political economy of coarse tuning. British Journal of Political Science 37 (1): 47–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cooke, G. and Lawton, K. (2008) Working out of Poverty. London: IPPR.Google Scholar
  17. Coutts, K., Glyn, A. and Rowthorn, R. (2007) Structural change under New Labour. Cambridge Journal of Economics 31: 845–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Crosland, A. (1956) The Future of Socialism. London: Cape.Google Scholar
  19. Edmonds, J. and Glyn, A. (2005) Public Spending Alone Explains Britain's Jobs Growth. Financial Times 30 June.Google Scholar
  20. Erdem, E. and Glyn, A. (2001) Jobs deficits in the UK regions. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 63 (s1): 737–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Exell, R. (2010) The spending review and public sector jobs. Radical Statistics 103: 25–34.Google Scholar
  22. Froud, J., Johal, S., Law, J., Leaver, A. and Williams, K. (2011) Rebalancing the Economy (or Buyer's Remorse). University of Manchester. CRESC Working Paper Series no. 87.Google Scholar
  23. Gudgin, G. (1995) Regional problems and policy in the UK. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 11 (2): 18–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hamnett, C. (2009) Spatial divisions of welfare: The geography of welfare benefit and of housing benefit in Britain. Regional Studies 43 (8): 1015–1033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Harrison, J. (2006) The political economy of Blair's ‘new regional policy’. Geoforum 37 (6): 932–943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Heim, C. (1988) Government research establishments, state capacity and distribution of industry policy in Britain. Regional Studies 22 (5): 375–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hills, J., Sefton, T. and Stewart, K. (2009) Towards a More Equal Society? Bristol, UK: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  28. Hirst, P. and Zeitlin, J. (1986) Reversing Industrial Decline? Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  29. House of Commons. (2009) Hansard (Commons), Vol. 329.Google Scholar
  30. John, P. and Ward, H. (2001) Political manipulation in majoritarian democracy: Central government targets of public funds to English subnational government, in space and across time. British Journal of Politics and International Relations 3 (3): 308–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Keynes, J.M. (1933) The Means to Prosperity. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  32. MacKay, R. and Williams, J. (2005) Thinking about need: Public spending in the regions. Regional Studies 39 (6): 815–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Marshall, J., Bradley, D., Hodgson, C., Alderman, N. and Richardson, R. (2005) Relocation, relocation, relocation: Assessing the case for public sector dispersal. Regional Studies 39 (6): 767–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Martin, R. (1988) The political economy of Britain's North-South divide. Regional Studies 13 (3): 389–418.Google Scholar
  35. McLean, I. and McMillan, A. (2003) The distribution of public expenditure across the UK regions. Fiscal Studies 24 (1): 45–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Middleton, R. (1996) Government Versus the Market. Cheltenham, UK: Elgar.Google Scholar
  37. Mohan, S. (1992) Public expenditure, public employment and the regions. In: P. Townroe and R. Martin (eds.) Regional Development in the 1990s. London: Kingsley, pp. 222–227.Google Scholar
  38. ONS. (2005) Public sector employment statistics methodology 2005,, accessed 18 June 2012.
  39. ONS. (2010) Regional Analysis of Public Sector Employment. London: ONS.Google Scholar
  40. ONS. (2011) Report on Review of Public Sector Employment. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  41. Oxford Economics. (2008) Regional Winners and Losers in UK Public Finances. Oxford: Oxford Economics.Google Scholar
  42. Parry, R. (1981) Territory and public employment: A general model and British evidence. Journal of Public Policy 1: 221–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Parry, R. (1985) Britain: Stable aggregates, changing composition. In: R. Rose (ed.) Public Employment in Western Nations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 54–87.Google Scholar
  44. Parry, R. (1987) Public Employment in Britain in the 1980s. Glasgow: University of Strathclyde, Centre for the Study of Public Policy.Google Scholar
  45. Parry, R. (2011) The Public Sector Workforce in Recession 2010–11, Social Policy Association Conference, Lincoln, UK, London: Social Policy Association.Google Scholar
  46. Parsons, W. (1986) The Political Economy of British Regional Policy. Beckenham, UK: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  47. Sadler, D. (1992) The Global Region. Production, State Policy and Uneven Development. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  48. Scott, P. (2004) Regional development and policy. In: R. Floud and P. Johnson (eds.) The Cambridge Economic History of Britain, Vol. 3. Structural Change and Growth, 1939–2000. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 332–367.Google Scholar
  49. Sharpe, L. (1982) Labour and the geography of inequality: A puzzle. In: D. Kavanagh (ed.) The Politics of the Labour Party. London: Allen and Unwin, pp. 135–170.Google Scholar
  50. Tomlinson, J. (1981) Why was there never a ‘Keynesian revolution’ in economic policy? Economy and Society 10 (1): 72–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tomlinson, J. (2007) Tale of a death exaggerated: How Keynesian policies survived the 1970s. Contemporary British History 21 (4): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tomlinson, J. (2008) A ‘failed experiment’? Public ownership and the narratives of post-war Britain. Labour History Review 73 (2): 199–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tomlinson, J. (2009) The deglobalisation of Dundee circa 1900–2000. Journal of Scottish Historical Studies 29 (2): 123–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. TUC. (2009) Public Sector Employment in Local Authorities. London: TUC.Google Scholar
  55. Treasury. (1979) Needs Assessment. A Report. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  56. Treasury. (2004) Trade and the Global Economy. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  57. Treasury. (2010) Spending Review, 2010 CM7942. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  58. Treasury. (2011) Public Spending Statistical Analysis, CM8104. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  59. Webster, H. (2002) The National Health Service. A Political History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Wren-Lewis, S. (2010) Macroeconomic policy in light of the credit crunch: The return of counter-cyclical fiscal policy? Oxford Review of Economic Policy 26: 71–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jim Tomlinson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of HistoryUniversity of DundeeDundeeUK

Personalised recommendations