British Politics

, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp 52–77 | Cite as

The Americanization of British party advertising? Negativity in party election broadcasts, 1964–2005

  • Jennifer vanHeerde-Hudson
Original Article

Abstract

This article examines the extent to which British party campaigning has become increasingly negative in tone or ‘Americanized’. Although few have missed the opportunity to lament the negative turn in campaigning, which has been shown to demobilize the electorate, depress turnout, contribute to a poor information environment and increase incivility, there is little empirical evidence to confirm the perceived increased in negativity. This article asks three questions: is there evidence to support the perception that parties are increasingly adopting a strategy of ‘going negative’ in election campaigns; are appeals issue, value or trait oriented; and is there anything positive about negative ads? Drawing on a content analysis of British party election broadcasts (1964–2005), the results show evidence of volatility in negativity, but no absolute increase in the number of negative appeals. Less than half of all appeals are negative, but when parties do ‘go negative’ they do so on issues rather than values or characteristics. Finally, negative appeals are positive in terms of the quality of information they provide; they are more likely to be evidence-based and contain explicit comparisons of parties’ policies than positive appeals. Thus, despite calls for a ‘different kind of politics’, there appear to be under-appreciated positive features of negative campaigning.

Keywords

party election broadcasts positive/negative advertising Americanization issue appeals professionalization of political communication 

References

  1. Ansolabehere, S. and Iyengar, S. (1995) Going Negative: How Attack Ads Shrink and Demobilize the Electorate. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  2. Ansolabehere, S., Iyengar, S., Simon, A. and Valentino, N. (1997) Does attack advertising demobilize the electorate? In: S. Iyengar and R. Reeves (eds.) Does the Media Govern? Politicians, Voters, and Reporters in America. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Arceneaux, K. and Nickerson, D. (2005) Two field experiments testing negative campaign tactics. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association; September, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  4. Baines, P. (2005) Marketing the political message: American influences on British practices. Journal of Political Marketing 4 (2): 135–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baines, P., Scheucher, C. and Plasser, F. (2001) The Americanization myth in European political markets: A focus on the United Kingdom. European Journal of Marketing 35 (9/10): 1099–1116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bartels, L. (1996) Uninformed votes: Information effects in presidential elections. American Journal of Political Science 40 (1): 194–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blumler, J. and Kavanagh, D. (1999) The third age of political communication: Influences and features. Political Communication 16: 209–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blumler, J., Kavanagh, D. and Nossiter, T.J. (1996) Modern communications versus traditional politics in Britain: Unstable marriage of convenience. In: D. Swanson and P. Mancini (eds.) Politics, Media and Modern Democracy: An International Study of Innovations in Electoral Campaigning and Their Consequences. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  9. Blumler, J. and Mc Quail, D. (1968) Television in Politics. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
  10. Bowler, S. and Farrell, D. (eds.) (1992) Electoral Strategies and Political Marketing. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brians, C. and Wattenberg, M. (1996) Campaign issue knowledge and salience: Comparing reception from TV commercials, TV news, and newspapers. American Journal of Political Science 40: 172–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brooks, D. (2006) The resilient voter: Moving toward closure in the debate over negative campaigning and turnout. Journal of Politics 68 (3): 684–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brooks, D. and Geer, J. (2007) Beyond negativity: The effects of incivility on the electorate. American Journal of Political Science 51 (1): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Craig, S. and Kane, J. (2000) Winning and losing, sour grapes, and negative ads: The impact of election campaigns on political support. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
  15. Denver, D. and Hands, G. (2000) Modern Constituency Electioneering. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
  16. Dermody, J. and Scullion, R. (2000) Perceptions of negative political advertising: Meaningful or menacing? An empirical study of the 1997 British general election campaign. International Journal of Advertising 19 (2): 201–223.Google Scholar
  17. Dermody, J. and Scullion, R. (2003) Exploring the consequences of negative political advertising for liberal democracy. Journal of Political Marketing 2 (1): 77–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dolan, C. (2004) Two cheers for negative ads. In: D. Schwartz (ed.) Lights, Camera, Campaign!: Media, Politics and Political Advertising. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.Google Scholar
  19. Electoral Commission. (2004) Political advertising: Report and Recommendations. London: Electoral Commission.Google Scholar
  20. Esser, F. and Pfetsch, B. (2004) Comparing Political Communication: Theories, Cases, and Challenges. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Farrell, D. (1996) Campaign strategies and tactics. In: L. LeDuc, R. Niemi and P. Norris (eds.) Comparing Democracies: Elections and Voting in Global Perspective. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  22. Finkel, S. and Geer, J. (1998) A spot check: Casting doubt on the demobilizing effect of attack advertising. American Journal of Political Science 42 (2): 573–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Freedman, P. and Goldstein, K. (1999) Measuring media exposure and the effects of negative campaign ads. American Journal of Political Science 43 (4): 1189–1208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Garramone, G. (1985) Effects of negative political advertising: The roles of sponsor and rebuttal. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 29: 147–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Geer, J. (2006) In Defense of Negativity: Attack Ads in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Geer, J. and Geer, J. (2003) Remembering attack ads: An experimental investigation of radio. Political Behavior 25: 69–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Geer, J. and Lau, R. (2006) A new approach for studying campaign effects. British Journal of Political Science 35: 269–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gibson, R. and Römmele, A. (2001) A party-centred theory of professional campaigning. Press/Politics 6 (4): 31–43.Google Scholar
  29. Gilens, M. (2001) Political ignorance and collective policy preferences. American Political Science Review 95 (2): 379–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Globetti, S. and Hetherington, M. (2000) The negative implications of anti-government campaign rhetoric. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
  31. Gunter, B., Saltzis, K. and Campbell, V. (2006) The changing nature of party election broadcasts: The growing influence of political marketing. Discussion Papers in Mass Communications, University of Leicester.Google Scholar
  32. Hallin, D. and Mancini, P. (2004) Americanization, globalization, and secularization: Understanding the convergence of media systems and political communication. In: F. Esser and B. Pfetsch (eds.) Comparing Political Communication: Theories, Cases and Challenges. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Hay, C. (2007) Why we Hate Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  34. van Heerde, J. (2005) Rethinking issues, image and negative advertising: British party election broadcasts, 2001–2005. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association Meeting, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  35. Hodess, R., Tedesco, J. and Kaid, L. (2000) British party election broadcasts: A comparison of 1992 and 1997. Press/Politics 5 (4): 55–70.Google Scholar
  36. Jackson, R. and Carsey, T. (2007) U.S. Senate campaigns, negative advertising, and voter mobilization in the 1998 midterm election. Electoral Studies 26: 180–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jackson, R. and Sides, J. (2006) Revisiting the influence of campaign tone in Senate elections. Political Analysis 14: 206–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jamieson, K., Waldman, P. and Scheer, S. (2000) Eliminate the negative? Defining and redefining categories of analysis for political advertisements. In: J. Thurber, C. Nelson and D. Dulio (eds.) Crowded Airwaves. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  39. Johnson, K. and Elebash, C. (1986) The contagion of the right: The Americanization of British political advertising. In: L.L. Kaid, D. Nimmo and K.R. Sanders (eds.) New Perspectives on Political Advertising. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Johnson-Cartee, K. and Copeland, G. (1991) Negative Political Advertising: Coming of Age. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates.Google Scholar
  41. Juarez, J. (2004) Political marketing and the production of political communications: A content analysis of British party election broadcasts from 1979 to 2001. Doctoral dissertation, University of Sheffield.Google Scholar
  42. Kahn, K. and Kenney, P. (1999) Do negative campaigns mobilize or suppress turnout? Clarifying the relationship between negativity and participation. American Political Science Review 93 (4): 877–889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kahn, K. and Kenney, P. (2004) No Holds Barred: Negativity in U.S. Senate Campaigns. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  44. Kaid, L. and Holtz-Bacha, C. (eds.) (1995) Political Advertising in Western Democracies: Parties and Candidates on Television. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  45. Kavanagh, D. (1995) Election Campaigning: The New Marketing of Politics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  46. Kelley, S. (1960) Political Campaigning. Washington: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  47. Lau, R. and Pomper, G. (2004) Negative Campaigning: An Analysis of U.S. Senate Elections. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  48. Lau, R., Sigelman, L. and Brown Rovner, I. (2007) The effects of negative political campaigns: A meta-analytic reassessment. Journal of Politics 69 (4): 1176–1209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lau, R., Sigelman, L., Heldman, C. and Babbitt, P. (1999) The effects of negative political advertisements: A meta-analytic assessment. American Political Science Review 93: 851–875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Luskin, R. and Bratcher, C. (1994) Negative campaigning, partisanship, and turnout. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
  51. Mancini, P. (1999) New frontiers in political professionalism. Political Communication 16: 231–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Negrine, R. (1994) Politics and the Mass Media in Britain. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  53. Negrine, R. and Lilleker, D. (2002) The professionalization of political communication: Continuities and change in media practices. European Journal of Communication 17 (3): 305–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Negrine, R. and Papathanassopoulos, S. (1996) The ‘Americanization’ of political communication: A critique. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 1 (2): 45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Norris, P. (2000) A Virtuous Circle: Political Communications in Postindustrial Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Office of Communications. (2005) Viewers and Voters: Attitudes to Television Coverage of the 2005 General Election. London: Her Majesty's Government, Office of Communications. Research Study conducted by ICM Research on behalf of Ofcom.Google Scholar
  57. Pattie, C. and Johnston, R. (2002) Assessing the television campaign: The impact of party election broadcasting on voters opinions at the 1997 British general election. Political Communications 19: 333–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pearce, M. (2008) Transcription of party election broadcasts, 1964–1997, http://www.psr.keele.ac.uk/area/uk/peb.htm, accessed 20 July 2008.
  59. Pinkleton, B., Um, N. and Weintraub Austin, E. (2002) An exploration of the effects of negative political advertising on political decision making. Journal of Advertising 31: 13–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Plasser, F. (2001) Parties’ diminishing relevance for campaign professionals. Press/Politics 6 (4): 44–59.Google Scholar
  61. Plasser, F., Scheucher, C. and Senft, C. (1999) Is there a European style of political marketing? A survey of political managers and consultants. In: B. Newman (ed.) The Handbook of Political Marketing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  62. Richardson, G. (2001) Looking for meaning in all the wrong places: Why negative advertising is a suspect category. Journal of Communication 51 (4): 775–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Russell, M. (2005) Must Politics Disappoint? London: Fabian Society.Google Scholar
  64. Sanders, D. and Norris, P. (2002) Advocacy versus attack: The impact of political advertising in the 2001 UK general election. Unpublished manuscript, http://ksghome.harvard.edu/∼pnorris/ACROBAT/peb.pdf, accessed 20 May 2008.
  65. Scammell, M. (1995) Designer Politics: How Elections are Won. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Scammell, M. (1997) The Wisdom of the War Room: US Campaigning and Americanization. Joan Shorenstein Center on Press. Politics and Public Policy Research Paper, R-17.Google Scholar
  67. Scammell, M. and Langer, A. (2006) Political advertising in the United Kingdom. In: L. Kaid and C. Holtz-Bacha (eds.) Sage Handbook of Political Advertising. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  68. Scammell, M. and Semetko, H. (1995) Political advertising on television: The British experience. In: L.L. Kaid and C. Holtz-Bacha (eds.) Political Advertising in Western Democracies: Parties and Candidates on Television. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  69. Scullion, R. and Dermody, J. (2005) The value of party election broadcasts for electoral engagement: A content analysis of the 2001 British general election campaign. International Journal of Advertising 24 (3): 345–372.Google Scholar
  70. Stevens, D. (2005) Separate and unequal effects: Information, political sophistication and negative advertising in American elections. Political Research Quarterly 58 (3): 413–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Stevens, D. (2008) The relationship between negative political advertising and public mood: Effects and consequences. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 18 (2): 153–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Swanson, D. and Mancini, P. (1996) Politics, Media and Modern Democracy: An International Study of Innovations in Electoral Campaigning and Their Consequences. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  73. Wattenberg, M. and Brians, C. (1999) Negative campaign advertising: Demobilizer or mobilizer? American Political Science Review 93 (4): 891–899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jennifer vanHeerde-Hudson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceUniversity CollegeLondonUK

Personalised recommendations