Advertisement

British Politics

, Volume 3, Issue 3, pp 270–299 | Cite as

‘A Bit Less Bunny-Hugging and a Bit More Bunny-Boiling’? Qualifying Conservative Party Change under David Cameron

  • Tim Bale
Article

Abstract

The Conservatives appear to have established a clear and consistent opinion poll lead over the Labour government. Some would suggest that this change of fortunes is connected to the ‘modernization’ undertaken by David Cameron. This article examines the extent to which the Conservative Party can be said to have changed in a manner that political scientists might regard as significant. From the comparative literature on party change, it derives five dimensions and associated indicators of change; it then proceeds to measure the Conservative Party against them. It finds that the extent of change — both actual and perceived — is easily overstated, partly because ‘Team Cameron’ has always had to tread carefully and particularly given significant adjustments made to the Party's course after the difficult summer of 2007. When it comes to the relationship between change and success, only a modicum of the former may be needed to achieve the latter given that elections are as much lost by governments as they are won by oppositions.

Keywords

party change Conservative David Cameron modernization Gordon Brown centre ground 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author would like to acknowledge the financial assistance provided by the Leverhulme Trust for the research and writing of this article.

References

  1. Adams, J., Clark, M., Ezrow, L. and Glasgow, G. (2004) ‘Understanding change and stability in party ideologies: do parties respond to public opinion or to past election results’, British Journal of Political Science 34 (4): 589–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ancram, M. (2007) ‘Still a Conservative’, (Self-published), available online at http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/graphics/2007/09/04/pam.pdf.
  3. Ashcroft, M. (2005) Smell the Coffee: A Wakeup Call for the Conservative Party, London: Politico's.Google Scholar
  4. Ball, S. (2003) ‘The Conservatives in Opposition, 1906–1979: A Comparative Analysis’, in M. Garnett and P. Lynch (eds.) The Conservatives in Crisis, Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bale, T. (2006a) ‘What took you so long? Why the Conservative Party needed nearly a decade to come to its senses’, Paper presented to the annual conference of the UK Political Studies Association's specialist group on Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, University of Nottingham, 8–10 September 2006.Google Scholar
  6. Bale, T. (2006b) ‘Between a soft and a hard place? The Conservative party, valence politics, and the need for a new “Eurorealism”’, Parliamentary Affairs 59 (3): 385–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bille, L. (1997) ‘Leadership change and party change: the case of the Danish social democratic party, 1960–95’, Party Politics 3 (3): 379–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Budge, I. (1994) ‘A new spatial theory of party competition: uncertainty, ideology and policy equilibria viewed comparatively and temporally’, British Journal of Political Science 24: 443–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Campbell, R., Childs, S. and Lovenduski, J. (2006) ‘Women's equality guarantees and the Conservative party’, Political Quarterly 77 (1): 18–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cheng, T.-j. (2006) ‘Strategizing party adaptation: the case of the Kuomintang’, Party Politics 12 (5): 367–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cronin, J. (2004) New Labour's Pasts, London: Longman.Google Scholar
  12. Denham, A. and O'Hara, K. (2007a) ‘The three “Mantras”: “Modernization” and the Conservative party’, British Politics 2 (2): 167–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Denham, A. and O'Hara, K. (2007b) ‘Cameron's “Mandate”: democracy, legitimacy and Conservative leadership’, Parliamentary Affairs 60 (3): 409–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Denver, D., Hands, G. and MacAllister, I. (2004) ‘The electoral impact of constituency campaigning in Britain, 1992–2001’, Political Studies 52 (2): 289–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dorey, P. (2007) ‘A new direction or another false dawn? David Cameron and the crisis of British Conservatism’, British Politics 2 (2): 137–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Duncan, F. (2007) ‘“Lately, Things Just don't Seem the Same”: external shocks, party change and the adaptation of the Dutch Christian democrats during “Purple Hague”, 1994–8’, Party Politics 13 (1): 69–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fielding, S. (2002) The Labour Party: Continuity and Change in the Making of New Labour, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  18. Finkelstein, D. (2007) ‘Six reasons why I'm an uber-modernizer’, Times Online, 3 October, http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/daniel_finkelstein/article2577753.ece.
  19. Garnett, M. and Lynch, P. (2003) The Conservatives in Crisis, Manchester: Manchester University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Green, J. (2007) ‘When voters and parties agree: valence issues and party competition’, Political Studies 55 (3): 629–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Harmel, R. and Janda, K. (1994) ‘An integrated theory of party goals and party change’, Journal of Theoretical Politics 6 (3): 259–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Harmel, R. and Tan, A. (2003) ‘Party actors and party change: does factional dominance matter?’, European Journal of Political Research 42: 409–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Harmel, R.,, Heo, U ., Tan, A . and Janda, K . (1995) ‘Performance, leadership, factions and party change: an empirical analysis’, West European Politics 18 (1): 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Johnston, R. and Pattie, C. (2007) ‘Conservative constituency parties' funding and spending in England and Wales, 2004–2005’, Political Quarterly 78 (3): 392–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kerr, P. (2007) ‘Cameron Chameleon and the current state of Britain's “Consensus”’, Parliamentary Affairs 60 (1): 46–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Key, V.O. (1966) The Responsible Electorate: Rationality in Presidential Voting 1936–1960, Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. King, A. (2006) ‘Why Labour Won-Yet Again’, in J. Bartle and A. King (eds.) Britain at the polls 2005. Washington DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
  28. Langston, J. (2006) ‘The changing party of the institutional revolution: electoral competition and decentralized candidate selection’, Party Politics 12 (5): 395–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Müller, W.C. (1997) ‘Inside the Black Box: a confrontation of party executive behaviour and theories of party organizational change’, Party Politics 3 (3): 293–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Norris, P. and Lovenduski, J. (2004) ‘Why parties fail to learn: electoral defeat, selective perception and British party politics’, Party Politics 10 (1): 85–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Panebianco, A. (1988) Political Parties: Organization and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  32. Sanders, D. (2006) ‘Reflections on the 2005 General Election: some speculations on how the Conservatives can win next time’, British Politics 1 (2): 170–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Shaw, E. (1994) The Labour Party Since 1979: Crisis and Transformation, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Snyder, J.M. and Ting, M.M. (2002) ‘An informational rationale for political parties’, American Journal of Political Science 46: 90–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Walters, S. (2001) Tory Wars: The Conservatives in Crisis, London: Politico's.Google Scholar
  36. Wheatcroft, G. (2005) The Strange Death of Tory England, Hermondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  37. Wilson, F.L. (1980) ‘Sources of Party Transformation: The Case of France’, in P.H. Merkl (ed.) Western European Party Systems: Trends and Prospects, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan Ltd 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tim Bale
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Politics and Contemporary European StudiesUniversity of SussexBrightonUK

Personalised recommendations